Peter Baumgartner wrote:
Great! That was the solution!!! I didn't understand what it meant to be an
executable path. I confused it with a LyX or a TeX path. After the hint
from Stephan I found a link to a directory I never have been seen
(/usr/local/texlive/2010/bin/X86_64-darwin), where I
Peter Baumgartner wrote:
Great! That was the solution!!! I didn't understand what it meant to be an
executable path. I confused it with a LyX or a TeX path. After the hint
from Stephan I found a link to a directory I never have been seen
(/usr/local/texlive/2010/bin/X86_64-darwin), where I
Peter Baumgartner wrote:
> Great! That was the solution!!! I didn't understand what it meant to be an
> executable path. I confused it with a LyX or a TeX path. After the hint
> from Stephan I found a link to a directory I never have been seen
> (/usr/local/texlive/2010/bin/X86_64-darwin), where I
Jürgen Spitzmüller spitz at lyx.org writes:
Did you change the preferences accordignly, so that bibtexall is called
instead of bibtex?
Yes, I did.
I'm using LyX 2.0.0beta2 on a Mac:
I changed under LyX - Preferences… - Output - LaTeX the menu for the
processor for bibliography generation
Peter Baumgartner wrote:
Yes, I did.
I'm using LyX 2.0.0beta2 on a Mac:
I changed under LyX - Preferences… - Output - LaTeX the menu for the
processor for bibliography generation to Custom and put bibtexall
without quotes into the command field.
And under Document - Settings -
Am 04.01.2011 um 16:26 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller:
Peter Baumgartner wrote:
Maybe I put bibtexall in a wrong directory? It is in a folder in my path of
the TeX installation and I have also done 'sudo texhash' from the
terminal.
The script must be in an executable path, unrelated to TeX.
Stephan Witt st.witt at gmx.net writes:
Am 04.01.2011 um 16:26 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller:
Peter Baumgartner wrote:
Maybe I put bibtexall in a wrong directory? It is in a folder in my path of
the TeX installation and I have also done 'sudo texhash' from the
terminal.
The script
Peter Baumgartner peter.baumgartner at donau-uni.ac.at writes:
I noticed that my final \printbibliography printed out all the references
without marks for refsections but not the bibliography cited in the marked
sections. Is there a way - besides of the sectioned bibliographies - to get a
Jürgen Spitzmüller spitz at lyx.org writes:
Did you change the preferences accordignly, so that bibtexall is called
instead of bibtex?
Yes, I did.
I'm using LyX 2.0.0beta2 on a Mac:
I changed under LyX - Preferences… - Output - LaTeX the menu for the
processor for bibliography generation
Peter Baumgartner wrote:
Yes, I did.
I'm using LyX 2.0.0beta2 on a Mac:
I changed under LyX - Preferences… - Output - LaTeX the menu for the
processor for bibliography generation to Custom and put bibtexall
without quotes into the command field.
And under Document - Settings -
Am 04.01.2011 um 16:26 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller:
Peter Baumgartner wrote:
Maybe I put bibtexall in a wrong directory? It is in a folder in my path of
the TeX installation and I have also done 'sudo texhash' from the
terminal.
The script must be in an executable path, unrelated to TeX.
Stephan Witt st.witt at gmx.net writes:
Am 04.01.2011 um 16:26 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller:
Peter Baumgartner wrote:
Maybe I put bibtexall in a wrong directory? It is in a folder in my path of
the TeX installation and I have also done 'sudo texhash' from the
terminal.
The script
Peter Baumgartner peter.baumgartner at donau-uni.ac.at writes:
I noticed that my final \printbibliography printed out all the references
without marks for refsections but not the bibliography cited in the marked
sections. Is there a way - besides of the sectioned bibliographies - to get a
Jürgen Spitzmüller lyx.org> writes:
> Did you change the preferences accordignly, so that bibtexall is called
> instead of bibtex?
>
Yes, I did.
I'm using LyX 2.0.0beta2 on a Mac:
I changed under LyX -> Preferences… -> Output -> LaTeX the menu for the
processor for bibliography generation
Peter Baumgartner wrote:
> Yes, I did.
>
> I'm using LyX 2.0.0beta2 on a Mac:
>
> I changed under LyX -> Preferences… -> Output -> LaTeX the menu for the
> processor for bibliography generation to "Custom" and put "bibtexall"
> without quotes into the command field.
>
> And under Document ->
Am 04.01.2011 um 16:26 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller:
> Peter Baumgartner wrote:
>> Maybe I put bibtexall in a wrong directory? It is in a folder in my path of
>> the TeX installation and I have also done 'sudo texhash' from the
>> terminal.
>
> The script must be in an executable path, unrelated
Stephan Witt gmx.net> writes:
>
> Am 04.01.2011 um 16:26 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller:
>
> > Peter Baumgartner wrote:
> >> Maybe I put bibtexall in a wrong directory? It is in a folder in my path of
> >> the TeX installation and I have also done 'sudo texhash' from the
> >> terminal.
> >
> >
Peter Baumgartner donau-uni.ac.at> writes:
> I noticed that my final \printbibliography printed out all the references
> without marks for refsections but not the bibliography cited in the marked
> sections. Is there a way - besides of the sectioned bibliographies - to get a
> complete
Peter Baumgartner wrote:
Thanks, Jürgen. But as I understood bibtexall is a workaround to process
all of biblatex's auxiliary files. So in my understanding the final output
from LyX should be correct. It seems to me that LyX is not calling
bibtexall. Or I'm completely wrong and should I call
Peter Baumgartner wrote:
Thanks, Jürgen. But as I understood bibtexall is a workaround to process
all of biblatex's auxiliary files. So in my understanding the final output
from LyX should be correct. It seems to me that LyX is not calling
bibtexall. Or I'm completely wrong and should I call
Peter Baumgartner wrote:
> Thanks, Jürgen. But as I understood bibtexall is a workaround to process
> all of biblatex's auxiliary files. So in my understanding the final output
> from LyX should be correct. It seems to me that LyX is not calling
> bibtexall. Or I'm completely wrong and should I
Peter Baumgartner wrote:
What is the problem? What did I wrong?
http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/6430
Jürgen
Peter Baumgartner wrote:
What is the problem? What did I wrong?
http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/6430
Thanks, Jürgen. But as I understood bibtexall is a workaround to process all of
biblatex's auxiliary files. So in my understanding the final output from LyX
should be correct. It seems to me
Peter Baumgartner wrote:
What is the problem? What did I wrong?
http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/6430
Jürgen
Peter Baumgartner wrote:
What is the problem? What did I wrong?
http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/6430
Thanks, Jürgen. But as I understood bibtexall is a workaround to process all of
biblatex's auxiliary files. So in my understanding the final output from LyX
should be correct. It seems to me
Peter Baumgartner wrote:
> What is the problem? What did I wrong?
http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/6430
Jürgen
> Peter Baumgartner wrote:
> > What is the problem? What did I wrong?
>
> http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/6430
Thanks, Jürgen. But as I understood bibtexall is a workaround to process all of
biblatex's auxiliary files. So in my understanding the final output from LyX
should be correct. It seems
In a book project I would need bibliographies after each section. I'm using
biblatex and tried the tips of http://wiki.lyx.org/BibTeX/Tips#secbib but it
didn't work:
It generates all bibliography references outside of biblatex refsections but
could not find the references inside of the
In a book project I would need bibliographies after each section. I'm using
biblatex and tried the tips of http://wiki.lyx.org/BibTeX/Tips#secbib but it
didn't work:
It generates all bibliography references outside of biblatex refsections but
could not find the references inside of the
In a book project I would need bibliographies after each section. I'm using
biblatex and tried the tips of http://wiki.lyx.org/BibTeX/Tips#secbib but it
didn't work:
It generates all bibliography references outside of biblatex refsections but
could not find the references inside of the
30 matches
Mail list logo
