That soleved the problem
Thanks
Volker
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>
> > "Volker" == Volker Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Volker> Hi, I am a newcommer to lyx and also observed the problem with
> Volker> view dvi and update dvi. Following the suggestions in the
> Volker> mailing list
> "Volker" == Volker Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Volker> Hi, I am a newcommer to lyx and also observed the problem with
Volker> view dvi and update dvi. Following the suggestions in the
Volker> mailing list I changed line 520 in filetools.C. This
Volker> definitely improved the situation
Hi,
I am a newcommer to lyx and also observed the problem with view dvi and update
dvi. Following the suggestions in the mailing list I changed line 520 in
filetools.C. This definitely improved the situation, but didn't fix all the
problems. The problem I still have is with bibtex:
view dvi makes
"Lars Gullik Bjønnes" wrote:
>
> Can those of you that does your own compiles and see this bug try
> this:
>
> Change line 520 in filetools.C to read:
>
> TempBase = GetCWD();
>
> and see if that makes a difference.
>
> Lgb
It absolutely does! Update DVI works well again and my TOC w
On 07 May 1999 14:17:48 +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
>Can those of you that does your own compiles and see this bug try
>this:
>
>Change line 520 in filetools.C to read:
>
>TempBase = GetCWD();
>
>and see if that makes a difference.
>
Yes, it really makes a difference.
Not, just a differen
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Can those of you that does your own compiles and see this bug try
> this:
>
> Change line 520 in filetools.C to read:
>
> TempBase = GetCWD();
>
> and see if that makes a difference.
>
> Lgb
This fixes the problem on my system as well.
-Mario
> Can all of you that has experienced this glitch/bug tell what shell
> and system you are running on?
>
> Lgb
solaris 2.6 and 2.7 both running csh.
-Mario
> Can all of you that has experienced this glitch/bug tell what shell
> and system you are running on?
No problem on i686 with Red Hat 5.2, kernel 2.0.36, bash version 1.14.7(1).
The problem occurs on Sparc 10 with Solaris 7, bash version
2.02.1(1)-release.
After applying the proposed patch of f
On 07 May 1999 13:52:30 +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>Can all of you that has experienced this glitch/bug tell what shell
>and system you are running on?
>
SuSE Linux 2.0.36 & bash.
Sasa
Sasa Janiska
Zagreb, Croatia
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Lars Gullik Bjønnes" wrote:
>
> Can those of you that does your own compiles and see this bug try
> this:
>
> Change line 520 in filetools.C to read:
>
> TempBase = GetCWD();
>
> and see if that makes a difference.
now everything is ok, LyX works fine! :-))
Thanks!
Herbert
--
[EMAIL PROTE
Can those of you that does your own compiles and see this bug try
this:
Change line 520 in filetools.C to read:
TempBase = GetCWD();
and see if that makes a difference.
Lgb
On 7 May 1999, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> We know now what the bug is. MakeAbsPath _is_ placed in the correct
> place in DepTable, but MakeAbsPath calls a function safer_cwd that
...
> We are thinking of a coupble of ways to fix this.
>
> Can all of you that has experienced this glitch/bug
Mario Parra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| I look at the code for DepTable.C in both 1.0.1 and 1.0.2 and the 1.0.1
| version never calls MakeAbsPath. Furthermore, in the 1.0.2 version,
| every time MakeAbsPath is called, there is a comment that says:
|
| // not quite sure if this is the correct
I look at the code for DepTable.C in both 1.0.1 and 1.0.2 and the 1.0.1
version never calls MakeAbsPath. Furthermore, in the 1.0.2 version,
every time MakeAbsPath is called, there is a comment that says:
// not quite sure if this is the correct place for MakeAbsPath
Otherwise the files are iden
> Here (lyx-1.0.2 on Sun Solaris 2.6), in /tmp/lyx_tmp6076aaa/lyx_bufrtmp6076aaa/
> -rw--- 1 chretien dera 8 May 6 19:03 newfile.aux
> -rw--- 1 chretien dera 228 May 6 19:03 newfile.dvi
> -rw--- 1 chretien dera2353 May 6 19:03 newfile.log
> -rw--
> "Mario" == Mario Parra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Mario> What I meant is that in your reply to my e-mail you claimed that
Kayvan > Even when I am running with ``\use_tempdir false'', the foo.tex.dep
Kayvan > file contains the right information:
Kayvan >
Kayvan > /tmp/lyx_tmp10450aaa/lyx
Kayvan Aghaiepour Sylvan wrote:
>
>
> Mario> Anyway, if \use_tmpdir is false, how come it is still using /tmp?
>
> It shouldn't be. Did you quit and restart lyx.
>
> Putting the line "\use_tempdir false" in your ~/.lyx/lyxrc should make
> lyx stop using temp directories (putting all intermediate
> "Mario" == Mario Parra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Mario> I am on a sparc 10 running solaris 2.6, but I think this bug is
Mario> not os dependent.
I don't really know if it's OS dependant or not. I and several people
from the LyX team don't see the problem and we're still trying to
figure
Kayvan Aghaiepour Sylvan wrote:
> > "Mario" == Mario Parra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Mario> One more thing, if I turn /usr_tmpdir to false and the lyx file
> Mario> is not in the distribution directory, then create dvi does not
> Mario> even work the first time around!
>
> What system a
Kayvan Aghaiepour Sylvan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| /tmp/lyx_tmp10450aaa/lyx_bufrtmp10450aaa/foo.tex 2303679553 2303679553
|
| My only other thought is that somehow MakeAbsPath() is returning the
| wrong thing for inclusion into the DepTable
|
| ---Kayvan
One thing th
>> Date: Thu, 06 May 1999 10:33:16 -0600
>> From: Mario Parra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> To: Kayvan Aghaiepour Sylvan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, lyx users
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Subject: Re: Small glitch in View dvi?
>>
>> Somehow the dependency fi
> "Mario" == Mario Parra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Mario> One more thing, if I turn /usr_tmpdir to false and the lyx file
Mario> is not in the distribution directory, then create dvi does not
Mario> even work the first time around!
What system are you running?
Even when I am running with
One more thing, if I turn /usr_tmpdir to false and the lyx file is not in the
distribution directory, then create dvi does not even work the first time
around!
-Mario
Somehow the dependency files are not being set properly.
This is why I think this is so.
If I set use_tmpdir true then lyx creates a directory under /tmp where it stores
temporary
files. Over there, there is a file called nameofdocumet.tex.dep that holds the
names of the
latex files used to creat
> How do you set \use_tmpdir? I tried putting it in the preamble but latex
You put \use_tempdir into your ~/.lyx/lyxrc:
\use_tempdir false
Do you have gdb installed? If so, maybe you can step through the code
and see if if the problem is happening in the DepTable code?
> On 06 May 1999 11:04:37 +0200, Lars Gullik Bj°nnes wrote:
>
> >Do those of you seeing this glitch use \use_tempdir true or false? Are
> >the temporary dir mounted over nfs?
> >
How do you set \use_tmpdir? I tried putting it in the preamble but latex
won't
take it.
I tried both on dirs mounted
"Lars Gullik Bjønnes" wrote:
>
> Kayvan Aghaiepour Sylvan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | Could you try running ``lyx -dbg'' and seeing if that gives a clue?
>
> try -dbg 128
>
there are the same messages on my system as in Marios mail.
my systems:
1. Linux 2.0.36 (i586) (Suse 5.3)
2. Linux
On 06 May 1999 11:04:37 +0200, Lars Gullik Bj°nnes wrote:
>Do those of you seeing this glitch use \use_tempdir true or false? Are
>the temporary dir mounted over nfs?
>
It is the same.
No temporary dir over nfs.
Something must broken in the code.
The same file worked in 1.0.1.
Sincerely,
Sasa
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> Do those of you seeing this glitch use \use_tempdir true or false? Are
Lars> the temporary dir mounted over nfs?
Just as a (non) data point: I am on an Redhat Linux 5.2 system with
kernel-2.0.36, tetex-0.9-6, LaTeX2e, running
Mario Parra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| return no_change
Do those of you seeing this glitch use \use_tempdir true or false? Are
the temporary dir mounted over nfs?
Lgb
ity: Normal
>X-Mailer: PMMail 1.96a For OS/2
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2"
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>Subject: Re: Small glitch in View dvi?
>
On Wed, 05 May 1999 10:36:14 -0600, Mario Parra wrote:
>
> I was writing a mes
Kayvan Aghaiepour Sylvan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Could you try running ``lyx -dbg'' and seeing if that gives a clue?
try -dbg 128
Lgb
Kayvan Aghaiepour Sylvan wrote:
> Could you try running ``lyx -dbg'' and seeing if that gives a clue?
>
> ---Kayvan
I run lyx -dbg 128 for latex debugging. The first time I run view dvi,
latex runs fine. Then I
make some change, click update dvi and this is what debugg
> "Herbert" == Herbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Herbert> Starting LyX 1.0.2, choosing new, typing a word like "LyX", ;-)
Herbert> dvi-viewing shows this word. Now you can do want you want,
Herbert> udating dvi or viewing postscript, all gives LyX, because
Herbert> Latex is NOT running.
Herbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| It's not a problem of a specific file!
| Starting LyX 1.0.2, choosing new, typing a word like "LyX", ;-)
| dvi-viewing shows this word. Now you can do want you want,
| udating dvi or viewing postscript, all gives LyX, because
| Latex is NOT running.
Then it
"Lars Gullik Bjønnes" wrote:
>
> Kayvan Aghaiepour Sylvan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | Hmmm... The update glitch does not happen for me (running 1.0.3pre1).
> |
> | I can try with 1.0.2 later today.
>
> try with files that need latex to be run more than once.
It's not a problem of a speci
Kayvan Aghaiepour Sylvan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Hmmm... The update glitch does not happen for me (running 1.0.3pre1).
|
| I can try with 1.0.2 later today.
try with files that need latex to be run more than once.
Lgb
David Aronstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| I have attached a simple file that did not update properly,
| when I: wrote the first sentence, viewed the DVI file, =
|
| wrote the second sentence, and then viewed the DVI file again.
|
| However, the file is saved correctly, and when I load up th
Hmmm... The update glitch does not happen for me (running 1.0.3pre1).
I can try with 1.0.2 later today.
---Kayvan
"Lars Gullik Bjønnes" wrote:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes:
> | David Aronstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> | | If I then add more text (say, "This is the next sentence.") and select View
> | | dvi, the new text does not appear. It seems that the .dvi file is
> | | not bei
I just checked this behavior and it happens also on my system with a file which
was working correctly up to version 1.02pre3.
hsl
--
Dr. Hartmut S. Leipner
Fachbereich Physik
Friedemann-Bach-Platz 6
Martin-Luther-Universität
06108 Halle
Tel. 0345-55 25 453
Fax 0345-55 27 563
WWW http://cryst
> "David" == David Aronstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
David> I have attached a simple file that did not update properly,
David> when I: wrote the first sentence, viewed the DVI file,
David> wrote the second sentence, and then viewed the DVI file again.
David> However, the file is saved
David Aronstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| So, I'm not sure if this file will be of any use.
| Is there some other way we can help track this down?
Only if you want to dig into the sources.
Lgb
> I have checked a bit, and does not see this. Can you send me a small
> lyx file that shows this behaviour.
>
> Lgb
I have attached a simple file that did not update properly,
when I: wrote the first sentence, viewed the DVI file,
wrote the second sentence, and then viewed the DVI file
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes:
| David Aronstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| | If I then add more text (say, "This is the next sentence.") and select View
| | dvi, the new text does not appear. It seems that the .dvi file is
| | not being updated?
I have checked a bit, and doe
David Aronstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| If I then add more text (say, "This is the next sentence.") and select View
| dvi, the new text does not appear. It seems that the .dvi file is not being
| updated?
Arrghhh. I should not be allowed to fix things 5 min before release.
But I am not su
David Aronstein wrote:
> I installed lyx 1.0.2 this morning and I wonder if there is a small
> glitch in the View dvi command?
>
> If I create a simple document (say, with one line: "This is the first
> sentence.") and select View dvi, then the document looks fine.
>
> If I then add more text
I installed lyx 1.0.2 this morning and I wonder if there is a small
glitch in the View dvi command?
If I create a simple document (say, with one line: "This is the first
sentence.") and select View dvi, then the document looks fine.
If I then add more text (say, "This is the next sentence.") an
48 matches
Mail list logo
