Re: A basic requested feature
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 3:54 PM, Sam Lewis stroboscopicallyconflu...@yahoo.co.uk wrote: IMO, we need to improve the functionality of LyX, and not block good ideas. Of course everybody is welcome to make suggestions and put forward ideas on functionality. But it does not mean that everything gets implemented; it needs to be realistic and accepted by the community of users and developers. ... and it needs someone interested and available to actually code the stuff. :) Liviu Cheers, Sam -- Do you know how to read? http://www.alienetworks.com/srtest.cfm http://goodies.xfce.org/projects/applications/xfce4-dict#speed-reader Do you know how to write? http://garbl.home.comcast.net/~garbl/stylemanual/e.htm#e-mail
Re: A basic requested feature
Am 13.04.2011 um 17:22 schrieb Diego Queiroz: I would encourage people to think a few seconds how to call their documents. That will save some time in searching for them later on. You get the point! And how can LyX aid users to achieve this? Yes, you guessed right! Proposing filenames! The title is easy to get, but in a higher level of discussion we may also want to discuss if the title/first sentence/etc is the better string to get. Maybe some info based on the master document or the document structure? (as Chapter-5, Appendix, etc). I dunno. There are lots of things to consider and this basic requested feature could be improved to a most wanted feature. Nowadays modern desktop systems are providing the capability to search your files, e. g. by content. Normally it is supported by indexing services, so it should give you quick answer to arbitrary questions. Proposing a filename is not such an importing feature, IMHO. And it is not easy to get it right. I' always expect different points of view, how this should work. Stephan
Re: A basic requested feature
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 3:09 AM, Diego Queiroz queiroz.di...@gmail.com wrote: Hellmut, this behavior is not a rule, right? As a programmer I assure you: once things are correctly handled, everything should be fine. Believe on me. :-) And I repeat, it is just a guess for a name to the file, LyX won't impose the filename. An option to disable this feature is welcome (for those who dislikes). The LyX coding 'philosophy' is to assist users but in an un-intrusive manner. To rephrase, we don't intend to provide each and every disturbingly-helpful feature that MS Word and the ilk provide. (Personally I find title / first line file name suggestions are useless for me and provide overhead, since I will always want to delete that text to provide a file name that confirms to my naming style. The current 'newfile#.lyx' is always helpful when creating dummy documents for the ML. I do appreciate, however, that others have different user habits.) To be clear, I don't think that LyX will ever care to provide such a trivial option in the Prefs. (I hope it won't!) What is left is to determine a consistent behaviour that works in most cases for most users. The current behaviour ('newfile#.lyx') is obviously consistent and works flawlessly whatever the actual content of the document. The behaviour you suggest would require coding a contrived hack, which would take \title if available, otherwise first line (to which some expressed strong aversion and which I also find disturbing), if suggestion contains funny chars or delimiters (such as \n \t and the like) strip them (considering utf-8, how do you determine what is legal and what is not?), perhaps other difficult to foresee cases (such as LyX documents containing only ERT). I know that you will disagree, but I don't think that most users and developers would approve of such a hack in LyX. And I don't know who would want to code _and_ maintain it. Regards Liviu If a guess for the filename wasn't necessary, why LyX doesn't leave the file field blank instead of newfile? The answer is: because this feature improves the software usability. Just as an stupid example, suppose I create 10 new files, type something in all of them and hit Save all. With this feature, I will be able to determine a good name for each file (based on the first sentence, or anything else) without navigate to each document. I bet I can't do the same if newfile or Untitled was the result. IMO, we need to improve the functionality of LyX, and not block good ideas. --- Diego Queiroz 2011/4/9 Hellmut Weber m...@hellmutweber.de Am 08.04.2011 18:37, schrieb Inon Sharony: Hey LyX developers! As in MS (boo!) Office, when saving a new file, whatever appears in the \title section should automatically be guessed as the name that the file should be saved as. Do you agree? Thanks, Although you addressed the developpers I would like to contribute my 0.02$ as a user. Please do not copy the idiocy of M$ Word to create file names using the title or (much worse) the first phrase. This leads in many casesto strings which contain blanks or even strnage utf-8 characters. Even some windows systems do substitute someof these 'strange' characters then by '?' or '_'. Best regards Hellmut -- Dr. Hellmut Weber m...@hellmutweber.de Degenfeldstraße 2 tel +49-89-3081172 D-80803 München-Schwabing mobil +49-172-8450321 please: No DOCs, no PPTs. why: tinyurl.com/cbgq -- Do you know how to read? http://www.alienetworks.com/srtest.cfm http://goodies.xfce.org/projects/applications/xfce4-dict#speed-reader Do you know how to write? http://garbl.home.comcast.net/~garbl/stylemanual/e.htm#e-mail
Re: A basic requested feature
On Thu, April 14, 2011 10:43, Stephan Witt wrote: Nowadays modern desktop systems are providing the capability to search your files, e. g. by content. Normally it is supported by indexing services, so it should give you quick answer to arbitrary questions. Proposing a filename is not such an importing feature, IMHO. And it is not easy to get it right. I' always expect different points of view, how this should work. It definitely is not easy to get 100% right, 80% would be interesting enough. I disagree on the desktop search bit, that is mostly helpful if you know a lot about the document you are looking for. I would find a name-suggester that would take: The current date, e.g. 20110414, an abbreviation of the style you are using, for example 'LTR' for letters and the subject of the document plus a version number useful. The most work is probably expanding the various document styles to include a field that refers to another field that is the most suitable source for the subject and an abbreviation scheme. And this assumes of course that people rarely use their own document styles. Regards, Walter
Re: A basic requested feature
maybe I'm a bit old fashioned (born in 1943 ;-). So I do not have this terrible need to do everyzhing the fastest way possible. I'm young (born in the 80's) and I confess I'm neurotic about automatization (much over the normal). Sorry if I am too boring sometimes. I enjoy to make the computer decide things for me, and I enjoy much more when it make good decisions. BTW, my reseach area is Artificial Intelligence, so how could I think different? :-) ... and it needs someone interested and available to actually code the stuff. :) I'm very interested. I have tons of ideas, but I still have problems to set up a confortable environment to start to code. Another problem is that I'm still trying to understand some pieces of code, so it will take some time for me to really contribute with some new feature. Proposing a filename is not such an importing feature, IMHO. I agree. But this thread subject isn't is list of most important features, it is just a feature request. Now if it is important or not, its really another question... What is left is to determine a consistent behaviour that works in most cases for most users. The current behaviour ('newfile#.lyx') is obviously consistent and works flawlessly whatever the actual content of the document. You're probably right. But actually, we really do not know what works in most cases for most users. We just guess it works for most users. IMO, this could be a good feature to implement: get statistics of LyX usage directly from users as other softwares already do (anonymous usage). Maybe, it is early to think in a thing like this, but it is good to start to think for the near future (and for god's sake, do not reply me with messages like I don't think this is the most important feature right now... I know I know, it is not, ok? :-) ). Cheers, --- Diego Queiroz 2011/4/14 Liviu Andronic landronim...@gmail.com On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 3:09 AM, Diego Queiroz queiroz.di...@gmail.com wrote: Hellmut, this behavior is not a rule, right? As a programmer I assure you: once things are correctly handled, everything should be fine. Believe on me. :-) And I repeat, it is just a guess for a name to the file, LyX won't impose the filename. An option to disable this feature is welcome (for those who dislikes). The LyX coding 'philosophy' is to assist users but in an un-intrusive manner. To rephrase, we don't intend to provide each and every disturbingly-helpful feature that MS Word and the ilk provide. (Personally I find title / first line file name suggestions are useless for me and provide overhead, since I will always want to delete that text to provide a file name that confirms to my naming style. The current 'newfile#.lyx' is always helpful when creating dummy documents for the ML. I do appreciate, however, that others have different user habits.) To be clear, I don't think that LyX will ever care to provide such a trivial option in the Prefs. (I hope it won't!) What is left is to determine a consistent behaviour that works in most cases for most users. The current behaviour ('newfile#.lyx') is obviously consistent and works flawlessly whatever the actual content of the document. The behaviour you suggest would require coding a contrived hack, which would take \title if available, otherwise first line (to which some expressed strong aversion and which I also find disturbing), if suggestion contains funny chars or delimiters (such as \n \t and the like) strip them (considering utf-8, how do you determine what is legal and what is not?), perhaps other difficult to foresee cases (such as LyX documents containing only ERT). I know that you will disagree, but I don't think that most users and developers would approve of such a hack in LyX. And I don't know who would want to code _and_ maintain it. Regards Liviu If a guess for the filename wasn't necessary, why LyX doesn't leave the file field blank instead of newfile? The answer is: because this feature improves the software usability. Just as an stupid example, suppose I create 10 new files, type something in all of them and hit Save all. With this feature, I will be able to determine a good name for each file (based on the first sentence, or anything else) without navigate to each document. I bet I can't do the same if newfile or Untitled was the result. IMO, we need to improve the functionality of LyX, and not block good ideas. --- Diego Queiroz 2011/4/9 Hellmut Weber m...@hellmutweber.de Am 08.04.2011 18:37, schrieb Inon Sharony: Hey LyX developers! As in MS (boo!) Office, when saving a new file, whatever appears in the \title section should automatically be guessed as the name that the file should be saved as. Do you agree? Thanks, Although you addressed the developpers I would like to contribute my 0.02$ as a user. Please do not copy the idiocy of M$ Word to create file names using the
Re: A basic requested feature
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 14/04/11 11:36, Walter van Holst wrote: On Thu, April 14, 2011 10:43, Stephan Witt wrote: Nowadays modern desktop systems are providing the capability to search your files, e. g. by content. Normally it is supported by indexing services, so it should give you quick answer to arbitrary questions. Proposing a filename is not such an importing feature, IMHO. And it is not easy to get it right. I' always expect different points of view, how this should work. It definitely is not easy to get 100% right, 80% would be interesting enough. I disagree on the desktop search bit, that is mostly helpful if you know a lot about the document you are looking for. I would find a name-suggester that would take: The current date, e.g. 20110414, an abbreviation of the style you are using, for example 'LTR' for letters and the subject of the document plus a version number useful. The most work is probably expanding the various document styles to include a field that refers to another field that is the most suitable source for the subject and an abbreviation scheme. And this assumes of course that people rarely use their own document styles. Interesting suggestion - bug I must agree, it is not an overly iportant feature. But: Put it as a feature request into the bug tracker - then it won't be lost. Then all comments can be there and one could work out a framework how this could work - I like the different templates for filename an interesting approach, which could even be used for backups (keep the last three backups, named following the template provided). Nice idea - but not that important. So: Add it to the bug tracker as a feature request then it will not be lost. Rainer Regards, Walter - -- Rainer M. Krug, PhD (Conservation Ecology, SUN), MSc (Conservation Biology, UCT), Dipl. Phys. (Germany) Centre of Excellence for Invasion Biology Stellenbosch University South Africa Tel : +33 - (0)9 53 10 27 44 Cell: +33 - (0)6 85 62 59 98 Fax : +33 - (0)9 58 10 27 44 Fax (D):+49 - (0)3 21 21 25 22 44 email: rai...@krugs.de Skype: RMkrug -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk2mxWIACgkQoYgNqgF2egoOTQCeLLT15U+gFo6RmInPzzh5HJzi AtIAniMqGmBncDog5oRrXFC6vw/5Z+zw =AeSS -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: A basic requested feature
On 04/14/2011 05:03 AM, Liviu Andronic wrote: To be clear, I don't think that LyX will ever care to provide such a trivial option in the Prefs. (I hope it won't!) See the other thread on how there are too many options already! Richard
Re: A basic requested feature
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 3:54 PM, Sam Lewis stroboscopicallyconflu...@yahoo.co.uk wrote: IMO, we need to improve the functionality of LyX, and not block good ideas. Of course everybody is welcome to make suggestions and put forward ideas on functionality. But it does not mean that everything gets implemented; it needs to be realistic and accepted by the community of users and developers. ... and it needs someone interested and available to actually code the stuff. :) Liviu Cheers, Sam -- Do you know how to read? http://www.alienetworks.com/srtest.cfm http://goodies.xfce.org/projects/applications/xfce4-dict#speed-reader Do you know how to write? http://garbl.home.comcast.net/~garbl/stylemanual/e.htm#e-mail
Re: A basic requested feature
Am 13.04.2011 um 17:22 schrieb Diego Queiroz: I would encourage people to think a few seconds how to call their documents. That will save some time in searching for them later on. You get the point! And how can LyX aid users to achieve this? Yes, you guessed right! Proposing filenames! The title is easy to get, but in a higher level of discussion we may also want to discuss if the title/first sentence/etc is the better string to get. Maybe some info based on the master document or the document structure? (as Chapter-5, Appendix, etc). I dunno. There are lots of things to consider and this basic requested feature could be improved to a most wanted feature. Nowadays modern desktop systems are providing the capability to search your files, e. g. by content. Normally it is supported by indexing services, so it should give you quick answer to arbitrary questions. Proposing a filename is not such an importing feature, IMHO. And it is not easy to get it right. I' always expect different points of view, how this should work. Stephan
Re: A basic requested feature
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 3:09 AM, Diego Queiroz queiroz.di...@gmail.com wrote: Hellmut, this behavior is not a rule, right? As a programmer I assure you: once things are correctly handled, everything should be fine. Believe on me. :-) And I repeat, it is just a guess for a name to the file, LyX won't impose the filename. An option to disable this feature is welcome (for those who dislikes). The LyX coding 'philosophy' is to assist users but in an un-intrusive manner. To rephrase, we don't intend to provide each and every disturbingly-helpful feature that MS Word and the ilk provide. (Personally I find title / first line file name suggestions are useless for me and provide overhead, since I will always want to delete that text to provide a file name that confirms to my naming style. The current 'newfile#.lyx' is always helpful when creating dummy documents for the ML. I do appreciate, however, that others have different user habits.) To be clear, I don't think that LyX will ever care to provide such a trivial option in the Prefs. (I hope it won't!) What is left is to determine a consistent behaviour that works in most cases for most users. The current behaviour ('newfile#.lyx') is obviously consistent and works flawlessly whatever the actual content of the document. The behaviour you suggest would require coding a contrived hack, which would take \title if available, otherwise first line (to which some expressed strong aversion and which I also find disturbing), if suggestion contains funny chars or delimiters (such as \n \t and the like) strip them (considering utf-8, how do you determine what is legal and what is not?), perhaps other difficult to foresee cases (such as LyX documents containing only ERT). I know that you will disagree, but I don't think that most users and developers would approve of such a hack in LyX. And I don't know who would want to code _and_ maintain it. Regards Liviu If a guess for the filename wasn't necessary, why LyX doesn't leave the file field blank instead of newfile? The answer is: because this feature improves the software usability. Just as an stupid example, suppose I create 10 new files, type something in all of them and hit Save all. With this feature, I will be able to determine a good name for each file (based on the first sentence, or anything else) without navigate to each document. I bet I can't do the same if newfile or Untitled was the result. IMO, we need to improve the functionality of LyX, and not block good ideas. --- Diego Queiroz 2011/4/9 Hellmut Weber m...@hellmutweber.de Am 08.04.2011 18:37, schrieb Inon Sharony: Hey LyX developers! As in MS (boo!) Office, when saving a new file, whatever appears in the \title section should automatically be guessed as the name that the file should be saved as. Do you agree? Thanks, Although you addressed the developpers I would like to contribute my 0.02$ as a user. Please do not copy the idiocy of M$ Word to create file names using the title or (much worse) the first phrase. This leads in many casesto strings which contain blanks or even strnage utf-8 characters. Even some windows systems do substitute someof these 'strange' characters then by '?' or '_'. Best regards Hellmut -- Dr. Hellmut Weber m...@hellmutweber.de Degenfeldstraße 2 tel +49-89-3081172 D-80803 München-Schwabing mobil +49-172-8450321 please: No DOCs, no PPTs. why: tinyurl.com/cbgq -- Do you know how to read? http://www.alienetworks.com/srtest.cfm http://goodies.xfce.org/projects/applications/xfce4-dict#speed-reader Do you know how to write? http://garbl.home.comcast.net/~garbl/stylemanual/e.htm#e-mail
Re: A basic requested feature
On Thu, April 14, 2011 10:43, Stephan Witt wrote: Nowadays modern desktop systems are providing the capability to search your files, e. g. by content. Normally it is supported by indexing services, so it should give you quick answer to arbitrary questions. Proposing a filename is not such an importing feature, IMHO. And it is not easy to get it right. I' always expect different points of view, how this should work. It definitely is not easy to get 100% right, 80% would be interesting enough. I disagree on the desktop search bit, that is mostly helpful if you know a lot about the document you are looking for. I would find a name-suggester that would take: The current date, e.g. 20110414, an abbreviation of the style you are using, for example 'LTR' for letters and the subject of the document plus a version number useful. The most work is probably expanding the various document styles to include a field that refers to another field that is the most suitable source for the subject and an abbreviation scheme. And this assumes of course that people rarely use their own document styles. Regards, Walter
Re: A basic requested feature
maybe I'm a bit old fashioned (born in 1943 ;-). So I do not have this terrible need to do everyzhing the fastest way possible. I'm young (born in the 80's) and I confess I'm neurotic about automatization (much over the normal). Sorry if I am too boring sometimes. I enjoy to make the computer decide things for me, and I enjoy much more when it make good decisions. BTW, my reseach area is Artificial Intelligence, so how could I think different? :-) ... and it needs someone interested and available to actually code the stuff. :) I'm very interested. I have tons of ideas, but I still have problems to set up a confortable environment to start to code. Another problem is that I'm still trying to understand some pieces of code, so it will take some time for me to really contribute with some new feature. Proposing a filename is not such an importing feature, IMHO. I agree. But this thread subject isn't is list of most important features, it is just a feature request. Now if it is important or not, its really another question... What is left is to determine a consistent behaviour that works in most cases for most users. The current behaviour ('newfile#.lyx') is obviously consistent and works flawlessly whatever the actual content of the document. You're probably right. But actually, we really do not know what works in most cases for most users. We just guess it works for most users. IMO, this could be a good feature to implement: get statistics of LyX usage directly from users as other softwares already do (anonymous usage). Maybe, it is early to think in a thing like this, but it is good to start to think for the near future (and for god's sake, do not reply me with messages like I don't think this is the most important feature right now... I know I know, it is not, ok? :-) ). Cheers, --- Diego Queiroz 2011/4/14 Liviu Andronic landronim...@gmail.com On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 3:09 AM, Diego Queiroz queiroz.di...@gmail.com wrote: Hellmut, this behavior is not a rule, right? As a programmer I assure you: once things are correctly handled, everything should be fine. Believe on me. :-) And I repeat, it is just a guess for a name to the file, LyX won't impose the filename. An option to disable this feature is welcome (for those who dislikes). The LyX coding 'philosophy' is to assist users but in an un-intrusive manner. To rephrase, we don't intend to provide each and every disturbingly-helpful feature that MS Word and the ilk provide. (Personally I find title / first line file name suggestions are useless for me and provide overhead, since I will always want to delete that text to provide a file name that confirms to my naming style. The current 'newfile#.lyx' is always helpful when creating dummy documents for the ML. I do appreciate, however, that others have different user habits.) To be clear, I don't think that LyX will ever care to provide such a trivial option in the Prefs. (I hope it won't!) What is left is to determine a consistent behaviour that works in most cases for most users. The current behaviour ('newfile#.lyx') is obviously consistent and works flawlessly whatever the actual content of the document. The behaviour you suggest would require coding a contrived hack, which would take \title if available, otherwise first line (to which some expressed strong aversion and which I also find disturbing), if suggestion contains funny chars or delimiters (such as \n \t and the like) strip them (considering utf-8, how do you determine what is legal and what is not?), perhaps other difficult to foresee cases (such as LyX documents containing only ERT). I know that you will disagree, but I don't think that most users and developers would approve of such a hack in LyX. And I don't know who would want to code _and_ maintain it. Regards Liviu If a guess for the filename wasn't necessary, why LyX doesn't leave the file field blank instead of newfile? The answer is: because this feature improves the software usability. Just as an stupid example, suppose I create 10 new files, type something in all of them and hit Save all. With this feature, I will be able to determine a good name for each file (based on the first sentence, or anything else) without navigate to each document. I bet I can't do the same if newfile or Untitled was the result. IMO, we need to improve the functionality of LyX, and not block good ideas. --- Diego Queiroz 2011/4/9 Hellmut Weber m...@hellmutweber.de Am 08.04.2011 18:37, schrieb Inon Sharony: Hey LyX developers! As in MS (boo!) Office, when saving a new file, whatever appears in the \title section should automatically be guessed as the name that the file should be saved as. Do you agree? Thanks, Although you addressed the developpers I would like to contribute my 0.02$ as a user. Please do not copy the idiocy of M$ Word to create file names using the
Re: A basic requested feature
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 14/04/11 11:36, Walter van Holst wrote: On Thu, April 14, 2011 10:43, Stephan Witt wrote: Nowadays modern desktop systems are providing the capability to search your files, e. g. by content. Normally it is supported by indexing services, so it should give you quick answer to arbitrary questions. Proposing a filename is not such an importing feature, IMHO. And it is not easy to get it right. I' always expect different points of view, how this should work. It definitely is not easy to get 100% right, 80% would be interesting enough. I disagree on the desktop search bit, that is mostly helpful if you know a lot about the document you are looking for. I would find a name-suggester that would take: The current date, e.g. 20110414, an abbreviation of the style you are using, for example 'LTR' for letters and the subject of the document plus a version number useful. The most work is probably expanding the various document styles to include a field that refers to another field that is the most suitable source for the subject and an abbreviation scheme. And this assumes of course that people rarely use their own document styles. Interesting suggestion - bug I must agree, it is not an overly iportant feature. But: Put it as a feature request into the bug tracker - then it won't be lost. Then all comments can be there and one could work out a framework how this could work - I like the different templates for filename an interesting approach, which could even be used for backups (keep the last three backups, named following the template provided). Nice idea - but not that important. So: Add it to the bug tracker as a feature request then it will not be lost. Rainer Regards, Walter - -- Rainer M. Krug, PhD (Conservation Ecology, SUN), MSc (Conservation Biology, UCT), Dipl. Phys. (Germany) Centre of Excellence for Invasion Biology Stellenbosch University South Africa Tel : +33 - (0)9 53 10 27 44 Cell: +33 - (0)6 85 62 59 98 Fax : +33 - (0)9 58 10 27 44 Fax (D):+49 - (0)3 21 21 25 22 44 email: rai...@krugs.de Skype: RMkrug -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk2mxWIACgkQoYgNqgF2egoOTQCeLLT15U+gFo6RmInPzzh5HJzi AtIAniMqGmBncDog5oRrXFC6vw/5Z+zw =AeSS -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: A basic requested feature
On 04/14/2011 05:03 AM, Liviu Andronic wrote: To be clear, I don't think that LyX will ever care to provide such a trivial option in the Prefs. (I hope it won't!) See the other thread on how there are too many options already! Richard
Re: A basic requested feature
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 3:54 PM, Sam Lewiswrote: >> IMO, we need to improve the functionality of >> LyX, and not block good ideas. > > Of course everybody is welcome to make suggestions and put forward ideas on > functionality. But it does not mean that everything gets implemented; it > needs to be realistic and accepted by the community of users and developers. > ... and it needs someone interested and available to actually code the stuff. :) Liviu > Cheers, Sam > -- Do you know how to read? http://www.alienetworks.com/srtest.cfm http://goodies.xfce.org/projects/applications/xfce4-dict#speed-reader Do you know how to write? http://garbl.home.comcast.net/~garbl/stylemanual/e.htm#e-mail
Re: A basic requested feature
Am 13.04.2011 um 17:22 schrieb Diego Queiroz: > > I would encourage people to think a few seconds how to call their > > documents. That will save some time in searching for them later on. > > You get the point! > And how can LyX aid users to achieve this? Yes, you guessed right! Proposing > filenames! > The title is easy to get, but in a higher level of discussion we may also > want to discuss if the title/first sentence/etc is the better string to get. > Maybe some info based on the master document or the document structure? (as > "Chapter-5", "Appendix", etc). I dunno. > There are lots of things to consider and this "basic requested feature" could > be improved to a "most wanted feature". Nowadays modern desktop systems are providing the capability to search your files, e. g. by content. Normally it is supported by indexing services, so it should give you quick answer to arbitrary questions. Proposing a filename is not such an importing feature, IMHO. And it is not easy to get it right. I' always expect different points of view, how this should work. Stephan
Re: A basic requested feature
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 3:09 AM, Diego Queirozwrote: > Hellmut, this behavior is not a rule, right? > As a programmer I assure you: once things are correctly handled, everything > should be fine. Believe on me. :-) > And I repeat, it is just a guess for a name to the file, LyX won't impose > the filename. > An option to disable this feature is welcome (for those who dislikes). > The LyX coding 'philosophy' is to assist users but in an un-intrusive manner. To rephrase, we don't intend to provide each and every disturbingly-helpful feature that MS Word and the ilk provide. (Personally I find title / first line file name suggestions are useless for me and provide overhead, since I will always want to delete that text to provide a file name that confirms to "my" naming style. The current 'newfile#.lyx' is always helpful when creating dummy documents for the ML. I do appreciate, however, that others have different user habits.) To be clear, I don't think that LyX will ever care to provide such a trivial option in the Prefs. (I hope it won't!) What is left is to determine a consistent behaviour that works in most cases for most users. The current behaviour ('newfile#.lyx') is obviously consistent and works flawlessly whatever the actual content of the document. The behaviour you suggest would require coding a contrived hack, which would take \title if available, otherwise first line (to which some expressed strong aversion and which I also find disturbing), if suggestion contains funny chars or delimiters (such as \n \t and the like) strip them (considering utf-8, how do you determine what is legal and what is not?), perhaps other difficult to foresee cases (such as LyX documents containing only ERT). I know that you will disagree, but I don't think that most users and developers would approve of such a hack in LyX. And I don't know who would want to code _and_ maintain it. Regards Liviu > If a guess for the filename wasn't necessary, why LyX doesn't leave the file > field blank instead of "newfile"? > The answer is: because this feature improves the software usability. > Just as an stupid example, suppose I create 10 new files, type something in > all of them and hit "Save all". > With this feature, I will be able to determine a good name for each file > (based on the first sentence, or anything else) without navigate to each > document. > I bet I can't do the same if "newfile" or "Untitled" was the result. > IMO, we need to improve the functionality of LyX, and not block good ideas. > --- > Diego Queiroz > > > > 2011/4/9 Hellmut Weber >> >> >> Am 08.04.2011 18:37, schrieb Inon Sharony: >> > Hey LyX developers! >> > >> > As in MS (boo!) Office, when saving a new file, whatever appears in the >> > \title section should automatically be guessed as the name that the file >> > should be saved as. >> > >> > Do you agree? >> > >> > Thanks, >> > >> Although you addressed the developpers I would like to contribute my >> 0.02$ as a user. >> >> Please do not copy the idiocy of M$ Word to create file names using the >> title or (much worse) the first phrase. This leads in many casesto >> strings which contain blanks or even strnage utf-8 characters. >> Even some windows s> characters then by '?' or '_'. >> >> >> Best regards >> >> Hellmut >> >> >> -- >> Dr. Hellmut Weber m...@hellmutweber.de >> Degenfeldstraße 2 tel +49-89-3081172 >> D-80803 München-Schwabing mobil +49-172-8450321 >> please: No DOCs, no PPTs. why: tinyurl.com/cbgq > > -- Do you know how to read? http://www.alienetworks.com/srtest.cfm http://goodies.xfce.org/projects/applications/xfce4-dict#speed-reader Do you know how to write? http://garbl.home.comcast.net/~garbl/stylemanual/e.htm#e-mail
Re: A basic requested feature
On Thu, April 14, 2011 10:43, Stephan Witt wrote: > Nowadays modern desktop systems are providing the capability to search > your files, e. g. by content. > Normally it is supported by indexing services, so it should give you > quick answer to > arbitrary questions. Proposing a filename is not such an importing > feature, IMHO. > And it is not easy to get it right. I' always expect different points > of view, how this should work. It definitely is not easy to get 100% right, 80% would be interesting enough. I disagree on the desktop search bit, that is mostly helpful if you know a lot about the document you are looking for. I would find a name-suggester that would take: The current date, e.g. 20110414, an abbreviation of the style you are using, for example 'LTR' for letters and the subject of the document plus a version number useful. The most work is probably expanding the various document styles to include a field that refers to another field that is the most suitable source for the subject and an abbreviation scheme. And this assumes of course that people rarely use their own document styles. Regards, Walter
Re: A basic requested feature
> maybe I'm a bit old fashioned (born in 1943 ;-). So I do not have this terrible need to do everyzhing the fastest way possible. I'm young (born in the 80's) and I confess I'm neurotic about automatization (much over the normal). Sorry if I am too boring sometimes. I enjoy to make the computer decide things for me, and I enjoy much more when it make good decisions. BTW, my reseach area is Artificial Intelligence, so how could I think different? :-) > ... and it needs someone interested and available to actually code the stuff. :) I'm very interested. I have tons of ideas, but I still have problems to set up a confortable environment to start to code. Another problem is that I'm still trying to understand some pieces of code, so it will take some time for me to really contribute with some new feature. > Proposing a filename is not such an importing feature, IMHO. I agree. But this thread subject isn't is "list of most important features", it is just a feature request. Now if it is important or not, its really another question... > What is left is to determine a consistent behaviour that works in most cases for most users. The current behaviour ('newfile#.lyx') is obviously consistent and works flawlessly whatever the actual content of the document. You're probably right. But actually, we really do not know what works in most cases for most users. We just guess it works for most users. IMO, this could be a good feature to implement: get statistics of LyX usage directly from users as other softwares already do (anonymous usage). Maybe, it is early to think in a thing like this, but it is good to start to think for the near future (and for god's sake, do not reply me with messages like "I don't think this is the most important feature right now"... I know I know, it is not, ok? :-) ). Cheers, --- Diego Queiroz 2011/4/14 Liviu Andronic> On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 3:09 AM, Diego Queiroz > wrote: > > Hellmut, this behavior is not a rule, right? > > As a programmer I assure you: once things are correctly handled, > everything > > should be fine. Believe on me. :-) > > And I repeat, it is just a guess for a name to the file, LyX won't impose > > the filename. > > An option to disable this feature is welcome (for those who dislikes). > > > The LyX coding 'philosophy' is to assist users but in an un-intrusive > manner. To rephrase, we don't intend to provide each and every > disturbingly-helpful feature that MS Word and the ilk provide. > (Personally I find title / first line file name suggestions are > useless for me and provide overhead, since I will always want to > delete that text to provide a file name that confirms to "my" naming > style. The current 'newfile#.lyx' is always helpful when creating > dummy documents for the ML. I do appreciate, however, that others have > different user habits.) > > To be clear, I don't think that LyX will ever care to provide such a > trivial option in the Prefs. (I hope it won't!) What is left is to > determine a consistent behaviour that works in most cases for most > users. The current behaviour ('newfile#.lyx') is obviously consistent > and works flawlessly whatever the actual content of the document. The > behaviour you suggest would require coding a contrived hack, which > would take \title if available, otherwise first line (to which some > expressed strong aversion and which I also find disturbing), if > suggestion contains funny chars or delimiters (such as \n \t and the > like) strip them (considering utf-8, how do you determine what is > legal and what is not?), perhaps other difficult to foresee cases > (such as LyX documents containing only ERT). > > I know that you will disagree, but I don't think that most users and > developers would approve of such a hack in LyX. And I don't know who > would want to code _and_ maintain it. Regards > Liviu > > > > > If a guess for the filename wasn't necessary, why LyX doesn't leave the > file > > field blank instead of "newfile"? > > The answer is: because this feature improves the software usability. > > Just as an stupid example, suppose I create 10 new files, type something > in > > all of them and hit "Save all". > > With this feature, I will be able to determine a good name for each file > > (based on the first sentence, or anything else) without navigate to each > > document. > > I bet I can't do the same if "newfile" or "Untitled" was the result. > > IMO, we need to improve the functionality of LyX, and not block good > ideas. > > --- > > Diego Queiroz > > > > > > > > 2011/4/9 Hellmut Weber > >> > >> > >> Am 08.04.2011 18:37, schrieb Inon Sharony: > >> > Hey LyX developers! > >> > > >> > As in MS (boo!) Office, when saving a new file, whatever appears in > the > >> > \title section should automatically be guessed as the name that the > file > >> > should be saved as. > >> > > >> > Do you agree? > >> > > >> > Thanks, > >> > > >> Although
Re: A basic requested feature
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 14/04/11 11:36, Walter van Holst wrote: > On Thu, April 14, 2011 10:43, Stephan Witt wrote: >> Nowadays modern desktop systems are providing the capability to search >> your files, e. g. by content. >> Normally it is supported by indexing services, so it should give you >> quick answer to >> arbitrary questions. Proposing a filename is not such an importing >> feature, IMHO. >> And it is not easy to get it right. I' always expect different points >> of view, how this should work. > > It definitely is not easy to get 100% right, 80% would be interesting > enough. I disagree on the desktop search bit, that is mostly helpful > if you know a lot about the document you are looking for. > > I would find a name-suggester that would take: > > The current date, e.g. 20110414, an abbreviation of the style you are > using, for example 'LTR' for letters and the subject of the document > plus a version number > > useful. > > The most work is probably expanding the various document styles to > include a field that refers to another field that is the most suitable > source for the subject and an abbreviation scheme. > > And this assumes of course that people rarely use their own document > styles. Interesting suggestion - bug I must agree, it is not an overly iportant feature. But: Put it as a feature request into the bug tracker - then it won't be lost. Then all comments can be there and one could work out a framework how this could work - I like the "different templates for filename" an interesting approach, which could even be used for backups (keep the last three backups, named following the template provided). Nice idea - but not that important. So: Add it to the bug tracker as a feature request then it will not be lost. Rainer > > Regards, > > Walter > - -- Rainer M. Krug, PhD (Conservation Ecology, SUN), MSc (Conservation Biology, UCT), Dipl. Phys. (Germany) Centre of Excellence for Invasion Biology Stellenbosch University South Africa Tel : +33 - (0)9 53 10 27 44 Cell: +33 - (0)6 85 62 59 98 Fax : +33 - (0)9 58 10 27 44 Fax (D):+49 - (0)3 21 21 25 22 44 email: rai...@krugs.de Skype: RMkrug -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk2mxWIACgkQoYgNqgF2egoOTQCeLLT15U+gFo6RmInPzzh5HJzi AtIAniMqGmBncDog5oRrXFC6vw/5Z+zw =AeSS -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: A basic requested feature
On 04/14/2011 05:03 AM, Liviu Andronic wrote: To be clear, I don't think that LyX will ever care to provide such a trivial option in the Prefs. (I hope it won't!) See the other thread on how there are too many options already! Richard
Re: A basic requested feature
On 2011-04-13, Diego Queiroz wrote: Just as an stupid example, suppose I create 10 new files, type something in all of them and hit Save all. With this feature, I will be able to determine a good name for each file (based on the first sentence, or anything else) without navigate to each document. I bet I can't do the same if newfile or Untitled was the result. You loose. LyX adds a number. And for me, a bunch fo newfilen.lyx is easier to recognize as wanting a proper filename or needs to be removed than any other wild guess. IMO, we need to improve the functionality of LyX, and not block good ideas. But we need to avoid featuritis and sort the good from the not so good ideas. If not for complete rejection, so at least to priorize on what is important. Feel free to file an enhancement request at track with a link to the thread. Günter
Re: A basic requested feature
Hey LyX developers! As in MS (boo!) Office, when saving a new file, whatever appears in the \title section should automatically be guessed as the name that the file should be saved as. In principle, I could live with proposing the title as the file name. That sort of makes sense if you are used to create documents with short meaningful titles. However, the titles in my case are usually 2 lines long and it's way too clumsy to use that as the file name. I can see the use case here, but I don't know yet how I can prevent from getting it annoy me by proposing file names that are way too long. I absolutely do not want LyX to use the first line of the doc. I imagine I will end up with tons of documents with nonsense names. Then I'd rather have newfile1...newfile100. If I don't care enough to give them a proper name they probably can be marked as to-be-removed. I would encourage people to think a few seconds how to call their documents. That will save some time in searching for them later on. Vincent
Re: A basic requested feature
IMO, we need to improve the functionality of LyX, and not block good ideas. Of course everybody is welcome to make suggestions and put forward ideas on functionality. But it does not mean that everything gets implemented; it needs to be realistic and accepted by the community of users and developers. Cheers, Sam
Re: A basic requested feature
You loose. LyX adds a number. It was just an example. If LyX adds an ID or not, it doesn't really matter. There is no link between the number and the contents of the document. If not for complete rejection, so at least to priorize on what is important. You're right. But I'm not trying to convince this is the most important feature. I am just telling this is a good feature. I absolutely do not want LyX to use the first line of the doc. I imagine I will end up with tons of documents with nonsense names. Then I'd rather have newfile1...newfile100. If I don't care enough to give them a proper name they probably can be marked as to-be-removed. You're not the only one that write papers with very long titles (I also do the same). But other softwares that suggest a filename (like MS Word) does not have problems with this right? Of course LyX will need to handle these things (limit the filename, remove illegal characters, and other things as well). This is not a big concern. You're right that sometimes we don't care to give good names for our files just because they are to-be-removed files. But I'm sure you do care to open various files to find something just because you decided to not give a proper filename in the past. I would encourage people to think a few seconds how to call their documents. That will save some time in searching for them later on. You get the point! And how can LyX aid users to achieve this? Yes, you guessed right! Proposing filenames! The title is easy to get, but in a higher level of discussion we may also want to discuss if the title/first sentence/etc is the better string to get. Maybe some info based on the master document or the document structure? (as Chapter-5, Appendix, etc). I dunno. There are lots of things to consider and this basic requested feature could be improved to a most wanted feature. Of course everybody is welcome to make suggestions and put forward ideas on functionality. But it does not mean that everything gets implemented; it needs to be realistic and accepted by the community of users and developers. You're absolutely right. Someone may suggest that we include an embedded SVG editor in LyX. Of course it would be handy, but before implement it we need to talk if does make sense, given the difficuties to implement. how important and desired the feature is, if there alternatives, and so on. However, we are not talking about an embedded SVG editor and nobody is saying this feature should be implemented independent of the community opinion. I am just trying to defend that this idea is good. Regards, --- Diego Queiroz 2011/4/13 Sam Lewis stroboscopicallyconflu...@yahoo.co.uk IMO, we need to improve the functionality of LyX, and not block good ideas. Of course everybody is welcome to make suggestions and put forward ideas on functionality. But it does not mean that everything gets implemented; it needs to be realistic and accepted by the community of users and developers. Cheers, Sam
Re: A basic requested feature
On 2011-04-13, Diego Queiroz wrote: Just as an stupid example, suppose I create 10 new files, type something in all of them and hit Save all. With this feature, I will be able to determine a good name for each file (based on the first sentence, or anything else) without navigate to each document. I bet I can't do the same if newfile or Untitled was the result. You loose. LyX adds a number. And for me, a bunch fo newfilen.lyx is easier to recognize as wanting a proper filename or needs to be removed than any other wild guess. IMO, we need to improve the functionality of LyX, and not block good ideas. But we need to avoid featuritis and sort the good from the not so good ideas. If not for complete rejection, so at least to priorize on what is important. Feel free to file an enhancement request at track with a link to the thread. Günter
Re: A basic requested feature
Hey LyX developers! As in MS (boo!) Office, when saving a new file, whatever appears in the \title section should automatically be guessed as the name that the file should be saved as. In principle, I could live with proposing the title as the file name. That sort of makes sense if you are used to create documents with short meaningful titles. However, the titles in my case are usually 2 lines long and it's way too clumsy to use that as the file name. I can see the use case here, but I don't know yet how I can prevent from getting it annoy me by proposing file names that are way too long. I absolutely do not want LyX to use the first line of the doc. I imagine I will end up with tons of documents with nonsense names. Then I'd rather have newfile1...newfile100. If I don't care enough to give them a proper name they probably can be marked as to-be-removed. I would encourage people to think a few seconds how to call their documents. That will save some time in searching for them later on. Vincent
Re: A basic requested feature
IMO, we need to improve the functionality of LyX, and not block good ideas. Of course everybody is welcome to make suggestions and put forward ideas on functionality. But it does not mean that everything gets implemented; it needs to be realistic and accepted by the community of users and developers. Cheers, Sam
Re: A basic requested feature
You loose. LyX adds a number. It was just an example. If LyX adds an ID or not, it doesn't really matter. There is no link between the number and the contents of the document. If not for complete rejection, so at least to priorize on what is important. You're right. But I'm not trying to convince this is the most important feature. I am just telling this is a good feature. I absolutely do not want LyX to use the first line of the doc. I imagine I will end up with tons of documents with nonsense names. Then I'd rather have newfile1...newfile100. If I don't care enough to give them a proper name they probably can be marked as to-be-removed. You're not the only one that write papers with very long titles (I also do the same). But other softwares that suggest a filename (like MS Word) does not have problems with this right? Of course LyX will need to handle these things (limit the filename, remove illegal characters, and other things as well). This is not a big concern. You're right that sometimes we don't care to give good names for our files just because they are to-be-removed files. But I'm sure you do care to open various files to find something just because you decided to not give a proper filename in the past. I would encourage people to think a few seconds how to call their documents. That will save some time in searching for them later on. You get the point! And how can LyX aid users to achieve this? Yes, you guessed right! Proposing filenames! The title is easy to get, but in a higher level of discussion we may also want to discuss if the title/first sentence/etc is the better string to get. Maybe some info based on the master document or the document structure? (as Chapter-5, Appendix, etc). I dunno. There are lots of things to consider and this basic requested feature could be improved to a most wanted feature. Of course everybody is welcome to make suggestions and put forward ideas on functionality. But it does not mean that everything gets implemented; it needs to be realistic and accepted by the community of users and developers. You're absolutely right. Someone may suggest that we include an embedded SVG editor in LyX. Of course it would be handy, but before implement it we need to talk if does make sense, given the difficuties to implement. how important and desired the feature is, if there alternatives, and so on. However, we are not talking about an embedded SVG editor and nobody is saying this feature should be implemented independent of the community opinion. I am just trying to defend that this idea is good. Regards, --- Diego Queiroz 2011/4/13 Sam Lewis stroboscopicallyconflu...@yahoo.co.uk IMO, we need to improve the functionality of LyX, and not block good ideas. Of course everybody is welcome to make suggestions and put forward ideas on functionality. But it does not mean that everything gets implemented; it needs to be realistic and accepted by the community of users and developers. Cheers, Sam
Re: A basic requested feature
On 2011-04-13, Diego Queiroz wrote: > Just as an stupid example, suppose I create 10 new files, type something in > all of them and hit "Save all". > With this feature, I will be able to determine a good name for each file > (based on the first sentence, or anything else) without navigate to each > document. > I bet I can't do the same if "newfile" or "Untitled" was the result. You loose. LyX adds a number. And for me, a bunch fo newfile.lyx is easier to recognize as "wanting a proper filename" or "needs to be removed" than any other "wild" guess. > IMO, we need to improve the functionality of LyX, and not block good ideas. But we need to avoid "featuritis" and sort the good from the not so good ideas. If not for complete rejection, so at least to priorize on what is important. Feel free to file an enhancement request at track with a link to the thread. Günter
Re: A basic requested feature
>> Hey LyX developers! >> >> As in MS (boo!) Office, when saving a new file, whatever appears in the >> \title section should automatically be guessed as the name that the file >> should be saved as. >> In principle, I could live with proposing the title as the file name. That sort of makes sense if you are used to create documents with short meaningful titles. However, the titles in my case are usually 2 lines long and it's way too clumsy to use that as the file name. I can see the use case here, but I don't know yet how I can prevent from getting it annoy me by proposing file names that are way too long. I absolutely do not want LyX to use the first line of the doc. I imagine I will end up with tons of documents with nonsense names. Then I'd rather have newfile1...newfile100. If I don't care enough to give them a proper name they probably can be marked as to-be-removed. I would encourage people to think a few seconds how to call their documents. That will save some time in searching for them later on. Vincent
Re: A basic requested feature
> IMO, we need to improve the functionality of > LyX, and not block good ideas. Of course everybody is welcome to make suggestions and put forward ideas on functionality. But it does not mean that everything gets implemented; it needs to be realistic and accepted by the community of users and developers. Cheers, Sam
Re: A basic requested feature
> You loose. LyX adds a number. It was just an example. If LyX adds an ID or not, it doesn't really matter. There is no link between the number and the contents of the document. > If not for complete rejection, so at least to priorize on what is important. You're right. But I'm not trying to convince this is the most important feature. I am just telling this is a good feature. > I absolutely do not want LyX to use the first line of the doc. I imagine I will end up with tons of documents with nonsense names. Then I'd rather have newfile1...newfile100. If I don't care enough to give them a proper name they probably can be marked as to-be-removed. You're not the only one that write papers with very long titles (I also do the same). But other softwares that suggest a filename (like MS Word) does not have problems with this right? Of course LyX will need to handle these things (limit the filename, remove illegal characters, and other things as well). This is not a big concern. You're right that sometimes we don't care to give good names for our files just because they are to-be-removed files. But I'm sure you do care to open various files to find something just because you decided to not give a proper filename in the past. > I would encourage people to think a few seconds how to call their documents. That will save some time in searching for them later on. You get the point! And how can LyX aid users to achieve this? Yes, you guessed right! Proposing filenames! The title is easy to get, but in a higher level of discussion we may also want to discuss if the title/first sentence/etc is the better string to get. Maybe some info based on the master document or the document structure? (as "Chapter-5", "Appendix", etc). I dunno. There are lots of things to consider and this "basic requested feature" could be improved to a "most wanted feature". > Of course everybody is welcome to make suggestions and put forward ideas on functionality. But it does not mean that everything gets implemented; it needs to be realistic and accepted by the community of users and developers. You're absolutely right. Someone may suggest that we include an embedded SVG editor in LyX. Of course it would be handy, but before implement it we need to talk if does make sense, given the difficuties to implement. how important and desired the feature is, if there alternatives, and so on. However, we are not talking about an embedded SVG editor and nobody is saying this feature should be implemented independent of the community opinion. I am just trying to defend that this idea is good. Regards, --- Diego Queiroz 2011/4/13 Sam Lewis <stroboscopicallyconflu...@yahoo.co.uk> > > IMO, we need to improve the functionality of > > LyX, and not block good ideas. > > Of course everybody is welcome to make suggestions and put forward ideas on > functionality. But it does not mean that everything gets implemented; it > needs to be realistic and accepted by the community of users and developers. > > Cheers, Sam >
Re: A basic requested feature
Hellmut, this behavior is not a rule, right? As a programmer I assure you: once things are correctly handled, everything should be fine. Believe on me. :-) And I repeat, it is just a guess for a name to the file, LyX won't impose the filename. An option to disable this feature is welcome (for those who dislikes). If a guess for the filename wasn't necessary, why LyX doesn't leave the file field blank instead of newfile? The answer is: because this feature improves the software usability. Just as an stupid example, suppose I create 10 new files, type something in all of them and hit Save all. With this feature, I will be able to determine a good name for each file (based on the first sentence, or anything else) without navigate to each document. I bet I can't do the same if newfile or Untitled was the result. IMO, we need to improve the functionality of LyX, and not block good ideas. --- Diego Queiroz 2011/4/9 Hellmut Weber m...@hellmutweber.de Am 08.04.2011 18:37, schrieb Inon Sharony: Hey LyX developers! As in MS (boo!) Office, when saving a new file, whatever appears in the \title section should automatically be guessed as the name that the file should be saved as. Do you agree? Thanks, Although you addressed the developpers I would like to contribute my 0.02$ as a user. Please do not copy the idiocy of M$ Word to create file names using the title or (much worse) the first phrase. This leads in many casesto strings which contain blanks or even strnage utf-8 characters. Even some windows systems do substitute someof these 'strange' characters then by '?' or '_'. Best regards Hellmut -- Dr. Hellmut Weber m...@hellmutweber.de Degenfeldstraße 2 tel +49-89-3081172 D-80803 München-Schwabing mobil +49-172-8450321 please: No DOCs, no PPTs. why: tinyurl.com/cbgq
Re: A basic requested feature
Hellmut, this behavior is not a rule, right? As a programmer I assure you: once things are correctly handled, everything should be fine. Believe on me. :-) And I repeat, it is just a guess for a name to the file, LyX won't impose the filename. An option to disable this feature is welcome (for those who dislikes). If a guess for the filename wasn't necessary, why LyX doesn't leave the file field blank instead of newfile? The answer is: because this feature improves the software usability. Just as an stupid example, suppose I create 10 new files, type something in all of them and hit Save all. With this feature, I will be able to determine a good name for each file (based on the first sentence, or anything else) without navigate to each document. I bet I can't do the same if newfile or Untitled was the result. IMO, we need to improve the functionality of LyX, and not block good ideas. --- Diego Queiroz 2011/4/9 Hellmut Weber m...@hellmutweber.de Am 08.04.2011 18:37, schrieb Inon Sharony: Hey LyX developers! As in MS (boo!) Office, when saving a new file, whatever appears in the \title section should automatically be guessed as the name that the file should be saved as. Do you agree? Thanks, Although you addressed the developpers I would like to contribute my 0.02$ as a user. Please do not copy the idiocy of M$ Word to create file names using the title or (much worse) the first phrase. This leads in many casesto strings which contain blanks or even strnage utf-8 characters. Even some windows systems do substitute someof these 'strange' characters then by '?' or '_'. Best regards Hellmut -- Dr. Hellmut Weber m...@hellmutweber.de Degenfeldstraße 2 tel +49-89-3081172 D-80803 München-Schwabing mobil +49-172-8450321 please: No DOCs, no PPTs. why: tinyurl.com/cbgq
Re: A basic requested feature
Hellmut, this behavior is not a rule, right? As a programmer I assure you: once things are correctly handled, everything should be fine. Believe on me. :-) And I repeat, it is just a guess for a name to the file, LyX won't impose the filename. An option to disable this feature is welcome (for those who dislikes). If a guess for the filename wasn't necessary, why LyX doesn't leave the file field blank instead of "newfile"? The answer is: because this feature improves the software usability. Just as an stupid example, suppose I create 10 new files, type something in all of them and hit "Save all". With this feature, I will be able to determine a good name for each file (based on the first sentence, or anything else) without navigate to each document. I bet I can't do the same if "newfile" or "Untitled" was the result. IMO, we need to improve the functionality of LyX, and not block good ideas. --- Diego Queiroz 2011/4/9 Hellmut Weber> > > Am 08.04.2011 18:37, schrieb Inon Sharony: > > Hey LyX developers! > > > > As in MS (boo!) Office, when saving a new file, whatever appears in the > > \title section should automatically be guessed as the name that the file > > should be saved as. > > > > Do you agree? > > > > Thanks, > > > Although you addressed the developpers I would like to contribute my > 0.02$ as a user. > > Please do not copy the idiocy of M$ Word to create file names using the > title or (much worse) the first phrase. This leads in many casesto > strings which contain blanks or even strnage utf-8 characters. > Even some windows s characters then by '?' or '_'. > > > Best regards > > Hellmut > > > -- > Dr. Hellmut Weber m...@hellmutweber.de > Degenfeldstraße 2 tel +49-89-3081172 > D-80803 München-Schwabing mobil +49-172-8450321 > please: No DOCs, no PPTs. why: tinyurl.com/cbgq >
Re: A basic requested feature
Am 08.04.2011 18:37, schrieb Inon Sharony: Hey LyX developers! As in MS (boo!) Office, when saving a new file, whatever appears in the \title section should automatically be guessed as the name that the file should be saved as. Do you agree? Thanks, Although you addressed the developpers I would like to contribute my 0.02$ as a user. Please do not copy the idiocy of M$ Word to create file names using the title or (much worse) the first phrase. This leads in many casesto strings which contain blanks or even strnage utf-8 characters. Even some windows systems do substitute someof these 'strange' characters then by '?' or '_'. Best regards Hellmut -- Dr. Hellmut Weber m...@hellmutweber.de Degenfeldstraße 2 tel +49-89-3081172 D-80803 München-Schwabing mobil +49-172-8450321 please: No DOCs, no PPTs. why: tinyurl.com/cbgq
Re: A basic requested feature
Am 08.04.2011 18:37, schrieb Inon Sharony: Hey LyX developers! As in MS (boo!) Office, when saving a new file, whatever appears in the \title section should automatically be guessed as the name that the file should be saved as. Do you agree? Thanks, Although you addressed the developpers I would like to contribute my 0.02$ as a user. Please do not copy the idiocy of M$ Word to create file names using the title or (much worse) the first phrase. This leads in many casesto strings which contain blanks or even strnage utf-8 characters. Even some windows systems do substitute someof these 'strange' characters then by '?' or '_'. Best regards Hellmut -- Dr. Hellmut Weber m...@hellmutweber.de Degenfeldstraße 2 tel +49-89-3081172 D-80803 München-Schwabing mobil +49-172-8450321 please: No DOCs, no PPTs. why: tinyurl.com/cbgq
Re: A basic requested feature
Am 08.04.2011 18:37, schrieb Inon Sharony: > Hey LyX developers! > > As in MS (boo!) Office, when saving a new file, whatever appears in the > \title section should automatically be guessed as the name that the file > should be saved as. > > Do you agree? > > Thanks, > Although you addressed the developpers I would like to contribute my 0.02$ as a user. Please do not copy the idiocy of M$ Word to create file names using the title or (much worse) the first phrase. This leads in many casesto strings which contain blanks or even strnage utf-8 characters. Even some windows s