Micha Feigin wrote:
Kenward
The menu structure changed, so what you need is probably elsewhere.
Also the structure of the setup files changed somewhat. Try moving your
.lyx directory from your home directory, it may solve some of the problem.
Yes, it is a good idea. The upgrading from
On Sun, Apr 23, 2006 at 05:57:10PM +0200, Charles de Miramon wrote:
Micha Feigin wrote:
Kenward
The menu structure changed, so what you need is probably elsewhere.
Also the structure of the setup files changed somewhat. Try moving your
.lyx directory from your home directory, it
Micha Feigin wrote:
Kenward
The menu structure changed, so what you need is probably elsewhere.
Also the structure of the setup files changed somewhat. Try moving your
.lyx directory from your home directory, it may solve some of the problem.
Yes, it is a good idea. The upgrading from
On Sun, Apr 23, 2006 at 05:57:10PM +0200, Charles de Miramon wrote:
Micha Feigin wrote:
Kenward
The menu structure changed, so what you need is probably elsewhere.
Also the structure of the setup files changed somewhat. Try moving your
.lyx directory from your home directory, it
Micha Feigin wrote:
>> Kenward
>
> The menu structure changed, so what you need is probably elsewhere.
>
> Also the structure of the setup files changed somewhat. Try moving your
> .lyx directory from your home directory, it may solve some of the problem.
Yes, it is a good idea. The upgrading
On Sun, Apr 23, 2006 at 05:57:10PM +0200, Charles de Miramon wrote:
> Micha Feigin wrote:
>
>
> >> Kenward
> >
> > The menu structure changed, so what you need is probably elsewhere.
> >
> > Also the structure of the setup files changed somewhat. Try moving your
> > .lyx directory from your
On Sat, Apr 22, 2006 at 08:04:05AM -0700, Kenward Vaughan wrote:
On Fri, Apr 21, 2006 at 01:23:07AM +0200, Charles de Miramon wrote:
Hello,
The Debian maintainers of LyX are not very active. I have therefore
created unofficial i386 binaries of LyX 1.4.1 for Debian unstable
(sid).
...
On Sat, 22 Apr 2006 08:38:13 -0700
Kenward Vaughan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Apr 22, 2006 at 08:04:05AM -0700, Kenward Vaughan wrote:
On Fri, Apr 21, 2006 at 01:23:07AM +0200, Charles de Miramon wrote:
Hello,
The Debian maintainers of LyX are not very active. I have therefore
On Sat, Apr 22, 2006 at 08:04:05AM -0700, Kenward Vaughan wrote:
On Fri, Apr 21, 2006 at 01:23:07AM +0200, Charles de Miramon wrote:
Hello,
The Debian maintainers of LyX are not very active. I have therefore
created unofficial i386 binaries of LyX 1.4.1 for Debian unstable
(sid).
...
On Sat, 22 Apr 2006 08:38:13 -0700
Kenward Vaughan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Apr 22, 2006 at 08:04:05AM -0700, Kenward Vaughan wrote:
On Fri, Apr 21, 2006 at 01:23:07AM +0200, Charles de Miramon wrote:
Hello,
The Debian maintainers of LyX are not very active. I have therefore
On Sat, Apr 22, 2006 at 08:04:05AM -0700, Kenward Vaughan wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 21, 2006 at 01:23:07AM +0200, Charles de Miramon wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > The Debian maintainers of LyX are not very active. I have therefore
> > created unofficial i386 binaries of LyX 1.4.1 for Debian unstable
> >
On Sat, 22 Apr 2006 08:38:13 -0700
Kenward Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 22, 2006 at 08:04:05AM -0700, Kenward Vaughan wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 21, 2006 at 01:23:07AM +0200, Charles de Miramon wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > The Debian maintainers of LyX are not very active. I
12 matches
Mail list logo
