sing LyX for a number of years. Because I was reusing a
> >>> lot of math macros, I started putting them in a separate file and
> >>> loading that file at the beginning of each document with an input
> >>> statement. Over time, the list has grown and I wanted t
On 1/24/24 03:09, Kornel Benko wrote:
Am Mon, 22 Jan 2024 17:35:25 -0500
schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck :
On 1/22/24 16:27, Michael Dean Pugh wrote:
I've been using LyX for a number of years. Because I was reusing a
lot of math macros, I started putting them in a separate file and
loading
Am Mon, 22 Jan 2024 17:35:25 -0500
schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck :
> On 1/22/24 16:27, Michael Dean Pugh wrote:
> > I've been using LyX for a number of years. Because I was reusing a
> > lot of math macros, I started putting them in a separate file and
> > loading that
On 1/22/24 16:27, Michael Dean Pugh wrote:
I've been using LyX for a number of years. Because I was reusing a
lot of math macros, I started putting them in a separate file and
loading that file at the beginning of each document with an input
statement. Over time, the list has grown and I
I've been using LyX for a number of years. Because I was reusing a lot of math
macros, I started putting them in a separate file and loading that file at the
beginning of each document with an input statement. Over time, the list has
grown and I wanted to search for a macro to see how I had
macro from document to document
> > (siunitx loaded, of course). By contrast, I can invoke the macro
> > \ce in
> > math mode with a keyboard shortcut without further ado in every
> > document and enjoy the immediate preview and avoid ERT.
> >
> > How is i
ut further ado in every
> document and enjoy the immediate preview and avoid ERT.
>
> How is it possible to have custom macros available across documents in
> the same way?
I have several child documents containing different sorts of macros I
use for different purposes. If I need one
ERT.
How is it possible to have custom macros available across documents in
the same way?
Thanks for helpful hints in advance!
Yours
Tobias
I can think of at least three possibilities.
* If you will use the custom code routinely, create a document
containing it and make that documen
But I have to copy this custom LyX macro from document to document
(siunitx loaded, of course). By contrast, I can invoke the macro \ce in
math mode with a keyboard shortcut without further ado in every
document and enjoy the immediate preview and avoid ERT.
How is it possible to have custom macros
On Wed, Nov 11, 2020 at 9:06 AM Richard Kimberly Heck
wrote:
> On 11/10/20 1:13 PM, Joel Kulesza wrote:
> > Colleagues,
> >
> > Is there a way to detokenize math macros in LyX such that characters
> > like an underscore are not passed? I'd like to highlight text a
On 11/10/20 1:13 PM, Joel Kulesza wrote:
Colleagues,
Is there a way to detokenize math macros in LyX such that characters
like an underscore are not passed? I'd like to highlight text and
then apply the macro (via toolbar button/shortcut), but it passes
through characters without escaping
Colleagues,
Is there a way to detokenize math macros in LyX such that characters like
an underscore are not passed? I'd like to highlight text and then apply
the macro (via toolbar button/shortcut), but it passes through characters
without escaping them automatically.
For example, please see
On 06/08/2018 01:39 PM, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
On 06/08/2018 08:31 AM, Paul A. Rubin wrote:
On 06/08/2018 01:14 AM, Reuven Segev wrote:
Hi,
When using LyX to produce slides with Beamer, I encountered the
following issue. Beamer produces an empty slide wherever I insert my
math macros
On 06/08/2018 08:31 AM, Paul A. Rubin wrote:
> On 06/08/2018 01:14 AM, Reuven Segev wrote:
>> Hi,
>> When using LyX to produce slides with Beamer, I encountered the
>> following issue. Beamer produces an empty slide wherever I insert my
>> math macros. I could not thi
On 06/08/2018 01:14 AM, Reuven Segev wrote:
Hi,
When using LyX to produce slides with Beamer, I encountered the
following issue. Beamer produces an empty slide wherever I insert my
math macros. I could not think of a way to "encapsulate" them.
Any help will be appreciated.
Be
Hi,
When using LyX to produce slides with Beamer, I encountered the following
issue. Beamer produces an empty slide wherever I insert my math macros. I
could not think of a way to "encapsulate" them.
Any help will be appreciated.
Best,
Reuven Segev
7). Further I would like to
> structure the different Includes by using Inputs for the associated
> sections. For each Input, I set the Include-file it is in as the main
> document. No problem so far.
>
> But I haven’t got to grips with my math macros file after several
> attempts
uts for the associated sections. For each
Input, I set the Include-file it is in as the main document. No problem so far.
But I haven’t got to grips with my math macros file after several attempts
(tried also with https://wiki.lyx.org/Tips/ChildMathMacros
<https://wiki.lyx.org/Tips/ChildMath
On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 11:49 PM, Guillaume Munch <g...@lyx.org> wrote:
> Le 01/10/2015 12:03, David a écrit :
>>
>> Dear Lyx users,
>>
>> I work on a document that contains a long list of math macros
>> defining various mathematical symbols. I would like
Am 01.10.2015 um 23:49 schrieb Guillaume Munch:
>
> As of now, there is a list of math macros in the navigation menu and the
> outline pane. Especially the outline pane works well for that: math
> macros can now be accessed and ordered either by appearance or
> alphabet
On 2015-10-02, Liviu Andronic wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 11:49 PM, Guillaume Munch <g...@lyx.org> wrote:
>> Le 01/10/2015 12:03, David a écrit :
...
>> As of now, there is a list of math macros in the navigation menu and the
>> outline pane. Especially
On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 10:40 AM, Guenter Milde <mi...@users.sf.net> wrote:
> On 2015-10-02, Liviu Andronic wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 11:49 PM, Guillaume Munch <g...@lyx.org> wrote:
>>> Le 01/10/2015 12:03, David a écrit :
>
> ...
>
>&g
As of now, there is a list of math macros in the navigation menu and the
outline pane. Especially the outline pane works well for that: math macros
can now be accessed and ordered either by appearance or alphabetically, and
can be searched for using the filter.
Is a list of math macros very different
Dear Lyx users,
I work on a document that contains a long list of math macros defining
various mathematical symbols. I would like to search in this list.
Please consider the example Lyx file attached. How could I find, for
example, \speedOfLight ? I have tried Edit > Find (Quick) and E
Le 01/10/2015 12:03, David a écrit :
Dear Lyx users,
I work on a document that contains a long list of math macros
defining various mathematical symbols. I would like to search in
this list.
Please consider the example Lyx file attached. How could I find, for
example, \speedOfLight ? I have
Dear list,
I would like to bring up the following topic again in the hope that
someone has an answer.
Am 30.07.2015 um 13:51 schrieb David Rörich:
2) I work on a document with many math macros having long names, several
of them beginning with the same string. When entering an ambiguous
on a document with many math macros having long names, several
of them beginning with the same string. When entering an ambiguous
string, an autocomplete window opens offering a choice of commands and
macros that begin with that string (see image attached). This is very
helpful. However, the delay between
On 08/13/2015 05:35 AM, David wrote:
Dear list,
I would like to bring up the following topic again in the hope that
someone has an answer.
PS You can also change the delay time under Tools Preferences Editing
Input Completion.
Richard
Am 13.08.2015 um 16:03 schrieb Richard Heck:
On 08/13/2015 05:35 AM, David wrote:
Dear list,
I would like to bring up the following topic again in the hope that
someone has an answer.
PS You can also change the delay time under Tools Preferences Editing
Input Completion.
Richard
Dear list,
I would like to bring up the following topic again in the hope that
someone has an answer.
Am 30.07.2015 um 13:51 schrieb David Rörich:
>
> 2) I work on a document with many math macros having long names, several
> of them beginning with the same string. When entering an
7.2015 um 13:51 schrieb David Rörich:
2) I work on a document with many math macros having long names, several
of them beginning with the same string. When entering an ambiguous
string, an autocomplete window opens offering a choice of commands and
macros that begin with that string (see image at
On 08/13/2015 05:35 AM, David wrote:
Dear list,
I would like to bring up the following topic again in the hope that
someone has an answer.
PS You can also change the delay time under Tools> Preferences> Editing>
Input Completion.
Richard
Am 13.08.2015 um 16:03 schrieb Richard Heck:
> On 08/13/2015 05:35 AM, David wrote:
>> Dear list,
>>
>> I would like to bring up the following topic again in the hope that
>> someone has an answer.
>
> PS You can also change the delay time under Tools> Preferences> Editing>
> Input Completion.
>
Am 31.07.2015 um 20:03 schrieb aparsloe:
A hackish way is to insert and then delete a space character, to 'dirty'
the document, which should enable the buffer-write:
command-sequence space-insert normal; char-delete-backward;
buffer-write; master-buffer-update;
but I suspect
Am 31.07.2015 um 20:03 schrieb aparsloe:
> A hackish way is to insert and then delete a space character, to 'dirty'
> the document, which should enable the buffer-write:
>
> command-sequence space-insert normal; char-delete-backward;
> buffer-write; master-buffer-update;
>
> but I suspect
I have two questions concerning keyboard macros / commands:
1) I'd like to bind a shortkey to the following command sequence:
command-sequence buffer-write; master-buffer-update;
i.e. save the current document, then update the preview of the master
document. In principle, this works. However
On 30/07/2015 4:51 a.m., David Rörich wrote:
I have two questions concerning keyboard macros / commands:
1) I'd like to bind a shortkey to the following command sequence:
command-sequence buffer-write; master-buffer-update;
i.e. save the current document, then update the preview of the master
I have two questions concerning keyboard macros / commands:
1) I'd like to bind a shortkey to the following command sequence:
command-sequence buffer-write; master-buffer-update;
i.e. save the current document, then update the preview of the master
document. In principle, this works. However
On 30/07/2015 4:51 a.m., David Rörich wrote:
I have two questions concerning keyboard macros / commands:
1) I'd like to bind a shortkey to the following command sequence:
command-sequence buffer-write; master-buffer-update;
i.e. save the current document, then update the preview of the master
On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 3:27 AM, Reuven Segev reuven.se...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
How can import a LaTeX file into LyX so that the LaTeX macros are imported
into LyX math macros?
Cross-posted at http://latex-community.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=19t=26277
Scott
Hi,
How can import a LaTeX file into LyX so that the LaTeX macros are imported
into LyX math macros?
Thanks
Hi,
How can import a LaTeX file into LyX so that the LaTeX macros are imported
into LyX math macros?
Thanks
On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 3:27 AM, Reuven Segev reuven.se...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
How can import a LaTeX file into LyX so that the LaTeX macros are imported
into LyX math macros?
Cross-posted at http://latex-community.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=19t=26277
Scott
Hi,
How can import a LaTeX file into LyX so that the LaTeX macros are imported
into LyX math macros?
Thanks
On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 3:27 AM, Reuven Segev <reuven.se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
> How can import a LaTeX file into LyX so that the LaTeX macros are imported
> into LyX math macros?
>
Cross-posted at http://latex-community.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=19=26277
Scott
On 2014-01-22, Liviu Andronic wrote:
So, is it a good or bad idea to use math macros to emulate text
macros? Is there a nicer approach?
IMO, it is a bad idea. Math macros are for mathematical typesetting (and
even then not the cleanest LaTeX code results).
The text alternative to math macros
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 12:09 PM, Guenter Milde mi...@users.sf.net wrote:
On 2014-01-22, Liviu Andronic wrote:
So, is it a good or bad idea to use math macros to emulate text
macros? Is there a nicer approach?
IMO, it is a bad idea. Math macros are for mathematical typesetting (and
even
On 2014-01-22, Liviu Andronic wrote:
So, is it a good or bad idea to use math macros to emulate text
macros? Is there a nicer approach?
IMO, it is a bad idea. Math macros are for mathematical typesetting (and
even then not the cleanest LaTeX code results).
The text alternative to math macros
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 12:09 PM, Guenter Milde mi...@users.sf.net wrote:
On 2014-01-22, Liviu Andronic wrote:
So, is it a good or bad idea to use math macros to emulate text
macros? Is there a nicer approach?
IMO, it is a bad idea. Math macros are for mathematical typesetting (and
even
On 2014-01-22, Liviu Andronic wrote:
> So, is it a good or bad idea to use math macros to emulate text
> macros? Is there a nicer approach?
IMO, it is a bad idea. "Math macros" are for mathematical typesetting (and
even then not the cleanest LaTeX code results).
The text alte
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 12:09 PM, Guenter Milde <mi...@users.sf.net> wrote:
> On 2014-01-22, Liviu Andronic wrote:
>
>> So, is it a good or bad idea to use math macros to emulate text
>> macros? Is there a nicer approach?
>
> IMO, it is a bad idea. "Math macro
Dear all,
I would like to use in my LyX documents something that would resemble
text macros. I'm aware of http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/1704 and of
solutions such as
http://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/12747/keeping-the-names-of-things-consistent-in-lyx
, but I'm wondering if the existing
Dear all,
I would like to use in my LyX documents something that would resemble
text macros. I'm aware of http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/1704 and of
solutions such as
http://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/12747/keeping-the-names-of-things-consistent-in-lyx
, but I'm wondering if the existing
Dear all,
I would like to use in my LyX documents something that would resemble
"text macros". I'm aware of http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/1704 and of
solutions such as
http://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/12747/keeping-the-names-of-things-consistent-in-lyx
, but I'm wondering if th
Dear Users,
I'm having trouble using macros like this ones. Please see attached
example
\global\long\def\rp#1{R_{\text{p}}^{\text{#1}}}
When I call the macro and parameter 1 is something like árbol or año
latex gives error \acute or \tilde only allowed in math mode.
LyX code calling the macro
El lun, 18-11-2013 a las 17:27 -0200, Alessandro Bandeira Duarte
escribió:
\mbox{}?
Thanks but the idea is to write \mbox or \text in the macro, in order
not to write it in the macro call!
Martin
On 2013-11-18, martin wrote:
[-- Type: text/plain, Encoding: quoted-printable --]
El lun, 18-11-2013 a las 17:27 -0200, Alessandro Bandeira Duarte
escribió:
\mbox{}?
Thanks but the idea is to write \mbox or \text in the macro, in order
not to write it in the macro call!
However, it
Dear Users,
I'm having trouble using macros like this ones. Please see attached
example
\global\long\def\rp#1{R_{\text{p}}^{\text{#1}}}
When I call the macro and parameter 1 is something like árbol or año
latex gives error \acute or \tilde only allowed in math mode.
LyX code calling the macro
El lun, 18-11-2013 a las 17:27 -0200, Alessandro Bandeira Duarte
escribió:
\mbox{}?
Thanks but the idea is to write \mbox or \text in the macro, in order
not to write it in the macro call!
Martin
On 2013-11-18, martin wrote:
[-- Type: text/plain, Encoding: quoted-printable --]
El lun, 18-11-2013 a las 17:27 -0200, Alessandro Bandeira Duarte
escribió:
\mbox{}?
Thanks but the idea is to write \mbox or \text in the macro, in order
not to write it in the macro call!
However, it
Dear Users,
I'm having trouble using macros like this ones. Please see attached
example
\global\long\def\rp#1{R_{\text{p}}^{\text{#1}}}
When I call the macro and parameter 1 is something like árbol or año
latex gives error \acute or \tilde only allowed in math mode.
LyX code calling the macro
El lun, 18-11-2013 a las 17:27 -0200, Alessandro Bandeira Duarte
escribió:
> \mbox{}?
>
Thanks but the idea is to write \mbox or \text in the macro, in order
not to write it in the macro call!
Martin
On 2013-11-18, martin wrote:
> [-- Type: text/plain, Encoding: quoted-printable --]
> El lun, 18-11-2013 a las 17:27 -0200, Alessandro Bandeira Duarte
> escribió:
>> \mbox{}?
> Thanks but the idea is to write \mbox or \text in the macro, in order
> not to write it in the macro call!
There are three files attached to this posting:
txtmacs.py, txtmacs_help.py -- a script implementing a system of text
macros in LyX, and its help file
pLyXTexTMacros(compressed).lyx -- an explanatory document (with nearly
670 text macros just waiting to be expanded)
The explanatory document
There are three files attached to this posting:
txtmacs.py, txtmacs_help.py -- a script implementing a system of text
macros in LyX, and its help file
pLyXTexTMacros(compressed).lyx -- an explanatory document (with nearly
670 text macros just waiting to be expanded)
The explanatory document
There are three files attached to this posting:
txtmacs.py, txtmacs_help.py -- a script implementing a system of text
macros in LyX, and its help file
pLyXTexTMacros(compressed).lyx -- an explanatory document (with nearly
670 text macros just waiting to be expanded)
The explanatory document
On 07/21/2012 11:34 PM, Allen Barker wrote:
On 07/20/2012 03:40 AM, Guenter Milde wrote:
Also, math-macros are document specific - defining a math-macro in one
document does not make it available in other ones. This is why my
documents include a file of commonly used math macros -- just like I
From: Richard Heck [rgh...@lyx.org]
Sent: Sunday, July 22, 2012 10:20 AM
So the attached shows a way around this problem. The difference between \test
and \lest
doesn't show up inside LyX, but it does in the output.
Is there any way to put these inside a preview inset?
Scott
On 2012-07-22, Allen Barker wrote:
On 07/20/2012 03:40 AM, Guenter Milde wrote:
Also, math-macros are document specific - defining a math-macro in one
document does not make it available in other ones. This is why my
documents include a file of commonly used math macros -- just like I
\input
On 07/21/2012 11:34 PM, Allen Barker wrote:
On 07/20/2012 03:40 AM, Guenter Milde wrote:
Also, math-macros are document specific - defining a math-macro in one
document does not make it available in other ones. This is why my
documents include a file of commonly used math macros -- just like I
From: Richard Heck [rgh...@lyx.org]
Sent: Sunday, July 22, 2012 10:20 AM
So the attached shows a way around this problem. The difference between \test
and \lest
doesn't show up inside LyX, but it does in the output.
Is there any way to put these inside a preview inset?
Scott
On 2012-07-22, Allen Barker wrote:
On 07/20/2012 03:40 AM, Guenter Milde wrote:
Also, math-macros are document specific - defining a math-macro in one
document does not make it available in other ones. This is why my
documents include a file of commonly used math macros -- just like I
\input
On 07/21/2012 11:34 PM, Allen Barker wrote:
On 07/20/2012 03:40 AM, Guenter Milde wrote:
Also, math-macros are document specific - defining a math-macro in one
document does not make it available in other ones. This is why my
documents include a file of commonly used math macros -- just like I
From: Richard Heck [rgh...@lyx.org]
Sent: Sunday, July 22, 2012 10:20 AM
>So the attached shows a way around this problem. The difference between \test
>and \lest
>doesn't show up inside LyX, but it does in the output.
Is there any way to put these inside a preview inset?
Scott
On 2012-07-22, Allen Barker wrote:
> On 07/20/2012 03:40 AM, Guenter Milde wrote:
>> Also, math-macros are document specific - defining a math-macro in one
>> document does not make it available in other ones. This is why my
>> documents include a file of commonly used math
On 07/20/2012 03:40 AM, Guenter Milde wrote:
Also, math-macros are document specific - defining a math-macro in one
document does not make it available in other ones. This is why my
documents include a file of commonly used math macros -- just like I
\input a file with commonly used preamble
On 07/20/2012 03:40 AM, Guenter Milde wrote:
Also, math-macros are document specific - defining a math-macro in one
document does not make it available in other ones. This is why my
documents include a file of commonly used math macros -- just like I
\input a file with commonly used preamble
On 07/20/2012 03:40 AM, Guenter Milde wrote:
Also, math-macros are document specific - defining a math-macro in one
document does not make it available in other ones. This is why my
documents include a file of commonly used math macros -- just like I
\input a file with commonly used preamble
want to like LyX. What a great concept. And
yet... I find LyX math macros an absolutely horror. Why construct LyX
to ignore macros in an imported LaTex preamble? Why defeat the most
popular usage, and why not write something to properly automate the
import?
Because (La)TeX is a macro language
want to like LyX. What a great concept. And
yet... I find LyX math macros an absolutely horror. Why construct LyX
to ignore macros in an imported LaTex preamble? Why defeat the most
popular usage, and why not write something to properly automate the
import?
Because (La)TeX is a macro language
t; features. I really want to like LyX. What a great concept. And
> yet... I find LyX math macros an absolutely horror. Why construct LyX
> to ignore macros in an imported LaTex preamble? Why defeat the most
> popular usage, and why not write something to properly automate the
> import?
concept. And yet...
I find LyX math macros an absolutely horror. Why construct LyX to ignore macros
in an imported LaTex preamble? Why defeat the most
popular usage, and why not write something to properly automate the import?
It's a
fact that exchanging LaTex with collaborators and opening old files
concept. And yet...
I find LyX math macros an absolutely horror. Why construct LyX to ignore macros
in an imported LaTex preamble? Why defeat the most
popular usage, and why not write something to properly automate the import?
It's a
fact that exchanging LaTex with collaborators and opening old files
concept. And yet...
I find LyX math macros an absolutely horror. Why construct LyX to ignore macros
in an imported LaTex preamble? Why defeat the most
popular usage, and why not write something to properly automate the import?
It's a
fact that exchanging LaTex with collaborators and opening old files
I would like to know if the topic discussed in this thread:
http://marc.info/?l=lyx-usersm=116195922003640w=2
has evolved since 2006.
I have a lot of math macros defined on the preamble of a master document, which
has several childs. When I process the document, the math macros are
correctly
On 05/08/2012 01:00 PM, Rudi Gaelzer wrote:
I would like to know if the topic discussed in this thread:
http://marc.info/?l=lyx-usersm=116195922003640w=2
has evolved since 2006.
I have a lot of math macros defined on the preamble of a master document, which
has several childs. When I process
I would like to know if the topic discussed in this thread:
http://marc.info/?l=lyx-usersm=116195922003640w=2
has evolved since 2006.
I have a lot of math macros defined on the preamble of a master document, which
has several childs. When I process the document, the math macros are
correctly
On 05/08/2012 01:00 PM, Rudi Gaelzer wrote:
I would like to know if the topic discussed in this thread:
http://marc.info/?l=lyx-usersm=116195922003640w=2
has evolved since 2006.
I have a lot of math macros defined on the preamble of a master document, which
has several childs. When I process
I would like to know if the topic discussed in this thread:
http://marc.info/?l=lyx-users=116195922003640=2
has evolved since 2006.
I have a lot of math macros defined on the preamble of a master document, which
has several childs. When I process the document, the math macros are
correctly
On 05/08/2012 01:00 PM, Rudi Gaelzer wrote:
I would like to know if the topic discussed in this thread:
http://marc.info/?l=lyx-users=116195922003640=2
has evolved since 2006.
I have a lot of math macros defined on the preamble of a master document, which
has several childs. When I process
Your test file compiled correctly for me every time I tried (multiple tries
within one LyX session, multiple LyX sessions, exported to .tex and compiled
outside LyX).
Paul
Your test file compiled correctly for me every time I tried (multiple tries
within one LyX session, multiple LyX sessions, exported to .tex and compiled
outside LyX).
Paul
Your test file compiled correctly for me every time I tried (multiple tries
within one LyX session, multiple LyX sessions, exported to .tex and compiled
outside LyX).
Paul
test3.lyx
Description: Binary data
I'm having a problem with optional arguments on macros. They are sometimes
written into the TeX file as
non-optional (i.e., in {} instead of []), which causes them to be ignored
by the TeX compiler. This appears to be random -- different instances
test3.lyx
Description: Binary data
I'm having a problem with optional arguments on macros. They are sometimes
written into the TeX file as
non-optional (i.e., in {} instead of []), which causes them to be ignored
by the TeX compiler. This appears to be random -- different instances
test3.lyx
Description: Binary data
I'm having a problem with optional arguments on macros. They are sometimes
written into the TeX file as
non-optional (i.e., in {} instead of []), which causes them to be ignored
by the TeX compiler. This appears to be random -- different instances
) correct page numbers and references and LyX will use the
parent doc settings instead of the child-doc ones.
Actually, I regularly compile stand-alone child docs (to save time on
checking the appearance in the output). I have set up a stand-alone
branch for math-macros and bibliography and I can
But the only one for truly consistent behaviour. If you want to export
stand-alone, uncheck the master setting.
Even if the master setting is not set in the child, LyX still display all
macros perfectly if the master document is open.
My complaint is this: if LyX is able to interpret things
On 2011-05-11, Diego Queiroz wrote:
[-- Type: text/plain, Encoding: --]
But the only one for truly consistent behaviour. If you want to export
stand-alone, uncheck the master setting.
Even if the master setting is not set in the child, LyX still display all
macros perfectly if the master
A show output anyway button would be great.
However, if LyX consistency were assured, there's no need for it (expect
when using ERT).
... or the LaTeX preamble (1) or an outdated TeX distribution (2) or a
package
combination with conflicts (3) or ... (?)
Günter
I repeat: if, and
1 - 100 of 630 matches
Mail list logo
