christiaan johannes pauw wrote:
Before I selected use natbib the citation style was something like
[Barth(1948), 40]. Now it is (Barth, 1948, 40). What I would like is
(Barth 1948:40). Is there something I can do to change the .bst file or
use something else to achieve that?
have a look at
Kevin Pfeiffer wrote:
What about a situation such as this: Fig. 26? To my eye, the interword
space behind the abbreviating period seems too wide. Should this be a
thin space instead?
It should be an unbreakable space in any case (that is, thinspace or protected
space ~). I use protected
Mike Meyer wrote:
2) I know this has to have been discussed to death - probably
repeatedly - but I couldn't seem to find the right query to tickle
google or the list archives into kicking it up. Could someone
provide a pointer to a rational for going with a single window
instead
On 9/10/05, Peter Flynn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just tried to install Lyx from the 1.3.6-1 RPMs.
It can't find the commands kpsewhich and texhash, which is weird
because they are both in the global path. The TeX is a new full
install from the
TeX Collection DVD.
How do I get
- Original Message -
From: Peter Flynn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
Sent: Friday, September 09, 2005 5:23 PM
Subject: Re: Problems installing 1.3.6-1 RPMs
Paul A. Rubin wrote:
Peter Flynn wrote:
I just tried to install Lyx from the 1.3.6-1 RPMs.
At the moment
- Original Message -
From: Peter Flynn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
Sent: Friday, September 09, 2005 5:23 PM
Subject: Re: Problems installing 1.3.6-1 RPMs
Paul A. Rubin wrote:
Peter Flynn wrote:
I just tried to install Lyx from the 1.3.6-1 RPMs.
At the moment
On 9/10/05, Peter Flynn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is anyone out there using LyX on FC4?
I am using LyX on FC4 with no problem. The way I installed it was:
1. copied my own .lyx directory into my home directory;
2. yum install lyx.
Excellent! Never used yum before, so here goes. I
Paul Smith wrote:
2. yum install lyx.
Aaaaggghhh! *Never*, never, never do this if you already have TeX.
Especially not if you have already carefully removed the outdated mess
that is the RH kludge of tetex, and replaced it with the real tetex from
the TeX Collection DVD.
yum fails to
Paul A. Rubin wrote:
Sorry, my wording was fuzzy. I don't have a working Linux box handy
these days, but I assume that LyX runs with the permissions of whatever
user is logged in. So if you can run latex directly, presumably when
you run the LyX configure script it has the same permissions.
- Original Message -
From: Peter Flynn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
Sent: Saturday, September 10, 2005 10:57 AM
Subject: Re: Problems installing 1.3.6-1 RPMs
Paul Smith wrote:
[me]
Is anyone out there using LyX on FC4?
I am using LyX on FC4 with no problem. The
- Original Message -
From: Peter Flynn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
Sent: Saturday, September 10, 2005 11:34 AM
Subject: Re: Problems installing 1.3.6-1 RPMs
Thanks for all your help...it's working, and all I wanted to do was
screenshot it and document the
Stephen P. Harris wrote:
[me]
Previously: No matter, all is now serene.
Oh, how nice. I suppose you were able to get a good screenshot of LyX
-- View -- Tex Information -- Latex classes (*.cls) which displayed a
partial list of your installed classes?
It displayed the whole lot, including
- Original Message -
From: Peter Flynn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
Sent: Saturday, September 10, 2005 2:28 PM
Subject: Re: Problems installing 1.3.6-1 RPMs
The Windows installation is easy,
We shall see. I'll be installing it under XP/SP2 on a system with the
Based on discussion regarding the configuration process on lyx-devel,
I started working on a generic file opener for Unix, ala open on
OS X and start on Windows. A first release is ready. I've tested it
on a number of different things, including using it to launch all my
viewers from LyX.
You can
_/ On Sun 11 Sep 2005 01:14:55 BST, [Mike Meyer] wrote : \_
Based on discussion regarding the configuration process on lyx-devel,
I started working on a generic file opener for Unix, ala open on
OS X and start on Windows. A first release is ready. I've tested it
on a number of different
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Roy Schestowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed:
_/ On Sun 11 Sep 2005 01:14:55 BST, [Mike Meyer] wrote : \_
Based on discussion regarding the configuration process on lyx-devel,
I started working on a generic file opener for Unix, ala open on
OS X and start on
christiaan johannes pauw wrote:
Before I selected use natbib the citation style was something like
[Barth(1948), 40]. Now it is (Barth, 1948, 40). What I would like is
(Barth 1948:40). Is there something I can do to change the .bst file or
use something else to achieve that?
have a look at
Kevin Pfeiffer wrote:
What about a situation such as this: Fig. 26? To my eye, the interword
space behind the abbreviating period seems too wide. Should this be a
thin space instead?
It should be an unbreakable space in any case (that is, thinspace or protected
space ~). I use protected
Mike Meyer wrote:
2) I know this has to have been discussed to death - probably
repeatedly - but I couldn't seem to find the right query to tickle
google or the list archives into kicking it up. Could someone
provide a pointer to a rational for going with a single window
instead
On 9/10/05, Peter Flynn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just tried to install Lyx from the 1.3.6-1 RPMs.
It can't find the commands kpsewhich and texhash, which is weird
because they are both in the global path. The TeX is a new full
install from the
TeX Collection DVD.
How do I get
- Original Message -
From: Peter Flynn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
Sent: Friday, September 09, 2005 5:23 PM
Subject: Re: Problems installing 1.3.6-1 RPMs
Paul A. Rubin wrote:
Peter Flynn wrote:
I just tried to install Lyx from the 1.3.6-1 RPMs.
At the moment
- Original Message -
From: Peter Flynn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
Sent: Friday, September 09, 2005 5:23 PM
Subject: Re: Problems installing 1.3.6-1 RPMs
Paul A. Rubin wrote:
Peter Flynn wrote:
I just tried to install Lyx from the 1.3.6-1 RPMs.
At the moment
Paul Smith wrote:
[me]
Is anyone out there using LyX on FC4?
I am using LyX on FC4 with no problem. The way I installed it was:
1. copied my own .lyx directory into my home directory;
2. yum install lyx.
Excellent! Never used yum before, so here goes. I wonder will it work
over the top of
On 9/10/05, Peter Flynn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is anyone out there using LyX on FC4?
I am using LyX on FC4 with no problem. The way I installed it was:
1. copied my own .lyx directory into my home directory;
2. yum install lyx.
Excellent! Never used yum before, so here goes. I
Paul Smith wrote:
2. yum install lyx.
Aaaaggghhh! *Never*, never, never do this if you already have TeX.
Especially not if you have already carefully removed the outdated mess
that is the RH kludge of tetex, and replaced it with the real tetex from
the TeX Collection DVD.
yum fails to
Paul A. Rubin wrote:
Sorry, my wording was fuzzy. I don't have a working Linux box handy
these days, but I assume that LyX runs with the permissions of whatever
user is logged in. So if you can run latex directly, presumably when
you run the LyX configure script it has the same permissions.
- Original Message -
From: Peter Flynn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
Sent: Saturday, September 10, 2005 10:57 AM
Subject: Re: Problems installing 1.3.6-1 RPMs
Paul Smith wrote:
[me]
Is anyone out there using LyX on FC4?
I am using LyX on FC4 with no problem. The
- Original Message -
From: Peter Flynn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
Sent: Saturday, September 10, 2005 11:34 AM
Subject: Re: Problems installing 1.3.6-1 RPMs
Thanks for all your help...it's working, and all I wanted to do was
screenshot it and document the
Stephen P. Harris wrote:
[me]
Previously: No matter, all is now serene.
Oh, how nice. I suppose you were able to get a good screenshot of LyX
-- View -- Tex Information -- Latex classes (*.cls) which displayed a
partial list of your installed classes?
It displayed the whole lot, including
- Original Message -
From: Peter Flynn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
Sent: Saturday, September 10, 2005 2:28 PM
Subject: Re: Problems installing 1.3.6-1 RPMs
The Windows installation is easy,
We shall see. I'll be installing it under XP/SP2 on a system with the
Based on discussion regarding the configuration process on lyx-devel,
I started working on a generic file opener for Unix, ala open on
OS X and start on Windows. A first release is ready. I've tested it
on a number of different things, including using it to launch all my
viewers from LyX.
You can
_/ On Sun 11 Sep 2005 01:14:55 BST, [Mike Meyer] wrote : \_
Based on discussion regarding the configuration process on lyx-devel,
I started working on a generic file opener for Unix, ala open on
OS X and start on Windows. A first release is ready. I've tested it
on a number of different
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Roy Schestowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed:
_/ On Sun 11 Sep 2005 01:14:55 BST, [Mike Meyer] wrote : \_
Based on discussion regarding the configuration process on lyx-devel,
I started working on a generic file opener for Unix, ala open on
OS X and start on
christiaan johannes pauw wrote:
> Before I selected "use natbib" the citation style was something like
> [Barth(1948), 40]. Now it is (Barth, 1948, 40). What I would like is
> (Barth 1948:40). Is there something I can do to change the .bst file or
> use something else to achieve that?
have a
Kevin Pfeiffer wrote:
> What about a situation such as this: "Fig. 26"? To my eye, the interword
> space behind the abbreviating period seems too wide. Should this be a
> thin space instead?
It should be an unbreakable space in any case (that is, thinspace or protected
space ~). I use protected
Mike Meyer wrote:
> 2) I know this has to have been discussed to death - probably
>repeatedly - but I couldn't seem to find the right query to tickle
>google or the list archives into kicking it up. Could someone
>provide a pointer to a rational for going with a single window
>
On 9/10/05, Peter Flynn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> I just tried to install Lyx from the 1.3.6-1 RPMs.
> >>
> >> It can't find the commands kpsewhich and texhash, which is weird
> >> because they are both in the global path. The TeX is a new full
> >> install from the
> >> TeX Collection DVD.
- Original Message -
From: "Peter Flynn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, September 09, 2005 5:23 PM
Subject: Re: Problems installing 1.3.6-1 RPMs
Paul A. Rubin wrote:
Peter Flynn wrote:
I just tried to install Lyx from the 1.3.6-1 RPMs.
At the
- Original Message -
From: "Peter Flynn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, September 09, 2005 5:23 PM
Subject: Re: Problems installing 1.3.6-1 RPMs
Paul A. Rubin wrote:
Peter Flynn wrote:
I just tried to install Lyx from the 1.3.6-1 RPMs.
At the
Paul Smith wrote:
[me]
Is anyone out there using LyX on FC4?
I am using LyX on FC4 with no problem. The way I installed it was:
1. copied my own .lyx directory into my home directory;
2. yum install lyx.
Excellent! Never used yum before, so here goes. I wonder will it work
over the top of
On 9/10/05, Peter Flynn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>Is anyone out there using LyX on FC4?
> >
> > I am using LyX on FC4 with no problem. The way I installed it was:
> >
> > 1. copied my own .lyx directory into my home directory;
> >
> > 2. yum install lyx.
>
> Excellent! Never used yum before,
Paul Smith wrote:
2. yum install lyx.
Aaaaggghhh! *Never*, never, never do this if you already have TeX.
Especially not if you have already carefully removed the outdated mess
that is the RH kludge of tetex, and replaced it with the real tetex from
the TeX Collection DVD.
yum fails to
Paul A. Rubin wrote:
Sorry, my wording was fuzzy. I don't have a working Linux box handy
these days, but I assume that LyX runs with the permissions of whatever
user is logged in. So if you can run latex directly, presumably when
you run the LyX configure script it has the same permissions.
- Original Message -
From: "Peter Flynn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Saturday, September 10, 2005 10:57 AM
Subject: Re: Problems installing 1.3.6-1 RPMs
Paul Smith wrote:
[me]
Is anyone out there using LyX on FC4?
I am using LyX on FC4 with no
- Original Message -
From: "Peter Flynn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Saturday, September 10, 2005 11:34 AM
Subject: Re: Problems installing 1.3.6-1 RPMs
Thanks for all your help...it's working, and all I wanted to do was
screenshot it and document the
Stephen P. Harris wrote:
[me]
Previously: No matter, all is now serene.
Oh, how nice. I suppose you were able to get a good screenshot of LyX
--> View --> Tex Information --> Latex classes (*.cls) which displayed a
partial list of your installed classes?
It displayed the whole lot,
- Original Message -
From: "Peter Flynn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Saturday, September 10, 2005 2:28 PM
Subject: Re: Problems installing 1.3.6-1 RPMs
The Windows installation is easy,
We shall see. I'll be installing it under XP/SP2 on a system with
Based on discussion regarding the configuration process on lyx-devel,
I started working on a generic "file opener" for Unix, ala "open" on
OS X and "start" on Windows. A first release is ready. I've tested it
on a number of different things, including using it to launch all my
viewers from LyX.
_/ On Sun 11 Sep 2005 01:14:55 BST, [Mike Meyer] wrote : \_
Based on discussion regarding the configuration process on lyx-devel,
I started working on a generic "file opener" for Unix, ala "open" on
OS X and "start" on Windows. A first release is ready. I've tested it
on a number of
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Roy Schestowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> typed:
> _/ On Sun 11 Sep 2005 01:14:55 BST, [Mike Meyer] wrote : \_
>
> > Based on discussion regarding the configuration process on lyx-devel,
> > I started working on a generic "file opener" for Unix, ala "open" on
> > OS X
50 matches
Mail list logo