Right. I deeply question that logic though. The fact that a corrupted save
bug was fixed is sort of a game changer from a usability perspective. I
mean, if it wasn't well known, well documented, or fixed, I might say that
it makes sense but as it stands, releasing code that has a known
On 07/04/2015 04:09 PM, Benedict Holland wrote:
Right. I deeply question that logic though. The fact that a corrupted
save bug was fixed is sort of a game changer from a usability
perspective. I mean, if it wasn't well known, well documented, or
fixed, I might say that it makes sense but as it
Am 02.07.2015 um 18:49 schrieb hatim ali:
Dear Uwe
- i updated arabic po file.
- small Questions:
chapter title from left to right, i want to make the text from rtl.
please see the attachment file.
Hi Hatim,
you found a regression bug in LyX 2.2dev. Could you please report it in
our bug
Am 02.07.2015 um 18:49 schrieb hatim ali:
Dear Uwe
- i updated arabic po file.
- small Questions:
chapter title from left to right, i want to make the text from rtl.
please see the attachment file.
Hi Hatim,
you found a regression bug in LyX 2.2dev. Could you please report it in
our bug
Right. I deeply question that logic though. The fact that a corrupted save
bug was fixed is sort of a game changer from a usability perspective. I
mean, if it wasn't well known, well documented, or fixed, I might say that
it makes sense but as it stands, releasing code that has a known
On 07/04/2015 04:09 PM, Benedict Holland wrote:
Right. I deeply question that logic though. The fact that a corrupted
save bug was fixed is sort of a game changer from a usability
perspective. I mean, if it wasn't well known, well documented, or
fixed, I might say that it makes sense but as it
Am 02.07.2015 um 18:49 schrieb hatim ali:
Dear Uwe
- i updated arabic po file.
- small Questions:
chapter title from left to right, i want to make the text from rtl.
please see the attachment file.
Hi Hatim,
you found a regression bug in LyX 2.2dev. Could you please report it in
our bug
Right. I deeply question that logic though. The fact that a corrupted save
bug was fixed is sort of a game changer from a usability perspective. I
mean, if it wasn't well known, well documented, or fixed, I might say that
it makes sense but as it stands, releasing code that has a known
On 07/04/2015 04:09 PM, Benedict Holland wrote:
Right. I deeply question that logic though. The fact that a corrupted
save bug was fixed is sort of a game changer from a usability
perspective. I mean, if it wasn't well known, well documented, or
fixed, I might say that it makes sense but as it
