On 01/16/12 at 09:00am, Richard Heck wrote:
On 01/16/2012 06:20 AM, Manolo Martínez wrote:
Hello,
I'm writing a paper, and a set of responses to referees. It'd be nice if I
could cross-reference pieces of the paper in those responses. The easy way
(having a document with both paper and
On 01/16/12 at 09:00am, Richard Heck wrote:
On 01/16/2012 06:20 AM, Manolo Martínez wrote:
Hello,
I'm writing a paper, and a set of responses to referees. It'd be nice if I
could cross-reference pieces of the paper in those responses. The easy way
(having a document with both paper and
On 01/16/12 at 09:00am, Richard Heck wrote:
> On 01/16/2012 06:20 AM, Manolo Martínez wrote:
> >Hello,
> >
> >I'm writing a paper, and a set of responses to referees. It'd be nice if I
> >could cross-reference pieces of the paper in those responses. The easy way
> >(having a document with both
Hello,
I'm writing a paper, and a set of responses to referees. It'd be nice if I
could cross-reference pieces of the paper in those responses. The easy way
(having a document with both paper and responses as children) does not work
straighforwardly, as then the section numbers in the responses
On 01/16/2012 06:20 AM, Manolo Martínez wrote:
Hello,
I'm writing a paper, and a set of responses to referees. It'd be nice if I
could cross-reference pieces of the paper in those responses. The easy way
(having a document with both paper and responses as children) does not work
Hello,
I'm writing a paper, and a set of responses to referees. It'd be nice if I
could cross-reference pieces of the paper in those responses. The easy way
(having a document with both paper and responses as children) does not work
straighforwardly, as then the section numbers in the responses
On 01/16/2012 06:20 AM, Manolo Martínez wrote:
Hello,
I'm writing a paper, and a set of responses to referees. It'd be nice if I
could cross-reference pieces of the paper in those responses. The easy way
(having a document with both paper and responses as children) does not work
Hello,
I'm writing a paper, and a set of responses to referees. It'd be nice if I
could cross-reference pieces of the paper in those responses. The easy way
(having a document with both paper and responses as children) does not work
straighforwardly, as then the section numbers in the responses
On 01/16/2012 06:20 AM, Manolo Martínez wrote:
Hello,
I'm writing a paper, and a set of responses to referees. It'd be nice if I
could cross-reference pieces of the paper in those responses. The easy way
(having a document with both paper and responses as children) does not work
On 2009-04-05, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
On 05/04/2009 18:37, Rudi Gaelzer wrote:
FYI we just hide the document selection combo since 1.6.0 because nobody
knew why this was needed. Maybe we can restore it back in 1.6.3 as we
found a user :-)
At least two.
Günter
Rudi Gaelzer wrote:
On Sunday 05 April 2009 16:09:05 Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Haha, now we know what this was about!
FYI we just hide the document selection combo since 1.6.0 because nobody
knew why this was needed. Maybe we can restore it back in 1.6.3 as we
found a user :-)
Abdel.
Please
Pavel Sanda wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Rudi Gaelzer wrote:
If you could enable again the use of the document selection combo, I'd
be very grateful.
I'll see what I can do but it won't be soon. But I copy the devel list in
case someone could do it before.
no he
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Rudi Gaelzer wrote:
On Sunday 05 April 2009 16:09:05 Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Haha, now we know what this was about!
FYI we just hide the document selection combo since 1.6.0 because nobody
knew why this was needed. Maybe we can restore it back in 1.6.3 as we
found a
On 2009-04-05, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
On 05/04/2009 18:37, Rudi Gaelzer wrote:
FYI we just hide the document selection combo since 1.6.0 because nobody
knew why this was needed. Maybe we can restore it back in 1.6.3 as we
found a user :-)
At least two.
Günter
Rudi Gaelzer wrote:
On Sunday 05 April 2009 16:09:05 Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Haha, now we know what this was about!
FYI we just hide the document selection combo since 1.6.0 because nobody
knew why this was needed. Maybe we can restore it back in 1.6.3 as we
found a user :-)
Abdel.
Please
Pavel Sanda wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Rudi Gaelzer wrote:
If you could enable again the use of the document selection combo, I'd
be very grateful.
I'll see what I can do but it won't be soon. But I copy the devel list in
case someone could do it before.
no he
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Rudi Gaelzer wrote:
On Sunday 05 April 2009 16:09:05 Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Haha, now we know what this was about!
FYI we just hide the document selection combo since 1.6.0 because nobody
knew why this was needed. Maybe we can restore it back in 1.6.3 as we
found a
On 2009-04-05, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> On 05/04/2009 18:37, Rudi Gaelzer wrote:
> FYI we just hide the document selection combo since 1.6.0 because nobody
> knew why this was needed. Maybe we can restore it back in 1.6.3 as we
> found a user :-)
At least two.
Günter
Rudi Gaelzer wrote:
On Sunday 05 April 2009 16:09:05 Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Haha, now we know what this was about!
FYI we just hide the document selection combo since 1.6.0 because nobody
knew why this was needed. Maybe we can restore it back in 1.6.3 as we
found a user :-)
Abdel.
Please
Pavel Sanda wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Rudi Gaelzer wrote:
If you could enable again the use of the "document selection combo", I'd
be very grateful.
I'll see what I can do but it won't be soon. But I copy the devel list in
case someone could do it before.
no he
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Rudi Gaelzer wrote:
>> On Sunday 05 April 2009 16:09:05 Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
>>> Haha, now we know what this was about!
>>> FYI we just hide the document selection combo since 1.6.0 because nobody
>>> knew why this was needed. Maybe we can restore it back in 1.6.3 as
On Sunday 05 April 2009 16:09:05 Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Haha, now we know what this was about!
FYI we just hide the document selection combo since 1.6.0 because nobody
knew why this was needed. Maybe we can restore it back in 1.6.3 as we
found a user :-)
Abdel.
Please do. I'm surprised
On Sunday 05 April 2009 16:09:05 Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Haha, now we know what this was about!
FYI we just hide the document selection combo since 1.6.0 because nobody
knew why this was needed. Maybe we can restore it back in 1.6.3 as we
found a user :-)
Abdel.
Please do. I'm surprised
On Sunday 05 April 2009 16:09:05 Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Haha, now we know what this was about!
> FYI we just hide the document selection combo since 1.6.0 because nobody
> knew why this was needed. Maybe we can restore it back in 1.6.3 as we
> found a user :-)
>
> Abdel.
Please do. I'm
I'm using Lyx 1.6.2. Some time ago, I was able to cross-reference equations
belonging to a different LyX file, which is neither a child nor a master
document. All I had to do was to create the .aux file for the first document,
open both documents, and then use the xr.sty package with the
On 05/04/2009 18:37, Rudi Gaelzer wrote:
I'm using Lyx 1.6.2. Some time ago, I was able to cross-reference equations
belonging to a different LyX file, which is neither a child nor a master
document. All I had to do was to create the .aux file for the first document,
open both documents, and
I'm using Lyx 1.6.2. Some time ago, I was able to cross-reference equations
belonging to a different LyX file, which is neither a child nor a master
document. All I had to do was to create the .aux file for the first document,
open both documents, and then use the xr.sty package with the
On 05/04/2009 18:37, Rudi Gaelzer wrote:
I'm using Lyx 1.6.2. Some time ago, I was able to cross-reference equations
belonging to a different LyX file, which is neither a child nor a master
document. All I had to do was to create the .aux file for the first document,
open both documents, and
I'm using Lyx 1.6.2. Some time ago, I was able to cross-reference equations
belonging to a different LyX file, which is neither a child nor a master
document. All I had to do was to create the .aux file for the first document,
open both documents, and then use the xr.sty package with the
On 05/04/2009 18:37, Rudi Gaelzer wrote:
I'm using Lyx 1.6.2. Some time ago, I was able to cross-reference equations
belonging to a different LyX file, which is neither a child nor a master
document. All I had to do was to create the .aux file for the first document,
open both documents, and
30 matches
Mail list logo
