> On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 11:43:34PM +0100, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> > > PPS: I cut a few smileys from the mail to avoid the embarassing ranking
> > > in the 1.7 smiley-per-mail statistics.
> >
> > feel free to uncover yourself, users list is not evaluated...
>
> Nobody expected the Spanish
Andre Poenitz wrote:
PPS: I cut a few smileys from the mail to avoid the embarassing ranking
in the 1.7 smiley-per-mail statistics.
Best to start now, eh?
rh
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
Dominik Waßenhoven schrieb:
On the Vista machine, I had no Python installed and the lyx2lyx script
failed. I now installed Microsoft's VC++ redistributable package, as
suggested by Paul Rubin, and now the lyx2lyx script works. So I think
there is a problem
Michael Wojcik wrote:
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
Dominik Waßenhoven schrieb:
On the Vista machine, I had no Python installed and the lyx2lyx script
failed. I now installed Microsoft's VC++ redistributable package, as
suggested by Paul Rubin, and now the lyx2lyx script works. So I think
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 11:07:05AM -0500, Paul A. Rubin wrote:
I wonder if disk manufacturers are paying M$ to do this? I've got about
54MB of crap in %windir%\winsxs, with multiple versions of each set of
files. Presumably there's no way for Windoze to know that something
depending on
Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In fact that's actually the most sensible behaviour since there are only
very few cases where a new version indeed can replace an older one
without any existing or imagined problem.
What's wrong with static linking? At least it goes away when the
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
Dominik Waßenhoven schrieb:
On the Vista machine, I had no Python installed and the lyx2lyx script
failed. I now installed Microsoft's VC++ redistributable package, as
suggested by Paul Rubin, and now the lyx2lyx script works. So I think
there is a problem
Michael Wojcik wrote:
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
Dominik Waßenhoven schrieb:
On the Vista machine, I had no Python installed and the lyx2lyx script
failed. I now installed Microsoft's VC++ redistributable package, as
suggested by Paul Rubin, and now the lyx2lyx script works. So I think
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 11:07:05AM -0500, Paul A. Rubin wrote:
I wonder if disk manufacturers are paying M$ to do this? I've got about
54MB of crap in %windir%\winsxs, with multiple versions of each set of
files. Presumably there's no way for Windoze to know that something
depending on
Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In fact that's actually the most sensible behaviour since there are only
very few cases where a new version indeed can replace an older one
without any existing or imagined problem.
What's wrong with static linking? At least it goes away when the
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> Dominik Waßenhoven schrieb:
>
>> On the Vista machine, I had no Python installed and the lyx2lyx script
>> failed. I now installed Microsoft's VC++ redistributable package, as
>> suggested by Paul Rubin, and now the lyx2lyx script works. So I thi
Michael Wojcik wrote:
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
Dominik Waßenhoven schrieb:
On the Vista machine, I had no Python installed and the lyx2lyx script
failed. I now installed Microsoft's VC++ redistributable package, as
suggested by Paul Rubin, and now the lyx2lyx script works. So I think
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 11:07:05AM -0500, Paul A. Rubin wrote:
> I wonder if disk manufacturers are paying M$ to do this? I've got about
> 54MB of crap in %windir%\winsxs, with multiple versions of each set of
> files. Presumably there's no way for Windoze to know that something
>
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> In fact that's actually the most sensible behaviour since there are only
> very few cases where a new version indeed can replace an older one
> without any existing or imagined problem.
What's wrong with static linking? At least it goes away when the
recognize it.
No, I think I was not clear enough. The second sentenc you cited above
bear on my insallation on a WinXP system, where your installer worked
perfectly.
On the Vista machine, I had no Python installed and the lyx2lyx script
failed. I now installed Microsoft's VC++ redistributable
Paul A. Rubin wrote:
Dominik Waßenhoven wrote:
Should I try to install Python on Vista and try to convert
from LyX 1.5 to 1.6 again?
That would likely work. Alternatively, you might install the M$ VC++
redistributable package
Dominik Waßenhoven schrieb:
On the Vista machine, I had no Python installed and the lyx2lyx script
failed. I now installed Microsoft's VC++ redistributable package, as
suggested by Paul Rubin, and now the lyx2lyx script works. So I think
there is a problem with the python.exe and/or python26
recognize it.
No, I think I was not clear enough. The second sentenc you cited above
bear on my insallation on a WinXP system, where your installer worked
perfectly.
On the Vista machine, I had no Python installed and the lyx2lyx script
failed. I now installed Microsoft's VC++ redistributable
Paul A. Rubin wrote:
Dominik Waßenhoven wrote:
Should I try to install Python on Vista and try to convert
from LyX 1.5 to 1.6 again?
That would likely work. Alternatively, you might install the M$ VC++
redistributable package
Dominik Waßenhoven schrieb:
On the Vista machine, I had no Python installed and the lyx2lyx script
failed. I now installed Microsoft's VC++ redistributable package, as
suggested by Paul Rubin, and now the lyx2lyx script works. So I think
there is a problem with the python.exe and/or python26
e Python 2.5.1 installed but the installer didn't
> recognize it.
No, I think I was not clear enough. The second sentenc you cited above
bear on my insallation on a WinXP system, where your installer worked
perfectly.
On the Vista machine, I had no Python installed and the lyx2lyx script
failed. I n
Paul A. Rubin wrote:
> Dominik Waßenhoven wrote:
>> Should I try to install Python on Vista and try to convert
>> from LyX 1.5 to 1.6 again?
> That would likely work. Alternatively, you might install the M$ VC++
> redistributable package
>
Dominik Waßenhoven schrieb:
On the Vista machine, I had no Python installed and the lyx2lyx script
failed. I now installed Microsoft's VC++ redistributable package, as
suggested by Paul Rubin, and now the lyx2lyx script works. So I think
there is a problem with the python.exe and/or python26
Paul A. Rubin wrote:
Dominik Waßenhoven wrote:
Dominik »Ingrid« Waßenhoven wrote:
I installed LyX 1.6.0 on WinXP without problems and can open lyx files
of the 1.5.x series. But on Windows Vista, the same installation cannot
read 1.5.x files.
I forgot: I used Uwe's AltInstaller.
Opening
Paul A. Rubin wrote:
Also, you might check try converting a file manually on the Vista box,
using a DOS shell. This would look something like
C:\Program Files\LyX16\python\python.exe C:\Program
Files\LyX16\Resources\lyx2lyx\lyx2lyx doc.lyx
where doc.lyx is the old document. If it works,
Dominik Waßenhoven wrote:
Paul A. Rubin wrote:
Also, you might check try converting a file manually on the Vista box,
using a DOS shell. This would look something like
C:\Program Files\LyX16\python\python.exe C:\Program
Files\LyX16\Resources\lyx2lyx\lyx2lyx doc.lyx
where doc.lyx is the
Dominik Waßenhoven schrieb:
In the bin directory is a python26.dll file.
Oh -- I just saw that I have a full Python installed on the WinXP
machine (I didn't realize that, sorry...). It's Python 2.5.1
This means that you have Python 2.5.1 installed but the installer didn't
recognize it.
I'm
I wrote:
p.s. I'll provide a new installer version within the next 2 hours that
fixes some Vista-specific bugs.
You can now download this version from:
https://developer.berlios.de/project/showfiles.php?group_id=5117release_id=15417
That fixes the following bugs:
- fix a bug in the Romanian
Paul A. Rubin wrote:
Dominik Waßenhoven wrote:
Dominik »Ingrid« Waßenhoven wrote:
I installed LyX 1.6.0 on WinXP without problems and can open lyx files
of the 1.5.x series. But on Windows Vista, the same installation cannot
read 1.5.x files.
I forgot: I used Uwe's AltInstaller.
Opening
Paul A. Rubin wrote:
Also, you might check try converting a file manually on the Vista box,
using a DOS shell. This would look something like
C:\Program Files\LyX16\python\python.exe C:\Program
Files\LyX16\Resources\lyx2lyx\lyx2lyx doc.lyx
where doc.lyx is the old document. If it works,
Dominik Waßenhoven wrote:
Paul A. Rubin wrote:
Also, you might check try converting a file manually on the Vista box,
using a DOS shell. This would look something like
C:\Program Files\LyX16\python\python.exe C:\Program
Files\LyX16\Resources\lyx2lyx\lyx2lyx doc.lyx
where doc.lyx is the
Dominik Waßenhoven schrieb:
In the bin directory is a python26.dll file.
Oh -- I just saw that I have a full Python installed on the WinXP
machine (I didn't realize that, sorry...). It's Python 2.5.1
This means that you have Python 2.5.1 installed but the installer didn't
recognize it.
I'm
I wrote:
p.s. I'll provide a new installer version within the next 2 hours that
fixes some Vista-specific bugs.
You can now download this version from:
https://developer.berlios.de/project/showfiles.php?group_id=5117release_id=15417
That fixes the following bugs:
- fix a bug in the Romanian
Paul A. Rubin wrote:
> Dominik Waßenhoven wrote:
>> Dominik »Ingrid« Waßenhoven wrote:
>>> I installed LyX 1.6.0 on WinXP without problems and can open lyx files
>>> of the 1.5.x series. But on Windows Vista, the same installation cannot
>>> read 1.5.x files.
>> I forgot: I used Uwe's
Paul A. Rubin wrote:
> Also, you might check try converting a file manually on the Vista box,
> using a DOS shell. This would look something like
>> "C:\Program Files\LyX16\python\python.exe" "C:\Program
>> Files\LyX16\Resources\lyx2lyx\lyx2lyx" doc.lyx
> where doc.lyx is the old document. If
Dominik Waßenhoven wrote:
Paul A. Rubin wrote:
Also, you might check try converting a file manually on the Vista box,
using a DOS shell. This would look something like
"C:\Program Files\LyX16\python\python.exe" "C:\Program
Files\LyX16\Resources\lyx2lyx\lyx2lyx" doc.lyx
where doc.lyx is
Dominik Waßenhoven schrieb:
In the bin directory is a python26.dll file.
Oh -- I just saw that I have a full Python installed on the WinXP
machine (I didn't realize that, sorry...). It's Python 2.5.1
This means that you have Python 2.5.1 installed but the installer didn't
recognize it.
I'm
I wrote:
p.s. I'll provide a new installer version within the next 2 hours that
fixes some Vista-specific bugs.
You can now download this version from:
https://developer.berlios.de/project/showfiles.php?group_id=5117_id=15417
That fixes the following bugs:
- fix a bug in the Romanian
Hi all,
I installed LyX 1.6.0 on WinXP without problems and can open lyx files
of the 1.5.x series. But on Windows Vista, the same installation cannot
read 1.5.x files.
I attach a file example which could not be opened on Vista, but could on
WinXP:
Dominik »Ingrid« Waßenhoven wrote:
I installed LyX 1.6.0 on WinXP without problems and can open lyx files
of the 1.5.x series. But on Windows Vista, the same installation cannot
read 1.5.x files.
I forgot: I used Uwe's AltInstaller.
Regards,
Dominik.-
Dominik Waßenhoven wrote:
Dominik »Ingrid« Waßenhoven wrote:
I installed LyX 1.6.0 on WinXP without problems and can open lyx files
of the 1.5.x series. But on Windows Vista, the same installation cannot
read 1.5.x files.
I forgot: I used Uwe's AltInstaller.
Opening a 1.5.x doc requires
I have the same problem in Windows Vista with the Uwe's AltInstaller.
Sergio
Dominik Waßenhoven escribió:
Dominik »Ingrid« Waßenhoven wrote:
I installed LyX 1.6.0 on WinXP without problems and can open lyx files
of the 1.5.x series. But on Windows Vista, the same installation cannot
Hi all,
I installed LyX 1.6.0 on WinXP without problems and can open lyx files
of the 1.5.x series. But on Windows Vista, the same installation cannot
read 1.5.x files.
I attach a file example which could not be opened on Vista, but could on
WinXP:
Dominik »Ingrid« Waßenhoven wrote:
I installed LyX 1.6.0 on WinXP without problems and can open lyx files
of the 1.5.x series. But on Windows Vista, the same installation cannot
read 1.5.x files.
I forgot: I used Uwe's AltInstaller.
Regards,
Dominik.-
Dominik Waßenhoven wrote:
Dominik »Ingrid« Waßenhoven wrote:
I installed LyX 1.6.0 on WinXP without problems and can open lyx files
of the 1.5.x series. But on Windows Vista, the same installation cannot
read 1.5.x files.
I forgot: I used Uwe's AltInstaller.
Opening a 1.5.x doc requires
I have the same problem in Windows Vista with the Uwe's AltInstaller.
Sergio
Dominik Waßenhoven escribió:
Dominik »Ingrid« Waßenhoven wrote:
I installed LyX 1.6.0 on WinXP without problems and can open lyx files
of the 1.5.x series. But on Windows Vista, the same installation cannot
Hi all,
I installed LyX 1.6.0 on WinXP without problems and can open lyx files
of the 1.5.x series. But on Windows Vista, the same installation cannot
read 1.5.x files.
I attach a file example which could not be opened on Vista, but could on
WinXP:
Dominik »Ingrid« Waßenhoven wrote:
> I installed LyX 1.6.0 on WinXP without problems and can open lyx files
> of the 1.5.x series. But on Windows Vista, the same installation cannot
> read 1.5.x files.
I forgot: I used Uwe's AltInstaller.
Regards,
Dominik.-
Dominik Waßenhoven wrote:
Dominik »Ingrid« Waßenhoven wrote:
I installed LyX 1.6.0 on WinXP without problems and can open lyx files
of the 1.5.x series. But on Windows Vista, the same installation cannot
read 1.5.x files.
I forgot: I used Uwe's AltInstaller.
Opening a 1.5.x doc requires
I have the same problem in Windows Vista with the Uwe's AltInstaller.
Sergio
Dominik Waßenhoven escribió:
Dominik »Ingrid« Waßenhoven wrote:
I installed LyX 1.6.0 on WinXP without problems and can open lyx files
of the 1.5.x series. But on Windows Vista, the same installation cannot
201 - 250 of 250 matches
Mail list logo
