Re: Looking for a way of circumventing a bug

2005-02-15 Thread Paul Smith
On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 21:55:48 +, Paul Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: no, look for extarticle.layout as an example I can copy the original file stdlayouts.inc and add your definition of the proof environment and rename it. Then, how can we make the new and renamed stdlayouts.inc file

Re: Looking for a way of circumventing a bug

2005-02-15 Thread Paul Smith
On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 21:33:35 +0100, Herbert Voss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: (1) can we have a tag for the above, so that we can see within LyX that it is a proof? yes, with this definition - see png # Proof style definition Style Proof MarginStatic LatexType

Re: Looking for a way of circumventing a bug

2005-02-15 Thread Paul Smith
On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 19:39:59 +, Paul Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: After each proof, the first paragraph is not indented as it should. Any idea to get back the indentation by default? Oh, forget my question: I have just tried with article AMS and it does not do any indentation. So, this

Re: Looking for a way of circumventing a bug

2005-02-15 Thread Herbert Voss
Paul Smith wrote: On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 21:55:48 +, Paul Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: no, look for extarticle.layout as an example I can copy the original file stdlayouts.inc and add your definition of the proof environment and rename it. Then, how can we make the new and renamed

Re: Looking for a way of circumventing a bug

2005-02-15 Thread Herbert Voss
Paul Smith wrote: On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 19:39:59 +, Paul Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: After each proof, the first paragraph is not indented as it should. Any idea to get back the indentation by default? Oh, forget my question: I have just tried with article AMS and it does not do any

Re: Looking for a way of circumventing a bug

2005-02-15 Thread Paul Smith
On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 21:22:38 +0100, Herbert Voss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I suppose, thet there is no other way here than insert ERT \hspace*{\parindent} befor the first line after a proof. An empty ERT + pressing the return key works as well. Paul

Re: Looking for a way of circumventing a bug

2005-02-15 Thread Paul Smith
On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 21:55:48 +, Paul Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: no, look for extarticle.layout as an example I can copy the original file stdlayouts.inc and add your definition of the proof environment and rename it. Then, how can we make the new and renamed stdlayouts.inc file

Re: Looking for a way of circumventing a bug

2005-02-15 Thread Paul Smith
On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 21:33:35 +0100, Herbert Voss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: (1) can we have a tag for the above, so that we can see within LyX that it is a proof? yes, with this definition - see png # Proof style definition Style Proof MarginStatic LatexType

Re: Looking for a way of circumventing a bug

2005-02-15 Thread Paul Smith
On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 19:39:59 +, Paul Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: After each proof, the first paragraph is not indented as it should. Any idea to get back the indentation by default? Oh, forget my question: I have just tried with article AMS and it does not do any indentation. So, this

Re: Looking for a way of circumventing a bug

2005-02-15 Thread Herbert Voss
Paul Smith wrote: On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 21:55:48 +, Paul Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: no, look for extarticle.layout as an example I can copy the original file stdlayouts.inc and add your definition of the proof environment and rename it. Then, how can we make the new and renamed

Re: Looking for a way of circumventing a bug

2005-02-15 Thread Herbert Voss
Paul Smith wrote: On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 19:39:59 +, Paul Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: After each proof, the first paragraph is not indented as it should. Any idea to get back the indentation by default? Oh, forget my question: I have just tried with article AMS and it does not do any

Re: Looking for a way of circumventing a bug

2005-02-15 Thread Paul Smith
On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 21:22:38 +0100, Herbert Voss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I suppose, thet there is no other way here than insert ERT \hspace*{\parindent} befor the first line after a proof. An empty ERT + pressing the return key works as well. Paul

Re: Looking for a way of circumventing a bug

2005-02-15 Thread Paul Smith
On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 21:55:48 +, Paul Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > no, look for extarticle.layout as an example > > I can copy the original file stdlayouts.inc and add your definition of > the proof environment and rename it. Then, how can we make the new and > renamed stdlayouts.inc

Re: Looking for a way of circumventing a bug

2005-02-15 Thread Paul Smith
On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 21:33:35 +0100, Herbert Voss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > (1) can we have a tag for the above, so that we can see within LyX > > that it is a proof? > > yes, with this definition -> see png > > # Proof style definition > Style Proof >MarginStatic >

Re: Looking for a way of circumventing a bug

2005-02-15 Thread Paul Smith
On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 19:39:59 +, Paul Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > After each proof, the first paragraph is not indented as it should. > Any idea to get back the indentation by default? Oh, forget my question: I have just tried with article AMS and it does not do any indentation. So,

Re: Looking for a way of circumventing a bug

2005-02-15 Thread Herbert Voss
Paul Smith wrote: On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 21:55:48 +, Paul Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: no, look for extarticle.layout as an example I can copy the original file stdlayouts.inc and add your definition of the proof environment and rename it. Then, how can we make the new and renamed

Re: Looking for a way of circumventing a bug

2005-02-15 Thread Herbert Voss
Paul Smith wrote: On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 19:39:59 +, Paul Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: After each proof, the first paragraph is not indented as it should. Any idea to get back the indentation by default? Oh, forget my question: I have just tried with article AMS and it does not do any

Re: Looking for a way of circumventing a bug

2005-02-15 Thread Paul Smith
On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 21:22:38 +0100, Herbert Voss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I suppose, thet there is no other way here than > insert ERT \hspace*{\parindent} befor the first line > after a proof. An empty ERT + pressing the return key works as well. Paul

Re: Looking for a way of circumventing a bug

2005-02-14 Thread Herbert Voss
Paul Smith wrote: Dear All Before proceeding, please have a look at my attached example. LyX converts the proof to LaTeX as follows: \begin{proof} This is my short proof. \end{proof} However, due to a bug in the ntheorem package, the end-mark symbol does not appear; one needs to delete the empty

Re: Looking for a way of circumventing a bug

2005-02-14 Thread Herbert Voss
Paul Smith wrote: (1) can we have a tag for the above, so that we can see within LyX that it is a proof? yes, with this definition - see png # Proof style definition Style Proof MarginStatic LatexType Environment LatexName proof NextNoIndent

Re: Looking for a way of circumventing a bug

2005-02-14 Thread Paul Smith
On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 21:33:35 +0100, Herbert Voss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: (1) can we have a tag for the above, so that we can see within LyX that it is a proof? yes, with this definition - see png Very nice! Thanks, Herbert. (2) does this solution conflict with other classes when I use

Re: Looking for a way of circumventing a bug

2005-02-14 Thread Herbert Voss
Paul Smith wrote: yes, when they also uses ntheorem, then there maybe a package clash. You can create your own layout class, then there is no problem. Is that difficult? no, look for extarticle.layout as an example Herbert -- http://TeXnik.de/ http://PSTricks.de/

Re: Looking for a way of circumventing a bug

2005-02-14 Thread Paul Smith
On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 22:24:57 +0100, Herbert Voss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is that difficult? no, look for extarticle.layout as an example Herbert, I can copy the original file stdlayouts.inc and add your definition of the proof environment and rename it. Then, how can we make the new and

Re: Looking for a way of circumventing a bug

2005-02-14 Thread Herbert Voss
Paul Smith wrote: Dear All Before proceeding, please have a look at my attached example. LyX converts the proof to LaTeX as follows: \begin{proof} This is my short proof. \end{proof} However, due to a bug in the ntheorem package, the end-mark symbol does not appear; one needs to delete the empty

Re: Looking for a way of circumventing a bug

2005-02-14 Thread Herbert Voss
Paul Smith wrote: (1) can we have a tag for the above, so that we can see within LyX that it is a proof? yes, with this definition - see png # Proof style definition Style Proof MarginStatic LatexType Environment LatexName proof NextNoIndent

Re: Looking for a way of circumventing a bug

2005-02-14 Thread Paul Smith
On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 21:33:35 +0100, Herbert Voss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: (1) can we have a tag for the above, so that we can see within LyX that it is a proof? yes, with this definition - see png Very nice! Thanks, Herbert. (2) does this solution conflict with other classes when I use

Re: Looking for a way of circumventing a bug

2005-02-14 Thread Herbert Voss
Paul Smith wrote: yes, when they also uses ntheorem, then there maybe a package clash. You can create your own layout class, then there is no problem. Is that difficult? no, look for extarticle.layout as an example Herbert -- http://TeXnik.de/ http://PSTricks.de/

Re: Looking for a way of circumventing a bug

2005-02-14 Thread Paul Smith
On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 22:24:57 +0100, Herbert Voss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is that difficult? no, look for extarticle.layout as an example Herbert, I can copy the original file stdlayouts.inc and add your definition of the proof environment and rename it. Then, how can we make the new and

Re: Looking for a way of circumventing a bug

2005-02-14 Thread Herbert Voss
Paul Smith wrote: Dear All Before proceeding, please have a look at my attached example. LyX converts the proof to LaTeX as follows: \begin{proof} This is my short proof. \end{proof} However, due to a bug in the ntheorem package, the end-mark symbol does not appear; one needs to delete the empty

Re: Looking for a way of circumventing a bug

2005-02-14 Thread Herbert Voss
Paul Smith wrote: (1) can we have a tag for the above, so that we can see within LyX that it is a proof? yes, with this definition -> see png # Proof style definition Style Proof MarginStatic LatexType Environment LatexName proof NextNoIndent

Re: Looking for a way of circumventing a bug

2005-02-14 Thread Paul Smith
On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 21:33:35 +0100, Herbert Voss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > (1) can we have a tag for the above, so that we can see within LyX > > that it is a proof? > > yes, with this definition -> see png Very nice! Thanks, Herbert. > > (2) does this solution conflict with other classes

Re: Looking for a way of circumventing a bug

2005-02-14 Thread Herbert Voss
Paul Smith wrote: yes, when they also uses ntheorem, then there maybe a package clash. You can create your own layout class, then there is no problem. Is that difficult? no, look for extarticle.layout as an example Herbert -- http://TeXnik.de/ http://PSTricks.de/

Re: Looking for a way of circumventing a bug

2005-02-14 Thread Paul Smith
On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 22:24:57 +0100, Herbert Voss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Is that difficult? > > no, look for extarticle.layout as an example Herbert, I can copy the original file stdlayouts.inc and add your definition of the proof environment and rename it. Then, how can we make the new