Re: Formatting/Equation numbering

> There are two relevant document class options: > > * "fleqn" (flush left equation), which aligns the equation to the left. Used > by itself, though, it leaves the equation number on the right. > > * "leqno" (left equation number), which puts th

Re: Formatting/Equation numbering

On 12/4/22 19:57, Dan wrote: I know how I can number equations, but I would like the equations to be in the following type of format: Eq. 1.1 (equation) Eq. 1.2 (equation) indented slightly.  IMO I don't like having them centered like the usual Edit, Math, NumberWholeFormula method does. I

Formatting/Equation numbering

I know how I can number equations, but I would like the equations to be in the following type of format: Eq. 1.1 (equation) Eq. 1.2 (equation) indented slightly. IMO I don't like having them centered like the usual Edit, Math, NumberWholeFormula method does. I know LaTeX supports defining

Re: Equation

What is with all these single word subject lines? "How do I highlight an equation?" is much more informative as a subject. ("in LyX" is probably not necessary when sending to a LyX Users mailing list. In most cases I would presume you were asking about how to do it in L

Re: Equation

El jue, 22 sept 2022 a las 1:26, Carlos Knauer () escribió: > How do I highlight an equation in LyX? > To change the text color, just select the whole equation and Right click → Text properties → Customize. To change the background, you can either follow section 9 of the Math editor manu

Equation

How do I highlight an equation in LyX? Carlos Fernando Knauer -- lyx-users mailing list lyx-users@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-users

Odd behavior of \protect in equation \tag

I’m using lyx 2.631 and the tikzlings package, and put \protect\tikz\protect\panda in an equation \tag. But after saving the .lyx file and reopening it the \protect vanishes. Obviously more of an annoyance for having to retype the \protect than a serious bug, but is there a known solution

Re: Option for displaying equation labels less obstrusively?

Le 03/10/2018 à 23:35, Klaus-Dieter Bauer a écrit : Hello! As it is currently implemented, equation labels are displayed as part of the equation number in LyX's editor. Sadly, for longer, semantically meaningful label names (e.g. "eq:maxwell-equations-in-vacuum"), this

Re: Option for displaying equation labels less obstrusively?

Sorry I was hopeful but I never use a numbered equation so I was just guessing. The module is handy in other places. On Thu, 4 Oct 2018 at 05:39, Klaus-Dieter Bauer < bauer.klaus.die...@gmail.com> wrote: > Insets cannot be used inside LyX equations sadly. > > On Thu, Oct 4,

Re: Option for displaying equation labels less obstrusively?

auer.klaus.die...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Hello! >>> >>> As it is currently implemented, equation labels are displayed as part of >>> the equation number in LyX's editor. Sadly, for longer, semantically >>> meaningful label names (e.g. "eq:m

Re: Option for displaying equation labels less obstrusively?

Thanks Andrew. On Wed, 3 Oct 2018 at 17:58, Joel Kulesza wrote: > On Wed, Oct 3, 2018 at 3:36 PM Klaus-Dieter Bauer < > bauer.klaus.die...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hello! >> >> As it is currently implemented, equation labels are displayed as part of >> the

Re: Option for displaying equation labels less obstrusively?

On Wed, Oct 3, 2018 at 3:36 PM Klaus-Dieter Bauer < bauer.klaus.die...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello! > > As it is currently implemented, equation labels are displayed as part of > the equation number in LyX's editor. Sadly, for longer, semantically > meaningful label na

Option for displaying equation labels less obstrusively?

Hello! As it is currently implemented, equation labels are displayed as part of the equation number in LyX's editor. Sadly, for longer, semantically meaningful label names (e.g. "eq:maxwell-equations-in-vacuum"), this throws off the formatting in the editor buffer: Instead of

latex equation copied from MathType generally shows redundant { }

{ and } symbolHowever, if you tried any online latex equation editors likehttps://www.codecogs.comhttps://arachnoid.com/latex/etc.You will find the latex code copied from mathtype is perfect with any redundant { }So I think the latex equation interpretation in lyx should be improved. This issue should be solved

Re: Improvements to splitting math equation for multi-line?

dded by > eqnarry is gone, which is a good thing IMO. > > Could you give an example of what you do not like? Attached. I have two nonsense displayed equations. The top is with align, the bottom with eqnarray. The extra spacing, as you call it, justifies the two sides of the equation consistentl

Re: Improvements to splitting math equation for multi-line?

Le 19/05/2018 à 16:08, David L. Johnson a écrit : I would prefer to have it go into the eqnarry environment rather than AMS align, or at least default to three columns rather than 2, with the = in the middle. That way, following lines will have the = sign aligned, which IMO is how it should be.

Re: Improvements to splitting math equation for multi-line?

Le 19/05/2018 à 16:08, David L. Johnson a écrit : But LyX doesn't understand them as delimiters unless they are written as such. Since 2.3, LyX knows the class (mathopen, mathclose, matrel...) of the insets. This has been used actually to generalize the old code which only looked at = sign

Re: Improvements to splitting math equation for multi-line?

On Sat, May 19, 2018 at 03:23:00PM +, David L. Johnson wrote: > On Sat, 19 May 2018 11:14:16 -0400 > Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > > > I would prefer to have it go into the eqnarry environment rather > > > than AMS align, or at least default to three columns rather than 2, > >

Re: Improvements to splitting math equation for multi-line?

On Sat, May 19, 2018 at 01:02:05PM +, Joel Kulesza wrote: > On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 11:04 PM, Scott Kostyshak <skost...@lyx.org> wrote: > > > When in a math display equation, if you press "ctrl + return", LyX will > > turn it into a multi-line equation

Re: Improvements to splitting math equation for multi-line?

On Sat, 19 May 2018 11:14:16 -0400 Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > I would prefer to have it go into the eqnarry environment rather > > than AMS align, or at least default to three columns rather than 2, > > with the = in the middle. That way, following lines will have the > > =

Re: Improvements to splitting math equation for multi-line?

On Sat, May 19, 2018 at 02:08:43PM +, David L. Johnson wrote: > On Sat, 19 May 2018 01:04:31 -0400 > Scott Kostyshak <skost...@lyx.org> wrote: > > > When in a math display equation, if you press "ctrl + return", LyX > > will turn it into a mul

Re: Improvements to splitting math equation for multi-line?

On Sat, 19 May 2018 01:04:31 -0400 Scott Kostyshak <skost...@lyx.org> wrote: > When in a math display equation, if you press "ctrl + return", LyX > will turn it into a multi-line equation. I think the default is an > "align" environment. To do this, LyX tr

Re: Fwd: Improvements to splitting math equation for multi-line?

The automatic detection is a hack, and I am not sure it is the best solution. A solution would be to split at the point where the cursor is, but maybe not add a new line when transforming from display equation to 1-line align. JMarc

Fwd: Improvements to splitting math equation for multi-line?

>>> When in a math display equation, if you press "ctrl + return", LyX will >>> turn it into a multi-line equation. I think the default is an "align" >>> environment. To do this, LyX tries "split" your current equation into >>>

Re: Improvements to splitting math equation for multi-line?

On Sat, May 19, 2018 at 05:39:09AM +, Baris Erkus wrote: > I may recommend to develop a tool where you can slide the location of "&" in > the equation. Something like tab sign in Word. I can see how that would be useful, especially for when there are many lines. I think

Re: Improvements to splitting math equation for multi-line?

On 5/19/2018 8:04 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: When in a math display equation, if you press "ctrl + return", LyX will turn it into a multi-line equation. I think the default is an "align" environment. To do this, LyX tries "split" your current equati

Improvements to splitting math equation for multi-line?

When in a math display equation, if you press "ctrl + return", LyX will turn it into a multi-line equation. I think the default is an "align" environment. To do this, LyX tries "split" your current equation into two parts. For example, if the equation is: y = 3x

Re: Equation Center Alignment Relative to Beamer Frame

On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 8:32 AM, Paul A. Rubin wrote: > So it's true: great minds think alike! Indeed, I played with negative spaces previously but didn't get anything useful. I was hoping there might be a more elegant, e.g., preamble-only, approach to redefine spacings

Re: Equation Center Alignment Relative to Beamer Frame

On 04/06/2017 10:23 AM, Rich Shepard wrote: On Thu, 6 Apr 2017, Joel Kulesza wrote: A minor complaint (and why I didn't go this route originally), the vertical spacing before/after the second equation is not consistent because of going between "standard" and "itemiz

Re: Equation Center Alignment Relative to Beamer Frame

On Thu, 6 Apr 2017, Joel Kulesza wrote: A minor complaint (and why I didn't go this route originally), the vertical spacing before/after the second equation is not consistent because of going between "standard" and "itemize". It's subtle, but is there a known fix? Joel

Re: Equation Center Alignment Relative to Beamer Frame

go this route originally), the vertical spacing before/after the second equation is not consistent because of going between "standard" and "itemize". It's subtle, but is there a known fix? I'm reluctant to get into playing with hard-coded spacings in the preamble, but I'm

Re: Equation Center Alignment Relative to Beamer Frame

On 04/05/2017 04:20 PM, Joel Kulesza wrote: Colleagues: My goal is to have equations on a Beamer frame center-aligned relative to the frame and not the indent level of the current environment. This issue is surprisingly hard to search for (e.g., most discussion addresses equation alignment

Equation Center Alignment Relative to Beamer Frame

Colleagues: My goal is to have equations on a Beamer frame center-aligned relative to the frame and not the indent level of the current environment. This issue is surprisingly hard to search for (e.g., most discussion addresses equation alignment with things such as \align). One approach I

Re: How can one box a equation with a specified color?

; EndPreamble > > End > > % > > > > regards > > 2016-10-12 0:17 GMT+03:00 Paul Smith <phh...@gmail.com>: >> >> Dear All, >> >> How can one box a equation with a specified color? >> >> Thanks in advance, >> >> Paul > >

Re: How can one box a equation with a specified color?

ramed}[backgroundcolor=blue!10,linecolor=blue!10,roundcorner= > 10pt]\quotation} > > > > {\endquotation\end{mdframed}} > > > > EndPreamble > > > > End > > > > % > > > > > > > > regards > > > > 2016-10-12 0:17 GMT+03:00 Paul Smith <phh...@gmail.com>: > >> > >> Dear All, > >> > >> How can one box a equation with a specified color? > >> > >> Thanks in advance, > >> > >> Paul > > > > >

Re: How can one box a equation with a specified color?

:00 Paul Smith <phh...@gmail.com>: > Dear All, > > How can one box a equation with a specified color? > > Thanks in advance, > > Paul >

How can one box a equation with a specified color?

Dear All, How can one box a equation with a specified color? Thanks in advance, Paul

Re: Bad equation renderings

On Fri, 15 Apr 2016 10:07:06 -0700 Tim Wescott wrote: > A reader contacted me asking why I left out the equals signs in the > equations. It turned out that the equals signs did not render > correctly in his web reader plug-in, but did render correctly in the > related

Re: Bad equation renderings

On 2016-04-15, Tim Wescott wrote: > [-- Type: text/plain, Encoding: 7bit --] > I posted this paper to my website yesterday: > http://wescottdesign.com/articles/pid/pidWithoutAPhd.pdf. > A reader contacted me asking why I left out the equals signs in the > equations. It turned out that the

Re: Bad equation renderings

The equal sign shows up well for me in both Chrome and Safari. I've had good luck with Foxit on Windows; however, I suspect this is can be blamed on it. It might be interesting to force embedding the fonts in the PDF and see if the user can see the equal signs then. On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 4:29

Re: Bad equation renderings

On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 11:40:24PM +0530, Madhusudan Singh wrote: > Have you considered the use of MathJax? > > If your math is web only, that is a compelling alternative. > On Apr 15, 2016 10:37 PM, "Tim Wescott" wrote: > > > I posted this paper to my website yesterday:

Re: Bad equation renderings

Have you considered the use of MathJax? If your math is web only, that is a compelling alternative. On Apr 15, 2016 10:37 PM, "Tim Wescott" wrote: > I posted this paper to my website yesterday: > http://wescottdesign.com/articles/pid/pidWithoutAPhd.pdf. > > A reader

Re: Equation numbering variants

Paul A. Rubin msu.edu> writes: > I'm going to assume that you want the marked equations not to interrupt the > equation numbering scheme. In other words, you want (2.3.3)DELTA consecutive > between (2.3.2) and (2.3.4), rather than having both a (2.3.3) and a > (2.3.3)DELTA. >

Re: Equation numbering variants

Le 16/12/2015 23:05, Franci Žižek a écrit : Paul A. Rubin msu.edu> writes: I'm going to assume that you want the marked equations not to interrupt the equation numbering scheme. In other words, you want (2.3.3)DELTA consecutive between (2.3.2) and (2.3.4), rather than having both a (2.

Re: Equation numbering variants

> Use \tag* instead: \stepcounter{equation}\tag*{(\theequation)\Delta} > > Guillaume > Beautiful! Thank you Guillaume! Best regards

Re: Equation numbering variants

Franci Žižek gmail.com> writes: > > Hi > > Can someone give me a hint how I could create a different equation numbering > variant? > > Currently all my equations are numbered like: (2.3.2) > > For some select equations I would like this to change to: (2.3.3)

Equation numbering variants

Hi Can someone give me a hint how I could create a different equation numbering variant? Currently all my equations are numbered like: (2.3.2) For some select equations I would like this to change to: (2.3.3)Δ The counting is continuous, some equations just have an additional DELTA at the end

how can i set up a shortcut for equation label?

Hi there, I need to use the function of equation labelling everyday. How can i set up a shortcut for it? I google a lot and fail to find a solution. Thanks a lot! Best, Chen

Re: how can i set up a shortcut for equation label?

On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 12:58 PM, Chen Lian zplg...@gmail.com wrote: Hi there, I need to use the function of equation labelling everyday. How can i set up a shortcut for it? I google a lot and fail to find a solution. Thanks a lot! Best, Chen Hi Chen, See the answer here. It is written

Re: how can i set up a shortcut for equation label?

to use the function of equation labelling everyday. How can i set up a shortcut for it? I google a lot and fail to find a solution. Thanks a lot! Best, Chen

how can i set up a shortcut for equation label?

Hi there, I need to use the function of equation labelling everyday. How can i set up a shortcut for it? I google a lot and fail to find a solution. Thanks a lot! Best, Chen

Re: how can i set up a shortcut for equation label?

On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 12:58 PM, Chen Lian <zplg...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi there, > > I need to use the function of equation labelling everyday. How can i set up a > shortcut for it? I google a lot and fail to find a solution. Thanks a lot! > > Best, > Chen Hi

Re: how can i set up a shortcut for equation label?

eed to use the function of equation labelling everyday. How can i set up a shortcut for it? I google a lot and fail to find a solution. Thanks a lot! Best, Chen

Re: Copy LaTeX source of an equation

On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 8:13 PM, Marduk Bolaños mardu...@mac.com wrote: I would like to copy the LaTeX source of an equation to the clipboard without having to open the source pane. This should work from within LyX. Simply select the math inset and copy it. Then you should get the LaTeX code

Copy LaTeX source of an equation

I would like to copy the LaTeX source of an equation to the clipboard without having to open the source pane. If this is not possible without modification to the source code of LyX, at least I would like to know how to call an arbitrary external script myscript with math-extern. I already tried

Re: Copy LaTeX source of an equation

It works now. Last time I checked (a few months ago) it did not. Thank you!

Copy LaTeX source of an equation

I would like to copy the LaTeX source of an equation to the clipboard without having to open the source pane. If this is not possible without modification to the source code of LyX, at least I would like to know how to call an arbitrary external script myscript with math-extern. I already tried

Re: Copy LaTeX source of an equation

On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 8:13 PM, Marduk Bolaños mardu...@mac.com wrote: I would like to copy the LaTeX source of an equation to the clipboard without having to open the source pane. This should work from within LyX. Simply select the math inset and copy it. Then you should get the LaTeX code

Re: Copy LaTeX source of an equation

It works now. Last time I checked (a few months ago) it did not. Thank you!

Copy LaTeX source of an equation

I would like to copy the LaTeX source of an equation to the clipboard without having to open the source pane. If this is not possible without modification to the source code of LyX, at least I would like to know how to call an arbitrary external script "myscript" with math-extern. I alr

Re: Copy LaTeX source of an equation

On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 8:13 PM, Marduk Bolaños <mardu...@mac.com> wrote: > I would like to copy the LaTeX source of an equation to the clipboard > without having to open the source pane. > This should work from within LyX. Simply select the math inset and copy it. Then you shoul

Re: Copy LaTeX source of an equation

It works now. Last time I checked (a few months ago) it did not. Thank you!

Bad auto-splitting when switching to equation array

In a math environment (display or environment), you can switch to an EqnArray environment with Ctrl Enter or Shift Enter. If there is already an equation, it will be automatically split into columns on particular symbols, including = and a few other operators and arrows. Unfortunately, it passes

Bad auto-splitting when switching to equation array

In a math environment (display or environment), you can switch to an EqnArray environment with Ctrl Enter or Shift Enter. If there is already an equation, it will be automatically split into columns on particular symbols, including = and a few other operators and arrows. Unfortunately, it passes

Bad auto-splitting when switching to equation array

In a math environment (display or environment), you can switch to an EqnArray environment with Ctrl Enter or Shift Enter. If there is already an equation, it will be automatically split into columns on particular symbols, including "=" and a few other operators and arrows. Unf

Re: resize equation output

On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 1:39 PM, Neal Becker ndbeck...@gmail.com wrote: Neal Becker wrote: I have the misfortune to be commanded to produce ppt. So I took one of my equations, in lyx. I chose beamer so I get something that'll look good on a slide. I put

Re: resize equation output

On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 1:39 PM, Neal Becker ndbeck...@gmail.com wrote: Neal Becker wrote: I have the misfortune to be commanded to produce ppt. So I took one of my equations, in lyx. I chose beamer so I get something that'll look good on a slide. I put

Re: resize equation output

On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 1:39 PM, Neal Becker wrote: > Neal Becker wrote: > > > I have the misfortune to be commanded to produce ppt. So I took one of > my > > equations, in lyx. I chose beamer so I get something that'll look good > on a > > slide. I put > >

resize equation output

I have the misfortune to be commanded to produce ppt. So I took one of my equations, in lyx. I chose beamer so I get something that'll look good on a slide. I put \beamertemplatenavigationsymbolsempty so crop will work. When exported export/pdf(crop), it looks OK, but it's too small. I

Re: resize equation output

Neal Becker wrote: I have the misfortune to be commanded to produce ppt. So I took one of my equations, in lyx. I chose beamer so I get something that'll look good on a slide. I put \beamertemplatenavigationsymbolsempty so crop will work. When exported export/pdf(crop), it looks OK,

resize equation output

I have the misfortune to be commanded to produce ppt. So I took one of my equations, in lyx. I chose beamer so I get something that'll look good on a slide. I put \beamertemplatenavigationsymbolsempty so crop will work. When exported export/pdf(crop), it looks OK, but it's too small. I

Re: resize equation output

Neal Becker wrote: I have the misfortune to be commanded to produce ppt. So I took one of my equations, in lyx. I chose beamer so I get something that'll look good on a slide. I put \beamertemplatenavigationsymbolsempty so crop will work. When exported export/pdf(crop), it looks OK,

resize equation output

I have the misfortune to be commanded to produce ppt. So I took one of my equations, in lyx. I chose beamer so I get something that'll look good on a slide. I put \beamertemplatenavigationsymbolsempty so crop will work. When exported export/pdf(crop), it looks OK, but it's too small. I

Re: resize equation output

Neal Becker wrote: > I have the misfortune to be commanded to produce ppt. So I took one of my > equations, in lyx. I chose beamer so I get something that'll look good on a > slide. I put > \beamertemplatenavigationsymbolsempty > > so crop will work. > > When exported export/pdf(crop), it

automatic equation numbering

Hello, Is there an option to have all the equations automatically numbered if I only label some of them ? Thank. === Patrick DUPRÉ                                 | | email: pdu...@gmx.com Laboratoire de Physico-Chimie de

Re: automatic equation numbering

On 2013-12-20, Patrick Dupre wrote: Hello, Is there an option to have all the equations automatically numbered if I only label some of them ? For this, I have in my latex preamble: % Gleichungen % --- % Alle Gleichungen nummerieren \renewcommand\[{\begin{equation}} \renewcommand

automatic equation numbering

Hello, Is there an option to have all the equations automatically numbered if I only label some of them ? Thank. === Patrick DUPRÉ                                 | | email: pdu...@gmx.com Laboratoire de Physico-Chimie de

Re: automatic equation numbering

On 2013-12-20, Patrick Dupre wrote: Hello, Is there an option to have all the equations automatically numbered if I only label some of them ? For this, I have in my latex preamble: % Gleichungen % --- % Alle Gleichungen nummerieren \renewcommand\[{\begin{equation}} \renewcommand

automatic equation numbering

Hello, Is there an option to have all the equations automatically numbered if I only label some of them ? Thank. === Patrick DUPRÉ                                 | | email: pdu...@gmx.com Laboratoire de Physico-Chimie de

Re: automatic equation numbering

On 2013-12-20, Patrick Dupre wrote: > Hello, > Is there an option to have all the equations automatically numbered if > I only label some of them ? For this, I have in my "latex preamble": % Gleichungen % --- % Alle Gleichungen nummerieren \renewcommand\[{\begin{equat

Re: Error compilating equation on PDF

On 04/02/2012 08:38 PM, Kenedy Torcatt wrote: Hello... Idon't know why when I'm trying to compile the pdf after creating a formula or equation in lyx I'm getting an error and I can't see the pdf. The description i attached in txt file. Thankyou in advance! It'd be more helpful to see the LyX

Re: Error compilating equation on PDF

On 04/02/2012 08:38 PM, Kenedy Torcatt wrote: Hello... Idon't know why when I'm trying to compile the pdf after creating a formula or equation in lyx I'm getting an error and I can't see the pdf. The description i attached in txt file. Thankyou in advance! It'd be more helpful to see the LyX

Re: Error compilating equation on PDF

On 04/02/2012 08:38 PM, Kenedy Torcatt wrote: Hello... Idon't know why when I'm trying to compile the pdf after creating a formula or equation in lyx I'm getting an error and I can't see the pdf. The description i attached in txt file. Thankyou in advance! It'd be more helpful to see the LyX

Error compilating equation on PDF

Hello... Idon't know why when I'm trying to compile the pdf after creating a formula or equation in lyx I'm getting an error and I can't see the pdf. The description i attached in txt file. Thankyou in advance! This is pdfTeX, Version 3.1415926-2.3-1.40.12 (MiKTeX 2.9) (preloaded format

Error compilating equation on PDF

Hello... Idon't know why when I'm trying to compile the pdf after creating a formula or equation in lyx I'm getting an error and I can't see the pdf. The description i attached in txt file. Thankyou in advance! This is pdfTeX, Version 3.1415926-2.3-1.40.12 (MiKTeX 2.9) (preloaded format

Error compilating equation on PDF

Hello... Idon't know why when I'm trying to compile the pdf after creating a formula or equation in lyx I'm getting an error and I can't see the pdf. The description i attached in txt file. Thankyou in advance! This is pdfTeX, Version 3.1415926-2.3-1.40.12 (MiKTeX 2.9) (preloaded format

Re: Inserting Space in Mathematical Equation

On Wed, 28 Mar 2012, David L. Johnson wrote: You have several options. When in math-mode, you might have a menubar on the bottom of the window. One option looks like \_/ in red. That gives various spaces. Ctrl-Shift-Space should also give you a medium space. Thank you, David. I prefer

Re: Inserting Space in Mathematical Equation

On 03/29/2012 09:20 AM, Rich Shepard wrote: On Wed, 28 Mar 2012, David L. Johnson wrote: You have several options. When in math-mode, you might have a menubar on the bottom of the window. One option looks like \_/ in red. That gives various spaces. Ctrl-Shift-Space should also give you a

Re: Inserting Space in Mathematical Equation

On Thu, 29 Mar 2012, Richard Heck wrote: Well, this does give you a space, but it doesn't conform to typesetting conventions, because the text is treated as a bunch of variables. You can enter math-text mode by hitting Ctrl-M, then type normally. The font choices are also availalbe under Edit

Re: Inserting Space in Mathematical Equation

On Wed, 28 Mar 2012, David L. Johnson wrote: You have several options. When in math-mode, you might have a menubar on the bottom of the window. One option looks like \_/ in red. That gives various spaces. Ctrl-Shift-Space should also give you a medium space. Thank you, David. I prefer

Re: Inserting Space in Mathematical Equation

On 03/29/2012 09:20 AM, Rich Shepard wrote: On Wed, 28 Mar 2012, David L. Johnson wrote: You have several options. When in math-mode, you might have a menubar on the bottom of the window. One option looks like \_/ in red. That gives various spaces. Ctrl-Shift-Space should also give you a

Re: Inserting Space in Mathematical Equation

On Thu, 29 Mar 2012, Richard Heck wrote: Well, this does give you a space, but it doesn't conform to typesetting conventions, because the text is treated as a bunch of variables. You can enter math-text mode by hitting Ctrl-M, then type normally. The font choices are also availalbe under Edit

Re: Inserting Space in Mathematical Equation

On Wed, 28 Mar 2012, David L. Johnson wrote: You have several options. When in math-mode, you might have a menubar on the bottom of the window. One option looks like \_/ in red. That gives various spaces. Ctrl-Shift-Space should also give you a medium space. Thank you, David. I prefer

Re: Inserting Space in Mathematical Equation

On 03/29/2012 09:20 AM, Rich Shepard wrote: On Wed, 28 Mar 2012, David L. Johnson wrote: You have several options. When in math-mode, you might have a menubar on the bottom of the window. One option looks like \_/ in red. That gives various spaces. Ctrl-Shift-Space should also give you a

Re: Inserting Space in Mathematical Equation

On Thu, 29 Mar 2012, Richard Heck wrote: Well, this does give you a space, but it doesn't conform to typesetting conventions, because the text is treated as a bunch of variables. You can enter math-text mode by hitting Ctrl-M, then type normally. The font choices are also availalbe under Edit>

Inserting Space in Mathematical Equation

I have an equation that contains words, such as '0.75 * Total Stream Length'. I looked in Herbert's Typesetting Mathematics with LaTeX and found a single index reference to 'space' that referred to something different. Ctrl-space does nothing. How do I insert a space within an equation

Re: Inserting Space in Mathematical Equation

On 03/28/2012 08:03 PM, Rich Shepard wrote: I have an equation that contains words, such as '0.75 * Total Stream Length'. I looked in Herbert's Typesetting Mathematics with LaTeX and found a single index reference to 'space' that referred to something different. Ctrl-space does nothing. How

Inserting Space in Mathematical Equation

I have an equation that contains words, such as '0.75 * Total Stream Length'. I looked in Herbert's Typesetting Mathematics with LaTeX and found a single index reference to 'space' that referred to something different. Ctrl-space does nothing. How do I insert a space within an equation

Re: Inserting Space in Mathematical Equation

On 03/28/2012 08:03 PM, Rich Shepard wrote: I have an equation that contains words, such as '0.75 * Total Stream Length'. I looked in Herbert's Typesetting Mathematics with LaTeX and found a single index reference to 'space' that referred to something different. Ctrl-space does nothing. How

Inserting Space in Mathematical Equation

I have an equation that contains words, such as '0.75 * Total Stream Length'. I looked in Herbert's "Typesetting Mathematics with LaTeX" and found a single index reference to 'space' that referred to something different. Ctrl-space does nothing. How do I insert a space within a

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >