On Today, +0100, Lars Gullik Bjnnes wrote:
Hi Lars!
Does \={i} give a dotless-i-macron? (no...)
dotless-i-macron is \={\i} so I am not sure what you are complaining
about. Can you please elaborate a bit, and not just tell what happens
but also what you want to achieve.
Please, excuse me.
On Today, +0100, Lars Gullik Bjnnes wrote:
Hi Lars!
Does \={i} give a dotless-i-macron? (no...)
dotless-i-macron is \={\i} so I am not sure what you are complaining
about. Can you please elaborate a bit, and not just tell what happens
but also what you want to achieve.
Please, excuse me.
On Today, +0100, Lars Gullik Bjnnes wrote:
Hi Lars!
> Does \={i} give a dotless-i-macron? (no...)
> dotless-i-macron is \={\i} so I am not sure what you are complaining
> about. Can you please elaborate a bit, and not just tell what happens
> but also what you want to achieve.
Please, excuse
On Today, +0200, Robin Turner wrote:
Hi Robin!
This was the result of editing a document in 1.1.6fix3 (?) in 1.2 (RPM from
Kayvan's site) - adding a second dotless i at the end of the line. What I'd
like to know is what has changed between the versions so that 1.2 ignores the
standard latin5
On Today, +0200, Robin Turner wrote:
Hi Robin!
This was the result of editing a document in 1.1.6fix3 (?) in 1.2 (RPM from
Kayvan's site) - adding a second dotless i at the end of the line. What I'd
like to know is what has changed between the versions so that 1.2 ignores the
standard latin5
On Today, +0200, Robin Turner wrote:
Hi Robin!
> This was the result of editing a document in 1.1.6fix3 (?) in 1.2 (RPM from
> Kayvan's site) - adding a second dotless "i" at the end of the line. What I'd
> like to know is what has changed between the versions so that 1.2 ignores the
> standard
