Inconsistencies in User Interface.

2003-02-11 Thread Sherwood Botsford
I'm a new lyx user. Often people get used to odd quirks in software, and get so that they don't notice them anymore, but to a newcomer they pinch and distract. I'll post periodically so that the design team can incorporate this into their 'to be fixed' list. Or in some cases, these may be FAQ

Re: Inconsistencies in User Interface.

2003-02-11 Thread Christian Ridderström
On Tue, 11 Feb 2003, Sherwood Botsford wrote: 3. Within math mode transformations are opaque. Several times already I have found myself starting an expression a/(b+c) then decided afterward to rewrite it as a --- b + c I've yet to find an easy and obvious way to do this. (My

Re: Inconsistencies in User Interface.

2003-02-11 Thread John Levon
On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 01:11:38PM -0700, Sherwood Botsford wrote: I'm a new lyx user. Often people get used to odd quirks in software, and get so that they don't notice them anymore, but to a newcomer they pinch and distract. I'll post periodically so that the design team can incorporate

Re: Inconsistencies in User Interface.

2003-02-11 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 01:11:38PM -0700, Sherwood Botsford wrote: Several times already I have found myself starting an expression a/(b+c) then decided afterward to rewrite it as a --- b + c I've yet to find an easy and obvious way to do this. Apart from the obvious, there is

Inconsistencies in User Interface.

2003-02-11 Thread Sherwood Botsford
I'm a new lyx user. Often people get used to odd quirks in software, and get so that they don't notice them anymore, but to a newcomer they pinch and distract. I'll post periodically so that the design team can incorporate this into their 'to be fixed' list. Or in some cases, these may be FAQ

Re: Inconsistencies in User Interface.

2003-02-11 Thread Christian Ridderström
On Tue, 11 Feb 2003, Sherwood Botsford wrote: 3. Within math mode transformations are opaque. Several times already I have found myself starting an expression a/(b+c) then decided afterward to rewrite it as a --- b + c I've yet to find an easy and obvious way to do this. (My

Re: Inconsistencies in User Interface.

2003-02-11 Thread John Levon
On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 01:11:38PM -0700, Sherwood Botsford wrote: I'm a new lyx user. Often people get used to odd quirks in software, and get so that they don't notice them anymore, but to a newcomer they pinch and distract. I'll post periodically so that the design team can incorporate

Re: Inconsistencies in User Interface.

2003-02-11 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 01:11:38PM -0700, Sherwood Botsford wrote: Several times already I have found myself starting an expression a/(b+c) then decided afterward to rewrite it as a --- b + c I've yet to find an easy and obvious way to do this. Apart from the obvious, there is

Inconsistencies in User Interface.

2003-02-11 Thread Sherwood Botsford
I'm a new lyx user. Often people get used to odd quirks in software, and get so that they don't notice them anymore, but to a newcomer they pinch and distract. I'll post periodically so that the design team can incorporate this into their 'to be fixed' list. Or in some cases, these may be FAQ

Re: Inconsistencies in User Interface.

2003-02-11 Thread Christian Ridderström
On Tue, 11 Feb 2003, Sherwood Botsford wrote: > 3. Within math mode transformations are opaque. > Several times already I have found myself starting an expression > a/(b+c) > then decided afterward to rewrite it as > a > --- > b + c > > I've yet to find an easy and obvious way to do

Re: Inconsistencies in User Interface.

2003-02-11 Thread John Levon
On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 01:11:38PM -0700, Sherwood Botsford wrote: > I'm a new lyx user. Often people get used to odd quirks in software, and > get so that they don't notice them anymore, but to a newcomer they pinch and > distract. I'll post periodically so that the design team can incorporate

Re: Inconsistencies in User Interface.

2003-02-11 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 01:11:38PM -0700, Sherwood Botsford wrote: > Several times already I have found myself starting an expression > a/(b+c) > then decided afterward to rewrite it as > a > --- > b + c > > I've yet to find an easy and obvious way to do this. Apart from the obvious,