Am Montag, 11. Juni 2012 um 11:03:00, schrieb Scott Kostyshak
skost...@princeton.edu
From: Kornel Benko [kornel.be...@berlin.de]
Sent: Monday, June 11, 2012 6:19 AM
Confirmed for lyx 2.0.4svn, but not for lyx 2.1.0svn.
Does this mean that in 2.1.0svn the F is correctly underlined for
From: Kornel Benko [kornel.be...@berlin.de]
Sent: Monday, June 11, 2012 7:44 AM
The crazy thing now is: Without recompiling, now also in 2.1.0svn 'F' is
underlined.
This is indeed weird. It's not completely crazy because the menu item in this
case is controlled by a text file, stdmenus.inc. If
Am Montag, 11. Juni 2012 um 11:03:00, schrieb Scott Kostyshak
skost...@princeton.edu
From: Kornel Benko [kornel.be...@berlin.de]
Sent: Monday, June 11, 2012 6:19 AM
Confirmed for lyx 2.0.4svn, but not for lyx 2.1.0svn.
Does this mean that in 2.1.0svn the F is correctly underlined for
From: Kornel Benko [kornel.be...@berlin.de]
Sent: Monday, June 11, 2012 7:44 AM
The crazy thing now is: Without recompiling, now also in 2.1.0svn 'F' is
underlined.
This is indeed weird. It's not completely crazy because the menu item in this
case is controlled by a text file, stdmenus.inc. If
Am Montag, 11. Juni 2012 um 11:03:00, schrieb Scott Kostyshak
> From: Kornel Benko [kornel.be...@berlin.de]
> Sent: Monday, June 11, 2012 6:19 AM
>
> >Confirmed for lyx 2.0.4svn, but not for lyx 2.1.0svn.
>
>
> Does this mean that in 2.1.0svn the F is correctly
From: Kornel Benko [kornel.be...@berlin.de]
Sent: Monday, June 11, 2012 7:44 AM
>The crazy thing now is: Without recompiling, now also in 2.1.0svn 'F' is
>underlined.
This is indeed weird. It's not completely crazy because the menu item in this
case is controlled by a text file, stdmenus.inc.