Re: texlive as support for lyx

2007-01-15 Thread Helge Hafting
abdelkader belahcene wrote: Hi, since the new available latex on linux, will be texlive instead of tetex, I think it 's time to support the texlive instead of tetex. [ Now the required latex for lyx 1.4.2 (is tetex) ] or I am wrong ?? I have been using LyX with texlive for half a year now.

Re: texlive as support for lyx

2007-01-15 Thread David L. Johnson
On Mon, 15 Jan 2007 11:59:57 +0100 Helge Hafting [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: abdelkader belahcene wrote: Hi, since the new available latex on linux, will be texlive instead of tetex, I think it 's time to support the texlive instead of tetex. [ Now the required latex for lyx 1.4.2 (is

Re: texlive as support for lyx

2007-01-15 Thread Helge Hafting
David L. Johnson wrote: On Mon, 15 Jan 2007 11:59:57 +0100 Helge Hafting [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: abdelkader belahcene wrote: Hi, since the new available latex on linux, will be texlive instead of tetex, I think it 's time to support the texlive instead of tetex. [ Now the required

Re: texlive as support for lyx

2007-01-15 Thread Kenward Vaughan
On Mon, 2007-01-15 at 17:05 +0100, Helge Hafting wrote: David L. Johnson wrote: On Mon, 15 Jan 2007 11:59:57 +0100 Helge Hafting [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: abdelkader belahcene wrote: Hi, since the new available latex on linux, will be texlive instead of tetex, I think it

Re: texlive as support for lyx

2007-01-15 Thread David L. Johnson
On Mon, 15 Jan 2007 09:58:13 -0800 Kenward Vaughan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What is the difference between the two for most of us users out here, and is there a reason to switch outside of a package's dependency (which I saw for one I was interested in, FWIW)? It doesn't sound like any from

Re: texlive as support for lyx

2007-01-15 Thread Helge Hafting
abdelkader belahcene wrote: Hi, since the new available latex on linux, will be texlive instead of tetex, I think it 's time to support the texlive instead of tetex. [ Now the required latex for lyx 1.4.2 (is tetex) ] or I am wrong ?? I have been using LyX with texlive for half a year now.

Re: texlive as support for lyx

2007-01-15 Thread David L. Johnson
On Mon, 15 Jan 2007 11:59:57 +0100 Helge Hafting [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: abdelkader belahcene wrote: Hi, since the new available latex on linux, will be texlive instead of tetex, I think it 's time to support the texlive instead of tetex. [ Now the required latex for lyx 1.4.2 (is

Re: texlive as support for lyx

2007-01-15 Thread Helge Hafting
David L. Johnson wrote: On Mon, 15 Jan 2007 11:59:57 +0100 Helge Hafting [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: abdelkader belahcene wrote: Hi, since the new available latex on linux, will be texlive instead of tetex, I think it 's time to support the texlive instead of tetex. [ Now the required

Re: texlive as support for lyx

2007-01-15 Thread Kenward Vaughan
On Mon, 2007-01-15 at 17:05 +0100, Helge Hafting wrote: David L. Johnson wrote: On Mon, 15 Jan 2007 11:59:57 +0100 Helge Hafting [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: abdelkader belahcene wrote: Hi, since the new available latex on linux, will be texlive instead of tetex, I think it

Re: texlive as support for lyx

2007-01-15 Thread David L. Johnson
On Mon, 15 Jan 2007 09:58:13 -0800 Kenward Vaughan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What is the difference between the two for most of us users out here, and is there a reason to switch outside of a package's dependency (which I saw for one I was interested in, FWIW)? It doesn't sound like any from

Re: texlive as support for lyx

2007-01-15 Thread Helge Hafting
abdelkader belahcene wrote: Hi, since the new available latex on linux, will be texlive instead of tetex, I think it 's time to support the texlive instead of tetex. [ Now the required latex for lyx 1.4.2 (is tetex) ] or I am wrong ?? I have been using LyX with texlive for half a year now.

Re: texlive as support for lyx

2007-01-15 Thread David L. Johnson
On Mon, 15 Jan 2007 11:59:57 +0100 Helge Hafting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > abdelkader belahcene wrote: > > Hi, > > since the new available latex on linux, will be texlive instead of > > tetex, I think it 's time to support the texlive instead of tetex. > > [ Now the required latex for lyx

Re: texlive as support for lyx

2007-01-15 Thread Helge Hafting
David L. Johnson wrote: On Mon, 15 Jan 2007 11:59:57 +0100 Helge Hafting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: abdelkader belahcene wrote: Hi, since the new available latex on linux, will be texlive instead of tetex, I think it 's time to support the texlive instead of tetex. [ Now the

Re: texlive as support for lyx

2007-01-15 Thread Kenward Vaughan
On Mon, 2007-01-15 at 17:05 +0100, Helge Hafting wrote: > David L. Johnson wrote: > > On Mon, 15 Jan 2007 11:59:57 +0100 > > Helge Hafting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > >> abdelkader belahcene wrote: > >> > >>> Hi, > >>> since the new available latex on linux, will be texlive

Re: texlive as support for lyx

2007-01-15 Thread David L. Johnson
On Mon, 15 Jan 2007 09:58:13 -0800 Kenward Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What is the difference between the two for most of us users out here, > and is there a reason to switch outside of a package's dependency (which > I saw for one I was interested in, FWIW)? It doesn't sound like any >

Re: texlive as support for lyx

2007-01-13 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Sat, Jan 13, 2007 at 09:38:41AM +0100, abdelkader belahcene wrote: Hi, since the new available latex on linux, will be texlive instead of tetex, I think it 's time to support the texlive instead of tetex. [ Now the required latex for lyx 1.4.2 (is tetex) ] or I am wrong ?? AFAIK LyX works

Re: texlive as support for lyx

2007-01-13 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Sat, Jan 13, 2007 at 09:38:41AM +0100, abdelkader belahcene wrote: Hi, since the new available latex on linux, will be texlive instead of tetex, I think it 's time to support the texlive instead of tetex. [ Now the required latex for lyx 1.4.2 (is tetex) ] or I am wrong ?? AFAIK LyX works

Re: texlive as support for lyx

2007-01-13 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Sat, Jan 13, 2007 at 09:38:41AM +0100, abdelkader belahcene wrote: > Hi, > since the new available latex on linux, will be texlive instead of > tetex, I think it 's time to support the texlive instead of tetex. > [ Now the required latex for lyx 1.4.2 (is tetex) ] or I am wrong ?? AFAIK LyX