Re: lyx2.0.0beta3 vs. texlive 2010

2011-03-05 Thread Rudi Gaelzer
Just did as you suggested and everything seems to be working, so far. Thanks Neal and José for the tips. On Wednesday 02 March 2011 13:24:38 José Matos wrote: On Wednesday 02 March 2011 13:32:33 Rudi Gaelzer wrote: Can you please tell me what did you do? Did you first uninstall all the

Re: lyx2.0.0beta3 vs. texlive 2010

2011-03-05 Thread Rudi Gaelzer
Just did as you suggested and everything seems to be working, so far. Thanks Neal and José for the tips. On Wednesday 02 March 2011 13:24:38 José Matos wrote: On Wednesday 02 March 2011 13:32:33 Rudi Gaelzer wrote: Can you please tell me what did you do? Did you first uninstall all the

Re: lyx2.0.0beta3 vs. texlive 2010

2011-03-05 Thread Rudi Gaelzer
Just did as you suggested and everything seems to be working, so far. Thanks Neal and José for the tips. On Wednesday 02 March 2011 13:24:38 José Matos wrote: > On Wednesday 02 March 2011 13:32:33 Rudi Gaelzer wrote: > > Can you please tell me what did you do? > > Did you first uninstall all the

Re: lyx2.0.0beta3 vs. texlive 2010

2011-03-02 Thread Rudi Gaelzer
Can you please tell me what did you do? Did you first uninstall all the TeXlive 2007 packages that come with F14 and then force the installation of 2010? Did you have to remove and reinstall LyX in the process? How do you find 2010 as compared with 2007? I'm mainly interested in the reverse

Re: lyx2.0.0beta3 vs. texlive 2010

2011-03-02 Thread Neal Becker
[texlive] name=TeX Live baseurl=http://jnovy.fedorapeople.org/texlive/2010/packages.fc14/ enabled=0 metadata_expire=1d gpgcheck=0 On Wednesday 02 March 2011, Rudi Gaelzer wrote: Can you please tell me what did you do? Did you first uninstall all the TeXlive 2007 packages that come with F14

Re: lyx2.0.0beta3 vs. texlive 2010

2011-03-02 Thread José Matos
On Wednesday 02 March 2011 13:56:35 Neal Becker wrote: [texlive] name=TeX Live baseurl=http://jnovy.fedorapeople.org/texlive/2010/packages.fc14/ enabled=0 metadata_expire=1d gpgcheck=0 If you want to use you should define enabled=1 in the above repo file. -- José Abílio

Re: lyx2.0.0beta3 vs. texlive 2010

2011-03-02 Thread José Matos
On Wednesday 02 March 2011 13:32:33 Rudi Gaelzer wrote: Can you please tell me what did you do? Did you first uninstall all the TeXlive 2007 packages that come with F14 and then force the installation of 2010? Did you have to remove and reinstall LyX in the process? After installing the repo

Re: lyx2.0.0beta3 vs. texlive 2010

2011-03-02 Thread Rudi Gaelzer
Can you please tell me what did you do? Did you first uninstall all the TeXlive 2007 packages that come with F14 and then force the installation of 2010? Did you have to remove and reinstall LyX in the process? How do you find 2010 as compared with 2007? I'm mainly interested in the reverse

Re: lyx2.0.0beta3 vs. texlive 2010

2011-03-02 Thread Neal Becker
[texlive] name=TeX Live baseurl=http://jnovy.fedorapeople.org/texlive/2010/packages.fc14/ enabled=0 metadata_expire=1d gpgcheck=0 On Wednesday 02 March 2011, Rudi Gaelzer wrote: Can you please tell me what did you do? Did you first uninstall all the TeXlive 2007 packages that come with F14

Re: lyx2.0.0beta3 vs. texlive 2010

2011-03-02 Thread José Matos
On Wednesday 02 March 2011 13:56:35 Neal Becker wrote: [texlive] name=TeX Live baseurl=http://jnovy.fedorapeople.org/texlive/2010/packages.fc14/ enabled=0 metadata_expire=1d gpgcheck=0 If you want to use you should define enabled=1 in the above repo file. -- José Abílio

Re: lyx2.0.0beta3 vs. texlive 2010

2011-03-02 Thread José Matos
On Wednesday 02 March 2011 13:32:33 Rudi Gaelzer wrote: Can you please tell me what did you do? Did you first uninstall all the TeXlive 2007 packages that come with F14 and then force the installation of 2010? Did you have to remove and reinstall LyX in the process? After installing the repo

Re: lyx2.0.0beta3 vs. texlive 2010

2011-03-02 Thread Rudi Gaelzer
Can you please tell me what did you do? Did you first uninstall all the TeXlive 2007 packages that come with F14 and then force the installation of 2010? Did you have to remove and reinstall LyX in the process? How do you find 2010 as compared with 2007? I'm mainly interested in the reverse

Re: lyx2.0.0beta3 vs. texlive 2010

2011-03-02 Thread Neal Becker
[texlive] name=TeX Live baseurl=http://jnovy.fedorapeople.org/texlive/2010/packages.fc14/ enabled=0 metadata_expire=1d gpgcheck=0 On Wednesday 02 March 2011, Rudi Gaelzer wrote: > Can you please tell me what did you do? > Did you first uninstall all the TeXlive 2007 packages that come with F14 >

Re: lyx2.0.0beta3 vs. texlive 2010

2011-03-02 Thread José Matos
On Wednesday 02 March 2011 13:56:35 Neal Becker wrote: > [texlive] > name=TeX Live > baseurl=http://jnovy.fedorapeople.org/texlive/2010/packages.fc14/ > enabled=0 > metadata_expire=1d > gpgcheck=0 If you want to use you should define enabled=1 in the above repo file. -- José Abílio

Re: lyx2.0.0beta3 vs. texlive 2010

2011-03-02 Thread José Matos
On Wednesday 02 March 2011 13:32:33 Rudi Gaelzer wrote: > Can you please tell me what did you do? > Did you first uninstall all the TeXlive 2007 packages that come with F14 > and then force the installation of 2010? > Did you have to remove and reinstall LyX in the process? After installing the

Re: lyx2.0.0beta3 vs. texlive 2010

2011-02-01 Thread Guenter Milde
On 2011-01-31, Neal Becker wrote: On Monday 31 January 2011, Marcelo Acuña wrote: This is fedora 14 using texlive 2010 package from Jindrich Novy jn...@redhat.com checking for a Latex2e program... +checking for latex... yes texlive 2010 work very well for me, with all 2.0 alphas

Re: lyx2.0.0beta3 vs. texlive 2010

2011-02-01 Thread Neal Becker
Guenter Milde wrote: On 2011-01-31, Neal Becker wrote: On Monday 31 January 2011, Marcelo Acuña wrote: This is fedora 14 using texlive 2010 package from Jindrich Novy jn...@redhat.com checking for a Latex2e program... +checking for latex... yes texlive 2010 work very well for

Re: lyx2.0.0beta3 vs. texlive 2010

2011-02-01 Thread Guenter Milde
On 2011-01-31, Neal Becker wrote: On Monday 31 January 2011, Marcelo Acuña wrote: This is fedora 14 using texlive 2010 package from Jindrich Novy jn...@redhat.com checking for a Latex2e program... +checking for latex... yes texlive 2010 work very well for me, with all 2.0 alphas

Re: lyx2.0.0beta3 vs. texlive 2010

2011-02-01 Thread Neal Becker
Guenter Milde wrote: On 2011-01-31, Neal Becker wrote: On Monday 31 January 2011, Marcelo Acuña wrote: This is fedora 14 using texlive 2010 package from Jindrich Novy jn...@redhat.com checking for a Latex2e program... +checking for latex... yes texlive 2010 work very well for

Re: lyx2.0.0beta3 vs. texlive 2010

2011-02-01 Thread Guenter Milde
On 2011-01-31, Neal Becker wrote: > On Monday 31 January 2011, Marcelo Acuña wrote: >> > This is fedora 14 using texlive 2010 >> > package from Jindrich Novy >> > >> > >> > checking for a Latex2e program... >> > +checking for "latex"... yes >> texlive 2010 work very well for

Re: lyx2.0.0beta3 vs. texlive 2010

2011-02-01 Thread Neal Becker
Guenter Milde wrote: > On 2011-01-31, Neal Becker wrote: >> On Monday 31 January 2011, Marcelo Acuña wrote: >>> > This is fedora 14 using texlive 2010 >>> > package from Jindrich Novy >>> > >>> > >>> > checking for a Latex2e program... >>> > +checking for "latex"... yes >

lyx2.0.0beta3 vs. texlive 2010

2011-01-31 Thread Neal Becker
This is fedora 14 using texlive 2010 package from Jindrich Novy jn...@redhat.com checking for a Latex2e program... +checking for latex... yes checking for a DVI postprocessing program... +checking for pplatex... no checking for pLaTeX, the Japanese LaTeX... +checking for platex... yes

Re: lyx2.0.0beta3 vs. texlive 2010

2011-01-31 Thread Marcelo Acuña
This is fedora 14 using texlive 2010 package from  Jindrich Novy jn...@redhat.com checking for a Latex2e program... +checking for latex...  yes texlive 2010 work very well for me, with all 2.0 alphas and betas and 1.6.8 versions. I have debian lenny. Marcelo

Re: lyx2.0.0beta3 vs. texlive 2010

2011-01-31 Thread Neal Becker
On Monday 31 January 2011, Marcelo Acuña wrote: This is fedora 14 using texlive 2010 package from Jindrich Novy jn...@redhat.com checking for a Latex2e program... +checking for latex... yes texlive 2010 work very well for me, with all 2.0 alphas and betas and 1.6.8 versions. I

lyx2.0.0beta3 vs. texlive 2010

2011-01-31 Thread Neal Becker
This is fedora 14 using texlive 2010 package from Jindrich Novy jn...@redhat.com checking for a Latex2e program... +checking for latex... yes checking for a DVI postprocessing program... +checking for pplatex... no checking for pLaTeX, the Japanese LaTeX... +checking for platex... yes

Re: lyx2.0.0beta3 vs. texlive 2010

2011-01-31 Thread Marcelo Acuña
This is fedora 14 using texlive 2010 package from  Jindrich Novy jn...@redhat.com checking for a Latex2e program... +checking for latex...  yes texlive 2010 work very well for me, with all 2.0 alphas and betas and 1.6.8 versions. I have debian lenny. Marcelo

Re: lyx2.0.0beta3 vs. texlive 2010

2011-01-31 Thread Neal Becker
On Monday 31 January 2011, Marcelo Acuña wrote: This is fedora 14 using texlive 2010 package from Jindrich Novy jn...@redhat.com checking for a Latex2e program... +checking for latex... yes texlive 2010 work very well for me, with all 2.0 alphas and betas and 1.6.8 versions. I

lyx2.0.0beta3 vs. texlive 2010

2011-01-31 Thread Neal Becker
This is fedora 14 using texlive 2010 package from Jindrich Novy checking for a Latex2e program... +checking for "latex"... yes checking for a DVI postprocessing program... +checking for "pplatex"... no checking for pLaTeX, the Japanese LaTeX... +checking for "platex"...

Re: lyx2.0.0beta3 vs. texlive 2010

2011-01-31 Thread Marcelo Acuña
> This is fedora 14 using texlive 2010 > package from  Jindrich Novy > > > checking for a Latex2e program... > +checking for "latex"...  yes texlive 2010 work very well for me, with all 2.0 alphas and betas and 1.6.8 versions. I have debian lenny. Marcelo

Re: lyx2.0.0beta3 vs. texlive 2010

2011-01-31 Thread Neal Becker
On Monday 31 January 2011, Marcelo Acuña wrote: > > This is fedora 14 using texlive 2010 > > package from Jindrich Novy > > > > > > checking for a Latex2e program... > > +checking for "latex"... yes > > texlive 2010 work very well for me, with all 2.0 alphas and betas and