RE: Figure key

2009-09-09 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW
 
Do you guys have opinions regarding which is the best place
to add explanations to a figure? A longish list of things
such as the pointed line means blah, and the blue square
stands for blah...

The figure box in the float is too small for that 

How can it be too small ? I can put a work by Shakespeare in it.

-and everything you put in there appears in the figure index.

Then you should try Insert-Short Title in the caption of the float. Only the 
text within this opt inset will be put in the figure index. In this way, you 
can have a brief description in the figure index (list).

I could do it in the main text, but I'd rather make sure that
it is just beside the float.

So, I would put everything you need to understand the figure in the caption. 
Any explanation, reasoning, conclusions, remarks, details etc. in the main text.

Thanks
Manolo

Vincent


Re: Figure key

2009-09-09 Thread Uwe Stöhr

Manolo Martí­nez schrieb:

Do you guys have opinions regarding which is the best place to add 
explanations to a figure? A longish list of things such as the pointed 
line means blah, and the blue square stands for blah...


The figure box in the float is too small for that -and everything you 
put in there appears in the figure index. I could do it in the main 
text, but I'd rather make sure that it is just beside the float.


That depends on your topic. For example in physics everything is written to the caption of the 
figure. The result are figures with huge captions. For engineers it is quite the opposite: the 
caption only contains a short description of the image, all explanations and details are given in 
the main text of the document.


regards Uwe


RE: Figure key

2009-09-09 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW
 
Do you guys have opinions regarding which is the best place
to add explanations to a figure? A longish list of things
such as the pointed line means blah, and the blue square
stands for blah...

The figure box in the float is too small for that 

How can it be too small ? I can put a work by Shakespeare in it.

-and everything you put in there appears in the figure index.

Then you should try Insert-Short Title in the caption of the float. Only the 
text within this opt inset will be put in the figure index. In this way, you 
can have a brief description in the figure index (list).

I could do it in the main text, but I'd rather make sure that
it is just beside the float.

So, I would put everything you need to understand the figure in the caption. 
Any explanation, reasoning, conclusions, remarks, details etc. in the main text.

Thanks
Manolo

Vincent


Re: Figure key

2009-09-09 Thread Uwe Stöhr

Manolo Martí­nez schrieb:

Do you guys have opinions regarding which is the best place to add 
explanations to a figure? A longish list of things such as the pointed 
line means blah, and the blue square stands for blah...


The figure box in the float is too small for that -and everything you 
put in there appears in the figure index. I could do it in the main 
text, but I'd rather make sure that it is just beside the float.


That depends on your topic. For example in physics everything is written to the caption of the 
figure. The result are figures with huge captions. For engineers it is quite the opposite: the 
caption only contains a short description of the image, all explanations and details are given in 
the main text of the document.


regards Uwe


RE: Figure key

2009-09-09 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW
 
>Do you guys have opinions regarding which is the best place
>to add explanations to a figure? A longish list of things
>such as "the pointed line means blah, and the blue square
>stands for blah"...
>
>The "figure" box in the float is too small for that 

How can it be too small ? I can put a work by Shakespeare in it.

>-and everything you put in there appears in the figure index.

Then you should try "Insert->Short Title" in the caption of the float. Only the 
text within this "opt" inset will be put in the figure index. In this way, you 
can have a brief description in the figure index (list).

>I could do it in the main text, but I'd rather make sure that
>it is just beside the float.

So, I would put everything you need to understand the figure in the caption. 
Any explanation, reasoning, conclusions, remarks, details etc. in the main text.

>Thanks
>Manolo

Vincent


Re: Figure key

2009-09-09 Thread Uwe Stöhr

Manolo Martí­nez schrieb:

Do you guys have opinions regarding which is the best place to add 
explanations to a figure? A longish list of things such as "the pointed 
line means blah, and the blue square stands for blah"...


The "figure" box in the float is too small for that -and everything you 
put in there appears in the figure index. I could do it in the main 
text, but I'd rather make sure that it is just beside the float.


That depends on your topic. For example in physics everything is written to the caption of the 
figure. The result are figures with huge captions. For engineers it is quite the opposite: the 
caption only contains a short description of the image, all explanations and details are given in 
the main text of the document.


regards Uwe