On Thu, 10 May 2007 18:14:28 +0200
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > "Micha" == Micha Feigin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Micha> Babel defines \R and \L for RTL or LTR text and it also defines
> Micha> \H but I don't recall exactly what for, something internal for
> Micha
> "Micha" == Micha Feigin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Micha> Babel defines \R and \L for RTL or LTR text and it also defines
Micha> \H but I don't recall exactly what for, something internal for
Micha> hebrew.
But not for an all english document, right?
Micha> Also, I haven't checked the XeT
On Thu, 10 May 2007 11:31:01 +0200
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > "Micha" == Micha Feigin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >> What kind of definitions? Is that a real english document?
>
> Micha> It is a real English document which is collaborated on at the
> Micha> late
> "Micha" == Micha Feigin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> What kind of definitions? Is that a real english document?
Micha> It is a real English document which is collaborated on at the
Micha> latex level so I'd rather keep the original definitions. In
Micha> this case for mathematics, \R for
Sorry, should have been sent to the list but reply to list doesn't work with
lyx-users
Begin forwarded message:
Date: Mon, 7 May 2007 22:06:13 +0300
From: Micha Feigin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: What's with pushing bab
> "Micha" == Micha Feigin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Micha> I'm playing around with lyx 1.5 beta 2 (from svn) It seems that
Micha> when exporting to latex (an all english document) lyx use the
Micha> babel package even when it is not needed (overriding in this
Micha> case some definitions I u
On Mon, 07 May 2007 01:32:52 +0200
Uwe Stöhr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Micha Feigin schrieb:
>
> > It seems that when exporting to latex (an all english document) lyx use the
> > babel package even when it is not needed (overriding in this case some
> > definitions I use). Why is that, and is
Micha Feigin schrieb:
It seems that when exporting to latex (an all english document) lyx use the
babel package even when it is not needed (overriding in this case some
definitions I use). Why is that, and is there a way to override that?
Why, to have a uniform solution for al languages.
To ov
I'm playing around with lyx 1.5 beta 2 (from svn)
It seems that when exporting to latex (an all english document) lyx use the
babel package even when it is not needed (overriding in this case some
definitions I use). Why is that, and is there a way to override that?
Thanks
