Re: New version 2.1.3

2015-03-10 17:55 GMT+01:00 Jürgen Spitzmüller: 2015-03-09 18:36 GMT+01:00 Jürgen Spitzmüller: Jean-Marc Lasgouttes lasgout...@lyx.org wrote: I checked that the \protect bug is fixed, but now we have to deal with another one, seen above in the caption. I do not know what caused this

Re: New version 2.1.3

2015-03-10 17:55 GMT+01:00 Jürgen Spitzmüller: 2015-03-09 18:36 GMT+01:00 Jürgen Spitzmüller: Jean-Marc Lasgouttes lasgout...@lyx.org wrote: I checked that the \protect bug is fixed, but now we have to deal with another one, seen above in the caption. I do not know what caused this

Re: New version 2.1.3

2015-03-10 17:55 GMT+01:00 Jürgen Spitzmüller: > 2015-03-09 18:36 GMT+01:00 Jürgen Spitzmüller: > >> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >> >>> I checked that the \protect bug is fixed, but now we have to deal with >>> another one, seen above in the caption. I do not know what caused

Re: New version 2.1.3

2015-03-09 18:36 GMT+01:00 Jürgen Spitzmüller: Jean-Marc Lasgouttes lasgout...@lyx.org wrote: I checked that the \protect bug is fixed, but now we have to deal with another one, seen above in the caption. I do not know what caused this actually, neither why LaTeX complains. Is it the \par?

Re: New version 2.1.3

On 03/10/2015 01:36 PM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: 2015-03-10 17:55 GMT+01:00 Jürgen Spitzmüller: 2015-03-09 18:36 GMT+01:00 Jürgen Spitzmüller: Jean-Marc Lasgouttes lasgout...@lyx.org mailto:lasgout...@lyx.org wrote: I checked that the \protect bug is fixed,

Re: New version 2.1.3

2015-03-09 18:36 GMT+01:00 Jürgen Spitzmüller: Jean-Marc Lasgouttes lasgout...@lyx.org wrote: I checked that the \protect bug is fixed, but now we have to deal with another one, seen above in the caption. I do not know what caused this actually, neither why LaTeX complains. Is it the \par?

Re: New version 2.1.3

On 03/10/2015 01:36 PM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: 2015-03-10 17:55 GMT+01:00 Jürgen Spitzmüller: 2015-03-09 18:36 GMT+01:00 Jürgen Spitzmüller: Jean-Marc Lasgouttes lasgout...@lyx.org mailto:lasgout...@lyx.org wrote: I checked that the \protect bug is fixed,

Re: New version 2.1.3

2015-03-09 18:36 GMT+01:00 Jürgen Spitzmüller: > Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > >> I checked that the \protect bug is fixed, but now we have to deal with >> another one, seen above in the caption. I do not know what caused this >> actually, neither why LaTeX complains. Is it

Re: New version 2.1.3

On 03/10/2015 01:36 PM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: 2015-03-10 17:55 GMT+01:00 Jürgen Spitzmüller: 2015-03-09 18:36 GMT+01:00 Jürgen Spitzmüller: Jean-Marc Lasgouttes > wrote: I checked that the \protect bug is

Re: New version 2.1.3

On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 5:41 PM, Scott Kostyshak skost...@lyx.org wrote: On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 5:27 PM, Patrick Dupre pdu...@gmx.com wrote: Actually, it is due to the sub figure. In the previous version it was OK. Thanks for the MWE. I confirm that for LyX 2.1.0 the compilation succeeds on

Re: New version 2.1.3

Le 09/03/2015 14:33, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : 47c47 \protect\caption{{\small{}Enlargemen}} --- \protect\caption{{\small{}Enlargemen}{\small \par}} This seems to be related to http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/9421. However that bug is fixed in master but I still cannot compile the file on

Re: New version 2.1.3

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes lasgout...@lyx.org wrote: I checked that the \protect bug is fixed, but now we have to deal with another one, seen above in the caption. I do not know what caused this actually, neither why LaTeX complains. Is it the \par? Yes. I have not tested (and unfortunately no

Re: New version 2.1.3

On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 5:41 PM, Scott Kostyshak skost...@lyx.org wrote: On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 5:27 PM, Patrick Dupre pdu...@gmx.com wrote: Actually, it is due to the sub figure. In the previous version it was OK. Thanks for the MWE. I confirm that for LyX 2.1.0 the compilation succeeds on

Re: New version 2.1.3

Le 09/03/2015 14:33, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : 47c47 \protect\caption{{\small{}Enlargemen}} --- \protect\caption{{\small{}Enlargemen}{\small \par}} This seems to be related to http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/9421. However that bug is fixed in master but I still cannot compile the file on

Re: New version 2.1.3

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes lasgout...@lyx.org wrote: I checked that the \protect bug is fixed, but now we have to deal with another one, seen above in the caption. I do not know what caused this actually, neither why LaTeX complains. Is it the \par? Yes. I have not tested (and unfortunately no

Re: New version 2.1.3

On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 5:41 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 5:27 PM, Patrick Dupre wrote: >> Actually, it is due to the sub figure. >> In the previous version it was OK. > > Thanks for the MWE. I confirm that for LyX 2.1.0 the compilation >

Re: New version 2.1.3

Le 09/03/2015 14:33, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : 47c47 < \protect\caption{{\small{}Enlargemen}} --- \protect\caption{{\small{}Enlargemen}{\small \par}} This seems to be related to http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/9421. However that bug is fixed in master but I still cannot compile the file on

Re: New version 2.1.3

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > I checked that the \protect bug is fixed, but now we have to deal with > another one, seen above in the caption. I do not know what caused this > actually, neither why LaTeX complains. Is it the \par? > Yes. I have not tested (and unfortunately

New version 2.1.3

Hello With the new version of lyx I get a compilation error when I try to change the font size (eg small) in the caption of a figure: Runaway argument? {{\small {}Enlargements of the absorption spectrum around the dissoci\ETC. ! Paragraph ended before \NR@gettitle was complete. to be read again

Re: New version 2.1.3

On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 5:07 PM, Patrick Dupre pdu...@gmx.com wrote: Hello With the new version of lyx I get a compilation error when I try to change the font size (eg small) in the caption of a figure: Hi Patrick, Could you please send a minimal example (http://wiki.lyx.org/FAQ

Re: New version 2.1.3

From: Scott Kostyshak skost...@lyx.org To: Patrick Dupre pdu...@gmx.com Cc: lyx lyx-users@lists.lyx.org Subject: Re: New version 2.1.3 On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 5:07 PM, Patrick Dupre pdu...@gmx.com wrote: Hello With the new version of lyx I get a compilation error when I try to change

Re: New version 2.1.3

On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 5:27 PM, Patrick Dupre pdu...@gmx.com wrote: Actually, it is due to the sub figure. In the previous version it was OK. Thanks for the MWE. I confirm that for LyX 2.1.0 the compilation succeeds on tmp.lyx, but for 2.1.3 the compilation fails. The diff between the LaTeX

New version 2.1.3

Hello With the new version of lyx I get a compilation error when I try to change the font size (eg small) in the caption of a figure: Runaway argument? {{\small {}Enlargements of the absorption spectrum around the dissoci\ETC. ! Paragraph ended before \NR@gettitle was complete. to be read again

Re: New version 2.1.3

On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 5:07 PM, Patrick Dupre pdu...@gmx.com wrote: Hello With the new version of lyx I get a compilation error when I try to change the font size (eg small) in the caption of a figure: Hi Patrick, Could you please send a minimal example (http://wiki.lyx.org/FAQ

Re: New version 2.1.3

From: Scott Kostyshak skost...@lyx.org To: Patrick Dupre pdu...@gmx.com Cc: lyx lyx-users@lists.lyx.org Subject: Re: New version 2.1.3 On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 5:07 PM, Patrick Dupre pdu...@gmx.com wrote: Hello With the new version of lyx I get a compilation error when I try to change

Re: New version 2.1.3

On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 5:27 PM, Patrick Dupre pdu...@gmx.com wrote: Actually, it is due to the sub figure. In the previous version it was OK. Thanks for the MWE. I confirm that for LyX 2.1.0 the compilation succeeds on tmp.lyx, but for 2.1.3 the compilation fails. The diff between the LaTeX

New version 2.1.3

Hello With the new version of lyx I get a compilation error when I try to change the font size (eg small) in the caption of a figure: Runaway argument? {{\small {}Enlargements of the absorption spectrum around the dissoci\ETC. ! Paragraph ended before \NR@gettitle was complete

Re: New version 2.1.3

On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 5:07 PM, Patrick Dupre <pdu...@gmx.com> wrote: > Hello > > With the new version of lyx I get a compilation error > when I try to change the font size (eg small) in the caption of > a figure: Hi Patrick, Could you please send a minimal example (ht

Re: New version 2.1.3

PM > From: "Scott Kostyshak" <skost...@lyx.org> > To: "Patrick Dupre" <pdu...@gmx.com> > Cc: lyx <lyx-users@lists.lyx.org> > Subject: Re: New version 2.1.3 > > On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 5:07 PM, Patrick Dupre <pdu...@gmx.com> wrote: > &

Re: New version 2.1.3

On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 5:27 PM, Patrick Dupre wrote: > Actually, it is due to the sub figure. > In the previous version it was OK. Thanks for the MWE. I confirm that for LyX 2.1.0 the compilation succeeds on tmp.lyx, but for 2.1.3 the compilation fails. The diff between the

Re: new version

2014-05-14 21:18 GMT+02:00 Patrick Dupre pdu...@gmx.com: I am attaching a log file because I get errors due to the use of the fourier font. It looks like it is not a lyx issue but a texlive issue. Both have been upgraded with fedora 20. Would you have an idea? Not really. Here is an

Re: new version

2014-05-14 21:18 GMT+02:00 Patrick Dupre pdu...@gmx.com: I am attaching a log file because I get errors due to the use of the fourier font. It looks like it is not a lyx issue but a texlive issue. Both have been upgraded with fedora 20. Would you have an idea? Not really. Here is an

Re: new version

2014-05-14 21:18 GMT+02:00 Patrick Dupre : > I am attaching a log file because I get errors due to the use of the > fourier font. It looks like it is not a lyx issue but a texlive issue. > Both have been upgraded with fedora 20. > Would you have an idea? > Not really. Here is an

new version

Hello, I have a document written with lyx 2.0.7. Now when I load it I get: Layout BeginPlainFrame was not found. I use Beamer package thank. === Patrick DUPRÉ                                 | | email: pdu...@gmx.com

Re: new version

2014-05-14 18:12 GMT+02:00 Patrick Dupre: Can you share this document? See attached file. This is a very strange corner case. The reason why this fails to convert is the empty paragraph at the end of the document. Remove it (in LyX 2.0.x), and the plain frame imports correctly. Actually,

new version

Hello, I have a document written with lyx 2.0.7. Now when I load it I get: Layout BeginPlainFrame was not found. I use Beamer package thank. === Patrick DUPRÉ                                 | | email: pdu...@gmx.com

Re: new version

2014-05-14 18:12 GMT+02:00 Patrick Dupre: Can you share this document? See attached file. This is a very strange corner case. The reason why this fails to convert is the empty paragraph at the end of the document. Remove it (in LyX 2.0.x), and the plain frame imports correctly. Actually,

new version

Hello, I have a document written with lyx 2.0.7. Now when I load it I get: Layout "BeginPlainFrame" was not found. I use Beamer package thank. === Patrick DUPRÉ                                 | | email: pdu...@gmx.com

Re: new version

2014-05-14 18:12 GMT+02:00 Patrick Dupre: > > Can you share this document? > See attached file. > This is a very strange corner case. The reason why this fails to convert is the empty paragraph at the end of the document. Remove it (in LyX 2.0.x), and the plain frame imports correctly. Actually,

LyX: Saves edited version of document as a new version (new file) ?

Hello fellow LyXers, I wonder if LyX can save documents that have been edited as a new (updated) version of the same file ? For instance, say I have a document called newdoc.lyx I am now editing it; I save the changes/modifications i made the file is saved as a new one called, say, newdoc2.lyx

Re: LyX: Saves edited version of document as a new version (new file) ?

On 03/25/11 14:54, BOB Merhebi wrote: Hello fellow LyXers, I wonder if LyX can save documents that have been edited as a new (updated) version of the same file ? I guess I don't understand. Using Save As you can save it incrementally with any name you please. I do this all the time. But,

Re: LyX: Saves edited version of document as a new version (new file) ?

On 03/25/2011 09:44 PM, David L. Johnson wrote: On 03/25/11 14:54, BOB Merhebi wrote: Hello fellow LyXers, I wonder if LyX can save documents that have been edited as a new (updated) version of the same file ? I guess I don't understand. Using Save As you can save it incrementally with

SV: LyX: Saves edited version of document as a new version (new file) ?

Maybe what you really want to enable is something on the order of version control, or change tracking. I believe this is a possible solution; all I need is being able to revise the document for the latest if not all the editing that occurred, particularly in the case that the undo feature is no

Re: LyX: Saves edited version of document as a new version (new file) ?

On 25/03/2011 4:02 PM, BOB Merhebi wrote: I believe this is a possible solution; all I need is being able to revise the document for the latest if not all the editing that occurred, particularly in the case that the undo feature is no more applicable like when lyx is closed. Use change

Re: LyX: Saves edited version of document as a new version (new file) ?

On 03/25/2011 10:26 PM, Ingar Pareliussen wrote: Maybe what you really want to enable is something on the order of version control, or change tracking. I believe this is a possible solution; all I need is being able to revise the document for the latest if not all the editing that occurred,

Re: LyX: Saves edited version of document as a new version (new file) ?

On 25/03/2011 5:06 PM, BOB Merhebi wrote: that's what i just did :D will see how that goes; but from your experience, does the tracking stay there even when i quite the document reopen it ? Yes that's right, it keeps track of changes until someone accepts them. Also between sessions. And

LyX: Saves edited version of document as a new version (new file) ?

Hello fellow LyXers, I wonder if LyX can save documents that have been edited as a new (updated) version of the same file ? For instance, say I have a document called newdoc.lyx I am now editing it; I save the changes/modifications i made the file is saved as a new one called, say, newdoc2.lyx

Re: LyX: Saves edited version of document as a new version (new file) ?

On 03/25/11 14:54, BOB Merhebi wrote: Hello fellow LyXers, I wonder if LyX can save documents that have been edited as a new (updated) version of the same file ? I guess I don't understand. Using Save As you can save it incrementally with any name you please. I do this all the time. But,

Re: LyX: Saves edited version of document as a new version (new file) ?

On 03/25/2011 09:44 PM, David L. Johnson wrote: On 03/25/11 14:54, BOB Merhebi wrote: Hello fellow LyXers, I wonder if LyX can save documents that have been edited as a new (updated) version of the same file ? I guess I don't understand. Using Save As you can save it incrementally with

SV: LyX: Saves edited version of document as a new version (new file) ?

Maybe what you really want to enable is something on the order of version control, or change tracking. I believe this is a possible solution; all I need is being able to revise the document for the latest if not all the editing that occurred, particularly in the case that the undo feature is no

Re: LyX: Saves edited version of document as a new version (new file) ?

On 25/03/2011 4:02 PM, BOB Merhebi wrote: I believe this is a possible solution; all I need is being able to revise the document for the latest if not all the editing that occurred, particularly in the case that the undo feature is no more applicable like when lyx is closed. Use change

Re: LyX: Saves edited version of document as a new version (new file) ?

On 03/25/2011 10:26 PM, Ingar Pareliussen wrote: Maybe what you really want to enable is something on the order of version control, or change tracking. I believe this is a possible solution; all I need is being able to revise the document for the latest if not all the editing that occurred,

Re: LyX: Saves edited version of document as a new version (new file) ?

On 25/03/2011 5:06 PM, BOB Merhebi wrote: that's what i just did :D will see how that goes; but from your experience, does the tracking stay there even when i quite the document reopen it ? Yes that's right, it keeps track of changes until someone accepts them. Also between sessions. And

LyX: Saves edited version of document as a new version (new file) ?

Hello fellow LyXers, I wonder if LyX can save documents that have been edited as a new (updated) version of the same file ? For instance, say I have a document called newdoc.lyx & I am now editing it; I save the changes/modifications i made & the file is saved as a new one called, say,

Re: LyX: Saves edited version of document as a new version (new file) ?

On 03/25/11 14:54, BOB Merhebi wrote: Hello fellow LyXers, I wonder if LyX can save documents that have been edited as a new (updated) version of the same file ? I guess I don't understand. Using "Save As" you can save it incrementally with any name you please. I do this all the time.

Re: LyX: Saves edited version of document as a new version (new file) ?

On 03/25/2011 09:44 PM, David L. Johnson wrote: > On 03/25/11 14:54, BOB Merhebi wrote: >> Hello fellow LyXers, >> >> I wonder if LyX can save documents that have been edited as a new >> (updated) version of the same file ? > > I guess I don't understand. Using "Save As" you can save it >

SV: LyX: Saves edited version of document as a new version (new file) ?

>> Maybe what you really want to enable is something on the order of >> version control, or change tracking. > >I believe this is a possible solution; all I need is being able to >revise the document for the latest if not all the editing that occurred, >particularly in the case that the "undo"

Re: LyX: Saves edited version of document as a new version (new file) ?

On 25/03/2011 4:02 PM, BOB Merhebi wrote: I believe this is a possible solution; all I need is being able to revise the document for the latest if not all the editing that occurred, particularly in the case that the "undo" feature is no more applicable like when lyx is closed. Use change

Re: LyX: Saves edited version of document as a new version (new file) ?

On 03/25/2011 10:26 PM, Ingar Pareliussen wrote: >>> Maybe what you really want to enable is something on the order of >>> version control, or change tracking. >> I believe this is a possible solution; all I need is being able to >> revise the document for the latest if not all the editing that

Re: LyX: Saves edited version of document as a new version (new file) ?

On 25/03/2011 5:06 PM, BOB Merhebi wrote: that's what i just did :D will see how that goes; but from your experience, does the tracking stay there even when i quite the document & reopen it ? Yes that's right, it keeps track of changes until someone "accepts" them. Also between sessions.

Re: New version question

On Tuesday 08 March 2011 03:55:24 David L. Johnson wrote: Hi folks. It has been a while since I have been on this list, but I thought I'd ask about something I noticed in the last upgrade I made. FWIW is nice to see you around here again. :-) Regards, -- José Abílio

Re: New version question

On Tuesday 08 March 2011 03:55:24 David L. Johnson wrote: Hi folks. It has been a while since I have been on this list, but I thought I'd ask about something I noticed in the last upgrade I made. FWIW is nice to see you around here again. :-) Regards, -- José Abílio

Re: New version question

On Tuesday 08 March 2011 03:55:24 David L. Johnson wrote: > Hi folks. It has been a while since I have been on this list, but I > thought I'd ask about something I noticed in the last upgrade I made. FWIW is nice to see you around here again. :-) Regards, -- José Abílio

Re: New version question

David L. Johnson wrote: So, why was this change made? Can I set some preference to un-make it? I don't really want to downgrade, if I can avoid it. LyX is my default program for writing just about everything. http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/7266 pavel

Re: New version question

David L. Johnson wrote: So, why was this change made? Can I set some preference to un-make it? I don't really want to downgrade, if I can avoid it. LyX is my default program for writing just about everything. http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/7266 pavel

Re: New version question

David L. Johnson wrote: > So, why was this change made? Can I set some preference to un-make it? I > don't really want to downgrade, if I can avoid it. LyX is my default > program for writing just about everything. http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/7266 pavel

New version question

Hi folks. It has been a while since I have been on this list, but I thought I'd ask about something I noticed in the last upgrade I made. I am currently using 2.0.0beta4, which came to me with my latest upgrade of debian testing. I have been using both Lyx and debian testing for aeons.

New version question

Hi folks. It has been a while since I have been on this list, but I thought I'd ask about something I noticed in the last upgrade I made. I am currently using 2.0.0beta4, which came to me with my latest upgrade of debian testing. I have been using both Lyx and debian testing for aeons.

New version question

Hi folks. It has been a while since I have been on this list, but I thought I'd ask about something I noticed in the last upgrade I made. I am currently using 2.0.0beta4, which came to me with my latest upgrade of debian testing. I have been using both Lyx and debian testing for aeons.

Re: Problems with new version

On 11/14/2010 09:35 AM, Markus Kossner wrote: Dear Lyx users, I have a strange problem when using a newer version of Lyx. Here's my problem: I have written my thesis using Lyx 1.6.2. Now I have a new computer running Lyx 1.6.7. Both computers had Ubuntu linux running. Now the lyx file can be

Re: Problems with new version

On 11/14/2010 09:35 AM, Markus Kossner wrote: Dear Lyx users, I have a strange problem when using a newer version of Lyx. Here's my problem: I have written my thesis using Lyx 1.6.2. Now I have a new computer running Lyx 1.6.7. Both computers had Ubuntu linux running. Now the lyx file can be

Re: Problems with new version

On 11/14/2010 09:35 AM, Markus Kossner wrote: Dear Lyx users, I have a strange problem when using a newer version of Lyx. Here's my problem: I have written my thesis using Lyx 1.6.2. Now I have a new computer running Lyx 1.6.7. Both computers had Ubuntu linux running. Now the lyx file can be

Problems with new version

Dear Lyx users, I have a strange problem when using a newer version of Lyx. Here's my problem: I have written my thesis using Lyx 1.6.2. Now I have a new computer running Lyx 1.6.7. Both computers had Ubuntu linux running. Now the lyx file can be opened and compiled to pdf on the old computer

Re: Problems with new version

I would compare what you have installed between machines for 'texlive' as a search term in synaptic as a starting point. On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 9:35 AM, Markus Kossner m.koss...@googlemail.comwrote: Dear Lyx users, I have a strange problem when using a newer version of Lyx. Here's my

Problems with new version

Dear Lyx users, I have a strange problem when using a newer version of Lyx. Here's my problem: I have written my thesis using Lyx 1.6.2. Now I have a new computer running Lyx 1.6.7. Both computers had Ubuntu linux running. Now the lyx file can be opened and compiled to pdf on the old computer

Re: Problems with new version

I would compare what you have installed between machines for 'texlive' as a search term in synaptic as a starting point. On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 9:35 AM, Markus Kossner m.koss...@googlemail.comwrote: Dear Lyx users, I have a strange problem when using a newer version of Lyx. Here's my

Problems with new version

Dear Lyx users, I have a strange problem when using a newer version of Lyx. Here's my problem: I have written my thesis using Lyx 1.6.2. Now I have a new computer running Lyx 1.6.7. Both computers had Ubuntu linux running. Now the lyx file can be opened and compiled to pdf on the old computer

Re: Problems with new version

I would compare what you have installed between machines for 'texlive' as a search term in synaptic as a starting point. On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 9:35 AM, Markus Kossner wrote: > Dear Lyx users, > I have a strange problem when using a newer version of Lyx. Here's my >

Retaining old file structure when editing in new version?

One of the reasons I'm going for LyX is the greater cross-compatbility between my Windows desktop and Linux laptop. However the newest versions available for each system are different - 1.6.1 on Windows and 1.4.3 on the EeePC. Perhaps unsurprisingly, a file saved in 1.6.1 won't open in 1.4.3. Is

Re: Retaining old file structure when editing in new version?

Try File Export Lyx 1.4.x Hope it helps Siegfried

Re: Retaining old file structure when editing in new version?

David Russell schrieb: One of the reasons I'm going for LyX is the greater cross-compatbility between my Windows desktop and Linux laptop. However the newest versions available for each system are different - 1.6.1 on Windows and 1.4.3 on the EeePC. EeePC's OS is Linux so it should be

Retaining old file structure when editing in new version?

One of the reasons I'm going for LyX is the greater cross-compatbility between my Windows desktop and Linux laptop. However the newest versions available for each system are different - 1.6.1 on Windows and 1.4.3 on the EeePC. Perhaps unsurprisingly, a file saved in 1.6.1 won't open in 1.4.3. Is

Re: Retaining old file structure when editing in new version?

Try File Export Lyx 1.4.x Hope it helps Siegfried

Re: Retaining old file structure when editing in new version?

David Russell schrieb: One of the reasons I'm going for LyX is the greater cross-compatbility between my Windows desktop and Linux laptop. However the newest versions available for each system are different - 1.6.1 on Windows and 1.4.3 on the EeePC. EeePC's OS is Linux so it should be

Retaining old file structure when editing in new version?

One of the reasons I'm going for LyX is the greater cross-compatbility between my Windows desktop and Linux laptop. However the newest versions available for each system are different - 1.6.1 on Windows and 1.4.3 on the EeePC. Perhaps unsurprisingly, a file saved in 1.6.1 won't open in 1.4.3. Is

Re: Retaining old file structure when editing in new version?

Try File > Export > Lyx 1.4.x Hope it helps Siegfried

Re: Retaining old file structure when editing in new version?

David Russell schrieb: One of the reasons I'm going for LyX is the greater cross-compatbility between my Windows desktop and Linux laptop. However the newest versions available for each system are different - 1.6.1 on Windows and 1.4.3 on the EeePC. EeePC's OS is Linux so it should be

Re: problem new version of LyX

Margaret Wojcicki wrote: Hi, I have been using the previous version of LyX (1.3.6) up until recently when LyX 1.4.4 was installed. I am running into some issues that I did not have before when getting a PDF (or any other type of file) from the source. The document is made up of a master

RE: problem new version of LyX

Margaret Wojcicki wrote: Hi, I have been using the previous version of LyX (1.3.6) up until recently when LyX 1.4.4 was installed. I am running into some issues that I did not have before when getting a PDF (or any other type of file) from the source. The document is made up of a master

Re: problem new version of LyX

Margaret Wojcicki wrote: Hi, I have been using the previous version of LyX (1.3.6) up until recently when LyX 1.4.4 was installed. I am running into some issues that I did not have before when getting a PDF (or any other type of file) from the source. The document is made up of a master

RE: problem new version of LyX

Margaret Wojcicki wrote: Hi, I have been using the previous version of LyX (1.3.6) up until recently when LyX 1.4.4 was installed. I am running into some issues that I did not have before when getting a PDF (or any other type of file) from the source. The document is made up of a master

Re: problem new version of LyX

Margaret Wojcicki wrote: Hi, I have been using the previous version of LyX (1.3.6) up until recently when LyX 1.4.4 was installed. I am running into some issues that I did not have before when getting a PDF (or any other type of file) from the source. The document is made up of a master

RE: problem new version of LyX

> >Margaret Wojcicki wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I have been using the previous version of LyX (1.3.6) up until recently >when >> LyX 1.4.4 was installed. I am running into some issues that I did not >have >> before when getting a PDF (or any other type of file) from the source. >The >> document is made

problem new version of LyX

Hi, I have been using the previous version of LyX (1.3.6) up until recently when LyX 1.4.4 was installed. I am running into some issues that I did not have before when getting a PDF (or any other type of file) from the source. The document is made up of a master document and chapter documents

problem new version of LyX

Hi, I have been using the previous version of LyX (1.3.6) up until recently when LyX 1.4.4 was installed. I am running into some issues that I did not have before when getting a PDF (or any other type of file) from the source. The document is made up of a master document and chapter documents

problem new version of LyX

Hi, I have been using the previous version of LyX (1.3.6) up until recently when LyX 1.4.4 was installed. I am running into some issues that I did not have before when getting a PDF (or any other type of file) from the source. The document is made up of a master document and chapter documents

Re: The new version

Patrick == Patrick Dupre [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Patrick Hello, I experience at least 2 problems with the new version: Patrick I cannot tape: \sqrt for example in a formula What do you mean? Patrick My old text have \rm in the formula, this non-slanted mode Patrick does not appear any more

Re: The new version

Patrick == Patrick Dupre [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Patrick Hello, I experience at least 2 problems with the new version: Patrick I cannot tape: \sqrt for example in a formula What do you mean? Patrick My old text have \rm in the formula, this non-slanted mode Patrick does not appear any more

Re: The new version

>>>>> "Patrick" == Patrick Dupre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Patrick> Hello, I experience at least 2 problems with the new version: Patrick> I cannot tape: \sqrt for example in a formula What do you mean? Patrick> My old text have \rm in the form

[announce] new version of the LyX installer for Windows

Hello LyXers, under http://developer.berlios.de/project/showfiles.php?group_id=5117release_id=9016 you find a new LyX installer for Windows version 1.1 that still comes with LyX 1.3.7 but with many changes behind the scenes and some bug fixes. To learn more about the LyX installer for

  1   2   >