On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 08:36:17PM -0600, Bruce Tyler wrote:
You need to put it in the texmf tree, perhaps under
~/texmf/bibtex/bst/
and then fix the configuration file under /usr/share/texmf/web2c ?
sorry, I can't remember the name of the file now. You can find the information
under
On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 08:36:17PM -0600, Bruce Tyler wrote:
You need to put it in the texmf tree, perhaps under
~/texmf/bibtex/bst/
and then fix the configuration file under /usr/share/texmf/web2c ?
sorry, I can't remember the name of the file now. You can find the information
under
On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 08:36:17PM -0600, Bruce Tyler wrote:
>
>
> You need to put it in the texmf tree, perhaps under
> ~/texmf/bibtex/bst/
>
> and then fix the configuration file under /usr/share/texmf/web2c ?
> sorry, I can't remember the name of the file now. You can find the information
>
On Fri, 2002-10-25 at 19:58, Luiz Eleno wrote:
I suppose this is a not well-known fact, that you can define your own
style for bibtex references. In a terminal, run the command
''latex makebst''
The script will ask you a lot of questions about your preferences (e.g.
full author names,
On Fri, Oct 25, 2002 at 04:58:23PM -0200, Luiz Eleno wrote:
I suppose this is a not well-known fact, that you can define your own
style for bibtex references. In a terminal, run the command
''latex makebst''
[snip]
In lyx, use this bst file WITHOUT the .bst extension, in the same way
On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 06:13:35PM -0500, Paul Tremblay opined:
On Fri, Oct 25, 2002 at 04:58:23PM -0200, Luiz Eleno wrote:
I suppose this is a not well-known fact, that you can define your own
style for bibtex references. In a terminal, run the command
''latex makebst''
[snip]
On Fri, 2002-10-25 at 19:58, Luiz Eleno wrote:
I suppose this is a not well-known fact, that you can define your own
style for bibtex references. In a terminal, run the command
''latex makebst''
The script will ask you a lot of questions about your preferences (e.g.
full author names,
On Fri, Oct 25, 2002 at 04:58:23PM -0200, Luiz Eleno wrote:
I suppose this is a not well-known fact, that you can define your own
style for bibtex references. In a terminal, run the command
''latex makebst''
[snip]
In lyx, use this bst file WITHOUT the .bst extension, in the same way
On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 06:13:35PM -0500, Paul Tremblay opined:
On Fri, Oct 25, 2002 at 04:58:23PM -0200, Luiz Eleno wrote:
I suppose this is a not well-known fact, that you can define your own
style for bibtex references. In a terminal, run the command
''latex makebst''
[snip]
On Fri, 2002-10-25 at 19:58, Luiz Eleno wrote:
> I suppose this is a not well-known fact, that you can define your own
> style for bibtex references. In a terminal, run the command
>
> ''latex makebst''
>
> The script will ask you a lot of questions about your preferences (e.g.
> full author
On Fri, Oct 25, 2002 at 04:58:23PM -0200, Luiz Eleno wrote:
>
> I suppose this is a not well-known fact, that you can define your own
> style for bibtex references. In a terminal, run the command
>
> ''latex makebst''
>
[snip]
> In lyx, use this bst file WITHOUT the .bst extension, in the
On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 06:13:35PM -0500, Paul Tremblay opined:
> On Fri, Oct 25, 2002 at 04:58:23PM -0200, Luiz Eleno wrote:
> >
> > I suppose this is a not well-known fact, that you can define your own
> > style for bibtex references. In a terminal, run the command
> >
> > ''latex makebst''
>
A Divendres 25 Octubre 2002 20:58, Luiz Eleno va escriure:
I suppose this is a not well-known fact, that you can define your own
style for bibtex references. In a terminal, run the command
''latex makebst''
Thanks a lot!! Great tip.
--
Josep Roca
Unitat Epidemiologia
Hospital U Germans
A Divendres 25 Octubre 2002 20:58, Luiz Eleno va escriure:
I suppose this is a not well-known fact, that you can define your own
style for bibtex references. In a terminal, run the command
''latex makebst''
Thanks a lot!! Great tip.
--
Josep Roca
Unitat Epidemiologia
Hospital U Germans
A Divendres 25 Octubre 2002 20:58, Luiz Eleno va escriure:
> I suppose this is a not well-known fact, that you can define your own
> style for bibtex references. In a terminal, run the command
>
> ''latex makebst''
Thanks a lot!! Great tip.
--
Josep Roca
Unitat Epidemiologia
Hospital U Germans
Hello everybody.
I'm using LyX LyX 1.1.6 fix 4 in Gnu/Linux, Debian distr.
I was suggested to use Natbib. And indeed it seems to work fine when I
cite a reference. For the list of references I was suggested to read
texdoc natbib for fixing it. After some time, just now I have finished
to read it.
I suppose this is a not well-known fact, that you can define your own
style for bibtex references. In a terminal, run the command
''latex makebst''
The script will ask you a lot of questions about your preferences (e.g.
full author names, order, numbered or literal references, etc). In the
Hello everybody.
I'm using LyX LyX 1.1.6 fix 4 in Gnu/Linux, Debian distr.
I was suggested to use Natbib. And indeed it seems to work fine when I
cite a reference. For the list of references I was suggested to read
texdoc natbib for fixing it. After some time, just now I have finished
to read it.
I suppose this is a not well-known fact, that you can define your own
style for bibtex references. In a terminal, run the command
''latex makebst''
The script will ask you a lot of questions about your preferences (e.g.
full author names, order, numbered or literal references, etc). In the
Hello everybody.
I'm using LyX LyX 1.1.6 fix 4 in Gnu/Linux, Debian distr.
I was suggested to use Natbib. And indeed it seems to work fine when I
cite a reference. For the list of references I was suggested to read
"texdoc natbib" for fixing it. After some time, just now I have finished
to read
I suppose this is a not well-known fact, that you can define your own
style for bibtex references. In a terminal, run the command
''latex makebst''
The script will ask you a lot of questions about your preferences (e.g.
full author names, order, numbered or literal references, etc). In the
21 matches
Mail list logo
