On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 2:51 AM, Liviu Andronic wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 5:56 AM, Dr Eberhard Lisse
> wrote:
> > My point was that it takes 5 minutes to learn BibDesk and it takes how
> > many weeks to write all that code?
> >
> Assuming, of course, that one uses Mac. What about Windows o
3:51:12 AM
Subject: Re: Using LyX to edit & organise bibliographies
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 5:56 AM, Dr Eberhard Lisse wrote:
> My point was that it takes 5 minutes to learn BibDesk and it takes how
> many weeks to write all that code?
>
Assuming, of course, that one uses Mac. What
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 20/12/12 09:51, Liviu Andronic wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 5:56 AM, Dr Eberhard Lisse wrote:
>> My point was that it takes 5 minutes to learn BibDesk and it takes how many
>> weeks to write
>> all that code?
>>
> Assuming, of course, that on
My point was that it takes 5 minutes to learn BibDesk and it takes how
many weeks to write all that code?
el
On 2012-12-17 00:26 , Andrew Parsloe wrote:
> On 16/12/2012 7:58 p.m., Dr Eberhard Lisse wrote:
>> Have a look at BibDesk,
>>
>> takes 1% of the time you took to re-invent the wheel.
>>
>>
On 16/12/2012 7:58 p.m., Dr Eberhard Lisse wrote:
Have a look at BibDesk,
takes 1% of the time you took to re-invent the wheel.
el
On 2012-04-17 10:39 , Andrew Parsloe wrote:
On 17/04/2012 8:43 p.m., PhilipPirrip wrote:
Excuse me for not trying what you've done, but I have to ask first: why
On the Mac BibDesk works with LyX.
el
On 2012-04-20 17:44 , Alex Vergara Gil wrote:
>[...]
> This is the first time I've heard about JabRef, but if it is that nice
> then it should be integrated into LyX as Gnumeric is
[...]
Have a look at BibDesk,
takes 1% of the time you took to re-invent the wheel.
el
On 2012-04-17 10:39 , Andrew Parsloe wrote:
> On 17/04/2012 8:43 p.m., PhilipPirrip wrote:
>> Excuse me for not trying what you've done, but I have to ask first: why
>> do you think this is better than using Mendele
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 5:58 AM, Eric Weir wrote:
> On Apr 20, 2012, at 11:23 AM, stefano franchi wrote:
>> Moreover, it is not even clear that BibTeX will remain the only
>> database format for TeX users. Biber, a much more flexible and heavily
>> developed BibTeX replacement, is starting to inte
On Apr 20, 2012, at 11:23 AM, stefano franchi wrote:
> Moreover, it is not even clear that BibTeX will remain the only
> database format for TeX users. Biber, a much more flexible and heavily
> developed BibTeX replacement, is starting to integrate other formats
> (such as EndNote). One more reas
On 25/04/2012 2:08 p.m., Sam Lewis wrote:
From: Liviu Andronic
It may be nice, perhaps, for LyX to provide an 'Edit BibTeX refs'
button that would allow to easily launch your preferred reference
manager on your ref library.
+1
Cheers, Sam
Ah! You mean launch another instance of LyX?
Andrew
> From: Liviu Andronic
> It may be nice, perhaps, for LyX to provide an 'Edit BibTeX refs'
> button that would allow to easily launch your preferred reference
> manager on your ref library.
+1
Cheers, Sam
On 21/04/2012 2:18 a.m., Liviu Andronic wrote:
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 5:57 PM, Alex Vergara Gil wrote:
at all. This is why LyX should have a reference manager. However if you get
Perhaps it _should_ not. LyX has evolved, in the spirit of Linux apps
development, to be very flexible and inte
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 11:44 AM, Alex Vergara Gil wrote:
> El 20/04/2012 08:22 a.m., Manolo Martínez escribió:
>
>> On 04/20/12 at 09:57am, Alex Vergara Gil wrote:
>>>
>>> El 20/04/2012 07:46 a.m., PhilipPirrip escribió:
On 04/20/2012 04:30 PM, Alex Vergara Gil wrote:
>
> why sh
Am Freitag, 20. April 2012, 18:44:25 schrieb Alex Vergara Gil:
> This is the first time I've heard about JabRef, but if it is that nice
> then it should be integrated into LyX as Gnumeric is
Its the other way round:
Jabref has a LyX knob which transfers the selected reference to the place
of
El 20/04/2012 08:22 a.m., Manolo Martínez escribió:
On 04/20/12 at 09:57am, Alex Vergara Gil wrote:
El 20/04/2012 07:46 a.m., PhilipPirrip escribió:
On 04/20/2012 04:30 PM, Alex Vergara Gil wrote:
why should I move out of LyX to edit my Bib files?
Because, as I said, you *don't* need to edit
El 20/04/2012 08:18 a.m., Liviu Andronic escribió:
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 5:57 PM, Alex Vergara Gil wrote:
at all. This is why LyX should have a reference manager. However if you get
Perhaps it _should_ not. LyX has evolved, in the spirit of Linux apps
development, to be very flexible and in
On 04/20/12 at 09:57am, Alex Vergara Gil wrote:
>
> El 20/04/2012 07:46 a.m., PhilipPirrip escribió:
> >On 04/20/2012 04:30 PM, Alex Vergara Gil wrote:
> >>why should I move out of LyX to edit my Bib files?
> >
> >Because, as I said, you *don't* need to edit your bib files. You
> >can have a progr
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 5:57 PM, Alex Vergara Gil wrote:
> at all. This is why LyX should have a reference manager. However if you get
>
Perhaps it _should_ not. LyX has evolved, in the spirit of Linux apps
development, to be very flexible and interact with a myriad of 3rd
party tools (LaTeX, docb
El 20/04/2012 07:46 a.m., PhilipPirrip escribió:
On 04/20/2012 04:30 PM, Alex Vergara Gil wrote:
why should I move out of LyX to edit my Bib files?
Because, as I said, you *don't* need to edit your bib files. You can
have a program (if your OS is multitasking) to make bib database for
you,
On 04/20/2012 04:30 PM, Alex Vergara Gil wrote:
why should I move out of LyX to edit my Bib files?
Because, as I said, you *don't* need to edit your bib files. You can
have a program (if your OS is multitasking) to make bib database for
you, by downloading all the data from the internet.
Do
El 18/04/2012 03:03 a.m., PhilipPirrip escribió:
On 04/17/2012 04:23 PM, Alex Vergara Gil wrote:
Secondly, why should I move out of LyX to edit my Bib files?
My question was, actually, why should you edit your bib files at all.
Let the reference manager produce them for you. And then let LaT
On 04/17/2012 04:23 PM, Alex Vergara Gil wrote:
Secondly, why should I move out of LyX to edit my Bib files?
My question was, actually, why should you edit your bib files at all.
Let the reference manager produce them for you. And then let LaTeX do
all the formatting.
El 17/04/2012 03:39 a.m., Andrew Parsloe escribió:
On 17/04/2012 8:43 p.m., PhilipPirrip wrote:
Excuse me for not trying what you've done, but I have to ask first: why
do you think this is better than using Mendeley, for instance, or some
other bibliography management software?
Tha answer to t
El 16/04/2012 04:49 p.m., Andrew Parsloe escribió:
On 17/04/2012 7:21 a.m., Alex Vergara Gil wrote:
> I want to personally congratulate Mr Andrew Parsloe for this piece of
> art. It's outstanding and is what I'm looking for a few days ago, there
> are off course some issues I want to discuss:
>
On 17/04/2012 8:43 p.m., PhilipPirrip wrote:
Excuse me for not trying what you've done, but I have to ask first: why
do you think this is better than using Mendeley, for instance, or some
other bibliography management software?
I don't (not that I've ever tried any bibliography manager) but it
Excuse me for not trying what you've done, but I have to ask first: why
do you think this is better than using Mendeley, for instance, or some
other bibliography management software?
On 17/04/2012 7:53 a.m., Alex Vergara Gil wrote:
> I'm still trying Mr Andrew Parsloe's work and there are to new thing I
> have discovered
>
> 3. The math insets such as $^{90}$ are imported as text when they should
> be imported as math, see point 1.
> 4. The coding \textemdash is imported as te
On 17/04/2012 7:21 a.m., Alex Vergara Gil wrote:
> I want to personally congratulate Mr Andrew Parsloe for this piece of
> art. It's outstanding and is what I'm looking for a few days ago, there
> are off course some issues I want to discuss:
>
> 1. when you import from BibTeX the coding as \text
I'm still trying Mr Andrew Parsloe's work and there are to new thing I
have discovered
3. The math insets such as $^{90}$ are imported as text when they should
be imported as math, see point 1.
4. The coding \textemdash is imported as text when it should be imported
as -- and the -- characters
I want to personally congratulate Mr Andrew Parsloe for this piece of
art. It's outstanding and is what I'm looking for a few days ago, there
are off course some issues I want to discuss:
1. when you import from BibTeX the coding as \textsc{} or \'{} are
imported as text, I know this is a firs
30 matches
Mail list logo
