Re: URL appearing in reference list with apa6

2013-02-18 Thread Ray Rashif
On 19 February 2013 02:39, John Kane  wrote:

> I seem to have gotten LyX back in action for the moment with apa6.
> However  am having a minor problem with a bibliography item.  For some
> reason it is including a URL which I don't want.
>
> The URL is correct, in that I did download the reference from someplace,
> but I don't want it in a journal entry since it is not a website,  etc and
> the download time and date are not relevant.
>
> I am handling my references with Zotero and it is creating a nice little
> bib file as I play around but why am I getting the URL in the reference. Or
> perhaps more correctly --how do I turn it off?  I can easily edit the
> bibtex entry but I suspect a lot of my references in real life willl have
> this and it might mean a lot of hand editing.
>
> Zotero and OpenOffice.org handle the reference correctly, BTW.
>
> Examples attached
>
> Thanks
> (and to paraphrase S. Pepys  "so to a late lunch".
>
>
This is dictated by your BibTeX style. The .bst file has all the logic to
deal with your .bib file - including what to parse and what not to parse,
and what to show when. I have yet to find a BibTeX editor that offers a
little bit of intuitive style handling as well.

If you're familiar with sed, you can manipulate your .bib file to your
liking (remove the url keys so they do not get parsed by your style, or use
a different style).


--
GPG/PGP ID: C0711BF1


Re: Downloading Lyx

2013-02-18 Thread Paul A . Rubin
I just did a Windows install and the same thing happened to me. At the time, the
file selector was showing Program Files (x86). I just added "\MiKTeX" manually
and installation proceeded from there.





Re: kitr problem after R update.

2013-02-18 Thread John Kane





 From: David L. Johnson 
To: John Kane  
Cc: "lyx-users@lists.lyx.org"  
Sent: Monday, February 18, 2013 3:31:24 PM
Subject: Re: kitr problem after R update.
 

On 02/18/2013 03:14 PM, John Kane wrote: 

>
>
>
>
>
> From: David L. Johnson 
>To: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org 
>Sent: Monday, February 18, 2013 11:06:00 AM
>Subject: Re: kitr problem after R update.
> 
>
>On 02/18/2013 10:53 AM, John Kane wrote: 
>That's what I was thinking last night after I had closed down the computer.  
>It does seem rather weird when almost no one uses Imperial measurements any 
>more.  Legacy issue I suppose?
>>
>Nobody?  Nobody except your neighbors to the South.  Not
that we call them "Imperial", that would be almost as
un-American as using the Godless metric system (yes,
that really is what many people here called it when
there was an abortive effort to convert, many years
ago).  
>
>Well there are a few misguided souls around still and I
still have cook books in Imperial.  -- What do Americans
call their  system anyway? 
>
"English", usually, even though the British have basically switched over.


>It is always a pleasure to try and figure out if a
gallon is Imperial (≈ 4.5 l or US (≈ 3.8 l)
>
Is an Imperial gallon 5 pints, then?  I think that is the only US use of the 
term "Imperial" with respect to measurements. 

No apparently there are 8 pints in an Imperial gallon according to 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pint

US and Imperial pints  aren't the same.  Not that I would know the only time I 
see a pint is when I'm in my local bar having a 20 fl oz (Imperial) pint of 
beer.  I don't think we, in Canada, use pints for anything else.   I've been in 
a commerical kitchen where there was mass confusion when a recipe called for x 
pints of Y.  No one had the slightest idea of what one looked like or what it 
was in relation to a litre.

--  David L. Johnson It is a scientifically proven fact that a mid life crisis 
can only be 
cured by something racy and Italian.  Bianchis and Colnagos are a lot 
cheaper than Maserattis and Ferraris.   -- Glenn Davies 

URL appearing in reference list with apa6

2013-02-18 Thread John Kane
I seem to have gotten LyX back in action for the moment with apa6. However  am 
having a minor problem with a bibliography item.  For some reason it is 
including a URL which I don't want.

The URL is correct, in that I did download the reference from someplace, 
but I don't want it in a journal entry since it is not a website,  etc and the 
download time and date are not relevant.  


I am handling my references with Zotero and it is creating a nice little bib 
file as I play around but why am I getting the URL in the reference. Or perhaps 
more correctly --how do I turn it off?  I can easily edit the bibtex entry but 
I suspect a lot of my references in real life willl have this and it might mean 
a lot of hand editing.

Zotero and OpenOffice.org handle the reference correctly, BTW.

Examples attached


Thanks
(and to paraphrase S. Pepys  "so to a late lunch".

apa6.1.knitr.lyx
Description: application/lyx
% This file was created with JabRef 2.7b.
% Encoding: UTF8

@ARTICLE{adams2001therisk,
  author = {Adams, J. and Hillman, M.},
  title = {The risk compensation theory and bicycle helmets},
  journal = {Injury Prevention},
  year = {2001},
  volume = {7},
  pages = {89{\textendash}90; discussion 90{\textendash}91},
  number = {2},
  month = jun,
  abstract = {[Comment, Journal Article, Review; 14 Refs; In English; England; {MEDLINE]}},
  url = {http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6WVB-45GNBD0-3G6/2/c4885e756af9e39fd3ad671f12830fd5}
}

@ARTICLE{cameron1994mandatory,
  author = {Cameron, M. H. and Vulcan, A. P. and Finch, C. F. and Newstead, S.
	V.},
  title = {Mandatory bicycle helmet use following a decade of helmet promotion
	in {V}ictoria, {A}ustralia{\textendash}an evaluation.},
  journal = {Accident Analysis and Prevention},
  year = {1994},
  volume = {26},
  pages = {325{\textendash}337},
  number = {3},
  month = jun,
  abstract = {On July 1, 1990, a law requiring wearing of an approved safety helmet
	by all bicyclists (unless exempted) came into effect in Victoria,
	Australia. Some of the more important steps that paved the way for
	this important initiative (believed to be the first statewide legislation
	of its type in the world) are described, and the initiative's effects
	are analysed. There was an immediate increase in average helmet-wearing
	rates from 31\% in March 1990 to 75\% in March 1991, although teenagers
	continued to show lower rates than younger children and adults. The
	number of insurance claims from bicyclists killed or admitted to
	hospital after sustaining a head injury decreased by 48\% and 70\%
	in the first and second years after the law, respectively. Analysis
	of the injury data also showed a 23\% and 28\% reduction in the number
	of bicyclists killed or admitted to hospital who did not sustain
	head injuries in the first and second post-law years, respectively.
	For Melbourne, where regular annual surveys of helmet wearing have
	been conducted, it was possible to fit a logistic regression model
	that related the reduction in head injuries to increased helmet wearing.
	Surveys in Melbourne also indicated a 36\% reduction in bicycle use
	by children during the first year of the law and an estimated increase
	in adult use of 44\%.},
  keywords = {Adolescent;, Adult;, Bicycling;, Child;, Devices;, Evaluation, Head,
	Humans;, Protective, Studies;, Victoria}
}



Re: kitr problem after R update.

2013-02-18 Thread David L. Johnson

On 02/18/2013 03:14 PM, John Kane wrote:




*From:* David L. Johnson 
*To:* lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
*Sent:* Monday, February 18, 2013 11:06:00 AM
*Subject:* Re: kitr problem after R update.

On 02/18/2013 10:53 AM, John Kane wrote:
That's what I was thinking last night after I had closed down the 
computer.  It does seem rather weird when almost no one uses Imperial 
measurements any more.  Legacy issue I suppose?


Nobody?  Nobody except your neighbors to the South.  Not that we call 
them "Imperial", that would be almost as un-American as using the 
Godless metric system (yes, that really is what many people here 
called it when there was an abortive effort to convert, many years ago).


Well there are a few misguided souls around still and I still have 
cook books in Imperial.  -- What do Americans call their  system anyway?

"English", usually, even though the British have basically switched over.


It is always a pleasure to try and figure out if a gallon is Imperial 
(≈ 4.5 l or US (≈ 3.8 l)
Is an Imperial gallon 5 pints, then?  I think that is the only US use of 
the term "Imperial" with respect to measurements.


--

David L. Johnson

It is a scientifically proven fact that a mid life crisis can only be
cured by something racy and Italian.  Bianchis and Colnagos are a lot
cheaper than Maserattis and Ferraris.
-- Glenn Davies



Re: kitr problem after R update.

2013-02-18 Thread John Kane





 From: David L. Johnson 
To: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org 
Sent: Monday, February 18, 2013 11:06:00 AM
Subject: Re: kitr problem after R update.
 

On 02/18/2013 10:53 AM, John Kane wrote: 
That's what I was thinking last night after I had closed down the computer.  It 
does seem rather weird when almost no one uses Imperial measurements any more.  
Legacy issue I suppose?
>
Nobody?  Nobody except your neighbors to the South.  Not that we
call them "Imperial", that would be almost as un-American as using
the Godless metric system (yes, that really is what many people here
called it when there was an abortive effort to convert, many years
ago).  

Well there are a few misguided souls around still and I still have cook books 
in Imperial.  -- What do Americans call their  system anyway? 

It is always a pleasure to try and figure out if a gallon is Imperial (≈ 4.5 l 
or US (≈ 3.8 l)

--  David L. Johnson Anyone who is capable of getting themselves made President 
should on 
no account be allowed to do the job.   -- Douglas Adams 

Re: kitr problem after R update.

2013-02-18 Thread David L. Johnson

On 02/18/2013 10:53 AM, John Kane wrote:
That's what I was thinking last night after I had closed down the 
computer.  It does seem rather weird when almost no one uses Imperial 
measurements any more.  Legacy issue I suppose?


Nobody?  Nobody except your neighbors to the South.  Not that we call 
them "Imperial", that would be almost as un-American as using the 
Godless metric system (yes, that really is what many people here called 
it when there was an abortive effort to convert, many years ago).


--

David L. Johnson

Anyone who is capable of getting themselves made President should on
no account be allowed to do the job.
-- Douglas Adams



Re: Downloading Lyx

2013-02-18 Thread John Kane
Presumably you are using some version of Windows?  Which one

How did you deletc LateX? What flavour was it? Mik Tex ?

Have a look at http://www.revouninstaller.com/








 From: william garrison 
To: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org 
Sent: Monday, February 18, 2013 4:11:54 AM
Subject: Downloading Lyx
 

 
Hello,
 
I am having some problems with downloading lyx, which I would like to use for 
my university project.
 
When downloading the lyx part goes fine and then the MikTex part won't work for 
me. I used all the default settings, but when finding a folder to install 
MikTex to and clicking next it comes up with "The specified installation 
directory is not empty." How do I get past this part? I have previously 
downloaded Latex but have deleted all files of it to replace it with lyx.
 
Many thanks,
William

Re: kitr problem after R update.

2013-02-18 Thread John Kane
That's what I was thinking last night after I had closed down the computer.  It 
does seem rather weird when almost no one uses Imperial measurements any more.  
Legacy issue I suppose?





 From: Yihui Xie 
To: John Kane  
Cc: Lyx List  
Sent: Sunday, February 17, 2013 2:34:58 PM
Subject: Re: kitr problem after R update.
 
You cannot use cm directly; you have to convert cm to in which should
be trivial: 1in = 2.54cm.

Regards,
Yihui
--
Yihui Xie 
Phone: 515-294-2465 Web: http://yihui.name
Department of Statistics, Iowa State University
2215 Snedecor Hall, Ames, IA


On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 11:53 AM, John Kane  wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for this and my appologies for taking so long to get back to you.
>
> I was so frustrated with my LyX/apa6/biblatex problems that I just stopped
> even trying to get it to work and got on with other things.
>
> I made the simple height to fig.height, etc change and it seems to work just
> fine now.
>
> My lack of LaTeX knowledge plus my inability to actually comprehend much of
> the knitr/Sweave material due to lack of experiencc with them is sometimes
> maddening.
>
> How do I set fig.height and fig.width in cm?  It appears to me that the
> default is inches?
>
> Thanks again.
>

Re: Share LaTeX

2013-02-18 Thread Rich Shepard

On Mon, 18 Feb 2013, UD wrote:


A similar thing for Lyx would be nice, wouldn't it?


  Yep.

Rich



Re: Share LaTeX

2013-02-18 Thread UD

  
  
A similar thing for Lyx would be nice, wouldn't it?
EK


On 02/12/2013 01:32 PM, Rich Shepard
  wrote:

  Has anyone used this tool,
  ? If so, what do
  
  you think of it?
  
  
  Thanks,
  
  
  Rich
  
  


-- 
Ehud Kaplan, Ph.D.
Jules & Doris Stein Research to Prevent Blindness Professor
Director, The laboratory of Visual & Computational Neuroscience
Director, Center for Excellence in Computational & Systems Neuroscience
The Friedman Brain Institute
Departments of Neuroscience, Ophthalmology, Structural & Chemical Biology,
The Ichan School of Medicine at Mount Sinai 
One Gustave Levy Place,
NY, NY, 10029