Re: tetex - texlive

2011-07-20 Thread Rudi Gaelzer
I've been using the texlive 2010 repository since Fedora 14 and had no greater problem than having to manually install/replace some individual packages, depending on the classes/modules employed by the document. The transition F14 - F15 was also uneventful. On Sunday, July 17, 2011 02:02:10

Re: tetex - texlive

2011-07-20 Thread Rich Shepard
On Wed, 20 Jul 2011, Rudi Gaelzer wrote: I've been using the texlive 2010 repository since Fedora 14 and had no greater problem than having to manually install/replace some individual packages, depending on the classes/modules employed by the document. The transition F14 - F15 was also

Re: tetex - texlive

2011-07-20 Thread Rudi Gaelzer
I've been using the texlive 2010 repository since Fedora 14 and had no greater problem than having to manually install/replace some individual packages, depending on the classes/modules employed by the document. The transition F14 - F15 was also uneventful. On Sunday, July 17, 2011 02:02:10

Re: tetex - texlive

2011-07-20 Thread Rich Shepard
On Wed, 20 Jul 2011, Rudi Gaelzer wrote: I've been using the texlive 2010 repository since Fedora 14 and had no greater problem than having to manually install/replace some individual packages, depending on the classes/modules employed by the document. The transition F14 - F15 was also

Re: tetex -> texlive

2011-07-20 Thread Rudi Gaelzer
I've been using the texlive 2010 repository since Fedora 14 and had no greater problem than having to manually install/replace some individual packages, depending on the classes/modules employed by the document. The transition F14 -> F15 was also uneventful. On Sunday, July 17, 2011 02:02:10

Re: tetex -> texlive

2011-07-20 Thread Rich Shepard
On Wed, 20 Jul 2011, Rudi Gaelzer wrote: I've been using the texlive 2010 repository since Fedora 14 and had no greater problem than having to manually install/replace some individual packages, depending on the classes/modules employed by the document. The transition F14 -> F15 was also

tetex - texlive

2011-07-17 Thread Rich Shepard
I've just replaced the tetex I've used for years with texlive-20100722. LyX fires right up. What I want to know is if there are potential gotcha's due to the transition. I expect not, but I'd like to be sure before I hit one during a critical event (such as a deadline to produce a document).

Re: tetex - texlive

2011-07-17 Thread David L. Johnson
On 07/17/2011 01:02 PM, Rich Shepard wrote: I've just replaced the tetex I've used for years with texlive-20100722. LyX fires right up. What I want to know is if there are potential gotcha's due to the transition. I expect not, but I'd like to be sure before I hit one during a critical event

Re: tetex - texlive

2011-07-17 Thread Rich Shepard
On Sun, 17 Jul 2011, David L. Johnson wrote: I did that transition some time ago, since AFAIK tetex is no longer supported, and texlive is. I do not recall any problems with the transition. David, Yes, Thomas dropped support for tetex last year. Since it worked for me I saw no need to

tetex - texlive

2011-07-17 Thread Rich Shepard
I've just replaced the tetex I've used for years with texlive-20100722. LyX fires right up. What I want to know is if there are potential gotcha's due to the transition. I expect not, but I'd like to be sure before I hit one during a critical event (such as a deadline to produce a document).

Re: tetex - texlive

2011-07-17 Thread David L. Johnson
On 07/17/2011 01:02 PM, Rich Shepard wrote: I've just replaced the tetex I've used for years with texlive-20100722. LyX fires right up. What I want to know is if there are potential gotcha's due to the transition. I expect not, but I'd like to be sure before I hit one during a critical event

Re: tetex - texlive

2011-07-17 Thread Rich Shepard
On Sun, 17 Jul 2011, David L. Johnson wrote: I did that transition some time ago, since AFAIK tetex is no longer supported, and texlive is. I do not recall any problems with the transition. David, Yes, Thomas dropped support for tetex last year. Since it worked for me I saw no need to

tetex -> texlive

2011-07-17 Thread Rich Shepard
I've just replaced the tetex I've used for years with texlive-20100722. LyX fires right up. What I want to know is if there are potential gotcha's due to the transition. I expect not, but I'd like to be sure before I hit one during a critical event (such as a deadline to produce a document).

Re: tetex -> texlive

2011-07-17 Thread David L. Johnson
On 07/17/2011 01:02 PM, Rich Shepard wrote: I've just replaced the tetex I've used for years with texlive-20100722. LyX fires right up. What I want to know is if there are potential gotcha's due to the transition. I expect not, but I'd like to be sure before I hit one during a critical event

Re: tetex -> texlive

2011-07-17 Thread Rich Shepard
On Sun, 17 Jul 2011, David L. Johnson wrote: I did that transition some time ago, since AFAIK tetex is no longer supported, and texlive is. I do not recall any problems with the transition. David, Yes, Thomas dropped support for tetex last year. Since it worked for me I saw no need to