Re: More indexing bogosity

2009-09-10 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Steve Litt wrote: > Let me refine the concept of "bogus". True, the ERT isn't bogus from a data > consistency point of view, nor is it bogus from a logical point of view. > But it's very bogus from the point of view of the user's workflow. The > user must now, twice per index see or seealso entry

Re: More indexing bogosity

2009-09-10 Thread Steve Litt
On Thursday 10 September 2009 04:14:44 Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > Steve Litt wrote: > > This time, when inserting see and seealso records, I'm forced to use ERT > > for each of the curly braces or else part of the seealso text doesn't > > show up and an erroneous page number is shown. This is a

Re: More indexing bogosity

2009-09-10 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Steve Litt wrote: > This time, when inserting see and seealso records, I'm forced to use ERT > for each of the curly braces or else part of the seealso text doesn't > show up and an erroneous page number is shown. This is a huge time sink. The big change in 1.6.x indexing is that indexes now be

Re: More indexing bogosity

2009-09-09 Thread Steve Litt
On Wednesday 09 September 2009 15:05:17 Steve Litt wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm deep in the middle of indexing my new book and found yet another > problem, and this one can't be worked around by setting > Tools->preferences->output- > > >latex->Tex_encoding to T1. > > This time, when inserting see and