Dear All,
Consider a BibTeX entry with 3 authors. With the style apalike, when
citing this BibTeX entry, I get something like the following in the
pdf file:
Author1 et al. (2000).
Is it possible instead to get something like the following in the pdf file:
Author1, Author2 and Author3 (2000)
?
On 17/08/2011 8:38 AM, Paul Smith wrote:
Dear All,
Consider a BibTeX entry with 3 authors. With the style apalike, when
citing this BibTeX entry, I get something like the following in the
pdf file:
Author1 et al. (2000).
Is it possible instead to get something like the following in the pdf
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 1:56 PM, Julien Rioux
jri...@physics.utoronto.ca wrote:
Consider a BibTeX entry with 3 authors. With the style apalike, when
citing this BibTeX entry, I get something like the following in the
pdf file:
Author1 et al. (2000).
Is it possible instead to get something
On 17/08/2011 9:23 AM, Paul Smith wrote:
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 1:56 PM, Julien Rioux
jri...@physics.utoronto.ca wrote:
Consider a BibTeX entry with 3 authors. With the style apalike, when
citing this BibTeX entry, I get something like the following in the
pdf file:
Author1 et al. (2000).
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 2:47 PM, Julien Rioux
jri...@physics.utoronto.ca wrote:
Consider a BibTeX entry with 3 authors. With the style apalike, when
citing this BibTeX entry, I get something like the following in the
pdf file:
Author1 et al. (2000).
Is it possible instead to get something
On 17/08/2011 9:56 AM, Paul Smith wrote:
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 2:47 PM, Julien Rioux
jri...@physics.utoronto.ca wrote:
Consider a BibTeX entry with 3 authors. With the style apalike, when
citing this BibTeX entry, I get something like the following in the
pdf file:
Author1 et al. (2000).
On 08/17/2011 10:03 AM, Julien Rioux wrote:
I might waste time learning bibtex's stack language to tweak the
apalike.bst file, but a quick workaround is simply to write the author
names in your LyX file.
Just compare the output.bibitem routine in apalike with the one in
plainnat, and you'll
On 17/08/2011 10:22 AM, Richard Heck wrote:
On 08/17/2011 10:03 AM, Julien Rioux wrote:
I might waste time learning bibtex's stack language to tweak the
apalike.bst file, but a quick workaround is simply to write the author
names in your LyX file.
Just compare the output.bibitem routine in
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 3:26 PM, Julien Rioux
jri...@physics.utoronto.ca wrote:
I might waste time learning bibtex's stack language to tweak the
apalike.bst file, but a quick workaround is simply to write the author
names in your LyX file.
Just compare the output.bibitem routine in apalike
On 08/17/2011 11:28 AM, Paul Smith wrote:
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 3:26 PM, Julien Rioux
jri...@physics.utoronto.ca wrote:
I might waste time learning bibtex's stack language to tweak the
apalike.bst file, but a quick workaround is simply to write the author
names in your LyX file.
Just
On 17/08/2011 12:31 PM, Richard Heck wrote:
On 08/17/2011 11:28 AM, Paul Smith wrote:
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 3:26 PM, Julien Rioux
jri...@physics.utoronto.ca wrote:
I might waste time learning bibtex's stack language to tweak the
apalike.bst file, but a quick workaround is simply to write
Dear All,
Consider a BibTeX entry with 3 authors. With the style apalike, when
citing this BibTeX entry, I get something like the following in the
pdf file:
Author1 et al. (2000).
Is it possible instead to get something like the following in the pdf file:
Author1, Author2 and Author3 (2000)
?
On 17/08/2011 8:38 AM, Paul Smith wrote:
Dear All,
Consider a BibTeX entry with 3 authors. With the style apalike, when
citing this BibTeX entry, I get something like the following in the
pdf file:
Author1 et al. (2000).
Is it possible instead to get something like the following in the pdf
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 1:56 PM, Julien Rioux
jri...@physics.utoronto.ca wrote:
Consider a BibTeX entry with 3 authors. With the style apalike, when
citing this BibTeX entry, I get something like the following in the
pdf file:
Author1 et al. (2000).
Is it possible instead to get something
On 17/08/2011 9:23 AM, Paul Smith wrote:
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 1:56 PM, Julien Rioux
jri...@physics.utoronto.ca wrote:
Consider a BibTeX entry with 3 authors. With the style apalike, when
citing this BibTeX entry, I get something like the following in the
pdf file:
Author1 et al. (2000).
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 2:47 PM, Julien Rioux
jri...@physics.utoronto.ca wrote:
Consider a BibTeX entry with 3 authors. With the style apalike, when
citing this BibTeX entry, I get something like the following in the
pdf file:
Author1 et al. (2000).
Is it possible instead to get something
On 17/08/2011 9:56 AM, Paul Smith wrote:
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 2:47 PM, Julien Rioux
jri...@physics.utoronto.ca wrote:
Consider a BibTeX entry with 3 authors. With the style apalike, when
citing this BibTeX entry, I get something like the following in the
pdf file:
Author1 et al. (2000).
On 08/17/2011 10:03 AM, Julien Rioux wrote:
I might waste time learning bibtex's stack language to tweak the
apalike.bst file, but a quick workaround is simply to write the author
names in your LyX file.
Just compare the output.bibitem routine in apalike with the one in
plainnat, and you'll
On 17/08/2011 10:22 AM, Richard Heck wrote:
On 08/17/2011 10:03 AM, Julien Rioux wrote:
I might waste time learning bibtex's stack language to tweak the
apalike.bst file, but a quick workaround is simply to write the author
names in your LyX file.
Just compare the output.bibitem routine in
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 3:26 PM, Julien Rioux
jri...@physics.utoronto.ca wrote:
I might waste time learning bibtex's stack language to tweak the
apalike.bst file, but a quick workaround is simply to write the author
names in your LyX file.
Just compare the output.bibitem routine in apalike
On 08/17/2011 11:28 AM, Paul Smith wrote:
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 3:26 PM, Julien Rioux
jri...@physics.utoronto.ca wrote:
I might waste time learning bibtex's stack language to tweak the
apalike.bst file, but a quick workaround is simply to write the author
names in your LyX file.
Just
On 17/08/2011 12:31 PM, Richard Heck wrote:
On 08/17/2011 11:28 AM, Paul Smith wrote:
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 3:26 PM, Julien Rioux
jri...@physics.utoronto.ca wrote:
I might waste time learning bibtex's stack language to tweak the
apalike.bst file, but a quick workaround is simply to write
Dear All,
Consider a BibTeX entry with 3 authors. With the style apalike, when
citing this BibTeX entry, I get something like the following in the
pdf file:
Author1 et al. (2000).
Is it possible instead to get something like the following in the pdf file:
Author1, Author2 and Author3 (2000)
?
On 17/08/2011 8:38 AM, Paul Smith wrote:
Dear All,
Consider a BibTeX entry with 3 authors. With the style apalike, when
citing this BibTeX entry, I get something like the following in the
pdf file:
Author1 et al. (2000).
Is it possible instead to get something like the following in the pdf
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 1:56 PM, Julien Rioux
wrote:
>> Consider a BibTeX entry with 3 authors. With the style apalike, when
>> citing this BibTeX entry, I get something like the following in the
>> pdf file:
>>
>> Author1 et al. (2000).
>>
>> Is it possible instead to
On 17/08/2011 9:23 AM, Paul Smith wrote:
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 1:56 PM, Julien Rioux
wrote:
Consider a BibTeX entry with 3 authors. With the style apalike, when
citing this BibTeX entry, I get something like the following in the
pdf file:
Author1 et al. (2000).
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 2:47 PM, Julien Rioux
wrote:
Consider a BibTeX entry with 3 authors. With the style apalike, when
citing this BibTeX entry, I get something like the following in the
pdf file:
Author1 et al. (2000).
Is it
On 17/08/2011 9:56 AM, Paul Smith wrote:
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 2:47 PM, Julien Rioux
wrote:
Consider a BibTeX entry with 3 authors. With the style apalike, when
citing this BibTeX entry, I get something like the following in the
pdf file:
Author1 et al. (2000).
On 08/17/2011 10:03 AM, Julien Rioux wrote:
>
> I might waste time learning bibtex's stack language to tweak the
> apalike.bst file, but a quick workaround is simply to write the author
> names in your LyX file.
>
Just compare the output.bibitem routine in apalike with the one in
plainnat, and
On 17/08/2011 10:22 AM, Richard Heck wrote:
On 08/17/2011 10:03 AM, Julien Rioux wrote:
I might waste time learning bibtex's stack language to tweak the
apalike.bst file, but a quick workaround is simply to write the author
names in your LyX file.
Just compare the output.bibitem routine in
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 3:26 PM, Julien Rioux
wrote:
>>> I might waste time learning bibtex's stack language to tweak the
>>> apalike.bst file, but a quick workaround is simply to write the author
>>> names in your LyX file.
>>>
>> Just compare the output.bibitem
On 08/17/2011 11:28 AM, Paul Smith wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 3:26 PM, Julien Rioux
> wrote:
I might waste time learning bibtex's stack language to tweak the
apalike.bst file, but a quick workaround is simply to write the author
names in your LyX
On 17/08/2011 12:31 PM, Richard Heck wrote:
On 08/17/2011 11:28 AM, Paul Smith wrote:
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 3:26 PM, Julien Rioux
wrote:
I might waste time learning bibtex's stack language to tweak the
apalike.bst file, but a quick workaround is simply to write
33 matches
Mail list logo