Well, that took a bit of sorting. Turns out it has nothing to do with either
LyX or LaTeX; it's something sneaky in your image. Your screenshot is 296x296
pixels, which sounds (and looks on the desktop, or in an image viewer, or in the
LyX GUI) square. The catch is that the resolution is
On 05/10/2012 11:00 AM, Paul A. Rubin wrote:
Well, that took a bit of sorting. Turns out it has nothing to do with either
LyX or LaTeX; it's something sneaky in your image. Your screenshot is 296x296
pixels, which sounds (and looks on the desktop, or in an image viewer, or in the
LyX GUI)
Well, that took a bit of sorting. Turns out it has nothing to do with either
LyX or LaTeX; it's something sneaky in your image. Your screenshot is 296x296
pixels, which sounds (and looks on the desktop, or in an image viewer, or in the
LyX GUI) square. The catch is that the resolution is
On 05/10/2012 11:00 AM, Paul A. Rubin wrote:
Well, that took a bit of sorting. Turns out it has nothing to do with either
LyX or LaTeX; it's something sneaky in your image. Your screenshot is 296x296
pixels, which sounds (and looks on the desktop, or in an image viewer, or in the
LyX GUI)
Well, that took a bit of sorting. Turns out it has nothing to do with either
LyX or LaTeX; it's something sneaky in your image. Your screenshot is 296x296
pixels, which sounds (and looks on the desktop, or in an image viewer, or in the
LyX GUI) square. The catch is that the resolution is
On 05/10/2012 11:00 AM, Paul A. Rubin wrote:
Well, that took a bit of sorting. Turns out it has nothing to do with either
LyX or LaTeX; it's something sneaky in your image. Your screenshot is 296x296
pixels, which sounds (and looks on the desktop, or in an image viewer, or in the
LyX GUI)
Allen Barker Allen.L.Barker at gmail.com writes:
On 05/03/2012 05:44 PM, Paul A. Rubin wrote:
Is your version of ImageMagick current?
It is Version: ImageMagick 6.6.5-10 2011-11-03 Q16
Perhaps you should post a minimal example (short LyX document plus image file).
Paul
On 05/08/2012 06:09 PM, Paul A. Rubin wrote:
Allen BarkerAllen.L.Barkerat gmail.com writes:
On 05/03/2012 05:44 PM, Paul A. Rubin wrote:
Is your version of ImageMagick current?
It is Version: ImageMagick 6.6.5-10 2011-11-03 Q16
Perhaps you should post a minimal example (short LyX
Allen Barker Allen.L.Barker at gmail.com writes:
On 05/03/2012 05:44 PM, Paul A. Rubin wrote:
Is your version of ImageMagick current?
It is Version: ImageMagick 6.6.5-10 2011-11-03 Q16
Perhaps you should post a minimal example (short LyX document plus image file).
Paul
On 05/08/2012 06:09 PM, Paul A. Rubin wrote:
Allen BarkerAllen.L.Barkerat gmail.com writes:
On 05/03/2012 05:44 PM, Paul A. Rubin wrote:
Is your version of ImageMagick current?
It is Version: ImageMagick 6.6.5-10 2011-11-03 Q16
Perhaps you should post a minimal example (short LyX
Allen Barker gmail.com> writes:
>
> On 05/03/2012 05:44 PM, Paul A. Rubin wrote:
> >Is your version of ImageMagick current?
>
> It is Version: ImageMagick 6.6.5-10 2011-11-03 Q16
>
>
Perhaps you should post a minimal example (short LyX document plus image file).
Paul
On 05/08/2012 06:09 PM, Paul A. Rubin wrote:
Allen Barker writes:
On 05/03/2012 05:44 PM, Paul A. Rubin wrote:
Is your version of ImageMagick current?
It is Version: ImageMagick 6.6.5-10 2011-11-03 Q16
Perhaps you should post a minimal example (short LyX
On 05/03/2012 05:44 PM, Paul A. Rubin wrote:
Sounds like something funny going on with ImageMagick, but it's hard to say. Is
your version of ImageMagick current?
It is Version: ImageMagick 6.6.5-10 2011-11-03 Q16
On 05/03/2012 05:44 PM, Paul A. Rubin wrote:
Sounds like something funny going on with ImageMagick, but it's hard to say. Is
your version of ImageMagick current?
It is Version: ImageMagick 6.6.5-10 2011-11-03 Q16
On 05/03/2012 05:44 PM, Paul A. Rubin wrote:
Sounds like something funny going on with ImageMagick, but it's hard to say. Is
your version of ImageMagick current?
It is Version: ImageMagick 6.6.5-10 2011-11-03 Q16
Sounds like something funny going on with ImageMagick, but it's hard to say. Is
your version of ImageMagick current?
Paul
Sounds like something funny going on with ImageMagick, but it's hard to say. Is
your version of ImageMagick current?
Paul
Sounds like something funny going on with ImageMagick, but it's hard to say. Is
your version of ImageMagick current?
Paul
On 04/23/2012 08:27 AM, Allen Barker wrote:
I'm having some problems with the aspect ratio of figures
which are inserted into Lyx. This is with version 2.0.3
on a Fedora 15 system.
I insert a .png screenshot with insert-graphics and set
the width to some value (with the maintain aspect ratio
On 04/23/2012 08:27 AM, Allen Barker wrote:
I'm having some problems with the aspect ratio of figures
which are inserted into Lyx. This is with version 2.0.3
on a Fedora 15 system.
I insert a .png screenshot with insert-graphics and set
the width to some value (with the maintain aspect ratio
On 04/23/2012 08:27 AM, Allen Barker wrote:
I'm having some problems with the aspect ratio of figures
which are inserted into Lyx. This is with version 2.0.3
on a Fedora 15 system.
I insert a .png screenshot with insert->graphics and set
the width to some value (with the maintain aspect ra
I'm having some problems with the aspect ratio of figures
which are inserted into Lyx. This is with version 2.0.3
on a Fedora 15 system.
I insert a .png screenshot with insert-graphics and set
the width to some value (with the maintain aspect ratio box
checked). The preview looks fine
I'm having some problems with the aspect ratio of figures
which are inserted into Lyx. This is with version 2.0.3
on a Fedora 15 system.
I insert a .png screenshot with insert-graphics and set
the width to some value (with the maintain aspect ratio box
checked). The preview looks fine
I'm having some problems with the aspect ratio of figures
which are inserted into Lyx. This is with version 2.0.3
on a Fedora 15 system.
I insert a .png screenshot with insert->graphics and set
the width to some value (with the maintain aspect ratio box
checked). The preview looks f
24 matches
Mail list logo
