Re: sorting behavior on references [feature implementation candidate]

2009-02-12 Thread Abdelrazak Younes
Manoj Rajagopalan wrote: I just wrote the case-insensitive sort feature and tested it against the latest SVN snapshot. I have included a Sort (no case) checkbox adjacent to the Sort checkbox in the insert-reference dialog. Also, my logic ensures that while both can be switched off, the

Re: sorting behavior on references [feature implementation candidate]

2009-02-12 Thread Abdelrazak Younes
Manoj Rajagopalan wrote: I just wrote the case-insensitive sort feature and tested it against the latest SVN snapshot. I have included a Sort (no case) checkbox adjacent to the Sort checkbox in the insert-reference dialog. Also, my logic ensures that while both can be switched off, the

Re: sorting behavior on references [feature implementation candidate]

2009-02-12 Thread Abdelrazak Younes
Manoj Rajagopalan wrote: I just wrote the case-insensitive sort feature and tested it against the latest SVN snapshot. I have included a "Sort ( case)" checkbox adjacent to the "" checkbox in the insert-reference dialog. Also, my logic ensures that while both can be switched off, the on-states

sorting behavior on references

2009-02-11 Thread Manoj Rajagopalan
Hi lyx users, When cross-referencing I find the 'sort' feature useful but it currently sorts case-sensitively which places all upper case letters before all lower case letters. This means labels with the same letters that differ only in case must be looked for in two different places. I

Re: sorting behavior on references [feature implementation candidate]

2009-02-11 Thread Manoj Rajagopalan
I just wrote the case-insensitive sort feature and tested it against the latest SVN snapshot. I have included a Sort (no case) checkbox adjacent to the Sort checkbox in the insert-reference dialog. Also, my logic ensures that while both can be switched off, the on-states are mutually

sorting behavior on references

2009-02-11 Thread Manoj Rajagopalan
Hi lyx users, When cross-referencing I find the 'sort' feature useful but it currently sorts case-sensitively which places all upper case letters before all lower case letters. This means labels with the same letters that differ only in case must be looked for in two different places. I

Re: sorting behavior on references [feature implementation candidate]

2009-02-11 Thread Manoj Rajagopalan
I just wrote the case-insensitive sort feature and tested it against the latest SVN snapshot. I have included a Sort (no case) checkbox adjacent to the Sort checkbox in the insert-reference dialog. Also, my logic ensures that while both can be switched off, the on-states are mutually

sorting behavior on references

2009-02-11 Thread Manoj Rajagopalan
Hi lyx users, When cross-referencing I find the 'sort' feature useful but it currently sorts case-sensitively which places all upper case letters before all lower case letters. This means labels with the same letters that differ only in case must be looked for in two different places. I

Re: sorting behavior on references [feature implementation candidate]

2009-02-11 Thread Manoj Rajagopalan
I just wrote the case-insensitive sort feature and tested it against the latest SVN snapshot. I have included a "Sort ( case)" checkbox adjacent to the "" checkbox in the insert-reference dialog. Also, my logic ensures that while both can be switched off, the on-states are mutually exclusive.