Dear lyx-users,
I have drawn a figure in xfig which itself contains an eps-file. This
figure is correctly shown within xfig and lyx. However, when I try to
export the lyx-document which contains the figure to dvi or pdf, the
eps-file is not shown in the output. I get an error message: No such
I get an error message: No such
picture file: foo_1.eps.
Can someone explain that, please? There is no problem when I export the
figure to eps (in xfig) and put that in my lyx-document.
As I know, LaTeX supports only PostScript (PS) pictures (.ps files).
When one use LyX to preview the
Ronald Pagel wrote:
Dear lyx-users,
I have drawn a figure in xfig which itself contains an eps-file.
This figure is correctly shown within xfig and lyx. However, when I
try to export the lyx-document which contains the figure to dvi or
pdf, the eps-file is not shown in the output. I get an
Angus Leeming wrote:
Does it work if you specify an absolute path to foo_1.eps within the
xfig file?
I suspect that xfig generates an eps file that references the
foo_1.eps file rather than contains a copy of it. That's why the
bitmap file shown on the lyx screen works ok, because the bitmap is
Angus Leeming wrote:
Angus Leeming wrote:
Does it work if you specify an absolute path to foo_1.eps within the
xfig file?
I believe so, see below.
I suspect that xfig generates an eps file that references the
foo_1.eps file rather than contains a copy of it. That's why the
bitmap file
Angus,
thank you for your response. Now I see the problem.
Angus Leeming wrote:
Does it work if you specify an absolute path to foo_1.eps within the
xfig file?
That's what I thought I did. Apparently, xfig 3.2.4 does not save the
whole path in the .fig if the embedded .eps is located in the
Georg Baum wrote:
Angus Leeming wrote:
Does it work if you specify an absolute path to foo_1.eps within
the xfig file?
I believe so, see below.
I suspect that xfig generates an eps file that references the
foo_1.eps file rather than contains a copy of it. That's why the
bitmap file
Georg Baum wrote:
Angus Leeming wrote:
I suspect that xfig generates an eps file that references the
foo_1.eps file rather than contains a copy of it. That's why the
bitmap file shown on the lyx screen works ok, because the bitmap is
complete.
At least on my system here (SuSE 9.0) xfig embeds
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2004 16:52:59 +0200
From: Ronald Pagel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: eps in a figure is missing in output
Georg Baum wrote:
Angus Leeming wrote:
I suspect that xfig generates an eps file that references the
foo_1.eps file rather than contains a copy of
Ronald Pagel wrote:
Indeed, the preview in lyx seems to be converted on the original .fig,
whereas the latex run is performed in a temp dir. Then, there exists
only a copy of the .fig but no copy of the files to be embedded into it
(such as foo_1.eps). I understand that a temp dir should be
On Tue, Mar 30, 2004 at 04:52:59PM +0200, Ronald Pagel wrote:
this lot raises a question to the developers: Is it really necessary to
copy the .figs (and apparently not only those) to the temp dir?
Getting the tempdir stuff right is a major pain.
Without the tempdir it is e.g. hard to tell
Dear lyx-users,
I have drawn a figure in xfig which itself contains an eps-file. This
figure is correctly shown within xfig and lyx. However, when I try to
export the lyx-document which contains the figure to dvi or pdf, the
eps-file is not shown in the output. I get an error message: No such
I get an error message: No such
picture file: foo_1.eps.
Can someone explain that, please? There is no problem when I export the
figure to eps (in xfig) and put that in my lyx-document.
As I know, LaTeX supports only PostScript (PS) pictures (.ps files).
When one use LyX to preview the
Ronald Pagel wrote:
Dear lyx-users,
I have drawn a figure in xfig which itself contains an eps-file.
This figure is correctly shown within xfig and lyx. However, when I
try to export the lyx-document which contains the figure to dvi or
pdf, the eps-file is not shown in the output. I get an
Angus Leeming wrote:
Does it work if you specify an absolute path to foo_1.eps within the
xfig file?
I suspect that xfig generates an eps file that references the
foo_1.eps file rather than contains a copy of it. That's why the
bitmap file shown on the lyx screen works ok, because the bitmap is
Angus Leeming wrote:
Angus Leeming wrote:
Does it work if you specify an absolute path to foo_1.eps within the
xfig file?
I believe so, see below.
I suspect that xfig generates an eps file that references the
foo_1.eps file rather than contains a copy of it. That's why the
bitmap file
Angus,
thank you for your response. Now I see the problem.
Angus Leeming wrote:
Does it work if you specify an absolute path to foo_1.eps within the
xfig file?
That's what I thought I did. Apparently, xfig 3.2.4 does not save the
whole path in the .fig if the embedded .eps is located in the
Georg Baum wrote:
Angus Leeming wrote:
Does it work if you specify an absolute path to foo_1.eps within
the xfig file?
I believe so, see below.
I suspect that xfig generates an eps file that references the
foo_1.eps file rather than contains a copy of it. That's why the
bitmap file
Georg Baum wrote:
Angus Leeming wrote:
I suspect that xfig generates an eps file that references the
foo_1.eps file rather than contains a copy of it. That's why the
bitmap file shown on the lyx screen works ok, because the bitmap is
complete.
At least on my system here (SuSE 9.0) xfig embeds
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2004 16:52:59 +0200
From: Ronald Pagel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: eps in a figure is missing in output
Georg Baum wrote:
Angus Leeming wrote:
I suspect that xfig generates an eps file that references the
foo_1.eps file rather than contains a copy of
Ronald Pagel wrote:
Indeed, the preview in lyx seems to be converted on the original .fig,
whereas the latex run is performed in a temp dir. Then, there exists
only a copy of the .fig but no copy of the files to be embedded into it
(such as foo_1.eps). I understand that a temp dir should be
On Tue, Mar 30, 2004 at 04:52:59PM +0200, Ronald Pagel wrote:
this lot raises a question to the developers: Is it really necessary to
copy the .figs (and apparently not only those) to the temp dir?
Getting the tempdir stuff right is a major pain.
Without the tempdir it is e.g. hard to tell
Dear lyx-users,
I have drawn a figure in xfig which itself contains an eps-file. This
figure is correctly shown within xfig and lyx. However, when I try to
export the lyx-document which contains the figure to dvi or pdf, the
eps-file is not shown in the output. I get an error message: No such
> I get an error message: No such
> picture file: foo_1.eps.
> Can someone explain that, please? There is no problem when I export the
> figure to eps (in xfig) and put that in my lyx-document.
As I know, LaTeX supports only PostScript (PS) pictures (.ps files).
When one use LyX to preview the
Ronald Pagel wrote:
> Dear lyx-users,
>
> I have drawn a figure in xfig which itself contains an eps-file.
> This figure is correctly shown within xfig and lyx. However, when I
> try to export the lyx-document which contains the figure to dvi or
> pdf, the eps-file is not shown in the output. I
Angus Leeming wrote:
> Does it work if you specify an absolute path to foo_1.eps within the
> xfig file?
I suspect that xfig generates an eps file that references the
foo_1.eps file rather than contains a copy of it. That's why the
bitmap file shown on the lyx screen works ok, because the bitmap
Angus Leeming wrote:
> Angus Leeming wrote:
>> Does it work if you specify an absolute path to foo_1.eps within the
>> xfig file?
I believe so, see below.
> I suspect that xfig generates an eps file that references the
> foo_1.eps file rather than contains a copy of it. That's why the
> bitmap
Angus,
thank you for your response. Now I see the problem.
Angus Leeming wrote:
Does it work if you specify an absolute path to foo_1.eps within the
xfig file?
That's what I thought I did. Apparently, xfig 3.2.4 does not save the
whole path in the .fig if the embedded .eps is located in the
Georg Baum wrote:
>> Angus Leeming wrote:
>>> Does it work if you specify an absolute path to foo_1.eps within
>>> the xfig file?
>
> I believe so, see below.
>
>> I suspect that xfig generates an eps file that references the
>> foo_1.eps file rather than contains a copy of it. That's why the
>>
Georg Baum wrote:
Angus Leeming wrote:
I suspect that xfig generates an eps file that references the
foo_1.eps file rather than contains a copy of it. That's why the
bitmap file shown on the lyx screen works ok, because the bitmap is
complete.
At least on my system here (SuSE 9.0) xfig embeds
>>Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2004 16:52:59 +0200
>>From: Ronald Pagel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>Subject: Re: eps in a figure is missing in output
>>
>>
>>
>>Georg Baum wrote:
>>> Angus Leeming wrote:
I suspect that xfig generates an eps file that references the
foo_1.eps file
Ronald Pagel wrote:
> Indeed, the preview in lyx seems to be converted on the original .fig,
> whereas the latex run is performed in a temp dir. Then, there exists
> only a copy of the .fig but no copy of the files to be embedded into it
> (such as foo_1.eps). I understand that a temp dir should
On Tue, Mar 30, 2004 at 04:52:59PM +0200, Ronald Pagel wrote:
> this lot raises a question to the developers: Is it really necessary to
> copy the .figs (and apparently not only those) to the temp dir?
Getting the tempdir stuff right is a major pain.
Without the tempdir it is e.g. hard to tell
33 matches
Mail list logo
