t:
Greek letters behave like non-letter symbols and do not change inside a
\math... alphabet:
In the following minimal example:
\documentclass{article}
% \usepackage{lmodern}
% \usepackage{mathpazo}
\usepackage[garamond]{mathdesign}
\usepackage{isomath}
\begin{document}
$VIC \Gamma vic \gamma \vare
Am Mittwoch, 16. Januar 2013, 00:11:05 schrieb Paul A. Rubin:
> It's some sort of font issue. I replicated the problem with your
> document here, then changed the Roman font from Palatino to Times Roman
> and got the expected output. I suspect the mathpazo package may not
> contain the needed glyph
It's some sort of font issue. I replicated the problem with your document here,
then changed the Roman font from Palatino to Times Roman and got the expected
output. I suspect the mathpazo package may not contain the needed glyph.
Paul
On 2013-01-10, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
> I try to convert
> CKI\varepsilon
> into
> mathrm, but that gives me CKI''
> Is this known, that greek characters do not convert, or am I missing
> something?
Upright Greek is a known problem.
* By default, Greek letters
Am Freitag, 11. Januar 2013, 00:01:15 schrieb Paul A. Rubin:
> Works for me.
>
> Paul
Thanks, Paul
your example works here too, but not the original. Must have to do with my
setting (Koma script?)
Would you mind to try it out?
Thanks
Wolfgang
Test-greek.lyx
Description: application/lyx
\html_math_output 0
\html_css_as_file 0
\html_be_strict false
\end_header
\begin_body
\begin_layout Standard
\begin_inset Formula $a=b=\mathrm{CKI\varepsilon}$
\end_inset
\end_layout
\end_body
\end_document
I try to convert
CKI\varepsilon
into
mathrm, but that gives me CKI''
Is this known, that greek characters do not convert, or am I missing
something?
Wolfgang
Am Donnerstag, 5. Januar 2012, 14:53:38 schrieb Guenter Milde:
> On 2012-01-05, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
> > I use
> > \mathrm{K}^{+}
> > to get an upright K^+ (K-Ion) (and other items such as units)
> > and guess the following message on the terminal from which I star
On 2012-01-05, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
> I use
> \mathrm{K}^{+}
> to get an upright K^+ (K-Ion) (and other items such as units)
> and guess the following message on the terminal from which I start lyx has
> to do with it:
> [Unknown [sub [mathrm [char E mathalpha]] [char e
But it compiles? I have tested it out of the box and it does so.
-
Julio Rojas
jcredbe...@gmail.com
On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 11:39 AM, Wolfgang Engelmann <
engelm...@uni-tuebingen.de> wrote:
> I use
> \mathrm{K}^{+}
> to get an upr
I use
\mathrm{K}^{+}
to get an upright K^+ (K-Ion) (and other items such as units)
and guess the following message on the terminal from which I start lyx has
to do with it:
[Unknown [sub [mathrm [char E mathalpha]] [char e mathalpha][char x
mathalpha]]]
Do I have to include some package or
hi all
I'm getting this strange "\mathrm allowed only in math mode" when my
appendix chapters contain equation arrays. This is a latex error and
also happens when I export to latex and run latex on the file.
Would someone be familiar with cases when this comes up? I ra
On Wed, 15 Sep 2004 18:37:27 -0400
nick afshartous <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> In my .bind file I could bind math-mode but
> the binding for mathrm below does not seem to take effect.
>
>
> \bind "C-m""math-mode&quo
Hi,
In my .bind file I could bind math-mode but
the binding for mathrm below does not seem to take effect.
\bind "C-m""math-mode"
\bind "C-r""mathrm"
When I hit C-r inside math mode the display bar shows &
On Fri, 9 Jul 2004 18:45:28 +0200
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Which is btw "correct typesetting" for things like \sin etc even in
> sans serif slides.
I think beamer makes it right when typesetting operators like sin
sans-serif. If you want math with serif letters you can always sp
On Fri, Jul 09, 2004 at 03:59:52PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > Isn't amsmath' \text what you need here (or \mbox, but it will not
> > set the size correctly). Normal text should not use mathrm, in any
> > case.
>
> I don&#
gt; It uses a nice, sans serif font by default, but I find that
> \mathrm{foo} results in foo being typeset with a serifed font. Ditto
> with \textrm. See attached test case.
\rm is "Roman" so you explicitly ask for serifs.
Which is btw "correct typesetting" for things like
er.sf.net)
>
> It uses a nice, sans serif font by default, but I find that
> \mathrm{foo} results in foo being typeset with a serifed font. Ditto
> with \textrm. See attached test case.
If you want to typeset text inside a formula with the same font as
normal text, use \text from ams
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Angus> I want a properly typeset subscripted phrase. \textnormal
Angus> works. \text works too.
Angus> Which would you use?
I don't know. To be fair, I did not know about \textnormal, but it
looks like a good candidate.
JMarc
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Isn't amsmath' \text what you need here (or \mbox, but it will not
> set the size correctly). Normal text should not use mathrm, in any
> case.
I don't know. That's why I'm asking.
I want a properly typeset subscripted phrase. \
e I can define a math macro
>>
Angus> \newcommand{\mathtext}[1]{\mathsf{#1}}
>>
Angus> and use it to separate markup from input, but is that really
Angus> what I'm expected to do here?
>> How do you use this typically?
Angus> D_{\mathrm{eff}}=D_{\mathrm{mol}}\fr
rate markup from input, but is that really
> Angus> what I'm expected to do here?
>
> How do you use this typically?
D_{\mathrm{eff}}=D_{\mathrm{mol}}\frac{A_{\mathrm{central\:
duct}}}{A_{\mathrm{whole}}}\]
> In LyX 'M-c space' should change the
> font to t
Jean-Pierre Chretien wrote:
> Those who are accustomed to serified math fonts and want to
> keep the good-looking sans-serif text font may use the [mathserif]
> class option.
Thanks for this info, Jean-Pierre.
> Till Tantau made a real good work about customization and
> compatibility. The comman
>>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>Subject: Re: latex beamer and \mathrm
>>From: Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>Date: Fri, 09 Jul 2004 15:09:16 +0200
>>X-Miltered: at concorde with ID 40EE98FC.000 by Joe's j-chkmail
(http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)!
&g
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Angus> Shrug. I expect a class that redefines the default font to also
Angus> redefine the default elsewhere too. Is that so unreasonable?
Well, roman in LaTeX world means serif (if I understand correctly). It
does not mean default. The
>
> Angus> It uses a nice, sans serif font by default, but I find that
> Angus> \mathrm{foo} results in foo being typeset with a serifed
> font. Angus> Ditto with \textrm. See attached test case.
>
> What's the problem? The default font is sans-serif, which is
> di
ee
Angus> http://latex-beamer.sf.net)
Angus> It uses a nice, sans serif font by default, but I find that
Angus> \mathrm{foo} results in foo being typeset with a serifed font.
Angus> Ditto with \textrm. See attached test case.
What's the problem? The default font is sans-serif,
I've noticed one small peculiarity with the latex beamer class. (For
those that don't know it, it's a *fantastic* class with which to
create pdf presentations. See http://latex-beamer.sf.net)
It uses a nice, sans serif font by default, but I find that
\mathrm{foo} results in fo
Herbert Voss wrote:
>
> Wolfgang Riedel wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > if I type the tex code (for instance) for an unit of measurement 'meter
> > per second' "\mathrm{\frac{m}{s}}" inside a mathematical expression in
> > lyx (the
Wolfgang Riedel wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> if I type the tex code (for instance) for an unit of measurement 'meter
> per second' "\mathrm{\frac{m}{s}}" inside a mathematical expression in
> lyx (the frac was created via the mathematical menue) it seems correct,
Hi,
if I type the tex code (for instance) for an unit of measurement 'meter
per second' "\mathrm{\frac{m}{s}}" inside a mathematical expression in
lyx (the frac was created via the mathematical menue) it seems correct,
the dvi is okay. But if I leave lyx, start it again an
italicized in the PS-file.
exp is certainly _not_ in italics here. dev is indeed, but this is
normal: it inherits the font of the environment. In fact you seem to
think that mathrm should not be in italics. This used to be true in
latex2.09, but latex2e has separated this in two different things:
f
On 08 Nov 1999 11:11:13 +010 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> "?" == <" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> writes:
>
>?> There are certain functions like sin, exp, etc. which are supposed
>?> to be written with non-italic letters even inside formulas. Usually
>?> this works (by using \sin or C-m sin). Ho
> "?" == <" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> writes:
?> There are certain functions like sin, exp, etc. which are supposed
?> to be written with non-italic letters even inside formulas. Usually
?> this works (by using \sin or C-m sin). However, in the Lemma and
?> Proposition environments (which italic
There are certain functions like sin, exp, etc. which are supposed to be written with
non-italic letters even inside formulas. Usually this works (by using \sin or C-m
sin). However, in the Lemma and Proposition environments (which italicize text) these
get italicized too. How can I turn tha
35 matches
Mail list logo
