Thanks for the tip. That solved one mystery for me.
Thanks for the tip. I was also confused about the different
behavior in different documents. This clears it up.
Thanks for the tip. That solved one mystery for me.
Thanks for the tip. I was also confused about the different
behavior in different documents. This clears it up.
Thanks for the tip. That solved one mystery for me.
Thanks for the tip. I was also confused about the different
behavior in different documents. This clears it up.
01/05/2014 23:59, Wil:
Since I never needed to explicitly enable amsmath until I started
working with parent/child documents, I never noticed this behavior until
now.
The behavior makes sense to me after I thought about it for a minute,
but it was surprising nonetheless. I've seen this
prefrence is not a valid
answer :)
Maybe
Use AMS-math:
( ) no
( ) automatically (only if absolutely required)
( ) automatically (preferred alternative)
( ) always
Günter
01/05/2014 23:59, Wil:
Since I never needed to explicitly enable amsmath until I started
working with parent/child documents, I never noticed this behavior until
now.
The behavior makes sense to me after I thought about it for a minute,
but it was surprising nonetheless. I've seen this
prefrence is not a valid
answer :)
Maybe
Use AMS-math:
( ) no
( ) automatically (only if absolutely required)
( ) automatically (preferred alternative)
( ) always
Günter
01/05/2014 23:59, Wil:
Since I never needed to explicitly enable amsmath until I started
working with parent/child documents, I never noticed this behavior until
now.
The behavior makes sense to me after I thought about it for a minute,
but it was surprising nonetheless. I've seen this
ow to improve the
> behavior? I warn you though that "add a new prefrence" is not a valid
> answer :)
Maybe
Use AMS-math:
( ) no
( ) automatically (only if absolutely required)
( ) automatically (preferred alternative)
( ) always
Günter
Something I recently ran across confused the heck out of me until I looked
into it and figured out what was going on. I'm hoping that this message
will help others resolve similar confusion.
I've been using LyX since at least the 1.6 days, and in all that time,
Ctrl-Enter in math mode changed
Something I recently ran across confused the heck out of me until I looked
into it and figured out what was going on. I'm hoping that this message
will help others resolve similar confusion.
I've been using LyX since at least the 1.6 days, and in all that time,
Ctrl-Enter in math mode changed
Something I recently ran across confused the heck out of me until I looked
into it and figured out what was going on. I'm hoping that this message
will help others resolve similar confusion.
I've been using LyX since at least the 1.6 days, and in all that time,
Ctrl-Enter in math mode changed
Hi
I have noticed some curious behaviour recently which hopefully someone
can shed light on.
In a document with Use AMS math package automatically set in
Documents/Settings, when I enter display maths and input x=y followed
by cntl-Enter I get a new line with three boxes the middle one
Hi
I have noticed some curious behaviour recently which hopefully someone
can shed light on.
In a document with Use AMS math package automatically set in
Documents/Settings, when I enter display maths and input x=y followed
by cntl-Enter I get a new line with three boxes the middle one
Hi
I have noticed some curious behaviour recently which hopefully someone
can shed light on.
In a document with "Use AMS math package automatically" set in
Documents/Settings, when I enter display maths and input x=y followed
by cntl-Enter I get a new line with three boxes the
In DocumentSettingsMath Options, checking the 'Use AMS math package
automatically' option doesn't mean exactly that. I use LyX for
constructing diagrams with PSTricks and enter the code in ERT (LyX's
PostScript View and Update buttons are excellent for this). I wanted to
label an angle with pi
Andrew Parsloe wrote:
In DocumentSettingsMath Options, checking the 'Use AMS math package
automatically' option doesn't mean exactly that. I use LyX for
constructing diagrams with PSTricks and enter the code in ERT (LyX's
PostScript View and Update buttons are excellent for this). I wanted
In DocumentSettingsMath Options, checking the 'Use AMS math package
automatically' option doesn't mean exactly that. I use LyX for
constructing diagrams with PSTricks and enter the code in ERT (LyX's
PostScript View and Update buttons are excellent for this). I wanted to
label an angle with pi
Andrew Parsloe wrote:
In DocumentSettingsMath Options, checking the 'Use AMS math package
automatically' option doesn't mean exactly that. I use LyX for
constructing diagrams with PSTricks and enter the code in ERT (LyX's
PostScript View and Update buttons are excellent for this). I wanted
In Document>Settings>Math Options, checking the 'Use AMS math package
automatically' option doesn't mean exactly that. I use LyX for
constructing diagrams with PSTricks and enter the code in ERT (LyX's
PostScript View and Update buttons are excellent for this). I wanted to
label an
Andrew Parsloe wrote:
> In Document>Settings>Math Options, checking the 'Use AMS math package
> automatically' option doesn't mean exactly that. I use LyX for
> constructing diagrams with PSTricks and enter the code in ERT (LyX's
> PostScript View and Update buttons are exce
.
Following the suggestions of many of you, I'll be using the AMS Math Book
document class. This document class has numerous environments whose names are
taken from math:
Right address theorum corollary
lemma proposition conjecture
criterion algorithm
an expensive class with an instructor (yes, I
am somewhat cynical). I'm going to distill algebra down to its simplest
components.
Following the suggestions of many of you, I'll be using the AMS Math Book
document class. This document class has numerous environments whose names are
taken from math
.
Following the suggestions of many of you, I'll be using the AMS Math Book
document class. This document class has numerous environments whose names are
taken from math:
Right address theorum corollary
lemma proposition conjecture
criterion algorithm
an expensive class with an instructor (yes, I
am somewhat cynical). I'm going to distill algebra down to its simplest
components.
Following the suggestions of many of you, I'll be using the AMS Math Book
document class. This document class has numerous environments whose names are
taken from math
.
Following the suggestions of many of you, I'll be using the AMS Math Book
document class. This document class has numerous environments whose names are
taken from math:
Right address theorum corollary
lemma proposition conjecture
criterion algorithm
an expensive class with an instructor (yes, I
am somewhat cynical). I'm going to distill algebra down to its simplest
components.
Following the suggestions of many of you, I'll be using the AMS Math Book
document class. This document class has numerous environments whose names are
taken from math
Something similar to 'end environment' can be done but is not very
consistent with the current ways of dealing with environments. I doubt
if this problem is in the bug/wish list of lyx. We can try to put this
in the wish list though.
That sounds like a good idea.. I'll check the wish
On Sat, Oct 26, 2002 at 05:43:21PM -0400, Nirmal Govind wrote:
Hi.. in the AMS math classes, how do I put one Definition after another
Definition (or for that matter, one Theorem after another Theorem etc.)
Currently if I hit Enter after a Definition, the environment remains the
same
On Sat, Oct 26, 2002 at 08:16:01PM -0500, Bo Peng wrote:
Something similar to 'end environment' can be done but is not very
consistent with the current ways of dealing with environments. I doubt
if this problem is in the bug/wish list of lyx. We can try to put this
in the wish list though.
Something similar to 'end environment' can be done but is not very
consistent with the current ways of dealing with environments. I doubt
if this problem is in the bug/wish list of lyx. We can try to put this
in the wish list though.
That sounds like a good idea.. I'll check the wish
On Sat, Oct 26, 2002 at 05:43:21PM -0400, Nirmal Govind wrote:
Hi.. in the AMS math classes, how do I put one Definition after another
Definition (or for that matter, one Theorem after another Theorem etc.)
Currently if I hit Enter after a Definition, the environment remains the
same
On Sat, Oct 26, 2002 at 08:16:01PM -0500, Bo Peng wrote:
Something similar to 'end environment' can be done but is not very
consistent with the current ways of dealing with environments. I doubt
if this problem is in the bug/wish list of lyx. We can try to put this
in the wish list though.
> Something similar to 'end environment' can be done but is not very
> consistent with the current ways of dealing with environments. I doubt
>
> if this problem is in the bug/wish list of lyx. We can try to put this
>
> in the wish list though.
>
That sounds like a good idea.. I'll check the
On Sat, Oct 26, 2002 at 05:43:21PM -0400, Nirmal Govind wrote:
> Hi.. in the AMS math classes, how do I put one Definition after another
> Definition (or for that matter, one Theorem after another Theorem etc.)
> Currently if I hit Enter after a Definition, the environment remains t
On Sat, Oct 26, 2002 at 08:16:01PM -0500, Bo Peng wrote:
> Something similar to 'end environment' can be done but is not very
> consistent with the current ways of dealing with environments. I doubt
> if this problem is in the bug/wish list of lyx. We can try to put this
> in the wish list
Hi.. in the AMS math classes, how do I put one Definition after another
Definition (or for that matter, one Theorem after another Theorem etc.)
Currently if I hit Enter after a Definition, the environment remains the
same and the Definition. doesn't show up again although I want to put
in a new
I use ntheorem.sty for such things ;) It is customizeable... but you have to
use \begin and \end for every environment :)
Remzi
On Saturday 26 October 2002 16:43, Nirmal Govind wrote:
Hi.. in the AMS math classes, how do I put one Definition after another
Definition (or for that matter, one
On Sat, Oct 26, 2002 at 05:43:21PM -0400, Nirmal Govind wrote:
Hi.. in the AMS math classes, how do I put one Definition after another
Definition (or for that matter, one Theorem after another Theorem etc.)
Currently if I hit Enter after a Definition, the environment remains the
same
Hello,
I just put, after the theorem (after pressing enter), an empty ERT in
standard mode (not in theorem mode) and only then (after pressing enter
again) start a new theorem.
Hope this helps,
Amir.
Nirmal Govind wrote:
Hi.. in the AMS math classes, how do I put one Definition after another
Thanks everyone.. that was helpful.. I just checked the cvs version and
it has the same behavior.. will this be taken care of in the final 1.3?
Thanks,
nirmal
On Sat, Oct 26, 2002 at 07:14:24PM -0400, Nirmal Govind wrote:
Thanks everyone.. that was helpful.. I just checked the cvs version and
it has the same behavior.. will this be taken care of in the final 1.3?
Thanks,
nirmal
In latex, we have \end{some-env} for all environments. In lyx, end of
Hi.. in the AMS math classes, how do I put one Definition after another
Definition (or for that matter, one Theorem after another Theorem etc.)
Currently if I hit Enter after a Definition, the environment remains the
same and the Definition. doesn't show up again although I want to put
in a new
I use ntheorem.sty for such things ;) It is customizeable... but you have to
use \begin and \end for every environment :)
Remzi
On Saturday 26 October 2002 16:43, Nirmal Govind wrote:
Hi.. in the AMS math classes, how do I put one Definition after another
Definition (or for that matter, one
On Sat, Oct 26, 2002 at 05:43:21PM -0400, Nirmal Govind wrote:
Hi.. in the AMS math classes, how do I put one Definition after another
Definition (or for that matter, one Theorem after another Theorem etc.)
Currently if I hit Enter after a Definition, the environment remains the
same
Hello,
I just put, after the theorem (after pressing enter), an empty ERT in
standard mode (not in theorem mode) and only then (after pressing enter
again) start a new theorem.
Hope this helps,
Amir.
Nirmal Govind wrote:
Hi.. in the AMS math classes, how do I put one Definition after another
Thanks everyone.. that was helpful.. I just checked the cvs version and
it has the same behavior.. will this be taken care of in the final 1.3?
Thanks,
nirmal
On Sat, Oct 26, 2002 at 07:14:24PM -0400, Nirmal Govind wrote:
Thanks everyone.. that was helpful.. I just checked the cvs version and
it has the same behavior.. will this be taken care of in the final 1.3?
Thanks,
nirmal
In latex, we have \end{some-env} for all environments. In lyx, end of
Hi.. in the AMS math classes, how do I put one Definition after another
Definition (or for that matter, one Theorem after another Theorem etc.)
Currently if I hit Enter after a Definition, the environment remains the
same and the "Definition." doesn't show up again although I want to pu
I use ntheorem.sty for such things ;) It is customizeable... but you have to
use \begin and \end for every environment :)
Remzi
On Saturday 26 October 2002 16:43, Nirmal Govind wrote:
> Hi.. in the AMS math classes, how do I put one Definition after another
> Definition (or for that matte
On Sat, Oct 26, 2002 at 05:43:21PM -0400, Nirmal Govind wrote:
> Hi.. in the AMS math classes, how do I put one Definition after another
> Definition (or for that matter, one Theorem after another Theorem etc.)
> Currently if I hit Enter after a Definition, the environment remains t
Hello,
I just put, after the theorem (after pressing enter), an empty ERT in
standard mode (not in theorem mode) and only then (after pressing enter
again) start a new theorem.
Hope this helps,
Amir.
Nirmal Govind wrote:
Hi.. in the AMS math classes, how do I put one Definition after another
Thanks everyone.. that was helpful.. I just checked the cvs version and
it has the same behavior.. will this be taken care of in the final 1.3?
Thanks,
nirmal
On Sat, Oct 26, 2002 at 07:14:24PM -0400, Nirmal Govind wrote:
> Thanks everyone.. that was helpful.. I just checked the cvs version and
> it has the same behavior.. will this be taken care of in the final 1.3?
> Thanks,
> nirmal
In latex, we have \end{some-env} for all environments. In lyx, end
Fernando Rodriguez wrote:
Dear all,
I am using lyx 1.1.6 on a yellowdog machine. When I use the document type AMS
(article) I get several overruns for the inlined equations. However when I
use the article class or article-koma script this doesn't happen.
Any ideas? Please Help!
Fernando Rodriguez wrote:
Dear all,
I am using lyx 1.1.6 on a yellowdog machine. When I use the document type AMS
(article) I get several overruns for the inlined equations. However when I
use the article class or article-koma script this doesn't happen.
Any ideas? Please Help!
Fernando Rodriguez wrote:
> Dear all,
>
>
> I am using lyx 1.1.6 on a yellowdog machine. When I use the document type AMS
> (article) I get several overruns for the inlined equations. However when I
> use the article class or article-koma script this doesn't happen.
>
> Any ideas? Please
..
choose layout-document-itemize bullets (I don't know the exact english
word for this signs, it's just over the AMS-math radiobutton). When
there
is "\(\bullet\)" in the latex-window, LyX produces the two errors, when
you
try the dvi-view. Instead of "\(\bullet\)" choose o
..
choose layout-document-itemize bullets (I don't know the exact english
word for this signs, it's just over the AMS-math radiobutton). When
there
is "\(\bullet\)" in the latex-window, LyX produces the two errors, when
you
try the dvi-view. Instead of "\(\bullet\)" choose o
got errors
> > when trying to View DVI.
>
> it's just a bit curious ...
> choose layout->document->itemize bullets (I don't know the exact english
> word for this signs, it's just over the AMS-math radiobutton). When
> there
> is "\(\bullet\)" in the latex-win
Package: lyx
Version: 1.1.2-2
Severity: normal
Although I have activated the radio button of AMS math at the Layout-Document
menu I can not been able to follow what the UserGuide.lyx suggets.
In particular, both \mathfrak{g} and \mathbb{R} give an error message.
\boldsymbol{\alpha}, which does
Although I have activated the radio button of AMS math at the Layout-Document
menu I can not been able to follow what the UserGuide.lyx suggets.
In particular, both \mathfrak{g} and \mathbb{R} give an error message.
\boldsymbol{\alpha}, which does not seem to require the AMS extentions
Package: lyx
Version: 1.1.2-2
Severity: normal
Although I have activated the radio button of AMS math at the Layout-Document
menu I can not been able to follow what the UserGuide.lyx suggets.
In particular, both \mathfrak{g} and \mathbb{R} give an error message.
\boldsymbol{\alpha}, which does
Although I have activated the radio button of AMS math at the Layout-Document
menu I can not been able to follow what the UserGuide.lyx suggets.
In particular, both \mathfrak{g} and \mathbb{R} give an error message.
\boldsymbol{\alpha}, which does not seem to require the AMS extentions
Package: lyx
Version: 1.1.2-2
Severity: normal
Although I have activated the radio button of AMS math at the Layout->Document
menu I can not been able to follow what the UserGuide.lyx suggets.
In particular, both \mathfrak{g} and \mathbb{R} give an error message.
\boldsymbol{\alpha}, wh
> Although I have activated the radio button of AMS math at the Layout->Document
> menu I can not been able to follow what the UserGuide.lyx suggets.
> In particular, both \mathfrak{g} and \mathbb{R} give an error message.
> \boldsymbol{\alpha}, which does not seem to require the
69 matches
Mail list logo
