geometry package first, and then
the fancyhdr.
Thank you anyway.
geometry package first, and then
the fancyhdr.
Thank you anyway.
I had load "geometry" package first, and then
the "fancyhdr".
Thank you anyway.
Hi Les:
Thank you for answering. Here I post a minimal document
Options (book). Font: 12pt, Two sided:
Preamble:
\usepackage[a4paper,twoside,includeall,outer= 2.5 cm,inner= 0.75 cm,
vmarginratio=4:5,textheight= 25 cm,ignoremp,bindingoffset= 0.5
cm,pdftex]{geometry}
LyX combines the power
On Wednesday 05 November 2008, a e wrote:
Thank you for answering. Here I post a minimal document
Looks right to me when I generate a PDF.
--
Les
~~
Please avoid sending me Word or PowerPoint attachments.
See
Hi Les:
Thank you for answering. Here I post a minimal document
Options (book). Font: 12pt, Two sided:
Preamble:
\usepackage[a4paper,twoside,includeall,outer= 2.5 cm,inner= 0.75 cm,
vmarginratio=4:5,textheight= 25 cm,ignoremp,bindingoffset= 0.5
cm,pdftex]{geometry}
LyX combines the power
On Wednesday 05 November 2008, a e wrote:
Thank you for answering. Here I post a minimal document
Looks right to me when I generate a PDF.
--
Les
~~
Please avoid sending me Word or PowerPoint attachments.
See
Hi Les:
Thank you for answering. Here I post a minimal document
Options (book). Font: 12pt, Two sided:
Preamble:
\usepackage[a4paper,twoside,includeall,outer= 2.5 cm,inner= 0.75 cm,
vmarginratio=4:5,textheight= 25 cm,ignoremp,bindingoffset= 0.5
cm,pdftex]{geometry}
LyX combines the power
On Wednesday 05 November 2008, a e wrote:
> Thank you for answering. Here I post a minimal document
Looks right to me when I generate a PDF.
--
Les
~~
Please avoid sending me Word or PowerPoint attachments.
See
Hi everybody:
Sorry if this has an stupid answer but I'm burned out triying to set up the
correct margins for my document. I'm using Lyx 1.5.5 working with two sided
document (Document-Page layout- two sided) (book class) and using geometry
package with the following options.
\usepackage
On Tuesday 04 November 2008, a e wrote:
Sorry if this has an stupid answer but I'm burned out triying to set up the
correct margins for my document. I'm using Lyx 1.5.5 working with two
sided document (Document-Page layout- two sided) (book class) and using
geometry package with the following
Hi everybody:
Sorry if this has an stupid answer but I'm burned out triying to set up the
correct margins for my document. I'm using Lyx 1.5.5 working with two sided
document (Document-Page layout- two sided) (book class) and using geometry
package with the following options.
\usepackage
On Tuesday 04 November 2008, a e wrote:
Sorry if this has an stupid answer but I'm burned out triying to set up the
correct margins for my document. I'm using Lyx 1.5.5 working with two
sided document (Document-Page layout- two sided) (book class) and using
geometry package with the following
Hi everybody:
Sorry if this has an stupid answer but I'm burned out triying to set up the
correct margins for my document. I'm using Lyx 1.5.5 working with two sided
document (Document->Page layout-> two sided) (book class) and using "geometry"
package with the following optio
On Tuesday 04 November 2008, a e wrote:
> Sorry if this has an stupid answer but I'm burned out triying to set up the
> correct margins for my document. I'm using Lyx 1.5.5 working with two
> sided document (Document->Page layout-> two sided) (book class) and using
>
this error:
-
LaTeX Error: Option clash for package geometry.
The package geometry has already been loaded with options:
[]
There has now been an attempt to load it with options
[dvips]
Adding the global options:
,dvips
to your
class I get this error:
-
LaTeX Error: Option clash for package geometry.
The package geometry has already been loaded with options:
[]
There has now been an attempt to load it with options
[dvips]
Adding the global options:
,dvips
On Mon, Nov 07, 2005 at 6:22:51PM -0500, Paul A. Rubin wrote:
Fortunately, options can be set with \geometry{}, and invocations
of that macro are cumulative. So try \geometry{dvips} in your
preamble and see if that works.
It does indeed.
Thanks, Paul!
Jim
this error:
-
LaTeX Error: Option clash for package geometry.
The package geometry has already been loaded with options:
[]
There has now been an attempt to load it with options
[dvips]
Adding the global options:
,dvips
to your
class I get this error:
-
LaTeX Error: Option clash for package geometry.
The package geometry has already been loaded with options:
[]
There has now been an attempt to load it with options
[dvips]
Adding the global options:
,dvips
On Mon, Nov 07, 2005 at 6:22:51PM -0500, Paul A. Rubin wrote:
Fortunately, options can be set with \geometry{}, and invocations
of that macro are cumulative. So try \geometry{dvips} in your
preamble and see if that works.
It does indeed.
Thanks, Paul!
Jim
this error:
-
LaTeX Error: Option clash for package geometry.
The package geometry has already been loaded with options:
[]
There has now been an attempt to load it with options
[dvips]
Adding the global options:
,dvips
to your
class I get this error:
-
LaTeX Error: Option clash for package geometry.
The package geometry has already been loaded with options:
[]
There has now been an attempt to load it with options
[dvips]
Adding the global options:
,dvips
On Mon, Nov 07, 2005 at 6:22:51PM -0500, Paul A. Rubin wrote:
> Fortunately, options can be set with \geometry{}, and invocations
> of that macro are cumulative. So try \geometry{dvips} in your
> preamble and see if that works.
It does indeed.
Thanks, Paul!
Jim
Robert Neumann wrote:
I am writing a text using the package geometry. for the 4th and 5th chapter
the topmargin should be changed. but I get the error message that
\geometry{tmargin=10mm} can only be used in the preamble.
using \topmargin is not easy because the tmargin of the geometry package
Robert Neumann wrote:
I am writing a text using the package geometry. for the 4th and 5th chapter
the topmargin should be changed. but I get the error message that
\geometry{tmargin=10mm} can only be used in the preamble.
using \topmargin is not easy because the tmargin of the geometry package
Robert Neumann wrote:
I am writing a text using the package geometry. for the 4th and 5th chapter
the topmargin should be changed. but I get the error message that
\geometry{tmargin=10mm} can only be used in the preamble.
using \topmargin is not easy because the tmargin of the geometry package
Hello,
I am writing a text using the package geometry. for the 4th and 5th chapter
the topmargin should be changed. but I get the error message that
\geometry{tmargin=10mm} can only be used in the preamble.
using \topmargin is not easy because the tmargin of the geometry package and
\topmargin
Hello,
I am writing a text using the package geometry. for the 4th and 5th chapter
the topmargin should be changed. but I get the error message that
\geometry{tmargin=10mm} can only be used in the preamble.
using \topmargin is not easy because the tmargin of the geometry package and
\topmargin
Hello,
I am writing a text using the package geometry. for the 4th and 5th chapter
the topmargin should be changed. but I get the error message that
\geometry{tmargin=10mm} can only be used in the preamble.
using \topmargin is not easy because the tmargin of the geometry package and
\topmargin
Hem, :-( I didn't check my preambule...
I had letterpaper as an option for package hyperref, so invoking legal size in the
paper size box was a bad mixture!
LyX was'nt wrong!
Raymond
--
Édité et transmis avec des logiciels libres sous Linux !
Hem, :-( I didn't check my preambule...
I had letterpaper as an option for package hyperref, so invoking legal size in the
paper size box was a bad mixture!
LyX was'nt wrong!
Raymond
--
Édité et transmis avec des logiciels libres sous Linux !
Hem, :-( I didn't check my preambule...
I had letterpaper as an option for package hyperref, so invoking legal size in the
paper size box was a bad mixture!
LyX was'nt wrong!
Raymond
--
Édité et transmis avec des logiciels libres sous Linux !
Same behavior on two systems:
Mandrake 10.0 Official + LyX 1.3.4Qt
Slackware 10 + LyX1.3.4Qt
I joined a gzip lyx file to this post to show the problem. Package geometry doesn't
seem to work at all, margins are not respected and if I use legal paper then the text
overlap towards the bottom
Same behavior on two systems:
Mandrake 10.0 Official + LyX 1.3.4Qt
Slackware 10 + LyX1.3.4Qt
I joined a gzip lyx file to this post to show the problem. Package geometry doesn't
seem to work at all, margins are not respected and if I use legal paper then the text
overlap towards the bottom
Same behavior on two systems:
Mandrake 10.0 Official + LyX 1.3.4Qt
Slackware 10 + LyX1.3.4Qt
I joined a gzip lyx file to this post to show the problem. Package geometry doesn't
seem to work at all, margins are not respected and if I use legal paper then the text
overlap towards the bottom
Günter Milde wrote:
seminar.cls has a bug that prevents proper working with the a4paper
option. (Option a4 works).
the seminar and prosper packages are still buggy.
The bug prevents use of seminar as doctype from LyX together with the
geometry package and a4 option, as LyX inserts:
\usepackage
Günter Milde wrote:
seminar.cls has a bug that prevents proper working with the a4paper
option. (Option a4 works).
the seminar and prosper packages are still buggy.
The bug prevents use of seminar as doctype from LyX together with the
geometry package and a4 option, as LyX inserts:
\usepackage
Günter Milde wrote:
seminar.cls has a bug that prevents proper working with the "a4paper"
option. (Option "a4" works).
the seminar and prosper packages are still buggy.
The bug prevents use of seminar as doctype from LyX together with the
geometry package and a4 op
Dear lyx-users,
seminar.cls has a bug that prevents proper working with the a4paper
option. (Option a4 works).
The bug prevents use of seminar as doctype from LyX together with the
geometry package and a4 option, as LyX inserts:
\usepackage{geometry}
\geometry{verbose,a4paper,tmargin=1cm
,
that is, --geometry 800x860+0+0? I tried the obvious:
\screen_geometry 800x860+0+0
but it had no effect, nor did it produce an error message.
I'm using Qt, fwiw.
TIA,
Jim
put in my lyxrc file to tell LyX to
start in the upper left corner of the screen, with size 800x860,
that is, --geometry 800x860+0+0? I tried the obvious:
\screen_geometry 800x860+0+0
but it had no effect, nor did it produce an error message.
I'm using Qt, fwiw.
TIA,
Jim
Try
Dear lyx-users,
seminar.cls has a bug that prevents proper working with the a4paper
option. (Option a4 works).
The bug prevents use of seminar as doctype from LyX together with the
geometry package and a4 option, as LyX inserts:
\usepackage{geometry}
\geometry{verbose,a4paper,tmargin=1cm
,
that is, --geometry 800x860+0+0? I tried the obvious:
\screen_geometry 800x860+0+0
but it had no effect, nor did it produce an error message.
I'm using Qt, fwiw.
TIA,
Jim
put in my lyxrc file to tell LyX to
start in the upper left corner of the screen, with size 800x860,
that is, --geometry 800x860+0+0? I tried the obvious:
\screen_geometry 800x860+0+0
but it had no effect, nor did it produce an error message.
I'm using Qt, fwiw.
TIA,
Jim
Try
Dear lyx-users,
seminar.cls has a bug that prevents proper working with the "a4paper"
option. (Option "a4" works).
The bug prevents use of seminar as doctype from LyX together with the
geometry package and a4 option, as LyX inserts:
\usepackage{geometry}
\geometry{verbose
ze 800x860,
that is, --geometry "800x860+0+0"? I tried the obvious:
\screen_geometry "800x860+0+0"
but it had no effect, nor did it produce an error message.
I'm using Qt, fwiw.
TIA,
Jim
ormation..."
>
> So, is there a line I can put in my lyxrc file to tell LyX to
> start in the upper left corner of the screen, with size 800x860,
> that is, --geometry "800x860+0+0"? I tried the obvious:
>
> \screen_geometry "800x860+0+0"
>
> but it had no effect
Juergen == Juergen Spitzmueller [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Juergen Ronald Florence wrote:
Am I missing something, or is the geometry input not in LyX-1.2.1?
I remember from earlier versions that it was possible to select
margins from the Layout - Page menu. With LyX-1.2.1 I ended up
putting
My thanks to those who kindly pointed out that the geometry package is
still alive and well in LyX-1.2.1. Regards,
--
Ronald Florencewww.18james.com
Juergen == Juergen Spitzmueller [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Juergen Ronald Florence wrote:
Am I missing something, or is the geometry input not in LyX-1.2.1?
I remember from earlier versions that it was possible to select
margins from the Layout - Page menu. With LyX-1.2.1 I ended up
putting
My thanks to those who kindly pointed out that the geometry package is
still alive and well in LyX-1.2.1. Regards,
--
Ronald Florencewww.18james.com
>>>>> "Juergen" == Juergen Spitzmueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Juergen> Ronald Florence wrote:
>> Am I missing something, or is the geometry input not in LyX-1.2.1?
>> I remember from earlier versions that it was possible to select
>> ma
My thanks to those who kindly pointed out that the geometry package is
still alive and well in LyX-1.2.1. Regards,
--
Ronald Florencewww.18james.com
Am I missing something, or is the geometry input not in LyX-1.2.1? I
remember from earlier versions that it was possible to select margins
from the Layout - Page menu. With LyX-1.2.1 I ended up putting some
geometry parameters in the Preamble.
--
Ronald Florence www.18james.com
Ronald Florence wrote:
Am I missing something, or is the geometry input not in LyX-1.2.1? I
remember from earlier versions that it was possible to select margins
from the Layout - Page menu. With LyX-1.2.1 I ended up putting some
geometry parameters in the Preamble.
It is still
Am I missing something, or is the geometry input not in LyX-1.2.1? I
remember from earlier versions that it was possible to select margins
from the Layout - Page menu. With LyX-1.2.1 I ended up putting some
geometry parameters in the Preamble.
--
Ronald Florence www.18james.com
Ronald Florence wrote:
Am I missing something, or is the geometry input not in LyX-1.2.1? I
remember from earlier versions that it was possible to select margins
from the Layout - Page menu. With LyX-1.2.1 I ended up putting some
geometry parameters in the Preamble.
It is still
Am I missing something, or is the geometry input not in LyX-1.2.1? I
remember from earlier versions that it was possible to select margins
from the Layout -> Page menu. With LyX-1.2.1 I ended up putting some
geometry parameters in the Preamble.
--
Ronald Florence www.18james.com
Ronald Florence wrote:
> Am I missing something, or is the geometry input not in LyX-1.2.1? I
> remember from earlier versions that it was possible to select margins
> from the Layout -> Page menu. With LyX-1.2.1 I ended up putting some
> geometry parameters in the Preambl
I thought I read in the documentation that newer versions of LyX (I'm
using Lyx-1.2.1) recognized the -geometry command-line argument and the
Lyx*geometry entry in ./.Xdefaults. Mine seems not to, unless I've
gotten the syntax wrong. When I put
Lyx*geometry: 720x900+283-15
in .Xdefaults
Ronald Florence wrote:
I thought I read in the documentation that newer versions of LyX (I'm
using Lyx-1.2.1) recognized the -geometry command-line argument and the
Lyx*geometry entry in ./.Xdefaults. Mine seems not to, unless I've
gotten the syntax wrong. When I put
Lyx*geometry
Peter Suetterlin wrote:
Hm, lyx -geometry 750x750+0+88 does work for me.
However, I'm not able to resize the lyx window to something smaller than
the starting size.
How do I get the geometry parameters, including position on the screen,
to work. Thanks,
What Windowmanager/DTE do
I thought I read in the documentation that newer versions of LyX (I'm
using Lyx-1.2.1) recognized the -geometry command-line argument and the
Lyx*geometry entry in ./.Xdefaults. Mine seems not to, unless I've
gotten the syntax wrong. When I put
Lyx*geometry: 720x900+283-15
in .Xdefaults
Ronald Florence wrote:
I thought I read in the documentation that newer versions of LyX (I'm
using Lyx-1.2.1) recognized the -geometry command-line argument and the
Lyx*geometry entry in ./.Xdefaults. Mine seems not to, unless I've
gotten the syntax wrong. When I put
Lyx*geometry
Peter Suetterlin wrote:
Hm, lyx -geometry 750x750+0+88 does work for me.
However, I'm not able to resize the lyx window to something smaller than
the starting size.
How do I get the geometry parameters, including position on the screen,
to work. Thanks,
What Windowmanager/DTE do
I thought I read in the documentation that newer versions of LyX (I'm
using Lyx-1.2.1) recognized the -geometry command-line argument and the
Lyx*geometry entry in ./.Xdefaults. Mine seems not to, unless I've
gotten the syntax wrong. When I put
Lyx*geometry: 720x900+283-15
in .Xdefaults
Ronald Florence wrote:
> I thought I read in the documentation that newer versions of LyX (I'm
> using Lyx-1.2.1) recognized the -geometry command-line argument and the
> Lyx*geometry entry in ./.Xdefaults. Mine seems not to, unless I've
> gotten the syntax wrong. When I put
Peter Suetterlin wrote:
> Hm, lyx -geometry 750x750+0+88 does work for me.
>
> However, I'm not able to resize the lyx window to something smaller than
> the starting size.
>
>
>>How do I get the geometry parameters, including position on the screen,
>>
On Tue, 28 May 2002 19:00:27 BST, John Levon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I compiled and installed LyX 1.2.0 yesterday and discovered that my
usual way of starting it with the -geometry option no longer works.
Is this a bug or a feature? (and in the latter case, what is the
advantage
On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 10:37:15AM +0100, Andreas Busch wrote:
What exactly goes wrong for you ?
Well, it just ignores the -geometry command line parameter. I
compiled it --with-version-suffix, so I have a $HOME/.lyx and a
$HOME/.lyx-1.2.0 directory. But that shouldn't be a problem
On Tue, 28 May 2002 19:00:27 BST, John Levon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I compiled and installed LyX 1.2.0 yesterday and discovered that my
usual way of starting it with the -geometry option no longer works.
Is this a bug or a feature? (and in the latter case, what is the
advantage
On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 10:37:15AM +0100, Andreas Busch wrote:
What exactly goes wrong for you ?
Well, it just ignores the -geometry command line parameter. I
compiled it --with-version-suffix, so I have a $HOME/.lyx and a
$HOME/.lyx-1.2.0 directory. But that shouldn't be a problem
On Tue, 28 May 2002 19:00:27 BST, John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I compiled and installed LyX 1.2.0 yesterday and discovered that my
>> usual way of starting it with the -geometry option no longer works.
>> Is this a bug or a feature? (and
On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 10:37:15AM +0100, Andreas Busch wrote:
> > What exactly goes wrong for you ?
>
> Well, it just ignores the -geometry command line parameter. I
> compiled it --with-version-suffix, so I have a $HOME/.lyx and a
> $HOME/.lyx-1.2.0 directory.
Hi,
I compiled and installed LyX 1.2.0 yesterday and discovered that my
usual way of starting it with the -geometry option no longer works.
Is this a bug or a feature? (and in the latter case, what is the
advantage?)
Hoping that someone will enlighten me,
cheers and thanks for another update
On Tue, May 28, 2002 at 06:00:40PM +0100, Andreas Busch wrote:
I compiled and installed LyX 1.2.0 yesterday and discovered that my
usual way of starting it with the -geometry option no longer works.
Is this a bug or a feature? (and in the latter case, what is the
advantage?)
Works fine
Hi,
I compiled and installed LyX 1.2.0 yesterday and discovered that my
usual way of starting it with the -geometry option no longer works.
Is this a bug or a feature? (and in the latter case, what is the
advantage?)
Hoping that someone will enlighten me,
cheers and thanks for another update
On Tue, May 28, 2002 at 06:00:40PM +0100, Andreas Busch wrote:
I compiled and installed LyX 1.2.0 yesterday and discovered that my
usual way of starting it with the -geometry option no longer works.
Is this a bug or a feature? (and in the latter case, what is the
advantage?)
Works fine
Hi,
I compiled and installed LyX 1.2.0 yesterday and discovered that my
usual way of starting it with the -geometry option no longer works.
Is this a bug or a feature? (and in the latter case, what is the
advantage?)
Hoping that someone will enlighten me,
cheers and thanks for another update
On Tue, May 28, 2002 at 06:00:40PM +0100, Andreas Busch wrote:
> I compiled and installed LyX 1.2.0 yesterday and discovered that my
> usual way of starting it with the -geometry option no longer works.
> Is this a bug or a feature? (and in the latter case, what is the
> advant
into a quest mostly because I
can't do it. I am unable to change the margins in any of my documents.
I've gone to the document layout screen, and I can check 'Use Geometry
Package', but as soon as I put a number into any of the fields (like Top
Margin), the OK and Apply buttons are greyed out.
Based on my
Hi,
On 28 Jan 2002, Rachel Collins wrote:
can't do it. I am unable to change the margins in any of my documents.
I've gone to the document layout screen, and I can check 'Use Geometry
Package', but as soon as I put a number into any of the fields (like Top
Margin), the OK and Apply buttons
On Mon, 2002-01-28 at 08:40, Yannick Patois wrote:
If you put:
Top: 2
This wont work
But it will work with:
Top: 2mm
Top: 2cm
Top: 2em
Thank you very much. It was the units that I was missing. Works
beautifully. =)
On Mon, 28 Jan 2002, Yannick Patois wrote:
Dont put any space between the number and the unit (it wont work, I think
from my TeX experience).
Works in fix3 if there's a space between the digit and the unit (e.g.,
1.5 in).
Rich
Dr. Richard B. Shepard, President
into a quest mostly because I
can't do it. I am unable to change the margins in any of my documents.
I've gone to the document layout screen, and I can check 'Use Geometry
Package', but as soon as I put a number into any of the fields (like Top
Margin), the OK and Apply buttons are greyed out.
Based on my
Hi,
On 28 Jan 2002, Rachel Collins wrote:
can't do it. I am unable to change the margins in any of my documents.
I've gone to the document layout screen, and I can check 'Use Geometry
Package', but as soon as I put a number into any of the fields (like Top
Margin), the OK and Apply buttons
On Mon, 2002-01-28 at 08:40, Yannick Patois wrote:
If you put:
Top: 2
This wont work
But it will work with:
Top: 2mm
Top: 2cm
Top: 2em
Thank you very much. It was the units that I was missing. Works
beautifully. =)
On Mon, 28 Jan 2002, Yannick Patois wrote:
Dont put any space between the number and the unit (it wont work, I think
from my TeX experience).
Works in fix3 if there's a space between the digit and the unit (e.g.,
1.5 in).
Rich
Dr. Richard B. Shepard, President
into a quest mostly because I
can't do it. I am unable to change the margins in any of my documents.
I've gone to the document layout screen, and I can check 'Use Geometry
Package', but as soon as I put a number into any of the fields (like Top
Margin), the OK and Apply buttons are greyed out.
Based on my
Hi,
On 28 Jan 2002, Rachel Collins wrote:
> can't do it. I am unable to change the margins in any of my documents.
> I've gone to the document layout screen, and I can check 'Use Geometry
> Package', but as soon as I put a number into any of the fields (like Top
> Margin), the
On Mon, 2002-01-28 at 08:40, Yannick Patois wrote:
> If you put:
> Top: 2
> This wont work
> But it will work with:
> Top: 2mm
> Top: 2cm
> Top: 2em
Thank you very much. It was the units that I was missing. Works
beautifully. =)
On Mon, 28 Jan 2002, Yannick Patois wrote:
> Dont put any space between the number and the unit (it wont work, I think
> from my TeX experience).
Works in fix3 if there's a space between the digit and the unit (e.g.,
"1.5 in").
Rich
Dr. Richard B. Shepard, President
and with 1.1.5 this worked well. After looking in the man page, I changed
this to
LyX*geometry 720x670
but still no effect.
I use LyX*geometry with no problem.
Looking at the line above, it seems you forgot to put ':', namely the line
should be
LyX*geometry: 720x670
That was it!
I
On Thu, 26 Apr 2001, Guenter Milde wrote:
- Changes in .Xdefaults will be in effect only after a restart of the
X-server.
Or, after you issue
xrdb -merge ~/.Xdefaults
and with 1.1.5 this worked well. After looking in the man page, I changed
this to
LyX*geometry 720x670
but still no effect.
I use LyX*geometry with no problem.
Looking at the line above, it seems you forgot to put ':', namely the line
should be
LyX*geometry: 720x670
That was it!
I
On Thu, 26 Apr 2001, Guenter Milde wrote:
- Changes in .Xdefaults will be in effect only after a restart of the
X-server.
Or, after you issue
xrdb -merge ~/.Xdefaults
LyX*width: 720
> > LyX*height:670
> >
> > and with 1.1.5 this worked well. After looking in the man page, I changed
> > this to
> >
> > LyX*geometry 720x670
> >
> > but still no effect.
>
> I use LyX*geometry with no problem.
> Lo
On Thu, 26 Apr 2001, Guenter Milde wrote:
> - Changes in .Xdefaults will be in effect only after a restart of the
> X-server.
Or, after you issue
xrdb -merge ~/.Xdefaults
since I upgraded to LyX 1.1.6fix1 (via rpm), LyX does not react on my
~.Xdefault setting. I had two lines telling
LyX*width: 720
LyX*height:670
As far as I know LyX does not check any .X* settings.
Andre'
--
André Pönitz . [EMAIL
1 - 100 of 135 matches
Mail list logo
