Re: The lyx file...

2000-05-04 Thread Bruce Richardson
Original Message On 5/4/00, 9:48:15 AM, Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote regarding Re: The lyx file...: On Wed, May 03, 2000 at 05:38:06PM +0100, Bruce Richardson wrote: ... would be more useful. BTW, the file is truncated I didn't received the programming list

Re: The lyx file...

2000-05-04 Thread Bruce Richardson
Original Message On 5/4/00, 9:48:15 AM, Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote regarding Re: The lyx file...: On Wed, May 03, 2000 at 05:38:06PM +0100, Bruce Richardson wrote: ... would be more useful. BTW, the file is truncated I didn't received the programming list

Re: The lyx file...

2000-05-04 Thread Bruce Richardson
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Original Message <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< On 5/4/00, 9:48:15 AM, Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote regarding Re: The lyx file...: >

The lyx file...

2000-05-03 Thread Bruce Richardson
... would be more useful. -- Bruce #LyX 1.1 created this file. For more info see http://www.lyx.org/ \lyxformat 2.15 \textclass docbook \begin_preamble !entity header system "header.sgml" \end_preamble \language default \inputencoding default \fontscheme default \graphics default

Re: DocBook sgml problems

2000-05-03 Thread Bruce Richardson
On 5/3/00, 12:11:10 PM, Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote regarding Re: DocBook sgml problems: On Wed, May 03, 2000 at 03:11:19AM +0100, Bruce Richardson wrote: I'm finding problems with the DocBook sgml exported by Lyx (1.1.4-fix3). Two examples: programlisting

The lyx file...

2000-05-03 Thread Bruce Richardson
... would be more useful. -- Bruce #LyX 1.1 created this file. For more info see http://www.lyx.org/ \lyxformat 2.15 \textclass docbook \begin_preamble !entity header system "header.sgml" \end_preamble \language default \inputencoding default \fontscheme default \graphics default

Re: DocBook sgml problems

2000-05-03 Thread Bruce Richardson
On 5/3/00, 12:11:10 PM, Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote regarding Re: DocBook sgml problems: On Wed, May 03, 2000 at 03:11:19AM +0100, Bruce Richardson wrote: I'm finding problems with the DocBook sgml exported by Lyx (1.1.4-fix3). Two examples: programlisting

The lyx file...

2000-05-03 Thread Bruce Richardson
... would be more useful. -- Bruce #LyX 1.1 created this file. For more info see http://www.lyx.org/ \lyxformat 2.15 \textclass docbook \begin_preamble \end_preamble \language default \inputencoding default \fontscheme default \graphics default \paperfontsize default \spacing single

Re: DocBook sgml problems

2000-05-03 Thread Bruce Richardson
On 5/3/00, 12:11:10 PM, Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote regarding Re: DocBook sgml problems: > On Wed, May 03, 2000 at 03:11:19AM +0100, Bruce Richardson wrote: > > I'm finding problems with the DocBook sgml exported by Lyx (1.1.4-fix3). &

Re: That makes two of us

2000-05-02 Thread Bruce Richardson
On Tue, May 02, 2000 at 12:54:45PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Even better -- the LyX people are working on making LyX GUI-independant. I'm personally looking forward to a Palm version ('cause that would be useful and unique) and a curses version (because I'm just that kind of person).

Re: That makes two of us

2000-05-02 Thread Bruce Richardson
On Tue, May 02, 2000 at 12:54:45PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Even better -- the LyX people are working on making LyX GUI-independant. I'm personally looking forward to a Palm version ('cause that would be useful and unique) and a curses version (because I'm just that kind of person).

Re: That makes two of us

2000-05-02 Thread Bruce Richardson
On Tue, May 02, 2000 at 12:54:45PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Even better -- the LyX people are working on making LyX GUI-independant. > I'm personally looking forward to a Palm version ('cause that would be > useful and unique) and a curses version (because I'm just that kind of >

~ disappears in postscript

2000-04-27 Thread Bruce Richardson
I'm writing a LinuxDoc document using Lyx 1.1.4fix3. If I export the document to postscript, any ~ character in a code environment disappears. Since I'm using a lot of command line examples, this isn't ideal! Any clues? -- Bruce It is impolite to tell a man who is carrying you on his

~ disappears in postscript

2000-04-27 Thread Bruce Richardson
I'm writing a LinuxDoc document using Lyx 1.1.4fix3. If I export the document to postscript, any ~ character in a code environment disappears. Since I'm using a lot of command line examples, this isn't ideal! Any clues? -- Bruce It is impolite to tell a man who is carrying you on his

~ disappears in postscript

2000-04-27 Thread Bruce Richardson
I'm writing a LinuxDoc document using Lyx 1.1.4fix3. If I export the document to postscript, any ~ character in a code environment disappears. Since I'm using a lot of command line examples, this isn't ideal! Any clues? -- Bruce It is impolite to tell a man who is carrying you on his

Re: Text as is

2000-04-24 Thread Bruce Richardson
On Mon, Apr 24, 2000 at 10:55:02PM +0100, Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos wrote: On Sun, Apr 23, 2000 at 11:44:51PM +0100, Bruce Richardson wrote: I'm trying to show part of a directory tree in a DocBook document, using ASCII characters. Is there an environment I can apply that will let me get

Re: Text as is

2000-04-24 Thread Bruce Richardson
On Mon, Apr 24, 2000 at 10:55:02PM +0100, Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos wrote: On Sun, Apr 23, 2000 at 11:44:51PM +0100, Bruce Richardson wrote: I'm trying to show part of a directory tree in a DocBook document, using ASCII characters. Is there an environment I can apply that will let me get

Re: Text "as is"

2000-04-24 Thread Bruce Richardson
On Mon, Apr 24, 2000 at 10:55:02PM +0100, Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos wrote: > On Sun, Apr 23, 2000 at 11:44:51PM +0100, Bruce Richardson wrote: > > I'm trying to show part of a directory tree in a DocBook document, using > > ASCII characters. Is there an environment I can apply t

Re: editing lyx files

2000-04-23 Thread Bruce Richardson
On Fri, Apr 21, 2000 at 08:11:02PM +0200, jdd wrote: As one may think the solution is with emacs. For example, in emacs, M-x replace-string ! C-q C-j \protected_separator C-q C-j ! inserts a protected separator before the !. C-q C-j inserts a cr in the emacs field. And in vi you

Text as is

2000-04-23 Thread Bruce Richardson
I'm trying to show part of a directory tree in a DocBook document, using ASCII characters. Is there an environment I can apply that will let me get the spacing exact so it all lines up? Frankly, DocBook and sgmltools 2 are turning out to be more trouble than they are worth - and less attractive

Re: editing lyx files

2000-04-23 Thread Bruce Richardson
On Fri, Apr 21, 2000 at 08:11:02PM +0200, jdd wrote: As one may think the solution is with emacs. For example, in emacs, M-x replace-string ! C-q C-j \protected_separator C-q C-j ! inserts a protected separator before the !. C-q C-j inserts a cr in the emacs field. And in vi you

Text as is

2000-04-23 Thread Bruce Richardson
I'm trying to show part of a directory tree in a DocBook document, using ASCII characters. Is there an environment I can apply that will let me get the spacing exact so it all lines up? Frankly, DocBook and sgmltools 2 are turning out to be more trouble than they are worth - and less attractive

Re: editing lyx files

2000-04-23 Thread Bruce Richardson
On Fri, Apr 21, 2000 at 08:11:02PM +0200, jdd wrote: > As one may think the solution is with emacs. For example, in emacs, > > M-x replace-string > ! > C-q C-j > \protected_separator C-q C-j > ! > > inserts a protected separator before the !. C-q C-j inserts a cr in the > emacs field. And in

Text "as is"

2000-04-23 Thread Bruce Richardson
I'm trying to show part of a directory tree in a DocBook document, using ASCII characters. Is there an environment I can apply that will let me get the spacing exact so it all lines up? Frankly, DocBook and sgmltools 2 are turning out to be more trouble than they are worth - and less attractive

DocBook errors

2000-04-21 Thread Bruce Richardson
Running sgmlcheck against any document I create from the DocBook template gives me this: start tag for "AUTHOR" omitted, but its declaration does not permit this no start tag specified for implied empty element "NAME" no start tag specified for implied empty element "AUTHOR" document type

DocBook errors

2000-04-21 Thread Bruce Richardson
Running sgmlcheck against any document I create from the DocBook template gives me this: start tag for "AUTHOR" omitted, but its declaration does not permit this no start tag specified for implied empty element "NAME" no start tag specified for implied empty element "AUTHOR" document type

DocBook errors

2000-04-21 Thread Bruce Richardson
Running sgmlcheck against any document I create from the DocBook template gives me this: start tag for "AUTHOR" omitted, but its declaration does not permit this no start tag specified for implied empty element "NAME" no start tag specified for implied empty element "AUTHOR" document type