Re: Problem Outputting Particular TIFF File

2011-09-26 Thread Jane Shevtsov
Hi Mark,

I haven't changed anything in the past couple of weeks, when I reinstalled
MiKTeX and reconfigured LyX. (BTW, I just tried out a different TIFF file,
and it worked fine.) The flowchart is something I copied from a PDF and then
edited in Paint. All the other graphics were generated by R, so there could
be something there.

Thanks,
Jane

On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 10:36 PM, Mark Livingstone <
livingstonem...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Jane,
>
> I'm more of a Mac guys, but I know when I installed Lyx on Win7 it had to
> download / configure a bunch of stuff in miktex as well as in Lyx. Have you
> changed your system configuration lately? Perhaps worth doing a Miktex
> update and a Lyx reconfigure?
>
> Are the rest of the (working) tiff file generated by the same program as
> your flowchart?
>
> Cheers,
>
> MarkL
>
> On 27 September 2011 12:33, Jane Shevtsov  wrote:
>
>> Maybe. What kind of "something else" could it be?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Jane
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 5:49 PM, Mark Livingstone <
>> livingstonem...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Jane,
>>>
>>> It worked fine for me using Lyx 2.01 / Texlive 2011 under OS X, and also
>>> under Lyx 2.0.0-3 / Miktex / Windows 7 professional.
>>>
>>> Something else in your setup maybe?
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> MarkL
>>>
>>>
>>> On 27 September 2011 09:40, Jane Shevtsov  wrote:
>>>
 Hi all,

 I added a TIFF graphic (attached) to my document and, upon trying to
 view the PDF, got a message saying, "no information for converting tiff
 format files to png". This is very strange, considering that the document
 already contains several TIFF images that output just fine. LyX displays 
 the
 image correctly on screen and putting it into a new document results in the
 same error. What's going on? I'm using LyX 2.0 on Windows 7.

 Thanks,
 Jane

 --
 -
 Jane Shevtsov
 Ecology Ph.D. candidate, University of Georgia
 co-founder, www.worldbeyondborders.org

 "All wars are civil wars, because all men are brothers... Each one owes
 infinitely more to the human race than to the particular country in which 
 he
 was born." --Francois Fenelon, theologian and writer (1651-1715)

>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> -
>> Jane Shevtsov
>> Ecology Ph.D. candidate, University of Georgia
>> co-founder, www.worldbeyondborders.org
>>
>> "All wars are civil wars, because all men are brothers... Each one owes
>> infinitely more to the human race than to the particular country in which he
>> was born." --Francois Fenelon, theologian and writer (1651-1715)
>>
>
>


-- 
-
Jane Shevtsov
Ecology Ph.D. candidate, University of Georgia
co-founder, www.worldbeyondborders.org

"All wars are civil wars, because all men are brothers... Each one owes
infinitely more to the human race than to the particular country in which he
was born." --Francois Fenelon, theologian and writer (1651-1715)


Re: Problem Outputting Particular TIFF File

2011-09-26 Thread Mark Livingstone
Hi Jane,

I'm more of a Mac guys, but I know when I installed Lyx on Win7 it had to
download / configure a bunch of stuff in miktex as well as in Lyx. Have you
changed your system configuration lately? Perhaps worth doing a Miktex
update and a Lyx reconfigure?

Are the rest of the (working) tiff file generated by the same program as
your flowchart?

Cheers,

MarkL

On 27 September 2011 12:33, Jane Shevtsov  wrote:

> Maybe. What kind of "something else" could it be?
>
> Thanks,
> Jane
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 5:49 PM, Mark Livingstone <
> livingstonem...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Jane,
>>
>> It worked fine for me using Lyx 2.01 / Texlive 2011 under OS X, and also
>> under Lyx 2.0.0-3 / Miktex / Windows 7 professional.
>>
>> Something else in your setup maybe?
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> MarkL
>>
>>
>> On 27 September 2011 09:40, Jane Shevtsov  wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I added a TIFF graphic (attached) to my document and, upon trying to view
>>> the PDF, got a message saying, "no information for converting tiff format
>>> files to png". This is very strange, considering that the document already
>>> contains several TIFF images that output just fine. LyX displays the image
>>> correctly on screen and putting it into a new document results in the same
>>> error. What's going on? I'm using LyX 2.0 on Windows 7.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Jane
>>>
>>> --
>>> -
>>> Jane Shevtsov
>>> Ecology Ph.D. candidate, University of Georgia
>>> co-founder, www.worldbeyondborders.org
>>>
>>> "All wars are civil wars, because all men are brothers... Each one owes
>>> infinitely more to the human race than to the particular country in which he
>>> was born." --Francois Fenelon, theologian and writer (1651-1715)
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> -
> Jane Shevtsov
> Ecology Ph.D. candidate, University of Georgia
> co-founder, www.worldbeyondborders.org
>
> "All wars are civil wars, because all men are brothers... Each one owes
> infinitely more to the human race than to the particular country in which he
> was born." --Francois Fenelon, theologian and writer (1651-1715)
>


Re: Problem Outputting Particular TIFF File

2011-09-26 Thread Jane Shevtsov
Maybe. What kind of "something else" could it be?

Thanks,
Jane

On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 5:49 PM, Mark Livingstone  wrote:

> Hi Jane,
>
> It worked fine for me using Lyx 2.01 / Texlive 2011 under OS X, and also
> under Lyx 2.0.0-3 / Miktex / Windows 7 professional.
>
> Something else in your setup maybe?
>
> Cheers,
>
> MarkL
>
>
> On 27 September 2011 09:40, Jane Shevtsov  wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I added a TIFF graphic (attached) to my document and, upon trying to view
>> the PDF, got a message saying, "no information for converting tiff format
>> files to png". This is very strange, considering that the document already
>> contains several TIFF images that output just fine. LyX displays the image
>> correctly on screen and putting it into a new document results in the same
>> error. What's going on? I'm using LyX 2.0 on Windows 7.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Jane
>>
>> --
>> -
>> Jane Shevtsov
>> Ecology Ph.D. candidate, University of Georgia
>> co-founder, www.worldbeyondborders.org
>>
>> "All wars are civil wars, because all men are brothers... Each one owes
>> infinitely more to the human race than to the particular country in which he
>> was born." --Francois Fenelon, theologian and writer (1651-1715)
>>
>
>


-- 
-
Jane Shevtsov
Ecology Ph.D. candidate, University of Georgia
co-founder, www.worldbeyondborders.org

"All wars are civil wars, because all men are brothers... Each one owes
infinitely more to the human race than to the particular country in which he
was born." --Francois Fenelon, theologian and writer (1651-1715)


Re: Problem Outputting Particular TIFF File

2011-09-26 Thread Mark Livingstone
Hi Jane,

It worked fine for me using Lyx 2.01 / Texlive 2011 under OS X, and also
under Lyx 2.0.0-3 / Miktex / Windows 7 professional.

Something else in your setup maybe?

Cheers,

MarkL


On 27 September 2011 09:40, Jane Shevtsov  wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> I added a TIFF graphic (attached) to my document and, upon trying to view
> the PDF, got a message saying, "no information for converting tiff format
> files to png". This is very strange, considering that the document already
> contains several TIFF images that output just fine. LyX displays the image
> correctly on screen and putting it into a new document results in the same
> error. What's going on? I'm using LyX 2.0 on Windows 7.
>
> Thanks,
> Jane
>
> --
> -
> Jane Shevtsov
> Ecology Ph.D. candidate, University of Georgia
> co-founder, www.worldbeyondborders.org
>
> "All wars are civil wars, because all men are brothers... Each one owes
> infinitely more to the human race than to the particular country in which he
> was born." --Francois Fenelon, theologian and writer (1651-1715)
>


Re: PDF won't generate

2011-09-26 Thread curtis osterhoudt
Yes, I've started getting this error with the 2.1 svn version. If I export the 
pdflatex code, that's fine, and it'll compile correctly from the command line. 
LyX isn't doing a step it probably should.

 
/**
"The four points of the compass be logic, knowledge, wisdom and the unknown. 
Some do bow in that final direction. Others advance upon it. To bow before the 
one is to lose sight of the three. I may submit to the unknown, but never to 
the unknowable." ~~Roger Zelazny, in "Lord of Light"
***/


>
>From: Kevin Buchs 
>To: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
>Sent: Monday, September 26, 2011 3:26 PM
>Subject: Re: PDF won't generate
>
>
>I have a similar problem with Lyx 2.0 on Windows 7. I have a custom style and 
>some required .JPG files that are inserted by that style. Lyx does not copy 
>them to its temporary directory. Ideally, I'd like Lyx to run latex in my 
>working directory. If I find the temporary directory, I can copy the files 
>manually to that directory, and then a second PDF generate command will 
>provide results, but this is sort of klunky. Anyone have suggestions?
>
> 
>On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 9:17 PM, Gabriel Hurley  
>wrote:
>
>With a fresh install of LyX, I create a new document and attempt to
>>convert it to PDF. It never converts (after 30 minutes of waiting).
>>The debug messages say the following:
>>
>>21:15:56.373: Previewing ...
>>21:15:56.379: (buffer-view: Ctrl+R)
>>21:15:56.402: pdflatex  "newfile1.tex"
>>21:15:56.472: This is pdfTeX, Version 3.1415926-1.40.10 (MiKTeX 2.8)
>>21:15:56.482: entering extended mode
>>21:15:56.483: ! I can't find file `newfile1.tex'.
>>
>
>

Re: PDF won't generate

2011-09-26 Thread Kevin Buchs
I have a similar problem with Lyx 2.0 on Windows 7. I have a custom style
and some required .JPG files that are inserted by that style. Lyx does not
copy them to its temporary directory. Ideally, I'd like Lyx to run latex in
my working directory. If I find the temporary directory, I can copy the
files manually to that directory, and then a second PDF generate command
will provide results, but this is sort of klunky. Anyone have suggestions?

On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 9:17 PM, Gabriel Hurley wrote:

> With a fresh install of LyX, I create a new document and attempt to
> convert it to PDF. It never converts (after 30 minutes of waiting).
> The debug messages say the following:
>
> 21:15:56.373: Previewing ...
> 21:15:56.379: (buffer-view: Ctrl+R)
> 21:15:56.402: pdflatex  "newfile1.tex"
> 21:15:56.472: This is pdfTeX, Version 3.1415926-1.40.10 (MiKTeX 2.8)
> 21:15:56.482: entering extended mode
> 21:15:56.483: ! I can't find file `newfile1.tex'.
>


Re: lyx can't find lilypond-book

2011-09-26 Thread Julien Rioux

On 26/09/2011 9:39 AM, Tao Cumplido wrote:

Julien Rioux  physics.utoronto.ca>  writes:



So you see that my version is too old. Your 2.14 is recent enough
though. Please report any message you get there, and also see the file
lilypond.lyx in the examples directory.



Thanks for the help. I already tried reconfiguring but didn't knew how to see
the
whole output. Apparently it finds lilypond-book but can't read the version
number.
I get the following output from reconfiguring:

09:27:36.121: checking for a LilyPond ->  EPS/PDF/PNG converter...
09:27:36.168: +checking for "lilypond"...  yes
09:27:37.884: +  found LilyPond version 2.14.2.
09:27:37.884: checking for a LilyPond book (LaTeX) ->  LaTeX converter...
09:27:37.884: +checking for "lilypond-book"...  yes
09:27:39.600: +  found LilyPond-book, but could not extract version number.
09:27:39.600: checking for a Noteedit ->  LilyPond converter...
09:27:39.600: +checking for "noteedit"...  no




Most likely there is something not working with lilypond-book. You could 
try to run it from the command line to get more info. Start Menu > Run > 
type "cmd" > OK. Now type this in

lilypond-book --version
and see what it gives you.

--
Julien



Re: LyX 2: spell checker skips around whole document ARrrgGgaAaaaaaaaaaa!!!!!

2011-09-26 Thread Joe(theWordy)Philbrook

It would appear that on Sep 25, Stephan Witt did say:

> Am 25.09.2011 um 00:02 schrieb Joe(theWordy)Philbrook:
> > Note: As I said I positioned my cursor *_AFTER_* the first instance of the
> > "gabaggge" word... (And I note that I also double checked the file:
> > "~/.lyx/pwl_english.dict" to make sure I hadn't accidentally added the
> > "gabaggge" word, I had not.)
> 
> "Ignore All" adds the word to the non-persistent list of accepted words for
> the current session. It doesn't add the word to your personal dictionary.
> And I think it should stop at the second word "gabaggge" in any case
> except when you did ignore it for the current session.

OK let me be a little more specific...

I checked ~/.lyx/pwl_english.dict to makes sure that I hadn't previously
added the "gabaggge" word to the word list by mistake. But the fact
that I positioned the cursor AFTER the "gabaggge" word before pressing
F7 And that somehow the spellchecker did skip back to a cursor position in
a chapter that I hadn't even looked at in months without first checking all
the errors that were there between the cursor position where I had pressed
F7 and the 2nd marker line with the 2nd instance in whole document of the
"gabaggge" word which it NEVER reached because when I realized I was
correcting deliberate misspelling in the earlier text I aborted
spellchecking without it ever actually finding either instance of the
"gabaggge" word. Which means that I never clicked on ANY spellchecker
button (ignore, ignore all, or any other) with the "gabaggge" word in
the spellchecker's crosshairs... 


> >> You should have been asked at the end of the document before wrapping 
> >> around.
> > 
> > Yeah, but it never got to the end of the document. At some point during the
> > spellcheck initiated between two "gabaggge" word markers {the cursor
> > was actually on the first character of the first line after the 
> > "gabaggge"
> > marker line when I pressed F7 and began spellchecking. The starting
> > position was several chapters deep in the "book" I'm writing. It had not yet
> > found  all of the many fat fingered typos that existed in the text between
> > the "gabaggge" word markers when I noticed some distinctive text that
> > only occurs in the first few chapters of the book...  
> 
> The spell checker always starts at the current cursor position, IMHO.
> When the cursor is moved to another part of your text the subsequent F7
> should start over there.

Agreed. But since I hadn't scrolled back to the previous chapters, "I"
didn't change the cursor position to them.

The only times I intervened in the cursor position was when I wasn't sure if
a suggested word was actually the word I intended or had some other meaning. in
which case I would hit escape to stop the spellchecker,  use ^X to cut the
questionable word to the clipboard, switch to the desktop area where I had a
browser open to an on-line dictionary. Paste the word and edit until the
dictionary liked the spelling AND presented me with the intended definition.
At which point I would mark the corrected word and copy it to the clipboard,
change back to the desktop area where my LyX window was, then I'd paste the
corrected word into my document. Then to ensure the opportunity to add that
word to LyX's word list if needed, I'd move the cursor up just one line and
press F7 again...  

> >> And no there is no way to spell check some selection of text only.
> >> But there is an enhancement request already: 
> >> http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/2511
> > 
> > Except that it always used to check in a linear fashion that allowed me to
> > be sure that each questionable word would always be further from the
> > beginning of the document than the last until and unless I confirmed that it
> > could continue checking from the beginning... Unfortunately this behavior
> > is no longer reliable.
> 
> It should be reliable unless you move to current cursor position manually.

Yeah it should be. And that is my whole point. For some reason it isn't.

The only time I change the cursor position of a LyX document while I'm
spellchecking is as I described above. 

But, like I said before, this problem doesn't happen every time I
spellcheck, so I can't reliably reproduce it for a bug report.
And since the workaround of cutting the section of text to the clipboard,
And then pasting it into an otherwise empty  .lyx file, does get me a way
to reliably spellcheck the text.

And until such a time as http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/2511 becomes a
reality, I think I'll just use that kludge I just described. 

-- 
|^^^   ^^^
| Joe (theWordy) Philbrook
|^   J(tWdy)P
|   ___ <>

   



Re: problem with xetex-option

2011-09-26 Thread ehud.kap...@gmail.com
I have this same problem on one XP machine, but not on another.  So far 
I was unable to find what the difference between the installations is-- 
they were installed at the same time from the same batch file.  I do not 
have this problem on an Ubuntu (11.04, 64 bit) machine.

EK

On 9/26/2011 4:59 AM, Tao Cumplido wrote:

Jürgen Spitzmüller  lyx.org>  writes:


Tao Cumplido wrote:

! Undefined control sequence.
l.52 \char_make_active:n

Make sure you have fairly recent LaTeX3 packages (l3kernel, l3packages etc.)
installed.

\char_make_active:n is defined by LaTeX3 and the fontspec package (which loads
non-TeX fonts) relies on it.

HTH,
Jürgen




Ok, I installed now every package found when I enter l3 and fontspec but I
still get the same errors. I reconfigured lyx after installing the packages
of course.

Is there any other specific package I need that is part of latex3 and doesn't
start with 'l3'? When I filter the packages for latex3 the package manager
finds nothing.

Thanks for the help so far.



--
Ehud Kaplan, Ph.D.
Jules and Doris Stein /Research to Prevent Blindness /Professor
*Director*, Center of Excellence for /Computational & System neuroscience,
The Friedman Brain Institute, MSSM/
*Director*, The laboratory of /Visual & Computational Neuroscience/
Depts. of Neuroscience, Ophthalmology, Chemical & Structural Biology
The Mount Sinai School of Medicine
One Gustave Levy Place
New York, NY, 10029


Re: problem with xetex-option

2011-09-26 Thread Tao Cumplido
Jürgen Spitzmüller  lyx.org> writes:

> 
> Tao Cumplido wrote:
> > ! Undefined control sequence.
> > l.52 \char_make_active:n
> 
> Make sure you have fairly recent LaTeX3 packages (l3kernel, l3packages etc.) 
> installed.
> 
> \char_make_active:n is defined by LaTeX3 and the fontspec package (which 
> loads 
> non-TeX fonts) relies on it.
> 
> HTH,
> Jürgen
> 
> 


Ok, I installed now every package found when I enter l3 and fontspec but I
still get the same errors. I reconfigured lyx after installing the packages
of course.

Is there any other specific package I need that is part of latex3 and doesn't
start with 'l3'? When I filter the packages for latex3 the package manager
finds nothing.

Thanks for the help so far.



Re: pdf viewer with ruler for linux

2011-09-26 Thread Guenter Milde
On 2011-09-25, Csikos Bela wrote:
> "Sebastian Krämer"  írta:
>>>On Fri, 2011-09-23 at 21:50 +0200, Csikos Bela wrote:
>>>Is there a pdf viewer for linux which has rulers (horizontal
>>> and  vertical)?

>>I wouldn't call it a pdf viewer but Gimp can open pdfs as graphics. It
>>should have a ruler. (I've never used one with gimp, so I can't say for
>>sure)

I'd prefer Inkscape over Gimp.

> But this method has inconveniences:
> 1. The document has to be opened as one page at a time.

Still true

> 2. The screen/ruler has to be calibrated, and even if it is done the
>ruler gives only accurate results when the document is viewed at
>100% magnification.

This is not a problem in Inkscape as the content is in scalable vector
format, there are "real" units and content and rulers scale
synchroneously when magnifiying.

> I do not understand why it is not implemented in any of the viewers.

Nor do I.


Günter



Re: lyx can't find lilypond-book

2011-09-26 Thread Tao Cumplido
Julien Rioux  physics.utoronto.ca> writes:


> So you see that my version is too old. Your 2.14 is recent enough 
> though. Please report any message you get there, and also see the file 
> lilypond.lyx in the examples directory.
> 

Thanks for the help. I already tried reconfiguring but didn't knew how to see
the
whole output. Apparently it finds lilypond-book but can't read the version
number.
I get the following output from reconfiguring:

09:27:36.121: checking for a LilyPond -> EPS/PDF/PNG converter...
09:27:36.168: +checking for "lilypond"...  yes
09:27:37.884: +  found LilyPond version 2.14.2.
09:27:37.884: checking for a LilyPond book (LaTeX) -> LaTeX converter...
09:27:37.884: +checking for "lilypond-book"...  yes
09:27:39.600: +  found LilyPond-book, but could not extract version number.
09:27:39.600: checking for a Noteedit -> LilyPond converter...
09:27:39.600: +checking for "noteedit"...  no