Re: latex font question
On Wed, Dec 18, 2002 at 08:53:58PM +0200, Dekel Tsur wrote: We had a code for math shortcuts: typing = would create \leq etc. However, this code was not applied (why?), so this feature wouldn't appear before version 1.4.0. The code is there, but disabled. The reason was that I did not find the time to come up with a fairly complete list of symbols and find a simple, comprehensable system of what symbols are related. So I thought it'd better not to deliver the feature at all than to give access to some half-baked version and earn collective outcries in the next version when behaviour changes again. Andre' -- Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security, will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson)
Re: latex font question
On Wed, Dec 18, 2002 at 08:53:58PM +0200, Dekel Tsur wrote: We had a code for math shortcuts: typing = would create \leq etc. However, this code was not applied (why?), so this feature wouldn't appear before version 1.4.0. The code is there, but disabled. The reason was that I did not find the time to come up with a fairly complete list of symbols and find a simple, comprehensable system of what symbols are related. So I thought it'd better not to deliver the feature at all than to give access to some half-baked version and earn collective outcries in the next version when behaviour changes again. Andre' -- Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security, will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson)
Re: latex font question
On Wed, Dec 18, 2002 at 08:53:58PM +0200, Dekel Tsur wrote: > We had a code for math shortcuts: typing <= would create \leq etc. > However, this code was not applied (why?), so this feature wouldn't appear > before version 1.4.0. The code is there, but disabled. The reason was that I did not find the time to come up with a fairly complete list of symbols and find a simple, comprehensable system of what symbols are "related". So I thought it'd better not to deliver the feature at all than to give access to some half-baked version and earn collective outcries in the next version when behaviour changes again. Andre' -- Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security, will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson)
Re: latex font question
On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 06:48:54PM +1030, Owen Lucas wrote:
Math macros? Ive heard of them but have not worked out what they are and
how to use them yet. what I wish to do is replace something like (1,0)
with the longer notation which in tex is $A^{2}\Sigma -X^{2}\Pi
\left(1-0\right)$.
Its one of those things that for day to day you can just say (1,0) and
you make perfect sense but put it in writing and you look like a fool
(and the above notation in tex is just the short version of the full
thing). As such it would be nice to type (1,0) and have it turn into the
above when the dvi is exported.
We had a code for math shortcuts: typing = would create \leq etc.
However, this code was not applied (why?), so this feature wouldn't appear
before version 1.4.0.
Re: latex font question
On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 06:48:54PM +1030, Owen Lucas wrote:
Math macros? Ive heard of them but have not worked out what they are and
how to use them yet. what I wish to do is replace something like (1,0)
with the longer notation which in tex is $A^{2}\Sigma -X^{2}\Pi
\left(1-0\right)$.
Its one of those things that for day to day you can just say (1,0) and
you make perfect sense but put it in writing and you look like a fool
(and the above notation in tex is just the short version of the full
thing). As such it would be nice to type (1,0) and have it turn into the
above when the dvi is exported.
We had a code for math shortcuts: typing = would create \leq etc.
However, this code was not applied (why?), so this feature wouldn't appear
before version 1.4.0.
Re: latex font question
On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 06:48:54PM +1030, Owen Lucas wrote:
> Math macros? Ive heard of them but have not worked out what they are and
> how to use them yet. what I wish to do is replace something like "(1,0)"
> with the longer notation which in tex is $A^{2}\Sigma -X^{2}\Pi
> \left(1-0\right)$.
>
> Its one of those things that for day to day you can just say (1,0) and
> you make perfect sense but put it in writing and you look like a fool
> (and the above notation in tex is just the short version of the full
> thing). As such it would be nice to type (1,0) and have it turn into the
> above when the dvi is exported.
We had a code for math shortcuts: typing <= would create \leq etc.
However, this code was not applied (why?), so this feature wouldn't appear
before version 1.4.0.
Re: latex font question
On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 12:32:28PM +1030, Owen Lucas wrote: Thanks I was just wanting to know how this was done as I could not find anything in the .cls or .layout files that would do this. I was also wondering if I could use this to replace words with some scientific notation without seeing all the mess in lyx. One could probably do that but the tide is turning against these hard-coded bits... What exactly are you trying to achieve? I have a strong feeling that we might be able to (ab)use math macros to do what you want... Andre' -- A: No. See http://www.netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html Q: Should I include quotations after my reply ?
Re: latex font question
---BeginMessage---
Math macros? Ive heard of them but have not worked out what they are and
how to use them yet. what I wish to do is replace something like (1,0)
with the longer notation which in tex is $A^{2}\Sigma -X^{2}\Pi
\left(1-0\right)$.
Its one of those things that for day to day you can just say (1,0) and
you make perfect sense but put it in writing and you look like a fool
(and the above notation in tex is just the short version of the full
thing). As such it would be nice to type (1,0) and have it turn into the
above when the dvi is exported.
There is several notations like this that if I could streem line them it
could make things easyer.
If Maths macros can do this then Ill look into them
cheers
owen
Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 12:32:28PM +1030, Owen Lucas wrote:
Thanks I was just wanting to know how this was done as I could not find
anything in the .cls or .layout files that would do this. I was also
wondering if I could use this to replace words with some scientific
notation without seeing all the mess in lyx.
One could probably do that but the tide is turning against these hard-coded
bits...
What exactly are you trying to achieve? I have a strong feeling that we
might be able to (ab)use math macros to do what you want...
Andre'
---End Message---
Re: latex font question
On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 12:32:28PM +1030, Owen Lucas wrote: Thanks I was just wanting to know how this was done as I could not find anything in the .cls or .layout files that would do this. I was also wondering if I could use this to replace words with some scientific notation without seeing all the mess in lyx. One could probably do that but the tide is turning against these hard-coded bits... What exactly are you trying to achieve? I have a strong feeling that we might be able to (ab)use math macros to do what you want... Andre' -- A: No. See http://www.netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html Q: Should I include quotations after my reply ?
Re: latex font question
---BeginMessage---
Math macros? Ive heard of them but have not worked out what they are and
how to use them yet. what I wish to do is replace something like (1,0)
with the longer notation which in tex is $A^{2}\Sigma -X^{2}\Pi
\left(1-0\right)$.
Its one of those things that for day to day you can just say (1,0) and
you make perfect sense but put it in writing and you look like a fool
(and the above notation in tex is just the short version of the full
thing). As such it would be nice to type (1,0) and have it turn into the
above when the dvi is exported.
There is several notations like this that if I could streem line them it
could make things easyer.
If Maths macros can do this then Ill look into them
cheers
owen
Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 12:32:28PM +1030, Owen Lucas wrote:
Thanks I was just wanting to know how this was done as I could not find
anything in the .cls or .layout files that would do this. I was also
wondering if I could use this to replace words with some scientific
notation without seeing all the mess in lyx.
One could probably do that but the tide is turning against these hard-coded
bits...
What exactly are you trying to achieve? I have a strong feeling that we
might be able to (ab)use math macros to do what you want...
Andre'
---End Message---
Re: latex font question
On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 12:32:28PM +1030, Owen Lucas wrote: > Thanks I was just wanting to know how this was done as I could not find > anything in the .cls or .layout files that would do this. I was also > wondering if I could use this to replace words with some scientific > notation without seeing all the mess in lyx. One could probably do that but the tide is turning against these hard-coded bits... What exactly are you trying to achieve? I have a strong feeling that we might be able to (ab)use math macros to do what you want... Andre' -- A: No. See http://www.netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html Q: Should I include quotations after my reply ?
Re: latex font question
--- Begin Message ---
Math macros? Ive heard of them but have not worked out what they are and
how to use them yet. what I wish to do is replace something like "(1,0)"
with the longer notation which in tex is $A^{2}\Sigma -X^{2}\Pi
\left(1-0\right)$.
Its one of those things that for day to day you can just say (1,0) and
you make perfect sense but put it in writing and you look like a fool
(and the above notation in tex is just the short version of the full
thing). As such it would be nice to type (1,0) and have it turn into the
above when the dvi is exported.
There is several notations like this that if I could streem line them it
could make things easyer.
If Maths macros can do this then Ill look into them
cheers
owen
Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 12:32:28PM +1030, Owen Lucas wrote:
Thanks I was just wanting to know how this was done as I could not find
anything in the .cls or .layout files that would do this. I was also
wondering if I could use this to replace words with some scientific
notation without seeing all the mess in lyx.
One could probably do that but the tide is turning against these hard-coded
bits...
What exactly are you trying to achieve? I have a strong feeling that we
might be able to (ab)use math macros to do what you want...
Andre'
--- End Message ---
Re: latex font question
Thanks I was just wanting to know how this was done as I could not find
anything in the .cls or .layout files that would do this. I was also
wondering if I could use this to replace words with some scientific
notation without seeing all the mess in lyx.
Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 04:54:28PM +1030, Owen Lucas wrote:
I want to know where and how Latex recognises Latex and puts the word
Latex in the latex wacky superscript subscript font?
ie where it sees LaTeX it puts \LaTeX{}
LaTeX never does this.
In case of LyX there is some braindead hard-coded mapping in
src/paragraph_pimpl.C.
Andre'
Re: latex font question
what do you mean by putting words in scientific notation?
Owen Lucas wrote:
Thanks I was just wanting to know how this was done as I could not find
anything in the .cls or .layout files that would do this. I was also
wondering if I could use this to replace words with some scientific
notation without seeing all the mess in lyx.
Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 04:54:28PM +1030, Owen Lucas wrote:
I want to know where and how Latex recognises Latex and puts the word
Latex in the latex wacky superscript subscript font?
ie where it sees LaTeX it puts \LaTeX{}
LaTeX never does this.
In case of LyX there is some braindead hard-coded mapping in
src/paragraph_pimpl.C.
Andre'
Re: latex font question
Well its a bit hard to show you with just text but sometimes I use typed
notation which should be a lot more and it would take a long time to
type in with tex or the maths panel. It would be nice to be able to type
in (1,0) and have it magically end up as all the maths (spectroscopic)
stuff it should be. And to your question on lyxcode try puting
\renewenvironment{lyxcode} {\begin{list}{}{\huge\ttfamily}\item[]}
{\end{list}}
in your preamble. You shuld have just come down and I would have given
it to you.
cheers
owen
Paul Medwell wrote:
what do you mean by putting words in scientific notation?
Owen Lucas wrote:
Thanks I was just wanting to know how this was done as I could not
find anything in the .cls or .layout files that would do this. I was
also wondering if I could use this to replace words with some
scientific notation without seeing all the mess in lyx.
Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 04:54:28PM +1030, Owen Lucas wrote:
I want to know where and how Latex recognises Latex and puts the word
Latex in the latex wacky superscript subscript font?
ie where it sees LaTeX it puts \LaTeX{}
LaTeX never does this.
In case of LyX there is some braindead hard-coded mapping in
src/paragraph_pimpl.C.
Andre'
Re: latex font question
Thanks I was just wanting to know how this was done as I could not find
anything in the .cls or .layout files that would do this. I was also
wondering if I could use this to replace words with some scientific
notation without seeing all the mess in lyx.
Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 04:54:28PM +1030, Owen Lucas wrote:
I want to know where and how Latex recognises Latex and puts the word
Latex in the latex wacky superscript subscript font?
ie where it sees LaTeX it puts \LaTeX{}
LaTeX never does this.
In case of LyX there is some braindead hard-coded mapping in
src/paragraph_pimpl.C.
Andre'
Re: latex font question
what do you mean by putting words in scientific notation?
Owen Lucas wrote:
Thanks I was just wanting to know how this was done as I could not find
anything in the .cls or .layout files that would do this. I was also
wondering if I could use this to replace words with some scientific
notation without seeing all the mess in lyx.
Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 04:54:28PM +1030, Owen Lucas wrote:
I want to know where and how Latex recognises Latex and puts the word
Latex in the latex wacky superscript subscript font?
ie where it sees LaTeX it puts \LaTeX{}
LaTeX never does this.
In case of LyX there is some braindead hard-coded mapping in
src/paragraph_pimpl.C.
Andre'
Re: latex font question
Well its a bit hard to show you with just text but sometimes I use typed
notation which should be a lot more and it would take a long time to
type in with tex or the maths panel. It would be nice to be able to type
in (1,0) and have it magically end up as all the maths (spectroscopic)
stuff it should be. And to your question on lyxcode try puting
\renewenvironment{lyxcode} {\begin{list}{}{\huge\ttfamily}\item[]}
{\end{list}}
in your preamble. You shuld have just come down and I would have given
it to you.
cheers
owen
Paul Medwell wrote:
what do you mean by putting words in scientific notation?
Owen Lucas wrote:
Thanks I was just wanting to know how this was done as I could not
find anything in the .cls or .layout files that would do this. I was
also wondering if I could use this to replace words with some
scientific notation without seeing all the mess in lyx.
Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 04:54:28PM +1030, Owen Lucas wrote:
I want to know where and how Latex recognises Latex and puts the word
Latex in the latex wacky superscript subscript font?
ie where it sees LaTeX it puts \LaTeX{}
LaTeX never does this.
In case of LyX there is some braindead hard-coded mapping in
src/paragraph_pimpl.C.
Andre'
Re: latex font question
Thanks I was just wanting to know how this was done as I could not find
anything in the .cls or .layout files that would do this. I was also
wondering if I could use this to replace words with some scientific
notation without seeing all the mess in lyx.
Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 04:54:28PM +1030, Owen Lucas wrote:
>I want to know where and how Latex recognises Latex and puts the word
>Latex in the latex wacky superscript subscript font?
>ie where it sees LaTeX it puts \LaTeX{}
LaTeX never does this.
In case of LyX there is some braindead hard-coded mapping in
src/paragraph_pimpl.C.
Andre'
Re: latex font question
what do you mean by putting words in scientific notation?
Owen Lucas wrote:
Thanks I was just wanting to know how this was done as I could not find
anything in the .cls or .layout files that would do this. I was also
wondering if I could use this to replace words with some scientific
notation without seeing all the mess in lyx.
Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 04:54:28PM +1030, Owen Lucas wrote:
>I want to know where and how Latex recognises Latex and puts the word
>Latex in the latex wacky superscript subscript font?
>ie where it sees LaTeX it puts \LaTeX{}
LaTeX never does this.
In case of LyX there is some braindead hard-coded mapping in
src/paragraph_pimpl.C.
Andre'
Re: latex font question
Well its a bit hard to show you with just text but sometimes I use typed
notation which should be a lot more and it would take a long time to
type in with tex or the maths panel. It would be nice to be able to type
in (1,0) and have it magically end up as all the maths (spectroscopic)
stuff it should be. And to your question on lyxcode try puting
\renewenvironment{lyxcode} {\begin{list}{}{\huge\ttfamily}\item[]}
{\end{list}}
in your preamble. You shuld have just come down and I would have given
it to you.
cheers
owen
Paul Medwell wrote:
what do you mean by putting words in scientific notation?
Owen Lucas wrote:
>
> Thanks I was just wanting to know how this was done as I could not
> find anything in the .cls or .layout files that would do this. I was
> also wondering if I could use this to replace words with some
> scientific notation without seeing all the mess in lyx.
>
>
> Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 04:54:28PM +1030, Owen Lucas wrote:
>>
>> >I want to know where and how Latex recognises Latex and puts the word
>> >Latex in the latex wacky superscript subscript font?
>> >ie where it sees LaTeX it puts \LaTeX{}
>>
>>
>> LaTeX never does this.
>>
>> In case of LyX there is some braindead hard-coded mapping in
>> src/paragraph_pimpl.C.
>>
>> Andre'
>>
>
>
latex font question
I want to know where and how Latex recognises Latex and puts the word
Latex in the latex wacky superscript subscript font?
ie where it sees LaTeX it puts \LaTeX{}
cheers
oz
Re: latex font question
On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 04:54:28PM +1030, Owen Lucas wrote:
I want to know where and how Latex recognises Latex and puts the word
Latex in the latex wacky superscript subscript font?
ie where it sees LaTeX it puts \LaTeX{}
LaTeX never does this.
In case of LyX there is some braindead hard-coded mapping in
src/paragraph_pimpl.C.
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson)
latex font question
I want to know where and how Latex recognises Latex and puts the word
Latex in the latex wacky superscript subscript font?
ie where it sees LaTeX it puts \LaTeX{}
cheers
oz
Re: latex font question
On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 04:54:28PM +1030, Owen Lucas wrote:
I want to know where and how Latex recognises Latex and puts the word
Latex in the latex wacky superscript subscript font?
ie where it sees LaTeX it puts \LaTeX{}
LaTeX never does this.
In case of LyX there is some braindead hard-coded mapping in
src/paragraph_pimpl.C.
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson)
latex font question
I want to know where and how Latex recognises Latex and puts the word
Latex in the latex wacky superscript subscript font?
ie where it sees LaTeX it puts \LaTeX{}
cheers
oz
Re: latex font question
On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 04:54:28PM +1030, Owen Lucas wrote:
> I want to know where and how Latex recognises Latex and puts the word
> Latex in the latex wacky superscript subscript font?
> ie where it sees LaTeX it puts \LaTeX{}
LaTeX never does this.
In case of LyX there is some braindead hard-coded mapping in
src/paragraph_pimpl.C.
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson)
