Re: 1.6.4 for Ubuntu 64?

2009-09-01 Thread Christian Ridderström
On Thu, 27 Aug 2009, rgheck wrote: On 08/27/2009 10:41 AM, Stefano Franchi wrote: Richard, just out of curiosity (since I won't be able to contribute to the coding effort), are these instructions supposed to work with the development code in trunk as well? In case Richard's instruction

Re: 1.6.4 for Ubuntu 64?

2009-08-27 Thread rgheck
On 08/27/2009 10:41 AM, Stefano Franchi wrote: Richard, just out of curiosity (since I won't be able to contribute to the coding effort), are these instructions supposed to work with the development code in trunk as well? More or less, yes. They don't seem to on my system (the configure

Re: 1.6.4 for Ubuntu 64?

2009-08-27 Thread Stefano Franchi
Richard, just out of curiosity (since I won't be able to contribute to the coding effort), are these instructions supposed to work with the development code in trunk as well? They don't seem to on my system (the configure script generated by autogen.sh fails). S. ___

Re: 1.6.4 for Ubuntu 64?

2009-08-27 Thread rgheck
On 08/27/2009 08:45 AM, Sven Hoexter wrote: On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 01:23:50PM +0200, Manveru wrote: 2009/8/27 E. Kaplan: Is there any way of getting Lyx 1.6.4 for Kubuntu 64 bits? The version in that is in the repositories is 1.6.2, I think. Compiling from sources does not appeal t

Re: 1.6.4 for Ubuntu 64?

2009-08-27 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 01:23:50PM +0200, Manveru wrote: > 2009/8/27 E. Kaplan : > > Is there any way of getting Lyx 1.6.4 for Kubuntu 64 bits?  The version in > > that is in the repositories is 1.6.2, I think.  Compiling from sources does > > not appeal to me. > > There is a LyX project on lanuch

Re: 1.6.4 for Ubuntu 64?

2009-08-27 Thread Manveru
2009/8/27 E. Kaplan : > Is there any way of getting Lyx 1.6.4 for Kubuntu 64 bits?  The version in > that is in the repositories is 1.6.2, I think.  Compiling from sources does > not appeal to me. There is a LyX project on lanuchpad.net which builds the code for Ubuntu - I think automatically, but