Re: Text-mode Accents in Math Mode

2004-01-21 Thread Rich Shepard
On Wed, 21 Jan 2004, Rich Shepard wrote: Is there a more efficient/better/proper way of using a over-tilde on a letter in math mode? Now I need some guidance on how to use the tilde-over-A as a subscript in an inline equation. I typed this: \textrm{\~ A }=\{(x,\mu_{\textrm{\~

Re: Text-mode Accents in Math Mode

2004-01-21 Thread Herbert Voss
Rich Shepard wrote: On Wed, 21 Jan 2004, Rich Shepard wrote: Is there a more efficient/better/proper way of using a over-tilde on a letter in math mode? Now I need some guidance on how to use the tilde-over-A as a subscript in an inline equation. I typed this: \textrm{\~ A

Re: Text-mode Accents in Math Mode

2004-01-21 Thread Rich Shepard
On Wed, 21 Jan 2004, Herbert Voss wrote: $\mathaccent`~A=\{(x,\mu_{\mathaccent`~A}(x))|(x\in U)\}$ mark it with the cursor and hit ctrl-m, then it will be converted to math. Herbert, I like that. Looks quicker to type it in TeX mode then convert it to math mode. this doesn't looks good,

Re: Text-mode Accents in Math Mode

2004-01-21 Thread Nirmal Govind
this doesn't looks good, when A is a kind of variable and s'hould be in italic mode. \mathaccent`~A is the better way. By trial-and-error I worked it out. I need a combination of spaces and right-arrows (or up arrows) to get back out of \textmf mode. Very slow and -- for me -- highly error

Re: Text-mode Accents in Math Mode

2004-01-21 Thread Rich Shepard
On Wed, 21 Jan 2004, Nirmal Govind wrote: Hmm... actually, a way that I find easy to achieve the above is as follows: enter math mode, hit Ctrl-M, type A, hit right arrow (you exit text-within-math-mode), now select the A that you entered by using Shift+left-arrow, then do a tilde on it with

Re: Text-mode Accents in Math Mode

2004-01-21 Thread Rich Shepard
On Wed, 21 Jan 2004, Rich Shepard wrote: Is there a more efficient/better/proper way of using a over-tilde on a letter in math mode? Now I need some guidance on how to use the tilde-over-A as a subscript in an inline equation. I typed this: \textrm{\~ A }=\{(x,\mu_{\textrm{\~

Re: Text-mode Accents in Math Mode

2004-01-21 Thread Herbert Voss
Rich Shepard wrote: On Wed, 21 Jan 2004, Rich Shepard wrote: Is there a more efficient/better/proper way of using a over-tilde on a letter in math mode? Now I need some guidance on how to use the tilde-over-A as a subscript in an inline equation. I typed this: \textrm{\~ A

Re: Text-mode Accents in Math Mode

2004-01-21 Thread Rich Shepard
On Wed, 21 Jan 2004, Herbert Voss wrote: $\mathaccent`~A=\{(x,\mu_{\mathaccent`~A}(x))|(x\in U)\}$ mark it with the cursor and hit ctrl-m, then it will be converted to math. Herbert, I like that. Looks quicker to type it in TeX mode then convert it to math mode. this doesn't looks good,

Re: Text-mode Accents in Math Mode

2004-01-21 Thread Nirmal Govind
this doesn't looks good, when A is a kind of variable and s'hould be in italic mode. \mathaccent`~A is the better way. By trial-and-error I worked it out. I need a combination of spaces and right-arrows (or up arrows) to get back out of \textmf mode. Very slow and -- for me -- highly error

Re: Text-mode Accents in Math Mode

2004-01-21 Thread Rich Shepard
On Wed, 21 Jan 2004, Nirmal Govind wrote: Hmm... actually, a way that I find easy to achieve the above is as follows: enter math mode, hit Ctrl-M, type A, hit right arrow (you exit text-within-math-mode), now select the A that you entered by using Shift+left-arrow, then do a tilde on it with

Re: Text-mode Accents in Math Mode

2004-01-21 Thread Rich Shepard
On Wed, 21 Jan 2004, Rich Shepard wrote: > Is there a more efficient/better/proper way of using a over-tilde on a > letter in math mode? Now I need some guidance on how to use the tilde-over-A as a subscript in an inline equation. I typed this: \textrm{\~ A }=\{(x,\mu_{\textrm{\~

Re: Text-mode Accents in Math Mode

2004-01-21 Thread Herbert Voss
Rich Shepard wrote: On Wed, 21 Jan 2004, Rich Shepard wrote: Is there a more efficient/better/proper way of using a over-tilde on a letter in math mode? Now I need some guidance on how to use the tilde-over-A as a subscript in an inline equation. I typed this: \textrm{\~ A

Re: Text-mode Accents in Math Mode

2004-01-21 Thread Rich Shepard
On Wed, 21 Jan 2004, Herbert Voss wrote: > $\mathaccent`~A=\{(x,\mu_{\mathaccent`~A}(x))|(x\in U)\}$ > mark it with the cursor and hit ctrl-m, then it will be > converted to math. Herbert, I like that. Looks quicker to type it in TeX mode then convert it to math mode. > this doesn't looks

Re: Text-mode Accents in Math Mode

2004-01-21 Thread Nirmal Govind
this doesn't looks good, when A is a kind of variable and s'hould be in italic mode. \mathaccent`~A is the better way. By trial-and-error I worked it out. I need a combination of spaces and right-arrows (or up arrows) to get back out of \textmf mode. Very slow and -- for me -- highly error

Re: Text-mode Accents in Math Mode

2004-01-21 Thread Rich Shepard
On Wed, 21 Jan 2004, Nirmal Govind wrote: > Hmm... actually, a way that I find easy to achieve the above is as > follows: enter math mode, hit Ctrl-M, type "A", hit right arrow (you exit > text-within-math-mode), now select the A that you entered by using > Shift+left-arrow, then do a tilde on it

accents in math

2000-01-25 Thread jdd
I still use the 1.04 lyx version. I just notice that accents inserted in math mode like this (lyx source file) left\{ \begin{array}{c} \overrightarrow{R}(actions\: extérieures\rightarrow système)=M\: \overrightarrow{\Gamma }(G)\\ \overrightarrow{M}G\: (action\: extérieure\rightarrow système

accents in math

2000-01-25 Thread jdd
I still use the 1.04 lyx version. I just notice that accents inserted in math mode like this (lyx source file) left\{ \begin{array}{c} \overrightarrow{R}(actions\: extérieures\rightarrow système)=M\: \overrightarrow{\Gamma }(G)\\ \overrightarrow{M}G\: (action\: extérieure\rightarrow système

accents in math

2000-01-25 Thread jdd
I still use the 1.04 lyx version. I just notice that accents inserted in math mode like this (lyx source file) left\{ \begin{array}{c} \overrightarrow{R}(actions\: extérieures\rightarrow système)=M\: \overrightarrow{\Gamma }(G)\\ \overrightarrow{M}G\: (action\: extérieure\rightarrow système