Re: multiple authors (\and) is ert necessary
On Mon, 07 May 2007 18:44:56 -0400
Paul A. Rubin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Micha Feigin wrote:
Is it necessary to use ert for \and when multiple authors are used,
Yes (AFAIK).
or is there a lyx way?
Haven't found one. Hypothetically it might be possible to cobble
together a layout file that dealt with this by having two author
environments (one for the last or sole author, one for any author other
than the last), but I think it would involve convincing LyX not to stick
a blank line (or bunch of blank lines) in the exported LaTeX file
between author fields, and I don't know how to do that, or even if it's
possible.
You can, of course, bind a key combination to insert the \and in ERT.
The sequence to bind would be something like
I don't think that it's something worth doing considering this appears
something like once per paper and once in while. It's just that I try to avoid
ert hacks when a more appropriate solution exists (they are hard to maintain
and debug)
command-sequence ert-insert;self-insert \and{};
/Paul
Re: multiple authors (\and) is ert necessary
On Mon, 07 May 2007 18:44:56 -0400
Paul A. Rubin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Micha Feigin wrote:
Is it necessary to use ert for \and when multiple authors are used,
Yes (AFAIK).
or is there a lyx way?
Haven't found one. Hypothetically it might be possible to cobble
together a layout file that dealt with this by having two author
environments (one for the last or sole author, one for any author other
than the last), but I think it would involve convincing LyX not to stick
a blank line (or bunch of blank lines) in the exported LaTeX file
between author fields, and I don't know how to do that, or even if it's
possible.
You can, of course, bind a key combination to insert the \and in ERT.
The sequence to bind would be something like
I don't think that it's something worth doing considering this appears
something like once per paper and once in while. It's just that I try to avoid
ert hacks when a more appropriate solution exists (they are hard to maintain
and debug)
command-sequence ert-insert;self-insert \and{};
/Paul
Re: multiple authors (\and) is ert necessary
On Mon, 07 May 2007 18:44:56 -0400
"Paul A. Rubin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Micha Feigin wrote:
> > Is it necessary to use ert for \and when multiple authors are used,
>
> Yes (AFAIK).
>
> > or is there a lyx way?
>
> Haven't found one. Hypothetically it might be possible to cobble
> together a layout file that dealt with this by having two author
> environments (one for the last or sole author, one for any author other
> than the last), but I think it would involve convincing LyX not to stick
> a blank line (or bunch of blank lines) in the exported LaTeX file
> between author fields, and I don't know how to do that, or even if it's
> possible.
>
> You can, of course, bind a key combination to insert the \and in ERT.
> The sequence to bind would be something like
>
I don't think that it's something worth doing considering this appears
something like once per paper and once in while. It's just that I try to avoid
ert hacks when a more appropriate solution exists (they are hard to maintain
and debug)
>command-sequence ert-insert;self-insert \and{};
>
> /Paul
>
Re: multiple authors (\and) is ert necessary
Micha Feigin schrieb: Is it necessary to use ert for \and when multiple authors are used, or is there a lyx way? If you are using Bibtex the just write Meyer, Hans and Jong, YU
Re: multiple authors (\and) is ert necessary
Tim, I guess what Micha means is if you need to use \and in ERT to separate authors in the author environment of a document. The answer, AFAIK, is that it depends on the class. I think that if you have multiple authors, the best approach is to use a full ERT first page where you include the title, authors, addresses, abstract and keywords. Hope this helps. On 5/7/07, Tim Michelsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Micha Feigin schrieb: Is it necessary to use ert for \and when multiple authors are used, or is there a lyx way? If you are using Bibtex the just write Meyer, Hans and Jong, YU -- - Julio Rojas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: multiple authors (\and) is ert necessary
Micha Feigin wrote:
Is it necessary to use ert for \and when multiple authors are used,
Yes (AFAIK).
or is there a lyx way?
Haven't found one. Hypothetically it might be possible to cobble
together a layout file that dealt with this by having two author
environments (one for the last or sole author, one for any author other
than the last), but I think it would involve convincing LyX not to stick
a blank line (or bunch of blank lines) in the exported LaTeX file
between author fields, and I don't know how to do that, or even if it's
possible.
You can, of course, bind a key combination to insert the \and in ERT.
The sequence to bind would be something like
command-sequence ert-insert;self-insert \and{};
/Paul
Re: multiple authors (\and) is ert necessary
Micha Feigin schrieb: Is it necessary to use ert for \and when multiple authors are used, or is there a lyx way? If you are using Bibtex the just write Meyer, Hans and Jong, YU
Re: multiple authors (\and) is ert necessary
Tim, I guess what Micha means is if you need to use \and in ERT to separate authors in the author environment of a document. The answer, AFAIK, is that it depends on the class. I think that if you have multiple authors, the best approach is to use a full ERT first page where you include the title, authors, addresses, abstract and keywords. Hope this helps. On 5/7/07, Tim Michelsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Micha Feigin schrieb: Is it necessary to use ert for \and when multiple authors are used, or is there a lyx way? If you are using Bibtex the just write Meyer, Hans and Jong, YU -- - Julio Rojas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: multiple authors (\and) is ert necessary
Micha Feigin wrote:
Is it necessary to use ert for \and when multiple authors are used,
Yes (AFAIK).
or is there a lyx way?
Haven't found one. Hypothetically it might be possible to cobble
together a layout file that dealt with this by having two author
environments (one for the last or sole author, one for any author other
than the last), but I think it would involve convincing LyX not to stick
a blank line (or bunch of blank lines) in the exported LaTeX file
between author fields, and I don't know how to do that, or even if it's
possible.
You can, of course, bind a key combination to insert the \and in ERT.
The sequence to bind would be something like
command-sequence ert-insert;self-insert \and{};
/Paul
Re: multiple authors (\and) is ert necessary
Micha Feigin schrieb: Is it necessary to use ert for \and when multiple authors are used, or is there a lyx way? If you are using Bibtex the just write Meyer, Hans and Jong, YU
Re: multiple authors (\and) is ert necessary
Tim, I guess what Micha means is if you need to use \and in ERT to separate authors in the author environment of a document. The answer, AFAIK, is that it depends on the class. I think that if you have multiple authors, the best approach is to use a full ERT first page where you include the title, authors, addresses, abstract and keywords. Hope this helps. On 5/7/07, Tim Michelsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Micha Feigin schrieb: > Is it necessary to use ert for \and when multiple authors are used, or is there > a lyx way? If you are using Bibtex the just write Meyer, Hans and Jong, YU -- - Julio Rojas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: multiple authors (\and) is ert necessary
Micha Feigin wrote:
Is it necessary to use ert for \and when multiple authors are used,
Yes (AFAIK).
or is there a lyx way?
Haven't found one. Hypothetically it might be possible to cobble
together a layout file that dealt with this by having two author
environments (one for the last or sole author, one for any author other
than the last), but I think it would involve convincing LyX not to stick
a blank line (or bunch of blank lines) in the exported LaTeX file
between author fields, and I don't know how to do that, or even if it's
possible.
You can, of course, bind a key combination to insert the \and in ERT.
The sequence to bind would be something like
command-sequence ert-insert;self-insert \and{};
/Paul
multiple authors (\and) is ert necessary
Is it necessary to use ert for \and when multiple authors are used, or is there a lyx way? Thanks
multiple authors (\and) is ert necessary
Is it necessary to use ert for \and when multiple authors are used, or is there a lyx way? Thanks
multiple authors (\and) is ert necessary
Is it necessary to use ert for \and when multiple authors are used, or is there a lyx way? Thanks
