custom equation numbering

2008-12-14 Thread Ivan Werning
How do I change an equation number that was chosen automatically from forcing a particular number or symbol? That is, I want the analog of \tag in Latex For example, I have an equation that is numbered (5) which is chosen by default because it comes after (4). That's the correct normal

Re: custom equation numbering

2008-12-14 Thread Paul A. Rubin
Ivan Werning wrote: How do I change an equation number that was chosen automatically from forcing a particular number or symbol? That is, I want the analog of \tag in Latex For example, I have an equation that is numbered (5) which is chosen by default because it comes after (4). That's the

Re: custom equation numbering

2008-12-14 Thread Neil Hepburn
Hi Ivan, Just to follow up on Paul's solution, you can go one step further and make the equation number automatic. Suppose that you have equation (3) and you also have a rewritten form of that equation, call it (3'). Do all of the steps that Paul has indicated, except rather than putting

Re: custom equation numbering

2008-12-14 Thread Ivan Werning
is that it still allows entering LaTeX quite easily. I really value that. Although it would be nice for LyX to allow custom equation numbering natively, given how standard it is. -Ivan On Dec 14, 2008, at 12:20 PM, Neil Hepburn wrote: Hi Ivan, Just to follow up on Paul's solution, you can go

custom equation numbering

2008-12-14 Thread Ivan Werning
How do I change an equation number that was chosen automatically from forcing a particular number or symbol? That is, I want the analog of \tag in Latex For example, I have an equation that is numbered (5) which is chosen by default because it comes after (4). That's the correct normal

Re: custom equation numbering

2008-12-14 Thread Paul A. Rubin
Ivan Werning wrote: How do I change an equation number that was chosen automatically from forcing a particular number or symbol? That is, I want the analog of \tag in Latex For example, I have an equation that is numbered (5) which is chosen by default because it comes after (4). That's the

Re: custom equation numbering

2008-12-14 Thread Neil Hepburn
Hi Ivan, Just to follow up on Paul's solution, you can go one step further and make the equation number automatic. Suppose that you have equation (3) and you also have a rewritten form of that equation, call it (3'). Do all of the steps that Paul has indicated, except rather than putting

Re: custom equation numbering

2008-12-14 Thread Ivan Werning
is that it still allows entering LaTeX quite easily. I really value that. Although it would be nice for LyX to allow custom equation numbering natively, given how standard it is. -Ivan On Dec 14, 2008, at 12:20 PM, Neil Hepburn wrote: Hi Ivan, Just to follow up on Paul's solution, you can go

custom equation numbering

2008-12-14 Thread Ivan Werning
How do I change an equation number that was chosen automatically from forcing a particular number or symbol? That is, I want the analog of \tag in Latex For example, I have an equation that is numbered "(5)" which is chosen by default because it comes after "(4)". That's the correct normal

Re: custom equation numbering

2008-12-14 Thread Paul A. Rubin
Ivan Werning wrote: How do I change an equation number that was chosen automatically from forcing a particular number or symbol? That is, I want the analog of \tag in Latex For example, I have an equation that is numbered "(5)" which is chosen by default because it comes after "(4)". That's

Re: custom equation numbering

2008-12-14 Thread Neil Hepburn
Hi Ivan, Just to follow up on Paul's solution, you can go one step further and make the equation number automatic. Suppose that you have equation (3) and you also have a rewritten form of that equation, call it (3'). Do all of the steps that Paul has indicated, except rather than putting

Re: custom equation numbering

2008-12-14 Thread Ivan Werning
is that it still allows entering LaTeX quite easily. I really value that. Although it would be nice for LyX to allow custom equation numbering natively, given how standard it is. -Ivan On Dec 14, 2008, at 12:20 PM, Neil Hepburn wrote: Hi Ivan, Just to follow up on Paul's solution, you can go