I also use it predominantly on Linux, but occasionally use it on Windows, too.
Have used LyX since, about, oh, 2000, for letters, articles, notes, and a
dissertation.
/
Down with categorical imperative!
flutz...@yahoo.com
I also use it predominantly on Linux, but occasionally use it on Windows, too.
Have used LyX since, about, oh, 2000, for letters, articles, notes, and a
dissertation.
/
Down with categorical imperative!
flutz...@yahoo.com
Hi, Semih,
I wasn't able to do this in pure LyX, but if you insert some ERT (ctrl-L)
and put the following into it, you may get what you want:
$\left[
\begin{array}{cl|c}
K_{aa} K_{ai} 0 \\
K_{ia} K_{ii} K_{ib} \\
\hline
0 K_{bi} K_{bb}
\end{array}
\right]
=
\left[
Hi, Semih,
I wasn't able to do this in pure LyX, but if you insert some ERT (ctrl-L)
and put the following into it, you may get what you want:
$\left[
\begin{array}{cl|c}
K_{aa} K_{ai} 0 \\
K_{ia} K_{ii} K_{ib} \\
\hline
0 K_{bi} K_{bb}
\end{array}
\right]
=
\left[
Hi, Semih,
I wasn't able to do this in "pure" LyX, but if you insert some ERT (ctrl-L)
and put the following into it, you may get what you want:
$\left[
\begin{array}{cl|c}
K_{aa} & K_{ai} & 0 \\
K_{ia} & K_{ii} & K_{ib} \\
\hline
0 & K_{bi} & K_{bb}
\end{array}
\right]
=
\left[
Dear all,
I have just (within the last week or so, using the 2.0.0 svn development
code, which I've kept up with and compiled) started having problems using XFig
figures within LyX.
Previously (and the mechanism is still there), to insert an XFig figure, I'd
use the external material
Dear all,
I have just (within the last week or so, using the 2.0.0 svn development
code, which I've kept up with and compiled) started having problems using XFig
figures within LyX.
Previously (and the mechanism is still there), to insert an XFig figure, I'd
use the external material
Dear all,
I have just (within the last week or so, using the 2.0.0 svn development
code, which I've kept up with and compiled) started having problems using XFig
figures within LyX.
Previously (and the mechanism is still there), to insert an XFig figure, I'd
use the "external material"
For me it's Mathematica (decidedly *not* free or open-source!) and XFig. Two of
the strangest programs paired up, but they work for about 99% of the graphics I
need to produce for LyX.
Incidentally, Origin (at least versions 6 and previously; I haven't tried
yet with the newest) runs just
For me it's Mathematica (decidedly *not* free or open-source!) and XFig. Two of
the strangest programs paired up, but they work for about 99% of the graphics I
need to produce for LyX.
Incidentally, Origin (at least versions 6 and previously; I haven't tried
yet with the newest) runs just
For me it's Mathematica (decidedly *not* free or open-source!) and XFig. Two of
the strangest programs paired up, but they work for about 99% of the graphics I
need to produce for LyX.
Incidentally, Origin (at least versions 6 and previously; I haven't tried
yet with the newest) runs just
When I first started learning LyX (what -- about 10 years ago?), I very much
liked the name 'Evil Red Text'. It showed that the developers had a sense of
humor, and the professionality of the manuals and the program itself was in no
way impacted (in my mind) with the 'ERT'. A colleague of mine
When I first started learning LyX (what -- about 10 years ago?), I very much
liked the name 'Evil Red Text'. It showed that the developers had a sense of
humor, and the professionality of the manuals and the program itself was in no
way impacted (in my mind) with the 'ERT'. A colleague of mine
When I first started learning LyX (what -- about 10 years ago?), I very much
liked the name 'Evil Red Text'. It showed that the developers had a sense of
humor, and the professionality of the manuals and the program itself was in no
way impacted (in my mind) with the 'ERT'. A colleague of mine
It's by design. However, in version 1.6.1 (possibly in older versions, too),
you can change that limit behavior by putting the cursor immediately after the
\sum symbol, and going to the Edit - Math - change limit type menu entry.
/
Down with categorical
It's by design. However, in version 1.6.1 (possibly in older versions, too),
you can change that limit behavior by putting the cursor immediately after the
\sum symbol, and going to the Edit - Math - change limit type menu entry.
/
Down with categorical
It's by design. However, in version 1.6.1 (possibly in older versions, too),
you can change that limit behavior by putting the cursor immediately after the
\sum symbol, and going to the "Edit -> Math -> change limit type" menu entry.
/
Down with categorical
Indeed. The way that Jabref imports the reference is to put curly-braces around
each of the fields, {}, so that BiBTeX isn't allowed to parse them at all. So
far as I know, whatever reference style is chosen, it will not be any different
than what Wolfgang got.
It looks to me as either a
Indeed. The way that Jabref imports the reference is to put curly-braces around
each of the fields, {}, so that BiBTeX isn't allowed to parse them at all. So
far as I know, whatever reference style is chosen, it will not be any different
than what Wolfgang got.
It looks to me as either a
Indeed. The way that Jabref imports the reference is to put curly-braces around
each of the fields, {}, so that BiBTeX isn't allowed to parse them at all. So
far as I know, whatever reference style is chosen, it will not be any different
than what Wolfgang got.
It looks to me as either a
Very nice, Jeff. Thanks for this. New to me!
/
Down with categorical imperative!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
/
From: Jamesdaff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
Sent: Tuesday, December
Very nice, Jeff. Thanks for this. New to me!
/
Down with categorical imperative!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
/
From: Jamesdaff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
Sent: Tuesday, December
Very nice, Jeff. Thanks for this. New to me!
/
Down with categorical imperative!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
/
From: Jamesdaff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
Sent: Tuesday,
If you're OK with using $\textdegree$ (some people complain about its
typography in various fonts), then you may be able to get it to work with no
additional packages, except perhaps 'textcomp'.
Cheers,
C.O.
/
Down with
If you're OK with using $\textdegree$ (some people complain about its
typography in various fonts), then you may be able to get it to work with no
additional packages, except perhaps 'textcomp'.
Cheers,
C.O.
/
Down with
If you're OK with using $\textdegree$ (some people complain about its
typography in various fonts), then you may be able to get it to work with no
additional packages, except perhaps 'textcomp'.
Cheers,
C.O.
/
Down with
Hi, LyXers,
I've noticed that in the 1.6.0svn versions (for example, today's revision
26278), the External Material dialog (when inserting a figure, e.g.) gives the
tab LaTeX and LyX Options. In this tab, there is the Show in LyX and
resultant Scale on Screen option, where I usually have a
Hi, LyXers,
I've noticed that in the 1.6.0svn versions (for example, today's revision
26278), the External Material dialog (when inserting a figure, e.g.) gives the
tab LaTeX and LyX Options. In this tab, there is the Show in LyX and
resultant Scale on Screen option, where I usually have a
Hi, LyXers,
I've noticed that in the 1.6.0svn versions (for example, today's revision
26278), the External Material dialog (when inserting a figure, e.g.) gives the
tab LaTeX and LyX Options. In this tab, there is the "Show in LyX" and
resultant "Scale on Screen" option, where I usually
Seems to be stable (no crash) in the 1.6.0rc2 version on Windows XP (32 bit).
/
Down with categorical imperative!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
/
- Original Message
From: James Sutherland [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: LyX Users
Seems to be stable (no crash) in the 1.6.0rc2 version on Windows XP (32 bit).
/
Down with categorical imperative!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
/
- Original Message
From: James Sutherland [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: LyX Users
Seems to be stable (no crash) in the 1.6.0rc2 version on Windows XP (32 bit).
/
Down with categorical imperative!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
/
- Original Message
From: James Sutherland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: LyX Users
This doesn't answer the original question, nor directly apply to the response
below it. However, I'd just like to state that I've been getting the 1.6
development version via svn every couple of days, and compiling it on linux.
It's wonderful thus far: no crashes; nice interface; wonderful new
This doesn't answer the original question, nor directly apply to the response
below it. However, I'd just like to state that I've been getting the 1.6
development version via svn every couple of days, and compiling it on linux.
It's wonderful thus far: no crashes; nice interface; wonderful new
This doesn't answer the original question, nor directly apply to the response
below it. However, I'd just like to state that I've been getting the 1.6
development version via svn every couple of days, and compiling it on linux.
It's wonderful thus far: no crashes; nice interface; wonderful new
- Original Message
From: Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
Cc: Aleksandar Kanchev [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2008 4:27:05 PM
Subject: Re: Zoom in LyX (like in firefox)
Erez Yerushalmi wrote:
Hi,
Go to
tools
- Original Message
From: Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
Cc: Aleksandar Kanchev [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2008 4:27:05 PM
Subject: Re: Zoom in LyX (like in firefox)
Erez Yerushalmi wrote:
Hi,
Go to
tools
- Original Message
From: Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
Cc: Aleksandar Kanchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2008 4:27:05 PM
Subject: Re: Zoom in LyX (like in firefox)
Erez Yerushalmi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Go to
> tools
/* original message below **/
- Original Message
From: Georg Baum [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2008 11:55:17 AM
Subject: Re: Xfig and LyX
snip
With other words, I have to redo all my fig files and add (or copy, if I
/* original message below **/
- Original Message
From: Georg Baum [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2008 11:55:17 AM
Subject: Re: Xfig and LyX
snip
With other words, I have to redo all my fig files and add (or copy, if I
/* original message below **/
- Original Message
From: Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2008 11:55:17 AM
Subject: Re: Xfig and LyX
> With other words, I have to redo all my fig files and add (or copy, if I
>
I can't reproduce that (just tried 1.6.0alpha2 on Windows XP), as the table
spacing looks fine.
One way you might be able to work around it is using a \nicefrac{+}{-}
instead of \pm. I personally don't prefer \nicefrac in this case, but it might
work.
Cheers,
It worked here for me, too -- no problems with the \pm symbol bleeding into
the table frames. ( 1.5.5 on Debian Sid and 1.6.0 svn on Windows XP )
- Original Message
From: Paul A. Rubin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2008
I can't reproduce that (just tried 1.6.0alpha2 on Windows XP), as the table
spacing looks fine.
One way you might be able to work around it is using a \nicefrac{+}{-}
instead of \pm. I personally don't prefer \nicefrac in this case, but it might
work.
Cheers,
It worked here for me, too -- no problems with the \pm symbol bleeding into
the table frames. ( 1.5.5 on Debian Sid and 1.6.0 svn on Windows XP )
- Original Message
From: Paul A. Rubin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2008
I can't reproduce that (just tried 1.6.0alpha2 on Windows XP), as the table
spacing looks fine.
One way you might be able to work around it is using a \nicefrac{+}{-}
instead of \pm. I personally don't prefer \nicefrac in this case, but it might
work.
Cheers,
It worked here for me, too -- no problems with the \pm symbol bleeding into
the table frames. ( 1.5.5 on Debian Sid and 1.6.0 svn on Windows XP )
- Original Message
From: Paul A. Rubin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2008
Paul's suggestion is certainly worthy of a try. However, sometimes the problem
is a problem of the whole, rather than of the sum of the parts. I mean this:
When I was finishing up my thesis, I ran into various TeX capacity problems,
none of which would occur when each chapter (appendix, etc.)
Paul's suggestion is certainly worthy of a try. However, sometimes the problem
is a problem of the whole, rather than of the sum of the parts. I mean this:
When I was finishing up my thesis, I ran into various TeX capacity problems,
none of which would occur when each chapter (appendix, etc.)
Paul's suggestion is certainly worthy of a try. However, sometimes the problem
is a problem of the whole, rather than of the sum of the parts. I mean this:
When I was finishing up my thesis, I ran into various TeX capacity problems,
none of which would occur when each chapter (appendix, etc.)
- Original Message
From: Micha [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
Sent: Friday, April 11, 2008 4:52:13 AM
Subject: Re: Lyx crash with unknown reason
On Fri, 11 Apr 2008 13:21:45 +0200
Sven Hoexter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 01:12:38PM +0300, Micha
- Original Message
From: Micha [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
Sent: Friday, April 11, 2008 4:52:13 AM
Subject: Re: Lyx crash with unknown reason
On Fri, 11 Apr 2008 13:21:45 +0200
Sven Hoexter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 01:12:38PM +0300, Micha
- Original Message
From: Micha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
Sent: Friday, April 11, 2008 4:52:13 AM
Subject: Re: Lyx crash with unknown reason
On Fri, 11 Apr 2008 13:21:45 +0200
Sven Hoexter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 01:12:38PM +0300, Micha
If you're actually comfortable with XFig (it's almost all I need sometimes),
look up JFig. It's not a 100% clone (which is a good thing, in my opinion).
/
Down with categorical imperative!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you're actually comfortable with XFig (it's almost all I need sometimes),
look up JFig. It's not a 100% clone (which is a good thing, in my opinion).
/
Down with categorical imperative!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you're actually comfortable with XFig (it's almost all I need sometimes),
look up JFig. It's not a 100% clone (which is a good thing, in my opinion).
/
Down with categorical imperative!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I like all of the page templates. My *least* favorite is Black Box, because
the text seems hard to read (gray on a black background?) and I keep peering at
the page to see if there are images hidden in the background.
http://www.lyx.org/test/index.php/Main/HomePage is really quite attractive
I like all of the page templates. My *least* favorite is Black Box, because
the text seems hard to read (gray on a black background?) and I keep peering at
the page to see if there are images hidden in the background.
http://www.lyx.org/test/index.php/Main/HomePage is really quite attractive
I like all of the page templates. My *least* favorite is "Black Box", because
the text seems hard to read (gray on a black background?) and I keep peering at
the page to see if there are images hidden in the background.
http://www.lyx.org/test/index.php/Main/HomePage is really quite
I don't see that LyXia engenders oral thoughts, though I'd be more strongly
inclined to give the program a try if it did! Besides, would this mean that
Word users suffer from dysLyXia?
C.O.
- Original Message
From: Marc J. Driftmeyer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
I don't see that LyXia engenders oral thoughts, though I'd be more strongly
inclined to give the program a try if it did! Besides, would this mean that
Word users suffer from dysLyXia?
C.O.
- Original Message
From: Marc J. Driftmeyer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
I don't see that "LyXia" engenders "oral" thoughts, though I'd be more strongly
inclined to give the program a try if it did! Besides, would this mean that
Word users suffer from dysLyXia?
C.O.
- Original Message
From: Marc J. Driftmeyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
- Original Message
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
Sent: Monday, March 24, 2008 12:32:14 PM
Subject: Re: Request for screenshots
On
Mon,
24
Mar
2008,
John
Coppens
wrote:
But
would
you
be
opposed
to
having
the
usual
colors
as
- Original Message
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
Sent: Monday, March 24, 2008 12:32:14 PM
Subject: Re: Request for screenshots
On
Mon,
24
Mar
2008,
John
Coppens
wrote:
But
would
you
be
opposed
to
having
the
usual
colors
as
- Original Message
From: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
Sent: Monday, March 24, 2008 12:32:14 PM
Subject: Re: Request for screenshots
On
Mon,
24
Mar
2008,
John
Coppens
wrote:
>>
But
would
you
be
opposed
to
having
the
usual
colors
Hi, Bill,
It appears that your MiKTeX installation didn't go through, or was
interrupted, possibly because internet connectrivity was lost or something. Can
you successfully use MiKTeX on that computer? If so, I'm probably wrong.
I've had no problems with LyX on either linux (Ubuntu
Hi, Bill,
It appears that your MiKTeX installation didn't go through, or was
interrupted, possibly because internet connectrivity was lost or something. Can
you successfully use MiKTeX on that computer? If so, I'm probably wrong.
I've had no problems with LyX on either linux (Ubuntu
Hi, Bill,
It appears that your MiKTeX installation didn't go through, or was
interrupted, possibly because internet connectrivity was lost or something. Can
you successfully use MiKTeX on that computer? If so, I'm probably wrong.
I've had no problems with LyX on either linux (Ubuntu
The divide-and-conquer method almost always works well... except when you get
into large documents, where interactions between different packages cause
problems if *both* sections are around, or if *many* sections are around (such
as the no room for a new \write error). I ran into that one when
The divide-and-conquer method almost always works well... except when you get
into large documents, where interactions between different packages cause
problems if *both* sections are around, or if *many* sections are around (such
as the no room for a new \write error). I ran into that one when
The divide-and-conquer method almost always works well... except when you get
into large documents, where interactions between different packages cause
problems if *both* sections are around, or if *many* sections are around (such
as the "no room for a new \write" error). I ran into that one
Andreas,
Click on the bibliography insert, and choose for the Style unsrt. That may be
what you want.
Good luck!
/
Down with categorical imperative!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
/
-
Andreas,
Click on the bibliography insert, and choose for the Style unsrt. That may be
what you want.
Good luck!
/
Down with categorical imperative!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
/
-
Andreas,
Click on the bibliography insert, and choose for the Style "unsrt". That may be
what you want.
Good luck!
/
Down with categorical imperative!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
/
-
I'm using sidux (based on Debian unstable) and have been since it branched off
of Kanotix. It's easily stable enough for my everyday use, and yet things like
the latest LyX are available quite quickly from repositories (and there's
nothing stopping one from downloading and installing from the
I'm using sidux (based on Debian unstable) and have been since it branched off
of Kanotix. It's easily stable enough for my everyday use, and yet things like
the latest LyX are available quite quickly from repositories (and there's
nothing stopping one from downloading and installing from the
I'm using sidux (based on Debian unstable) and have been since it branched off
of Kanotix. It's easily stable enough for my everyday use, and yet things like
the latest LyX are available quite quickly from repositories (and there's
nothing stopping one from downloading and installing from the
I can't remember details, but my dissertation used the style you're looking
for. You might look at details for the overcite package (contained in cite,
I believe) and the citesupernumber package.
Hope that helps!
/*
If I understand you correctly, changing (or adding, if not present) the line
\preview_scale_factor
in the preferences file in your ~/.lyx directory to have another value (mine
is 1.25) will change the size of the math-preview fonts.
So my ~/.lyx/preferences file has
\preview_scale_factor
I can't remember details, but my dissertation used the style you're looking
for. You might look at details for the overcite package (contained in cite,
I believe) and the citesupernumber package.
Hope that helps!
/*
If I understand you correctly, changing (or adding, if not present) the line
\preview_scale_factor
in the preferences file in your ~/.lyx directory to have another value (mine
is 1.25) will change the size of the math-preview fonts.
So my ~/.lyx/preferences file has
\preview_scale_factor
I can't remember details, but my dissertation used the style you're looking
for. You might look at details for the "overcite" package (contained in "cite",
I believe) and the "citesupernumber" package.
Hope that helps!
/*
If I understand you correctly, changing (or adding, if not present) the line
\preview_scale_factor
in the "preferences" file in your ~/.lyx directory to have another value (mine
is 1.25) will change the size of the math-preview fonts.
So my ~/.lyx/preferences file has
\preview_scale_factor
Roberto Gorjão wrote:
Which code editor, if any, would you recommend to edit LaTeX?
Preferably one that doesn't mess, or messes as little as possible,
with what LyX does.
I'm on Win XP.
Both JEdit (http://www.jedit.org/) and Cream
(http://cream.sourceforge.net/download.html) have
Roberto Gorjão wrote:
Which code editor, if any, would you recommend to edit LaTeX?
Preferably one that doesn't mess, or messes as little as possible,
with what LyX does.
I'm on Win XP.
Both JEdit (http://www.jedit.org/) and Cream
(http://cream.sourceforge.net/download.html) have
Roberto Gorjão wrote:
> Which code editor, if any, would you recommend to edit LaTeX?
> Preferably one that doesn't mess, or messes as little as possible,
> with what LyX does.
>
> I'm on Win XP.
Both JEdit (http://www.jedit.org/) and Cream
(http://cream.sourceforge.net/download.html) have
- Original Message
From: Lyx Physicst [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Paul A. Rubin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2007 9:10:36 AM
Subject: Re: Removing first page number on bibtex generated bibliography
On 7/17/07, Paul A. Rubin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Original Message
From: Lyx Physicst [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Paul A. Rubin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2007 9:10:36 AM
Subject: Re: Removing first page number on bibtex generated bibliography
On 7/17/07, Paul A. Rubin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Original Message
From: Lyx Physicst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Paul A. Rubin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2007 9:10:36 AM
Subject: Re: Removing first page number on bibtex generated bibliography
On 7/17/07, Paul A. Rubin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I've been waiting for this wonderful project to receive one of those. Best
wishes, all!
/*
Down with categorical imperative!
[EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I've been waiting for this wonderful project to receive one of those. Best
wishes, all!
/*
Down with categorical imperative!
[EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I've been waiting for this wonderful project to receive one of those. Best
wishes, all!
/*
Down with categorical imperative!
[EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dear LyXers,
I was delighted to find the other day that I can put math-moded symbols in
my index tags, and that they'll be typeset into a Symbols section at the
start of my index. Unfortunately, this is not working any more for me, despite
not changing my preamble in any way.
Details:
( Sorry about the subject of my previous message. I responded to an earlier
message and forgot to change the subject line. At the risk of being considered
a nuisance, here's my message again with a correct subject this time.)
Dear LyXers,
I was delighted to find the other day that I can
Dear LyXers,
I was delighted to find the other day that I can put math-moded symbols in
my index tags, and that they'll be typeset into a Symbols section at the
start of my index. Unfortunately, this is not working any more for me, despite
not changing my preamble in any way.
Details:
( Sorry about the subject of my previous message. I responded to an earlier
message and forgot to change the subject line. At the risk of being considered
a nuisance, here's my message again with a correct subject this time.)
Dear LyXers,
I was delighted to find the other day that I can
Dear LyXers,
I was delighted to find the other day that I can put math-moded symbols in
my index tags, and that they'll be typeset into a "Symbols" section at the
start of my index. Unfortunately, this is not working any more for me, despite
not changing my preamble in any way.
( Sorry about the subject of my previous message. I responded to an earlier
message and forgot to change the subject line. At the risk of being considered
a nuisance, here's my message again with a correct subject this time.)
Dear LyXers,
I was delighted to find the other day that I can
:
curtis osterhoudt wrote:
I'm running into the dreaded No room for a new \write problem.
[...]
Could it be that the widest-label
argument to the \begin{thebibliography} command (which is now 10) is
causing the problem? If that's the case, can I change it in LyX?
My impression
:
curtis osterhoudt wrote:
I'm running into the dreaded No room for a new \write problem.
[...]
Could it be that the widest-label
argument to the \begin{thebibliography} command (which is now 10) is
causing the problem? If that's the case, can I change it in LyX?
My impression
101 - 200 of 336 matches
Mail list logo
