Also sprach Jürgen Spitzmüller:
Peter Baumgartner wrote:
Is there a plan to solve the \includeonly problem?
In the long run, yes (there's a ticket on trac about the issue).
FYI I took a breath and implemented native \includeonly support to our
development version (this can not be
Also sprach Jürgen Spitzmüller:
Peter Baumgartner wrote:
Is there a plan to solve the \includeonly problem?
In the long run, yes (there's a ticket on trac about the issue).
FYI I took a breath and implemented native \includeonly support to our
development version (this can not be
Also sprach Jürgen Spitzmüller:
> Peter Baumgartner wrote:
> > Is there a plan to solve the \includeonly problem?
>
> In the long run, yes (there's a ticket on trac about the issue).
FYI I took a breath and implemented native \includeonly support to our
development version (this can not be
On 2010-01-05, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Peter Baumgartner wrote:
... the command \includeonly does not work.
At least that was the discussion on an older lyx version ...
Yes. It does not work since LyX uses specific filenames for the
compilation of the document in the temporary directory.
Guenter Milde wrote:
In older LyX versions, you could choose to compile without temporary
directory. Is this still supported?
I don't think so.
Jürgen
On 06.01.2010, at 10:58, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Guenter Milde wrote:
In older LyX versions, you could choose to compile without temporary
directory. Is this still supported?
I don't think so.
Which is a pity, IMHO.
Not only this would be an easy workaround for all problems related to
On 2010-01-05, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Peter Baumgartner wrote:
... the command \includeonly does not work.
At least that was the discussion on an older lyx version ...
Yes. It does not work since LyX uses specific filenames for the
compilation of the document in the temporary directory.
Guenter Milde wrote:
In older LyX versions, you could choose to compile without temporary
directory. Is this still supported?
I don't think so.
Jürgen
On 06.01.2010, at 10:58, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Guenter Milde wrote:
In older LyX versions, you could choose to compile without temporary
directory. Is this still supported?
I don't think so.
Which is a pity, IMHO.
Not only this would be an easy workaround for all problems related to
On 2010-01-05, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Peter Baumgartner wrote:
>> ... the command \includeonly does not work.
>> At least that was the discussion on an older lyx version ...
> Yes. It does not work since LyX uses specific filenames for the
> compilation of the document in the temporary
Guenter Milde wrote:
> In older LyX versions, you could choose to compile without temporary
> directory. Is this still supported?
I don't think so.
Jürgen
On 06.01.2010, at 10:58, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Guenter Milde wrote:
In older LyX versions, you could choose to compile without temporary
directory. Is this still supported?
I don't think so.
Which is a pity, IMHO.
Not only this would be an easy workaround for all problems related to
Hi,
I too have observed that the \includeonly command doesn't work and I would
be very interested in knowing if there is a way to use it in LyX.
For now, a very simple suggestion for Peter consists in compiling from the
master file but only after including in a LyX note the chapters he doesn't
Peter Baumgartner wrote:
I'm writing on a long document (book with various chapters) with LyX 1.6.5
on OS X 10.5.8. After trying to prepare a master file with a preamble
valid for all files and to work on each file separately I noticed through
different posts on this forum that the command
Pierfranco: Thanks for the tip, very helpful
Jürgen: Now it works! Problem was the filename preamble.tex :blush:
Two more related questions:
Is there a plan to solve the \includeonly problem?
If not: How to change this misleading paragraph in the manual?
--
View this message in context:
Peter Baumgartner wrote:
Is there a plan to solve the \includeonly problem?
In the long run, yes (there's a ticket on trac about the issue).
The problem is: a proper includeonly support involves some work, since LyX
will need to take care that the whole document is compiled at least once
Hi,
I too have observed that the \includeonly command doesn't work and I would
be very interested in knowing if there is a way to use it in LyX.
For now, a very simple suggestion for Peter consists in compiling from the
master file but only after including in a LyX note the chapters he doesn't
Peter Baumgartner wrote:
I'm writing on a long document (book with various chapters) with LyX 1.6.5
on OS X 10.5.8. After trying to prepare a master file with a preamble
valid for all files and to work on each file separately I noticed through
different posts on this forum that the command
Pierfranco: Thanks for the tip, very helpful
Jürgen: Now it works! Problem was the filename preamble.tex :blush:
Two more related questions:
Is there a plan to solve the \includeonly problem?
If not: How to change this misleading paragraph in the manual?
--
View this message in context:
Peter Baumgartner wrote:
Is there a plan to solve the \includeonly problem?
In the long run, yes (there's a ticket on trac about the issue).
The problem is: a proper includeonly support involves some work, since LyX
will need to take care that the whole document is compiled at least once
Hi,
I too have observed that the \includeonly command doesn't work and I would
be very interested in knowing if there is a way to use it in LyX.
For now, a very simple suggestion for Peter consists in compiling from the
master file but only after including in a LyX note the chapters he doesn't
Peter Baumgartner wrote:
> I'm writing on a long document (book with various chapters) with LyX 1.6.5
> on OS X 10.5.8. After trying to prepare a master file with a preamble
> valid for all files and to work on each file separately I noticed through
> different posts on this forum that the
Pierfranco: Thanks for the tip, very helpful
Jürgen: Now it works! Problem was the filename "preamble.tex" :blush:
Two more related questions:
Is there a plan to solve the \includeonly problem?
If not: How to change this misleading paragraph in the manual?
--
View this message in context:
Peter Baumgartner wrote:
> Is there a plan to solve the \includeonly problem?
In the long run, yes (there's a ticket on trac about the issue).
The problem is: a proper includeonly support involves some work, since LyX
will need to take care that the whole document is compiled at least once
24 matches
Mail list logo
