Re: correct way to troubleshot .cls/layout problems?

2010-02-28 Thread Richard Heck
On 2/28/10 6:15 AM, Jose Quesada wrote: Hi Richard, looking at the terminal, there are no messages at all. It seems to not see larkc.cls at all. the class of the doc is correct, but the formatting is plain book. I added some of the macros defined in larkc.cls to the preamble, and they are ignor

Re: correct way to troubleshot .cls/layout problems?

2010-02-28 Thread Jose Quesada
Hi Richard, looking at the terminal, there are no messages at all. It seems to not see larkc.cls at all. the class of the doc is correct, but the formatting is plain book. I added some of the macros defined in larkc.cls to the preamble, and they are ignored. Any idea what to do next? Thanks, -Jos

Re: correct way to troubleshot .cls/layout problems?

2010-02-27 Thread Richard Heck
On 2/27/10 12:15 PM, Jose Quesada wrote: thanks Richard. But in the windows box, with the exact same layout file, it produces the correct results: it loads larkc, because the header has an image, and it shows. So you are talking about the LaTeX output. Maybe a bug in 1.6.4 fixed in 1.6.5? M

Re: correct way to troubleshot .cls/layout problems?

2010-02-27 Thread Jose Quesada
thanks Richard. But in the windows box, with the exact same layout file, it produces the correct results: it loads larkc, because the header has an image, and it shows. Maybe a bug in 1.6.4 fixed in 1.6.5? Maybe miktex doing something that texlive doesn't? On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 2:08 PM, Richard

Re: correct way to troubleshot .cls/layout problems?

2010-02-27 Thread Richard Heck
On 2/27/10 5:56 AM, Jose Quesada wrote: Hi Steve, the LyX versions were in my email, last line. I read your entire doc (very useful, thanks!). I can see only one copy of the class larkc on the list. The problem is that the formatting is just plain 'book' class. Do you mean in the LaTeX outpu

Re: correct way to troubleshot .cls/layout problems?

2010-02-27 Thread Jose Quesada
Hi Steve, the LyX versions were in my email, last line. I read your entire doc (very useful, thanks!). I can see only one copy of the class larkc on the list. The problem is that the formatting is just plain 'book' class. Thanks. -J On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 1:28 AM, Steve Litt wrote: > On Friday

Re: correct way to troubleshot .cls/layout problems?

2010-02-26 Thread Steve Litt
On Friday 26 February 2010 15:41:36 Jose Quesada wrote: > A question for the rest of the list too, and linux heads... > > I got LyX to see the larkc.cls on win but it doesn't work on ubuntu. > > I placed the .cls and figures here > /usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex > > LyX sees the layout just

Re: correct way to troubleshot .cls/layout problems?

2010-02-26 Thread Manoj Rajagopalan
Did you run the texhash command (no args) from the command line after you placed the .cls file in the texlive dir? You might have to run that as root. -- Manoj On Friday 26 February 2010 03:41:36 pm Jose Quesada wrote: > A question for the rest of the list too, and linux heads... > > I got LyX

correct way to troubleshot .cls/layout problems?

2010-02-26 Thread Jose Quesada
A question for the rest of the list too, and linux heads... I got LyX to see the larkc.cls on win but it doesn't work on ubuntu. I placed the .cls and figures here /usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex LyX sees the layout just fine, but renders it like 'book'. this is the layout: --- #% Do not dele