Re: I get only partial dvi/ps output

2001-04-20 Thread Herbert Voss

Christopher Jones wrote:
 
 For some reason I cannot generate complete output for one document
 in particular. If I print to file, view postscript or dvi, export to postscript
 or dvi, the displayed output stops at page four. If I view pdf or pdflatex, gs
 comes up, stopped at page four. If I view html, I get the complete document.

which lyx version?

 I have tried other files, and they work just fine. I can't think of any changes
 I made to anything, which might account for this, and I don't really know how
 to track down the problem. I suppose it must be something to do with the dvi,
 since latex2html does its job.

latex2html needs a tex-file, nothing more. it never makes
a syntax check. therefore it's ok when you get all of
your text converted.
i suppose that there is a problem with latex behind your
page four. have a look at your code in your lyx-file, if
there is something like latex code, special commands,
which can make trouble.


Herbert


-- 
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]





Re: I get only partial dvi/ps output

2001-04-20 Thread Christopher Jones

I'm using 1.1.6. The document was created in that version.

No figures in the document.

I haven't tried printing it on paper. I tried printing it to file and got the
same stuff, so I figured priting to paper would do the same as printing to file.

The line that ends page four is "...extrinsic denomination of existing in a
place. But this" and then it stops. I don't see anything in the code that could
be a mistake. But then I might just not know enough.

Also, I did try just copying the text into another document, in case something
had gotten corrupted. That didn't work either.


On Fri, 20 Apr 2001, you wrote:
 On Thu, 19 Apr 2001 19:04:28 -0500 wrote Christopher Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
 
  For some reason I cannot generate complete output for one document
  in particular. If I print to file, view postscript or dvi, export to postscript
  or dvi, the displayed output stops at page four. If I view pdf or pdflatex, gs
  comes up, stopped at page four. If I view html, I get the complete document. 
  
  I have tried other files, and they work just fine. I can't think of any changes
  I made to anything, which might account for this, and I don't really know how
  to track down the problem. I suppose it must be something to do with the dvi,
  since latex2html does its job.

#LyX 1.1 created this file. For more info see http://www.lyx.org/
\lyxformat 218
\textclass article
\begin_preamble
\usepackage{abbrevs}
\usepackage{achicago}
\usepackage{attrib}
\usepackage{philabbrevs}

\newabbrev\oni{\emph{On Nature Itself} (1698)}
\end_preamble
\language english
\inputencoding latin1
\fontscheme times
\graphics default
\paperfontsize 12
\spacing double 
\papersize letterpaper
\paperpackage a4
\use_geometry 1
\use_amsmath 0
\paperorientation portrait
\leftmargin 1in
\topmargin 1in
\rightmargin 1in
\bottommargin 1in
\secnumdepth 3
\tocdepth 3
\paragraph_separation skip
\defskip medskip
\quotes_language english
\quotes_times 2
\papercolumns 1
\papersides 1
\paperpagestyle plain

\layout Author

Christopher M.
 Jones
\layout Title

From Physics to Metaphsics
\layout Subsection

Introduction
\layout Standard

The main thesis in 
\latex latex 

\backslash 
S13
\latex default 
 
\latex latex 
of 
\backslash 
oni
\latex default 
 is that 
\begin_inset Quotes eld
\end_inset 

we must necessarily place something in bodies over and above uniform mass
 and its transposition
\begin_inset Quotes erd
\end_inset 

.
 Though it is true that this section presents a largely, and perhaps even
 entirely negative argument against the Cartesian notion of extension, it's
 aim is more positive than just this.
 
\layout Standard

Though I profess dissagreement with both the interpretations I review, my
 dissagreement is on different grounds with respect to each of them.
 Regarding the Garber/Adams interpretation, I align myself with Lodge in
 his criticisms.
 Regarding Lodge's insterpretation, I consider my interpretation to be an
 extension of and a further reflection on some of the hermaneutical issues
 he raises at the conclusion of his paper which, though it does not consitute
 a substantial disagreement, nevertheless places the argument in a slightly
 different light.
 
\layout Subsection

Division of the argument
\layout Standard

Both of the interpretations I review here understand Leibniz's argument
 as primarily a negative one, primarily concerned to show up the Cartesian
 notion of body as merely extended to be inadequate.
 This is reflected in the divisions of the argument offered by its respective
 commentators.
 Against these views, which I shall discuss following my discussion of the
 argument itself, I offer an interpretation recognizing one major division
 in the section as a whole, the latter of which contains the thesis of the
 section as a whole, which the conclusions of the previous one are meant
 to support.
 
\layout Subsection

Sturm's Cartesian view of body
\layout Enumerate

In 
\latex latex 

\backslash 
oni
\latex default 
 Leibniz presents an argument which Daniel Garber characterizes as showing
 that 
\begin_inset Quotes eld
\end_inset 

if the world is full, and full of matter uniform in its nature (both of
 which follow from the doctrine of body as exension Descartes held), then
 change is impossible
\begin_inset Quotes erd
\end_inset 

 
\latex latex 

\backslash 
cite[286]{Garber-CCL}
\latex default 
.
 
\layout Enumerate

From section twelve, we know that Leibniz takes Sturm to be committed to
 two related positions with respect to substance and matter.
 
\begin_deeper 
\layout Enumerate

On the one hand, he is committed to the essential passivity of matter (matter
 is a passive substance), from which it would follow that bodies, or the
 things in bodies, being only modifications of matter, would be essentially
 passive.
 
\layout Enumerate

On the other hand, he is committed to a view of motion as consisting of
 no more than the successive existence of the moving thing in different
 places.
\end_deeper 

Re: I get only partial dvi/ps output

2001-04-20 Thread Herbert Voss

Christopher Jones wrote:
 
 I'm using 1.1.6. The document was created in that version.
 
 No figures in the document.
 
 I haven't tried printing it on paper. I tried printing it to file and got the
 same stuff, so I figured priting to paper would do the same as printing to file.
 
 The line that ends page four is "...extrinsic denomination of existing in a
 place. But this" and then it stops. I don't see anything in the code that could
 be a mistake. But then I might just not know enough.

where can i get \usepackage{philabbrevs} or send it by private mail
to save bandwidth

Herbert

-- 
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: I get only partial dvi/ps output

2001-04-20 Thread Herbert Voss

Christopher Jones wrote:
 
 I'm using 1.1.6. The document was created in that version.
 
 No figures in the document.
 
 I haven't tried printing it on paper. I tried printing it to file and got the
 same stuff, so I figured priting to paper would do the same as printing to file.
 
 The line that ends page four is "...extrinsic denomination of existing in a
 place. But this" and then it stops. I don't see anything in the code that could
 be a mistake. But then I might just not know enough.
 
 Also, I did try just copying the text into another document, in case something
 had gotten corrupted. That didn't work either.

ok, i got it.
as i said, it must be a problem on page 5


discrimination in bodies, nor could we ever explain the different
appearances we sense. \attrib{\cite[164]{ag}.
 ^^


a missing parenthesis ... :-)


Herbert


-- 
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: I get only partial dvi/ps output

2001-04-20 Thread Herbert Voss

Herbert Voss wrote:

 appearances we sense. \attrib{\cite[164]{ag}.
  ^^

uups! not there, but here and the end of \attrib

\attrib{\cite[164]{ag}}

Herbert

-- 
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: I get only partial dvi/ps output

2001-04-20 Thread Herbert Voss

Christopher Jones wrote:
 
 For some reason I cannot generate complete output for one document
 in particular. If I print to file, view postscript or dvi, export to postscript
 or dvi, the displayed output stops at page four. If I view pdf or pdflatex, gs
 comes up, stopped at page four. If I view html, I get the complete document.

which lyx version?

 I have tried other files, and they work just fine. I can't think of any changes
 I made to anything, which might account for this, and I don't really know how
 to track down the problem. I suppose it must be something to do with the dvi,
 since latex2html does its job.

latex2html needs a tex-file, nothing more. it never makes
a syntax check. therefore it's ok when you get all of
your text converted.
i suppose that there is a problem with latex behind your
page four. have a look at your code in your lyx-file, if
there is something like latex code, special commands,
which can make trouble.


Herbert


-- 
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]





Re: I get only partial dvi/ps output

2001-04-20 Thread Christopher Jones

I'm using 1.1.6. The document was created in that version.

No figures in the document.

I haven't tried printing it on paper. I tried printing it to file and got the
same stuff, so I figured priting to paper would do the same as printing to file.

The line that ends page four is "...extrinsic denomination of existing in a
place. But this" and then it stops. I don't see anything in the code that could
be a mistake. But then I might just not know enough.

Also, I did try just copying the text into another document, in case something
had gotten corrupted. That didn't work either.


On Fri, 20 Apr 2001, you wrote:
 On Thu, 19 Apr 2001 19:04:28 -0500 wrote Christopher Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
 
  For some reason I cannot generate complete output for one document
  in particular. If I print to file, view postscript or dvi, export to postscript
  or dvi, the displayed output stops at page four. If I view pdf or pdflatex, gs
  comes up, stopped at page four. If I view html, I get the complete document. 
  
  I have tried other files, and they work just fine. I can't think of any changes
  I made to anything, which might account for this, and I don't really know how
  to track down the problem. I suppose it must be something to do with the dvi,
  since latex2html does its job.

#LyX 1.1 created this file. For more info see http://www.lyx.org/
\lyxformat 218
\textclass article
\begin_preamble
\usepackage{abbrevs}
\usepackage{achicago}
\usepackage{attrib}
\usepackage{philabbrevs}

\newabbrev\oni{\emph{On Nature Itself} (1698)}
\end_preamble
\language english
\inputencoding latin1
\fontscheme times
\graphics default
\paperfontsize 12
\spacing double 
\papersize letterpaper
\paperpackage a4
\use_geometry 1
\use_amsmath 0
\paperorientation portrait
\leftmargin 1in
\topmargin 1in
\rightmargin 1in
\bottommargin 1in
\secnumdepth 3
\tocdepth 3
\paragraph_separation skip
\defskip medskip
\quotes_language english
\quotes_times 2
\papercolumns 1
\papersides 1
\paperpagestyle plain

\layout Author

Christopher M.
 Jones
\layout Title

From Physics to Metaphsics
\layout Subsection

Introduction
\layout Standard

The main thesis in 
\latex latex 

\backslash 
S13
\latex default 
 
\latex latex 
of 
\backslash 
oni
\latex default 
 is that 
\begin_inset Quotes eld
\end_inset 

we must necessarily place something in bodies over and above uniform mass
 and its transposition
\begin_inset Quotes erd
\end_inset 

.
 Though it is true that this section presents a largely, and perhaps even
 entirely negative argument against the Cartesian notion of extension, it's
 aim is more positive than just this.
 
\layout Standard

Though I profess dissagreement with both the interpretations I review, my
 dissagreement is on different grounds with respect to each of them.
 Regarding the Garber/Adams interpretation, I align myself with Lodge in
 his criticisms.
 Regarding Lodge's insterpretation, I consider my interpretation to be an
 extension of and a further reflection on some of the hermaneutical issues
 he raises at the conclusion of his paper which, though it does not consitute
 a substantial disagreement, nevertheless places the argument in a slightly
 different light.
 
\layout Subsection

Division of the argument
\layout Standard

Both of the interpretations I review here understand Leibniz's argument
 as primarily a negative one, primarily concerned to show up the Cartesian
 notion of body as merely extended to be inadequate.
 This is reflected in the divisions of the argument offered by its respective
 commentators.
 Against these views, which I shall discuss following my discussion of the
 argument itself, I offer an interpretation recognizing one major division
 in the section as a whole, the latter of which contains the thesis of the
 section as a whole, which the conclusions of the previous one are meant
 to support.
 
\layout Subsection

Sturm's Cartesian view of body
\layout Enumerate

In 
\latex latex 

\backslash 
oni
\latex default 
 Leibniz presents an argument which Daniel Garber characterizes as showing
 that 
\begin_inset Quotes eld
\end_inset 

if the world is full, and full of matter uniform in its nature (both of
 which follow from the doctrine of body as exension Descartes held), then
 change is impossible
\begin_inset Quotes erd
\end_inset 

 
\latex latex 

\backslash 
cite[286]{Garber-CCL}
\latex default 
.
 
\layout Enumerate

From section twelve, we know that Leibniz takes Sturm to be committed to
 two related positions with respect to substance and matter.
 
\begin_deeper 
\layout Enumerate

On the one hand, he is committed to the essential passivity of matter (matter
 is a passive substance), from which it would follow that bodies, or the
 things in bodies, being only modifications of matter, would be essentially
 passive.
 
\layout Enumerate

On the other hand, he is committed to a view of motion as consisting of
 no more than the successive existence of the moving thing in different
 places.
\end_deeper 

Re: I get only partial dvi/ps output

2001-04-20 Thread Herbert Voss

Christopher Jones wrote:
 
 I'm using 1.1.6. The document was created in that version.
 
 No figures in the document.
 
 I haven't tried printing it on paper. I tried printing it to file and got the
 same stuff, so I figured priting to paper would do the same as printing to file.
 
 The line that ends page four is "...extrinsic denomination of existing in a
 place. But this" and then it stops. I don't see anything in the code that could
 be a mistake. But then I might just not know enough.

where can i get \usepackage{philabbrevs} or send it by private mail
to save bandwidth

Herbert

-- 
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: I get only partial dvi/ps output

2001-04-20 Thread Herbert Voss

Christopher Jones wrote:
 
 I'm using 1.1.6. The document was created in that version.
 
 No figures in the document.
 
 I haven't tried printing it on paper. I tried printing it to file and got the
 same stuff, so I figured priting to paper would do the same as printing to file.
 
 The line that ends page four is "...extrinsic denomination of existing in a
 place. But this" and then it stops. I don't see anything in the code that could
 be a mistake. But then I might just not know enough.
 
 Also, I did try just copying the text into another document, in case something
 had gotten corrupted. That didn't work either.

ok, i got it.
as i said, it must be a problem on page 5


discrimination in bodies, nor could we ever explain the different
appearances we sense. \attrib{\cite[164]{ag}.
 ^^


a missing parenthesis ... :-)


Herbert


-- 
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: I get only partial dvi/ps output

2001-04-20 Thread Herbert Voss

Herbert Voss wrote:

 appearances we sense. \attrib{\cite[164]{ag}.
  ^^

uups! not there, but here and the end of \attrib

\attrib{\cite[164]{ag}}

Herbert

-- 
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: I get only partial dvi/ps output

2001-04-20 Thread Herbert Voss

Christopher Jones wrote:
> 
> For some reason I cannot generate complete output for one document
> in particular. If I print to file, view postscript or dvi, export to postscript
> or dvi, the displayed output stops at page four. If I view pdf or pdflatex, gs
> comes up, stopped at page four. If I view html, I get the complete document.

which lyx version?

> I have tried other files, and they work just fine. I can't think of any changes
> I made to anything, which might account for this, and I don't really know how
> to track down the problem. I suppose it must be something to do with the dvi,
> since latex2html does its job.

latex2html needs a tex-file, nothing more. it never makes
a syntax check. therefore it's ok when you get all of
your text converted.
i suppose that there is a problem with latex behind your
page four. have a look at your code in your lyx-file, if
there is something like latex code, special commands,
which can make trouble.


Herbert


-- 
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]





Re: I get only partial dvi/ps output

2001-04-20 Thread Christopher Jones

I'm using 1.1.6. The document was created in that version.

No figures in the document.

I haven't tried printing it on paper. I tried printing it to file and got the
same stuff, so I figured priting to paper would do the same as printing to file.

The line that ends page four is "...extrinsic denomination of existing in a
place. But this" and then it stops. I don't see anything in the code that could
be a mistake. But then I might just not know enough.

Also, I did try just copying the text into another document, in case something
had gotten corrupted. That didn't work either.


On Fri, 20 Apr 2001, you wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Apr 2001 19:04:28 -0500 wrote Christopher Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> 
> > For some reason I cannot generate complete output for one document
> > in particular. If I print to file, view postscript or dvi, export to postscript
> > or dvi, the displayed output stops at page four. If I view pdf or pdflatex, gs
> > comes up, stopped at page four. If I view html, I get the complete document. 
> > 
> > I have tried other files, and they work just fine. I can't think of any changes
> > I made to anything, which might account for this, and I don't really know how
> > to track down the problem. I suppose it must be something to do with the dvi,
> > since latex2html does its job.

#LyX 1.1 created this file. For more info see http://www.lyx.org/
\lyxformat 218
\textclass article
\begin_preamble
\usepackage{abbrevs}
\usepackage{achicago}
\usepackage{attrib}
\usepackage{philabbrevs}

\newabbrev\oni{\emph{On Nature Itself} (1698)}
\end_preamble
\language english
\inputencoding latin1
\fontscheme times
\graphics default
\paperfontsize 12
\spacing double 
\papersize letterpaper
\paperpackage a4
\use_geometry 1
\use_amsmath 0
\paperorientation portrait
\leftmargin 1in
\topmargin 1in
\rightmargin 1in
\bottommargin 1in
\secnumdepth 3
\tocdepth 3
\paragraph_separation skip
\defskip medskip
\quotes_language english
\quotes_times 2
\papercolumns 1
\papersides 1
\paperpagestyle plain

\layout Author

Christopher M.
 Jones
\layout Title

From Physics to Metaphsics
\layout Subsection

Introduction
\layout Standard

The main thesis in 
\latex latex 

\backslash 
S13
\latex default 
 
\latex latex 
of 
\backslash 
oni
\latex default 
 is that 
\begin_inset Quotes eld
\end_inset 

we must necessarily place something in bodies over and above uniform mass
 and its transposition
\begin_inset Quotes erd
\end_inset 

.
 Though it is true that this section presents a largely, and perhaps even
 entirely negative argument against the Cartesian notion of extension, it's
 aim is more positive than just this.
 
\layout Standard

Though I profess dissagreement with both the interpretations I review, my
 dissagreement is on different grounds with respect to each of them.
 Regarding the Garber/Adams interpretation, I align myself with Lodge in
 his criticisms.
 Regarding Lodge's insterpretation, I consider my interpretation to be an
 extension of and a further reflection on some of the hermaneutical issues
 he raises at the conclusion of his paper which, though it does not consitute
 a substantial disagreement, nevertheless places the argument in a slightly
 different light.
 
\layout Subsection

Division of the argument
\layout Standard

Both of the interpretations I review here understand Leibniz's argument
 as primarily a negative one, primarily concerned to show up the Cartesian
 notion of body as merely extended to be inadequate.
 This is reflected in the divisions of the argument offered by its respective
 commentators.
 Against these views, which I shall discuss following my discussion of the
 argument itself, I offer an interpretation recognizing one major division
 in the section as a whole, the latter of which contains the thesis of the
 section as a whole, which the conclusions of the previous one are meant
 to support.
 
\layout Subsection

Sturm's Cartesian view of body
\layout Enumerate

In 
\latex latex 

\backslash 
oni
\latex default 
 Leibniz presents an argument which Daniel Garber characterizes as showing
 that 
\begin_inset Quotes eld
\end_inset 

if the world is full, and full of matter uniform in its nature (both of
 which follow from the doctrine of body as exension Descartes held), then
 change is impossible
\begin_inset Quotes erd
\end_inset 

 
\latex latex 

\backslash 
cite[286]{Garber-CCL}
\latex default 
.
 
\layout Enumerate

From section twelve, we know that Leibniz takes Sturm to be committed to
 two related positions with respect to substance and matter.
 
\begin_deeper 
\layout Enumerate

On the one hand, he is committed to the essential passivity of matter (matter
 is a passive substance), from which it would follow that bodies, or the
 things in bodies, being only modifications of matter, would be essentially
 passive.
 
\layout Enumerate

On the other hand, he is committed to a view of motion as consisting of
 no more than the successive existence of the moving thing in different
 

Re: I get only partial dvi/ps output

2001-04-20 Thread Herbert Voss

Christopher Jones wrote:
> 
> I'm using 1.1.6. The document was created in that version.
> 
> No figures in the document.
> 
> I haven't tried printing it on paper. I tried printing it to file and got the
> same stuff, so I figured priting to paper would do the same as printing to file.
> 
> The line that ends page four is "...extrinsic denomination of existing in a
> place. But this" and then it stops. I don't see anything in the code that could
> be a mistake. But then I might just not know enough.

where can i get \usepackage{philabbrevs} or send it by private mail
to save bandwidth

Herbert

-- 
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: I get only partial dvi/ps output

2001-04-20 Thread Herbert Voss

Christopher Jones wrote:
> 
> I'm using 1.1.6. The document was created in that version.
> 
> No figures in the document.
> 
> I haven't tried printing it on paper. I tried printing it to file and got the
> same stuff, so I figured priting to paper would do the same as printing to file.
> 
> The line that ends page four is "...extrinsic denomination of existing in a
> place. But this" and then it stops. I don't see anything in the code that could
> be a mistake. But then I might just not know enough.
> 
> Also, I did try just copying the text into another document, in case something
> had gotten corrupted. That didn't work either.

ok, i got it.
as i said, it must be a problem on page 5


discrimination in bodies, nor could we ever explain the different
appearances we sense. \attrib{\cite[164]{ag}.
 ^^


a missing parenthesis ... :-)


Herbert


-- 
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: I get only partial dvi/ps output

2001-04-20 Thread Herbert Voss

Herbert Voss wrote:

> appearances we sense. \attrib{\cite[164]{ag}.
>  ^^

uups! not there, but here and the end of \attrib

\attrib{\cite[164]{ag}}

Herbert

-- 
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



I get only partial dvi/ps output

2001-04-19 Thread Christopher Jones

For some reason I cannot generate complete output for one document
in particular. If I print to file, view postscript or dvi, export to postscript
or dvi, the displayed output stops at page four. If I view pdf or pdflatex, gs
comes up, stopped at page four. If I view html, I get the complete document. 

I have tried other files, and they work just fine. I can't think of any changes
I made to anything, which might account for this, and I don't really know how
to track down the problem. I suppose it must be something to do with the dvi,
since latex2html does its job.

Any ideas?



I get only partial dvi/ps output

2001-04-19 Thread Christopher Jones

For some reason I cannot generate complete output for one document
in particular. If I print to file, view postscript or dvi, export to postscript
or dvi, the displayed output stops at page four. If I view pdf or pdflatex, gs
comes up, stopped at page four. If I view html, I get the complete document. 

I have tried other files, and they work just fine. I can't think of any changes
I made to anything, which might account for this, and I don't really know how
to track down the problem. I suppose it must be something to do with the dvi,
since latex2html does its job.

Any ideas?



I get only partial dvi/ps output

2001-04-19 Thread Christopher Jones

For some reason I cannot generate complete output for one document
in particular. If I print to file, view postscript or dvi, export to postscript
or dvi, the displayed output stops at page four. If I view pdf or pdflatex, gs
comes up, stopped at page four. If I view html, I get the complete document. 

I have tried other files, and they work just fine. I can't think of any changes
I made to anything, which might account for this, and I don't really know how
to track down the problem. I suppose it must be something to do with the dvi,
since latex2html does its job.

Any ideas?