On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 05:01:20PM -0500, Les Denham wrote:
On Thursday 20 August 2009 02:38:08 pm José Matos wrote:
On Thursday 20 August 2009 16:09:21 Steve Litt wrote:
Unless of course you have a 64 bit computer.
And the data type used is long. For most of the 64-bit linux the memory
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 05:01:20PM -0500, Les Denham wrote:
On Thursday 20 August 2009 02:38:08 pm José Matos wrote:
On Thursday 20 August 2009 16:09:21 Steve Litt wrote:
Unless of course you have a 64 bit computer.
And the data type used is long. For most of the 64-bit linux the memory
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 05:01:20PM -0500, Les Denham wrote:
> On Thursday 20 August 2009 02:38:08 pm José Matos wrote:
> > On Thursday 20 August 2009 16:09:21 Steve Litt wrote:
> > > Unless of course you have a 64 bit computer.
> >
> > And the data type used is long. For most of the 64-bit linux
Rich Shepard wrote:
Someone local has developed his own solution for preparing and displaying
slides during presentations. He uses a browser for the display and type
size
of 60pt-120pt. I mentioned that I use the Beamer class with whatever the
default type size is and the results are
On Thu, 20 Aug 2009, Helge Hafting wrote:
I tested 30pt once just for fun - it looked fine.
I believe LaTeX is limited by 32-bit numbers, and fail on distances longer
than about 6 meters. 120pt is below that. :-)
Helge,
Thank you. I passed on your helpful insight.
Rich
--
Richard B.
On Thursday 20 August 2009 10:00:01 Helge Hafting wrote:
I tested 30pt once just for fun - it looked fine.
I believe LaTeX is limited by 32-bit numbers, and fail on distances
longer than about 6 meters
Unless of course you have a 64 bit computer.
SteveT
Steve Litt
Recession Relief Package
On Thursday 20 August 2009 10:09:21 am Steve Litt wrote:
On Thursday 20 August 2009 10:00:01 Helge Hafting wrote:
I tested 30pt once just for fun - it looked fine.
I believe LaTeX is limited by 32-bit numbers, and fail on distances
longer than about 6 meters
Unless of course you have a
On Thursday 20 August 2009 16:09:21 Steve Litt wrote:
Unless of course you have a 64 bit computer.
And the data type used is long. For most of the 64-bit linux the memory layout
is LP-64 that means that only long and pointer are 64 bits wide.
In case anyone wonders wikipedia has an interesting
On Thursday 20 August 2009 02:38:08 pm José Matos wrote:
On Thursday 20 August 2009 16:09:21 Steve Litt wrote:
Unless of course you have a 64 bit computer.
And the data type used is long. For most of the 64-bit linux the memory
layout is LP-64 that means that only long and pointer are 64
Rich Shepard wrote:
Someone local has developed his own solution for preparing and displaying
slides during presentations. He uses a browser for the display and type
size
of 60pt-120pt. I mentioned that I use the Beamer class with whatever the
default type size is and the results are
On Thu, 20 Aug 2009, Helge Hafting wrote:
I tested 30pt once just for fun - it looked fine.
I believe LaTeX is limited by 32-bit numbers, and fail on distances longer
than about 6 meters. 120pt is below that. :-)
Helge,
Thank you. I passed on your helpful insight.
Rich
--
Richard B.
On Thursday 20 August 2009 10:00:01 Helge Hafting wrote:
I tested 30pt once just for fun - it looked fine.
I believe LaTeX is limited by 32-bit numbers, and fail on distances
longer than about 6 meters
Unless of course you have a 64 bit computer.
SteveT
Steve Litt
Recession Relief Package
On Thursday 20 August 2009 10:09:21 am Steve Litt wrote:
On Thursday 20 August 2009 10:00:01 Helge Hafting wrote:
I tested 30pt once just for fun - it looked fine.
I believe LaTeX is limited by 32-bit numbers, and fail on distances
longer than about 6 meters
Unless of course you have a
On Thursday 20 August 2009 16:09:21 Steve Litt wrote:
Unless of course you have a 64 bit computer.
And the data type used is long. For most of the 64-bit linux the memory layout
is LP-64 that means that only long and pointer are 64 bits wide.
In case anyone wonders wikipedia has an interesting
On Thursday 20 August 2009 02:38:08 pm José Matos wrote:
On Thursday 20 August 2009 16:09:21 Steve Litt wrote:
Unless of course you have a 64 bit computer.
And the data type used is long. For most of the 64-bit linux the memory
layout is LP-64 that means that only long and pointer are 64
Rich Shepard wrote:
Someone local has developed his own solution for preparing and displaying
slides during presentations. He uses a browser for the display and type
size
of 60pt-120pt. I mentioned that I use the Beamer class with whatever the
default type size is and the results are
On Thu, 20 Aug 2009, Helge Hafting wrote:
I tested 30pt once just for fun - it looked fine.
I believe LaTeX is limited by 32-bit numbers, and fail on distances longer
than about 6 meters. 120pt is below that. :-)
Helge,
Thank you. I passed on your helpful insight.
Rich
--
Richard B.
On Thursday 20 August 2009 10:00:01 Helge Hafting wrote:
> I tested 30pt once just for fun - it looked fine.
>
> I believe LaTeX is limited by 32-bit numbers, and fail on distances
> longer than about 6 meters
Unless of course you have a 64 bit computer.
SteveT
Steve Litt
Recession Relief
On Thursday 20 August 2009 10:09:21 am Steve Litt wrote:
> On Thursday 20 August 2009 10:00:01 Helge Hafting wrote:
> > I tested 30pt once just for fun - it looked fine.
> >
> > I believe LaTeX is limited by 32-bit numbers, and fail on distances
> > longer than about 6 meters
>
> Unless of course
On Thursday 20 August 2009 16:09:21 Steve Litt wrote:
> Unless of course you have a 64 bit computer.
And the data type used is long. For most of the 64-bit linux the memory layout
is LP-64 that means that only long and pointer are 64 bits wide.
In case anyone wonders wikipedia has an
On Thursday 20 August 2009 02:38:08 pm José Matos wrote:
> On Thursday 20 August 2009 16:09:21 Steve Litt wrote:
> > Unless of course you have a 64 bit computer.
>
> And the data type used is long. For most of the 64-bit linux the memory
> layout is LP-64 that means that only long and pointer are
Someone local has developed his own solution for preparing and displaying
slides during presentations. He uses a browser for the display and type size
of 60pt-120pt. I mentioned that I use the Beamer class with whatever the
default type size is and the results are readable in all room sizes in
On Monday 17 August 2009, Rich Shepard wrote:
But, he asked if LaTeX (or TeX itself) can scale type to 60-120pt and have
it look as smooth as smaller sizes. I've never done this, nor am I sure
just how to go about testing whether it can be done, so I'm asking here. I
have a vague recollection
On Mon, 17 Aug 2009, Les Denham wrote:
The attached is not a large font size, but it is a randomly chosen PDF
generated from LyX, enlarged in Acrobat Reader to 2400%.
Looks clean to me.
I don't see any essential difference between an enlarge version of a small
font, and a large font. In
On Monday 17 August 2009 10:38:36 am Rich Shepard wrote:
On Mon, 17 Aug 2009, Les Denham wrote:
The attached is not a large font size, but it is a randomly chosen PDF
generated from LyX, enlarged in Acrobat Reader to 2400%.
Looks clean to me.
I don't see any essential difference
On Mon, 17 Aug 2009, Stefano Franchi wrote:
All typographers and font designers routinely complain that bigger font
scaled up font (and viceversa), because the typeface features must be
manually adjusted to convey the same look in different sizes. However, I
doubt that considerations of
Someone local has developed his own solution for preparing and displaying
slides during presentations. He uses a browser for the display and type size
of 60pt-120pt. I mentioned that I use the Beamer class with whatever the
default type size is and the results are readable in all room sizes in
On Monday 17 August 2009, Rich Shepard wrote:
But, he asked if LaTeX (or TeX itself) can scale type to 60-120pt and have
it look as smooth as smaller sizes. I've never done this, nor am I sure
just how to go about testing whether it can be done, so I'm asking here. I
have a vague recollection
On Mon, 17 Aug 2009, Les Denham wrote:
The attached is not a large font size, but it is a randomly chosen PDF
generated from LyX, enlarged in Acrobat Reader to 2400%.
Looks clean to me.
I don't see any essential difference between an enlarge version of a small
font, and a large font. In
On Monday 17 August 2009 10:38:36 am Rich Shepard wrote:
On Mon, 17 Aug 2009, Les Denham wrote:
The attached is not a large font size, but it is a randomly chosen PDF
generated from LyX, enlarged in Acrobat Reader to 2400%.
Looks clean to me.
I don't see any essential difference
On Mon, 17 Aug 2009, Stefano Franchi wrote:
All typographers and font designers routinely complain that bigger font
scaled up font (and viceversa), because the typeface features must be
manually adjusted to convey the same look in different sizes. However, I
doubt that considerations of
Someone local has developed his own solution for preparing and displaying
slides during presentations. He uses a browser for the display and type size
of 60pt-120pt. I mentioned that I use the Beamer class with whatever the
default type size is and the results are readable in all room sizes in
On Monday 17 August 2009, Rich Shepard wrote:
> But, he asked if LaTeX (or TeX itself) can scale type to 60-120pt and have
> it look as smooth as smaller sizes. I've never done this, nor am I sure
> just how to go about testing whether it can be done, so I'm asking here. I
> have a vague
On Mon, 17 Aug 2009, Les Denham wrote:
The attached is not a large font size, but it is a randomly chosen PDF
generated from LyX, enlarged in Acrobat Reader to 2400%.
Looks clean to me.
I don't see any essential difference between an enlarge version of a small
font, and a large font. In
On Monday 17 August 2009 10:38:36 am Rich Shepard wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Aug 2009, Les Denham wrote:
> > The attached is not a large font size, but it is a randomly chosen PDF
> > generated from LyX, enlarged in Acrobat Reader to 2400%.
> >
> > Looks clean to me.
> >
> > I don't see any essential
On Mon, 17 Aug 2009, Stefano Franchi wrote:
All typographers and font designers routinely complain that "bigger font"
<> scaled up font (and viceversa), because the typeface features must be
manually adjusted to convey the same look in different sizes. However, I
doubt that considerations of
36 matches
Mail list logo
