Re: Links vs. -nodeps for install LYX on RH7.3?
Where did you get it? I found lyx-1.1.6fix4-133.src.rpm on fr2 [rpmfind] I was able to get it to rebuild - it took forever (~45 mins) - but then it says that it requires te_latex. But I already have tetex-latex installed, which should be about the same thing, right? I think I've wandered into a distinction between SuSE and other versions. Suggestions? Anyone know of any other RPM versions of 1.1.6fix4 around? On Wed, 30 Oct 2002 02:16, Carole Womeldorf wrote: Has anyone gotten Lyx to work on RH 7.3? Please help... On Tuesday 29 October 2002 09:50 pm, Steve.Homolya wrote: YES!!! lyx 1.1.6fix4 and 1.2.0 installed just fine from the binary rpms. 1.2.1 I don't know about. I recommend you go with 1.1.6fix4, or the latest fix version of 1.1.5. TIAA - Carole
Re: Links vs. -nodeps for install LYX on RH7.3?
Where did you get it? I found lyx-1.1.6fix4-133.src.rpm on fr2 [rpmfind] I was able to get it to rebuild - it took forever (~45 mins) - but then it says that it requires te_latex. But I already have tetex-latex installed, which should be about the same thing, right? I think I've wandered into a distinction between SuSE and other versions. Suggestions? Anyone know of any other RPM versions of 1.1.6fix4 around? On Wed, 30 Oct 2002 02:16, Carole Womeldorf wrote: Has anyone gotten Lyx to work on RH 7.3? Please help... On Tuesday 29 October 2002 09:50 pm, Steve.Homolya wrote: YES!!! lyx 1.1.6fix4 and 1.2.0 installed just fine from the binary rpms. 1.2.1 I don't know about. I recommend you go with 1.1.6fix4, or the latest fix version of 1.1.5. TIAA - Carole
Re: Links vs. -nodeps for install LYX on RH7.3?
Where did you get it? I found "lyx-1.1.6fix4-133.src.rpm" on fr2 [rpmfind] I was able to get it to rebuild - it took forever (~45 mins) - but then it says that it requires te_latex. But I already have tetex-latex installed, which should be about the same thing, right? I think I've wandered into a distinction between SuSE and other versions. Suggestions? Anyone know of any other RPM versions of 1.1.6fix4 around? > On Wed, 30 Oct 2002 02:16, Carole Womeldorf wrote: > > > > Has anyone gotten Lyx to work on RH 7.3? Please help... On Tuesday 29 October 2002 09:50 pm, Steve.Homolya wrote: > > YES!!! lyx 1.1.6fix4 and 1.2.0 installed just fine from the binary > rpms. 1.2.1 I don't know about. I recommend you go with 1.1.6fix4, > or the latest fix version of 1.1.5. > TIAA - Carole
Re: Links vs. -nodeps for install LYX on RH7.3?
I located a SuSE RPM that has BOTH libforms.so.0.88 and libforms.so.0.89 included in it - I found it referenced online, but couldn't find it on the web. Luckily I found it on my SuSE disks from my other computer: xforms-0.89-525.i386.rpm However the libstdc++-libc6.1-2.so.3 is more problematic. Apparently RH7.3 installs newer versions that lyx 1.2.1 isn't happy with AND installing the older version isn't permitted because it conflicts with the newer version. HAS ANYONE GOTTEN LYX TO WORK ON RH 7.3? Please help. TIA - Carole On Friday 25 October 2002 04:00 pm, Carole Womeldorf wrote: I've just upgraded to RH 7.3. I found three RPMS that seem nearly appropriate: A) lyx-1.2.0-3.i386.rpm B) lyx-1.2.1-1.i386.rpm C) lyx-1.2.1-1rh8-xforms089.i386.rpm With each I get dependency errors - A) [rootLyx_Install]# rpm -Uvh --test lyx-1.2.0-3.i386.rpm error: failed dependencies: xdvi is needed by lyx-1.2.0-3 libAiksaurus.so.0 is needed by lyx-1.2.0-3 libstdc++.so.2.10 is needed by lyx-1.2.0-3 Aiksaurus is needed by lyx-1.2.0-3 B) [rootLyx_Install]# rpm -Uvh lyx-1.2.1-1.i386.rpm error: failed dependencies: libforms.so.0.88 is needed by lyx-1.2.1-1 libstdc++-libc6.1-2.so.3 is needed by lyx-1.2.1-1 C) [rootLyx_Install]# rpm -Uvh lyx-1.2.1-1rh8-xforms089.i386.rpm error: failed dependencies: libgcc_s.so.1 is needed by lyx-1.2.1-1 libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0) is needed by lyx-1.2.1-1 libstdc++.so.5 is needed by lyx-1.2.1-1 libstdc++.so.5(GLIBCPP_3.2) is needed by lyx-1.2.1-1 (B) with the fewest problems, is most promising AND I do have installed: ./usr/lib/libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3 ./usr/lib/libstdc++-libc6.1-1.so.2 and ./usr/X11R6/lib/libforms.so.0.89 So I guess the reasonable response is go with (B), the lyx-1.2.1-1.i386.rpm file. AND use -nodeps. OR Would it be helpful to create the following links: ln -s libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3 libstdc++-libc6.2-1.so.3 ln -s libforms.so.0.89 libforms.so.0.88 TIA Carole
Re: Links vs. -nodeps for install LYX on RH7.3?
I located a SuSE RPM that has BOTH libforms.so.0.88 and libforms.so.0.89 included in it - I found it referenced online, but couldn't find it on the web. Luckily I found it on my SuSE disks from my other computer: xforms-0.89-525.i386.rpm However the libstdc++-libc6.1-2.so.3 is more problematic. Apparently RH7.3 installs newer versions that lyx 1.2.1 isn't happy with AND installing the older version isn't permitted because it conflicts with the newer version. HAS ANYONE GOTTEN LYX TO WORK ON RH 7.3? Please help. TIA - Carole On Friday 25 October 2002 04:00 pm, Carole Womeldorf wrote: I've just upgraded to RH 7.3. I found three RPMS that seem nearly appropriate: A) lyx-1.2.0-3.i386.rpm B) lyx-1.2.1-1.i386.rpm C) lyx-1.2.1-1rh8-xforms089.i386.rpm With each I get dependency errors - A) [rootLyx_Install]# rpm -Uvh --test lyx-1.2.0-3.i386.rpm error: failed dependencies: xdvi is needed by lyx-1.2.0-3 libAiksaurus.so.0 is needed by lyx-1.2.0-3 libstdc++.so.2.10 is needed by lyx-1.2.0-3 Aiksaurus is needed by lyx-1.2.0-3 B) [rootLyx_Install]# rpm -Uvh lyx-1.2.1-1.i386.rpm error: failed dependencies: libforms.so.0.88 is needed by lyx-1.2.1-1 libstdc++-libc6.1-2.so.3 is needed by lyx-1.2.1-1 C) [rootLyx_Install]# rpm -Uvh lyx-1.2.1-1rh8-xforms089.i386.rpm error: failed dependencies: libgcc_s.so.1 is needed by lyx-1.2.1-1 libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0) is needed by lyx-1.2.1-1 libstdc++.so.5 is needed by lyx-1.2.1-1 libstdc++.so.5(GLIBCPP_3.2) is needed by lyx-1.2.1-1 (B) with the fewest problems, is most promising AND I do have installed: ./usr/lib/libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3 ./usr/lib/libstdc++-libc6.1-1.so.2 and ./usr/X11R6/lib/libforms.so.0.89 So I guess the reasonable response is go with (B), the lyx-1.2.1-1.i386.rpm file. AND use -nodeps. OR Would it be helpful to create the following links: ln -s libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3 libstdc++-libc6.2-1.so.3 ln -s libforms.so.0.89 libforms.so.0.88 TIA Carole
Re: Links vs. -nodeps for install LYX on RH7.3?
I located a SuSE RPM that has BOTH libforms.so.0.88 and libforms.so.0.89 included in it - I found it referenced online, but couldn't find it on the web. Luckily I found it on my SuSE disks from my other computer: "xforms-0.89-525.i386.rpm" However the libstdc++-libc6.1-2.so.3 is more problematic. Apparently RH7.3 installs newer versions that lyx 1.2.1 isn't happy with AND installing the older version isn't permitted because it conflicts with the newer version. HAS ANYONE GOTTEN LYX TO WORK ON RH 7.3? Please help. TIA - Carole On Friday 25 October 2002 04:00 pm, Carole Womeldorf wrote: > I've just upgraded to RH 7.3. I found three RPMS that seem nearly > appropriate: > > A) lyx-1.2.0-3.i386.rpm > B) lyx-1.2.1-1.i386.rpm > C) lyx-1.2.1-1rh8-xforms089.i386.rpm > > With each I get dependency errors - > > A) [root@Lyx_Install]# rpm -Uvh --test lyx-1.2.0-3.i386.rpm > error: failed dependencies: > xdvi is needed by lyx-1.2.0-3 > libAiksaurus.so.0 is needed by lyx-1.2.0-3 > libstdc++.so.2.10 is needed by lyx-1.2.0-3 > Aiksaurus is needed by lyx-1.2.0-3 > B) [root@Lyx_Install]# rpm -Uvh lyx-1.2.1-1.i386.rpm > error: failed dependencies: > libforms.so.0.88 is needed by lyx-1.2.1-1 > libstdc++-libc6.1-2.so.3 is needed by lyx-1.2.1-1 > C) [root@Lyx_Install]# rpm -Uvh lyx-1.2.1-1rh8-xforms089.i386.rpm > error: failed dependencies: > libgcc_s.so.1 is needed by lyx-1.2.1-1 > libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0) is needed by lyx-1.2.1-1 > libstdc++.so.5 is needed by lyx-1.2.1-1 > libstdc++.so.5(GLIBCPP_3.2) is needed by lyx-1.2.1-1 > > (B) with the fewest problems, is most promising AND I do have > installed: > ./usr/lib/libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3 > ./usr/lib/libstdc++-libc6.1-1.so.2 > and > ./usr/X11R6/lib/libforms.so.0.89 > > So I guess the reasonable response is go with (B), the > lyx-1.2.1-1.i386.rpm file. > AND use -nodeps. > > OR Would it be helpful to create the following links: > > ln -s libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3 libstdc++-libc6.2-1.so.3 > ln -s libforms.so.0.89 libforms.so.0.88 > > TIA Carole
Links vs. -nodeps for install LYX on RH7.3?
I've just upgraded to RH 7.3. I found three RPMS that seem nearly appropriate: A) lyx-1.2.0-3.i386.rpm B) lyx-1.2.1-1.i386.rpm C) lyx-1.2.1-1rh8-xforms089.i386.rpm With each I get dependency errors - A) [rootLyx_Install]# rpm -Uvh --test lyx-1.2.0-3.i386.rpm error: failed dependencies: xdvi is needed by lyx-1.2.0-3 libAiksaurus.so.0 is needed by lyx-1.2.0-3 libstdc++.so.2.10 is needed by lyx-1.2.0-3 Aiksaurus is needed by lyx-1.2.0-3 B) [rootLyx_Install]# rpm -Uvh lyx-1.2.1-1.i386.rpm error: failed dependencies: libforms.so.0.88 is needed by lyx-1.2.1-1 libstdc++-libc6.1-2.so.3 is needed by lyx-1.2.1-1 C) [rootLyx_Install]# rpm -Uvh lyx-1.2.1-1rh8-xforms089.i386.rpm error: failed dependencies: libgcc_s.so.1 is needed by lyx-1.2.1-1 libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0) is needed by lyx-1.2.1-1 libstdc++.so.5 is needed by lyx-1.2.1-1 libstdc++.so.5(GLIBCPP_3.2) is needed by lyx-1.2.1-1 (B) with the fewest problems, is most promising AND I do have installed: ./usr/lib/libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3 ./usr/lib/libstdc++-libc6.1-1.so.2 and ./usr/X11R6/lib/libforms.so.0.89 So I guess the reasonable response is go with (B), the lyx-1.2.1-1.i386.rpm file. AND use -nodeps. OR Would it be helpful to create the following links: ln -s libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3 libstdc++-libc6.2-1.so.3 ln -s libforms.so.0.89 libforms.so.0.88 TIA Carole
Links vs. -nodeps for install LYX on RH7.3?
I've just upgraded to RH 7.3. I found three RPMS that seem nearly appropriate: A) lyx-1.2.0-3.i386.rpm B) lyx-1.2.1-1.i386.rpm C) lyx-1.2.1-1rh8-xforms089.i386.rpm With each I get dependency errors - A) [rootLyx_Install]# rpm -Uvh --test lyx-1.2.0-3.i386.rpm error: failed dependencies: xdvi is needed by lyx-1.2.0-3 libAiksaurus.so.0 is needed by lyx-1.2.0-3 libstdc++.so.2.10 is needed by lyx-1.2.0-3 Aiksaurus is needed by lyx-1.2.0-3 B) [rootLyx_Install]# rpm -Uvh lyx-1.2.1-1.i386.rpm error: failed dependencies: libforms.so.0.88 is needed by lyx-1.2.1-1 libstdc++-libc6.1-2.so.3 is needed by lyx-1.2.1-1 C) [rootLyx_Install]# rpm -Uvh lyx-1.2.1-1rh8-xforms089.i386.rpm error: failed dependencies: libgcc_s.so.1 is needed by lyx-1.2.1-1 libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0) is needed by lyx-1.2.1-1 libstdc++.so.5 is needed by lyx-1.2.1-1 libstdc++.so.5(GLIBCPP_3.2) is needed by lyx-1.2.1-1 (B) with the fewest problems, is most promising AND I do have installed: ./usr/lib/libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3 ./usr/lib/libstdc++-libc6.1-1.so.2 and ./usr/X11R6/lib/libforms.so.0.89 So I guess the reasonable response is go with (B), the lyx-1.2.1-1.i386.rpm file. AND use -nodeps. OR Would it be helpful to create the following links: ln -s libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3 libstdc++-libc6.2-1.so.3 ln -s libforms.so.0.89 libforms.so.0.88 TIA Carole
Links vs. -nodeps for install LYX on RH7.3?
I've just upgraded to RH 7.3. I found three RPMS that seem nearly appropriate: A) lyx-1.2.0-3.i386.rpm B) lyx-1.2.1-1.i386.rpm C) lyx-1.2.1-1rh8-xforms089.i386.rpm With each I get dependency errors - A) [root@Lyx_Install]# rpm -Uvh --test lyx-1.2.0-3.i386.rpm error: failed dependencies: xdvi is needed by lyx-1.2.0-3 libAiksaurus.so.0 is needed by lyx-1.2.0-3 libstdc++.so.2.10 is needed by lyx-1.2.0-3 Aiksaurus is needed by lyx-1.2.0-3 B) [root@Lyx_Install]# rpm -Uvh lyx-1.2.1-1.i386.rpm error: failed dependencies: libforms.so.0.88 is needed by lyx-1.2.1-1 libstdc++-libc6.1-2.so.3 is needed by lyx-1.2.1-1 C) [root@Lyx_Install]# rpm -Uvh lyx-1.2.1-1rh8-xforms089.i386.rpm error: failed dependencies: libgcc_s.so.1 is needed by lyx-1.2.1-1 libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0) is needed by lyx-1.2.1-1 libstdc++.so.5 is needed by lyx-1.2.1-1 libstdc++.so.5(GLIBCPP_3.2) is needed by lyx-1.2.1-1 (B) with the fewest problems, is most promising AND I do have installed: ./usr/lib/libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3 ./usr/lib/libstdc++-libc6.1-1.so.2 and ./usr/X11R6/lib/libforms.so.0.89 So I guess the reasonable response is go with (B), the lyx-1.2.1-1.i386.rpm file. AND use -nodeps. OR Would it be helpful to create the following links: ln -s libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3 libstdc++-libc6.2-1.so.3 ln -s libforms.so.0.89 libforms.so.0.88 TIA Carole
Missing textclass files for examples
When I start up the examples: Foils.lyx, Literate.lyx, aa.lyx, on start up I get the Alert: The document uses an unknown textclass foils [literate-article, aa] Lyx will not be able to produce output correctly. Is something missing from my setup? The only foil* file I have found is /usr/share/lyx/layouts/foils.layout. Or is this just, more or less, noise and the default will work fine?...Well, the foils.lyx file gives 4 ERRORS when I try to send it to DVI. And the aa file give 41 ERRORS. Suggestions? Errors like: Layout 'Foilhead' does not exist in textclass 'cv' Trying to use default layout instead. show up on std error output. When I change the 'aa' textclass from 'cv' to 'article' I can get down to 6 errors, but these are the examples - they shouldn't have errors until after I mess with them. ;) Suggestions Carole [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Missing textclass files for examples
When I start up the examples: Foils.lyx, Literate.lyx, aa.lyx, on start up I get the Alert: The document uses an unknown textclass foils [literate-article, aa] Lyx will not be able to produce output correctly. Is something missing from my setup? The only foil* file I have found is /usr/share/lyx/layouts/foils.layout. Or is this just, more or less, noise and the default will work fine?...Well, the foils.lyx file gives 4 ERRORS when I try to send it to DVI. And the aa file give 41 ERRORS. Suggestions? Errors like: Layout 'Foilhead' does not exist in textclass 'cv' Trying to use default layout instead. show up on std error output. When I change the 'aa' textclass from 'cv' to 'article' I can get down to 6 errors, but these are the examples - they shouldn't have errors until after I mess with them. ;) Suggestions Carole [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Missing textclass files for examples
When I start up the examples: "Foils.lyx", "Literate.lyx", "aa.lyx", on start up I get the Alert: "The document uses an unknown textclass "foils" ["literate-article", "aa"] Lyx will not be able to produce output correctly." Is something missing from my setup? The only "foil*" file I have found is "/usr/share/lyx/layouts/foils.layout." Or is this just, more or less, noise and the default will work fine?...Well, the foils.lyx file gives 4 ERRORS when I try to send it to DVI. And the "aa" file give 41 ERRORS. Suggestions? Errors like: "Layout 'Foilhead' does not exist in textclass 'cv' Trying to use default layout instead. show up on std error output. When I change the 'aa' textclass from 'cv' to 'article' I can get down to 6 errors, but these are the examples - they shouldn't have errors until after I mess with them. ;) Suggestions Carole [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Lyx upgrade Latex to Lyx *.cls files
On my SuSE 8.0 system, I want to upgrade my Lyx version (currently 1.1.6fix4) - however when I run rpm -Uvh --test lyx-1.2.1-1.i386.rpm I get failed dependencies tetex-dvips and tetex-latex. I tried installing the rpms from tetex but I must have gotten the wrong versions. My current version of teTeX is beta.20020207-70. Suggestions? Also 1) Is there a good guide for a newbie to learn to turn a *.cls file into something useful in Lyx 2) Are there many demos of different journal article formats somewhere? Thanks a bunch everybody - Carole [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Lyx upgrade Latex to Lyx *.cls files
Herbert Voss wrote: Carole Womeldorf wrote: On my SuSE 8.0 system, I want to upgrade my Lyx version (currently 1.1.6fix4) - however when I run rpm -Uvh --test lyx-1.2.1-1.i386.rpm I rpm -Uvh --nodeps Thanks for all the tips, Herbert. Quick question - will I be losing any functionality by doing this? Are tetex-latex and tetex-dvips already in my version of teTeX (beta.20020207-70) but just not registering as individual programs in the rpm database? Carole
Lyx upgrade Latex to Lyx *.cls files
On my SuSE 8.0 system, I want to upgrade my Lyx version (currently 1.1.6fix4) - however when I run rpm -Uvh --test lyx-1.2.1-1.i386.rpm I get failed dependencies tetex-dvips and tetex-latex. I tried installing the rpms from tetex but I must have gotten the wrong versions. My current version of teTeX is beta.20020207-70. Suggestions? Also 1) Is there a good guide for a newbie to learn to turn a *.cls file into something useful in Lyx 2) Are there many demos of different journal article formats somewhere? Thanks a bunch everybody - Carole [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Lyx upgrade Latex to Lyx *.cls files
Herbert Voss wrote: Carole Womeldorf wrote: On my SuSE 8.0 system, I want to upgrade my Lyx version (currently 1.1.6fix4) - however when I run rpm -Uvh --test lyx-1.2.1-1.i386.rpm I rpm -Uvh --nodeps Thanks for all the tips, Herbert. Quick question - will I be losing any functionality by doing this? Are tetex-latex and tetex-dvips already in my version of teTeX (beta.20020207-70) but just not registering as individual programs in the rpm database? Carole
Lyx upgrade & Latex to Lyx & *.cls files
On my SuSE 8.0 system, I want to upgrade my Lyx version (currently 1.1.6fix4) - however when I run "rpm -Uvh --test lyx-1.2.1-1.i386.rpm" I get failed dependencies "tetex-dvips" and "tetex-latex." I tried installing the rpms from tetex but I must have gotten the wrong versions. My current version of teTeX is beta.20020207-70. Suggestions? Also 1) Is there a good guide for a newbie to learn to turn a *.cls file into something useful in Lyx 2) Are there many demos of different journal article formats somewhere? Thanks a bunch everybody - Carole [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Lyx upgrade & Latex to Lyx & *.cls files
Herbert Voss wrote: > Carole Womeldorf wrote: > > On my SuSE 8.0 system, I want to upgrade my Lyx version (currently > > 1.1.6fix4) - however when I run "rpm -Uvh --test lyx-1.2.1-1.i386.rpm" I > > rpm -Uvh --nodeps Thanks for all the tips, Herbert. Quick question - will I be losing any functionality by doing this? Are tetex-latex and tetex-dvips already in my version of teTeX (beta.20020207-70) but just not registering as individual programs in the rpm database? Carole
