Guenter Milde milde at users.berlios.de writes:
You can bind a key-combo to ert-insert --- and so on...
Putting
ert-insert ---
into the Finction: field does not help. This produces an empty ERT.
Alexander
Alexander Tsyplakov wrote:
Guenter Milde milde at users.berlios.de writes:
You can bind a key-combo to ert-insert --- and so on...
Putting
ert-insert ---
of course since it was never meant to work, look at lyx functions manual.
what you need is command-sequence, ert-insert, self-insert...
Le 24 nov. 2010 à 22:46, Richard Heck a écrit :
On 11/24/2010 04:00 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Le 24 nov. 2010 à 17:32, Richard Heck a écrit :
Certainly part of this would be fairly simple to do. Call it
InsetSimpleCommand, and the only thing it does
is issue whatever command it is
Pavel Sanda sanda at lyx.org writes:
Alexander Tsyplakov wrote:
Guenter Milde milde at users.berlios.de writes:
You can bind a key-combo to ert-insert --- and so on...
Putting
ert-insert ---
of course since it was never meant to work, look at lyx functions manual.
what you need is
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 10:46 PM, Richard Heck rgh...@comcast.net wrote:
I suppose, and really long-term maybe that'd be even better. My dream---I
seem to have a lot of these---is for Flex insets that take arguments. So you
click on the button and you get a dialog, where you can enter
On 11/26/2010 01:18 PM, Liviu Andronic wrote:
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 10:46 PM, Richard Heckrgh...@comcast.net wrote:
I suppose, and really long-term maybe that'd be even better. My dream---I
seem to have a lot of these---is for Flex insets that take arguments. So you
click on the button and
Le 26 nov. 2010 à 19:18, Liviu Andronic a écrit :
The current solutions (the Schunk environment and the use of Sweave
code in ERT insets) are awkward or require unnecessary and
prone-to-error typing. I'd much like to come up with a native LyX
inset for the Sweave code chunks, a design I've
Guenter Milde milde at users.berlios.de writes:
You can bind a key-combo to ert-insert --- and so on...
Putting
ert-insert ---
into the Finction: field does not help. This produces an empty ERT.
Alexander
Alexander Tsyplakov wrote:
Guenter Milde milde at users.berlios.de writes:
You can bind a key-combo to ert-insert --- and so on...
Putting
ert-insert ---
of course since it was never meant to work, look at lyx functions manual.
what you need is command-sequence, ert-insert, self-insert...
Le 24 nov. 2010 à 22:46, Richard Heck a écrit :
On 11/24/2010 04:00 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Le 24 nov. 2010 à 17:32, Richard Heck a écrit :
Certainly part of this would be fairly simple to do. Call it
InsetSimpleCommand, and the only thing it does
is issue whatever command it is
Pavel Sanda sanda at lyx.org writes:
Alexander Tsyplakov wrote:
Guenter Milde milde at users.berlios.de writes:
You can bind a key-combo to ert-insert --- and so on...
Putting
ert-insert ---
of course since it was never meant to work, look at lyx functions manual.
what you need is
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 10:46 PM, Richard Heck rgh...@comcast.net wrote:
I suppose, and really long-term maybe that'd be even better. My dream---I
seem to have a lot of these---is for Flex insets that take arguments. So you
click on the button and you get a dialog, where you can enter
On 11/26/2010 01:18 PM, Liviu Andronic wrote:
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 10:46 PM, Richard Heckrgh...@comcast.net wrote:
I suppose, and really long-term maybe that'd be even better. My dream---I
seem to have a lot of these---is for Flex insets that take arguments. So you
click on the button and
Le 26 nov. 2010 à 19:18, Liviu Andronic a écrit :
The current solutions (the Schunk environment and the use of Sweave
code in ERT insets) are awkward or require unnecessary and
prone-to-error typing. I'd much like to come up with a native LyX
inset for the Sweave code chunks, a design I've
Guenter Milde users.berlios.de> writes:
> You can bind a key-combo to ert-insert "--- and so on...
Putting
ert-insert "---
into the "Finction:" field does not help. This produces an empty ERT.
Alexander
Alexander Tsyplakov wrote:
> Guenter Milde users.berlios.de> writes:
> > You can bind a key-combo to ert-insert "--- and so on...
>
> Putting
> ert-insert "---
of course since it was never meant to work, look at lyx functions manual.
what you need is command-sequence, ert-insert, self-insert...
Le 24 nov. 2010 à 22:46, Richard Heck a écrit :
On 11/24/2010 04:00 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> Le 24 nov. 2010 à 17:32, Richard Heck a écrit :
>>> Certainly part of this would be fairly simple to do. Call it
>>> InsetSimpleCommand, and the only thing it does
>>> is issue whatever command
Pavel Sanda lyx.org> writes:
> Alexander Tsyplakov wrote:
> > Guenter Milde users.berlios.de> writes:
> > > You can bind a key-combo to ert-insert "--- and so on...
> >
> > Putting
> > ert-insert "---
>
> of course since it was never meant to work, look at lyx functions manual.
> what you need
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 10:46 PM, Richard Heck wrote:
> I suppose, and really long-term maybe that'd be even better. My dream---I
> seem to have a lot of these---is for Flex insets that take arguments. So you
> click on the button and you get a dialog, where you can enter
On 11/26/2010 01:18 PM, Liviu Andronic wrote:
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 10:46 PM, Richard Heck wrote:
I suppose, and really long-term maybe that'd be even better. My dream---I
seem to have a lot of these---is for Flex insets that take arguments. So you
click on the button and
Le 26 nov. 2010 à 19:18, Liviu Andronic a écrit :
> The current solutions (the Schunk environment and the use of Sweave
> code in ERT insets) are awkward or require unnecessary and
> prone-to-error typing. I'd much like to come up with a native LyX
> inset for the Sweave code chunks, a design I've
Richard Heck wrote Tuesday, November 23, 2010,
20:56:06:
RH On 11/23/2010 03:48 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Richard Heck wrote:
I see that the file is for unicode symbols only.
So this cannot be used for something which is
outside unicode table, can it?
There are such things?
Certainly
Alexander Tsyplakov wrote:
Sorry for my vague description of the problem and
somewhat confusing title for the thread. Logically
any special character is very similar to an inset
without text inside. At an abstract level one can
think about text markup entities which are
elementary in their
On 11/24/2010 11:11 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Alexander Tsyplakov wrote:
Sorry for my vague description of the problem and
somewhat confusing title for the thread. Logically
any special character is very similar to an inset
without text inside. At an abstract level one can
think about text
Le 24 nov. 2010 à 17:32, Richard Heck a écrit :
Certainly part of this would be fairly simple to do. Call it
InsetSimpleCommand, and the only thing it does
is issue whatever command it is supposed to issue. The command in question
can be given in a module:
InsetCommand InsertEndnotes
On 11/24/2010 04:00 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Le 24 nov. 2010 à 17:32, Richard Heck a écrit :
Certainly part of this would be fairly simple to do. Call it
InsetSimpleCommand, and the only thing it does
is issue whatever command it is supposed to issue. The command in question can
be
Le 24 nov. 2010 à 22:46, Richard Heck a écrit :
On 11/24/2010 04:00 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Le 24 nov. 2010 à 17:32, Richard Heck a écrit :
Certainly part of this would be fairly simple to do. Call it
InsetSimpleCommand, and the only thing it does
is issue whatever command it is
On 2010-11-24, Alexander Tsyplakov wrote:
My personal need concerns the commands of the
Russian babel. In Russian babel there are, for
example, 3 commands for Cyrillic dashes:
\cdash- in plain text.
\cdash~ in compound names
\cdash* for denoting direct speech.
One can enter them with ERT
Richard Heck wrote Tuesday, November 23, 2010,
20:56:06:
RH On 11/23/2010 03:48 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Richard Heck wrote:
I see that the file is for unicode symbols only.
So this cannot be used for something which is
outside unicode table, can it?
There are such things?
Certainly
Alexander Tsyplakov wrote:
Sorry for my vague description of the problem and
somewhat confusing title for the thread. Logically
any special character is very similar to an inset
without text inside. At an abstract level one can
think about text markup entities which are
elementary in their
On 11/24/2010 11:11 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Alexander Tsyplakov wrote:
Sorry for my vague description of the problem and
somewhat confusing title for the thread. Logically
any special character is very similar to an inset
without text inside. At an abstract level one can
think about text
Le 24 nov. 2010 à 17:32, Richard Heck a écrit :
Certainly part of this would be fairly simple to do. Call it
InsetSimpleCommand, and the only thing it does
is issue whatever command it is supposed to issue. The command in question
can be given in a module:
InsetCommand InsertEndnotes
On 11/24/2010 04:00 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Le 24 nov. 2010 à 17:32, Richard Heck a écrit :
Certainly part of this would be fairly simple to do. Call it
InsetSimpleCommand, and the only thing it does
is issue whatever command it is supposed to issue. The command in question can
be
Le 24 nov. 2010 à 22:46, Richard Heck a écrit :
On 11/24/2010 04:00 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Le 24 nov. 2010 à 17:32, Richard Heck a écrit :
Certainly part of this would be fairly simple to do. Call it
InsetSimpleCommand, and the only thing it does
is issue whatever command it is
On 2010-11-24, Alexander Tsyplakov wrote:
My personal need concerns the commands of the
Russian babel. In Russian babel there are, for
example, 3 commands for Cyrillic dashes:
\cdash- in plain text.
\cdash~ in compound names
\cdash* for denoting direct speech.
One can enter them with ERT
Richard Heck wrote Tuesday, November 23, 2010,
20:56:06:
RH> On 11/23/2010 03:48 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
>> Richard Heck wrote:
I see that the file is for unicode symbols only.
So this cannot be used for something which is
outside unicode table, can it?
>>> There are such
Alexander Tsyplakov wrote:
> Sorry for my vague description of the problem and
> somewhat confusing title for the thread. Logically
> any special character is very similar to an inset
> without text inside. At an abstract level one can
> think about text markup entities which are
> elementary in
On 11/24/2010 11:11 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Alexander Tsyplakov wrote:
Sorry for my vague description of the problem and
somewhat confusing title for the thread. Logically
any special character is very similar to an inset
without text inside. At an abstract level one can
think about text
Le 24 nov. 2010 à 17:32, Richard Heck a écrit :
> Certainly part of this would be fairly simple to do. Call it
> InsetSimpleCommand, and the only thing it does
> is issue whatever command it is supposed to issue. The command in question
> can be given in a module:
>
> InsetCommand
On 11/24/2010 04:00 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Le 24 nov. 2010 à 17:32, Richard Heck a écrit :
Certainly part of this would be fairly simple to do. Call it
InsetSimpleCommand, and the only thing it does
is issue whatever command it is supposed to issue. The command in question can
be
Le 24 nov. 2010 à 22:46, Richard Heck a écrit :
On 11/24/2010 04:00 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> Le 24 nov. 2010 à 17:32, Richard Heck a écrit :
>>> Certainly part of this would be fairly simple to do. Call it
>>> InsetSimpleCommand, and the only thing it does
>>> is issue whatever command
On 2010-11-24, Alexander Tsyplakov wrote:
> My personal need concerns the commands of the
> Russian babel. In Russian babel there are, for
> example, 3 commands for "Cyrillic" dashes:
> \cdash- in plain text.
> \cdash~ in compound names
> \cdash* for denoting direct speech.
> One can enter them
Richard Heck wrote:
I see that the file is for unicode symbols only.
So this cannot be used for something which is
outside unicode table, can it?
There are such things?
Sure. Alexander's proposal is very valid. And actually despetrately needed.
Currently, we cannot even make insets like
On 11/23/2010 03:48 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Richard Heck wrote:
I see that the file is for unicode symbols only.
So this cannot be used for something which is
outside unicode table, can it?
There are such things?
Sure. Alexander's proposal is very valid. And actually despetrately
Richard Heck wrote:
I see that the file is for unicode symbols only.
So this cannot be used for something which is
outside unicode table, can it?
There are such things?
Sure. Alexander's proposal is very valid. And actually despetrately needed.
Currently, we cannot even make insets like
On 11/23/2010 03:48 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Richard Heck wrote:
I see that the file is for unicode symbols only.
So this cannot be used for something which is
outside unicode table, can it?
There are such things?
Sure. Alexander's proposal is very valid. And actually despetrately
Richard Heck wrote:
> > I see that the file is for unicode symbols only.
> > So this cannot be used for something which is
> > outside unicode table, can it?
>
> There are such things?
Sure. Alexander's proposal is very valid. And actually despetrately needed.
Currently, we cannot even make
On 11/23/2010 03:48 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Richard Heck wrote:
I see that the file is for unicode symbols only.
So this cannot be used for something which is
outside unicode table, can it?
There are such things?
Sure. Alexander's proposal is very valid. And actually despetrately
On 11/22/2010 01:10 AM, Alexander Tsyplakov wrote:
LyX has several means of defining customized
markup: custom insets, paragraph and character
styles. However I can not figure out how to define
custom character entities like build-in
Ellipsis. Am I missing something?
No, there is no provision
Richard Heck wrote Monday, November 22, 2010, 21:31:38:
RH On 11/22/2010 01:10 AM, Alexander Tsyplakov wrote:
LyX has several means of defining customized
markup: custom insets, paragraph and character
styles. However I can not figure out how to define
custom character entities like build
to define
custom character entities like build-in
Ellipsis. Am I missing something?
RH No, there is no provision for this. If some
RH character you need is missing, report it as a
RH bug to the devel list. Adding it is easy, but
RH it has to be done in the source.
I meant user customization
On 2010-11-22, Richard Heck wrote:
You can give LyX the ability to recognize (and even display) new
characters and such by adding them to the unicodesymbols file, which
lives in the system directory, e.g.: /usr/local/share/lyx/ on Linux, by
default.
As usual with LyX config files, it works
Richard Heck wrote Monday, November 22, 2010, 23:56:52:
I meant user customization by means of inclusion
in layouts and modules. This can be used for
logotypes, special babel commands, etc. One can
not hard code any special symbol in advance.
RH If you want to add custom insets, paragraph or
On 11/22/2010 02:44 PM, Alexander Tsyplakov wrote:
RH In fact, though, what I said earlier isn't
RH quite true. You can give LyX the ability to
RH recognize (and even display) new characters
RH and such by adding them to the unicodesymbols
RH file, which lives in the system directory,
RH
Richard Heck wrote Tuesday, November 23, 2010, 2:12:05:
RH On 11/22/2010 02:44 PM, Alexander Tsyplakov wrote:
RH In fact, though, what I said earlier isn't
RH quite true. You can give LyX the ability to
RH recognize (and even display) new characters
RH and such by adding them to the
On 11/22/2010 03:23 PM, Alexander Tsyplakov wrote:
Richard Heck wrote Tuesday, November 23, 2010, 2:12:05:
RH On 11/22/2010 02:44 PM, Alexander Tsyplakov wrote:
RH In fact, though, what I said earlier isn't
RH quite true. You can give LyX the ability to
RH recognize (and even display)
On 11/22/2010 01:10 AM, Alexander Tsyplakov wrote:
LyX has several means of defining customized
markup: custom insets, paragraph and character
styles. However I can not figure out how to define
custom character entities like build-in
Ellipsis. Am I missing something?
No, there is no provision
Richard Heck wrote Monday, November 22, 2010, 21:31:38:
RH On 11/22/2010 01:10 AM, Alexander Tsyplakov wrote:
LyX has several means of defining customized
markup: custom insets, paragraph and character
styles. However I can not figure out how to define
custom character entities like build
to define
custom character entities like build-in
Ellipsis. Am I missing something?
RH No, there is no provision for this. If some
RH character you need is missing, report it as a
RH bug to the devel list. Adding it is easy, but
RH it has to be done in the source.
I meant user customization
On 2010-11-22, Richard Heck wrote:
You can give LyX the ability to recognize (and even display) new
characters and such by adding them to the unicodesymbols file, which
lives in the system directory, e.g.: /usr/local/share/lyx/ on Linux, by
default.
As usual with LyX config files, it works
Richard Heck wrote Monday, November 22, 2010, 23:56:52:
I meant user customization by means of inclusion
in layouts and modules. This can be used for
logotypes, special babel commands, etc. One can
not hard code any special symbol in advance.
RH If you want to add custom insets, paragraph or
On 11/22/2010 02:44 PM, Alexander Tsyplakov wrote:
RH In fact, though, what I said earlier isn't
RH quite true. You can give LyX the ability to
RH recognize (and even display) new characters
RH and such by adding them to the unicodesymbols
RH file, which lives in the system directory,
RH
Richard Heck wrote Tuesday, November 23, 2010, 2:12:05:
RH On 11/22/2010 02:44 PM, Alexander Tsyplakov wrote:
RH In fact, though, what I said earlier isn't
RH quite true. You can give LyX the ability to
RH recognize (and even display) new characters
RH and such by adding them to the
On 11/22/2010 03:23 PM, Alexander Tsyplakov wrote:
Richard Heck wrote Tuesday, November 23, 2010, 2:12:05:
RH On 11/22/2010 02:44 PM, Alexander Tsyplakov wrote:
RH In fact, though, what I said earlier isn't
RH quite true. You can give LyX the ability to
RH recognize (and even display)
On 11/22/2010 01:10 AM, Alexander Tsyplakov wrote:
LyX has several means of defining customized
markup: custom insets, paragraph and character
styles. However I can not figure out how to define
custom character entities like build-in
"Ellipsis". Am I missing
Richard Heck wrote Monday, November 22, 2010, 21:31:38:
RH> On 11/22/2010 01:10 AM, Alexander Tsyplakov wrote:
>> LyX has several means of defining customized
>> markup: custom insets, paragraph and character
>> styles. However I can not figure out how to define
>> cus
how to define
custom character entities like build-in
"Ellipsis". Am I missing something?
RH> No, there is no provision for this. If some
RH> character you need is missing, report it as a
RH> bug to the devel list. Adding it is easy, but
RH> it has to be done in
On 2010-11-22, Richard Heck wrote:
> You can give LyX the ability to recognize (and even display) new
> characters and such by adding them to the unicodesymbols file, which
> lives in the system directory, e.g.: /usr/local/share/lyx/ on Linux, by
> default.
As usual with LyX config files, it
Richard Heck wrote Monday, November 22, 2010, 23:56:52:
>> I meant user customization by means of inclusion
>> in layouts and modules. This can be used for
>> logotypes, special babel commands, etc. One can
>> not hard code any special symbol in advance.
RH> If you want to add custom insets,
On 11/22/2010 02:44 PM, Alexander Tsyplakov wrote:
RH> In fact, though, what I said earlier isn't
RH> quite true. You can give LyX the ability to
RH> recognize (and even display) new characters
RH> and such by adding them to the unicodesymbols
RH> file, which lives in the system directory,
Richard Heck wrote Tuesday, November 23, 2010, 2:12:05:
RH> On 11/22/2010 02:44 PM, Alexander Tsyplakov wrote:
>>
>> RH> In fact, though, what I said earlier isn't
>> RH> quite true. You can give LyX the ability to
>> RH> recognize (and even display) new characters
>> RH> and such by adding
On 11/22/2010 03:23 PM, Alexander Tsyplakov wrote:
Richard Heck wrote Tuesday, November 23, 2010, 2:12:05:
RH> On 11/22/2010 02:44 PM, Alexander Tsyplakov wrote:
RH> In fact, though, what I said earlier isn't
RH> quite true. You can give LyX the ability to
RH> recognize (and even
72 matches
Mail list logo