Re: Document doews not compile with rc1 and multiple bibliograpies

2014-03-28 Thread Rainer M Krug
Jürgen Spitzmüller sp...@lyx.org writes: 2014-03-28 15:59 GMT+01:00 Rainer M Krug rai...@krugs.de: Yes - that's what I meant - I roght-clicked on the BibTeX insets - Settings - Style and changed both to elsarticle-harv. Am I missing something? Remove the style completely in the second

Re: Document doews not compile with rc1 and multiple bibliograpies

2014-03-28 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 3:37 PM, Jürgen Spitzmüller sp...@lyx.org wrote: 2014-03-28 15:19 GMT+01:00 Rainer M Krug rai...@krugs.de: Hi I am having a document (attached) which does not compile in the new LyX rc but on 2.0.7.1 It has something to do with multiple bibliographies - if I

Re: Document doews not compile with rc1 and multiple bibliograpies

2014-03-28 Thread Rainer M Krug
Jürgen Spitzmüller sp...@lyx.org writes: 2014-03-28 15:42 GMT+01:00 Murat Yildizoglu murat.yildizo...@u-bordeaux4.fr : However, until LyX 2.1, we did not track bibtex errors. Now we do. So were just not informed that something is wrong before. Concerning this point, could we have a

Re: Document doews not compile with rc1 and multiple bibliograpies

2014-03-28 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
2014-03-28 16:03 GMT+01:00 Philipp Gröne philipp.gro...@googlemail.com: Yes, sometimes the PDF would be the wrong one. But imagine this case: My thesis had 4 chapters, and was made up from 6 documents (Master document+Appendix where 5. and 6.). Out of some reasons, the 4th chapter wouldn't

Re: Document doews not compile with rc1 and multiple bibliograpies

2014-03-28 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 11:12 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller sp...@lyx.org wrote: 2014-03-28 16:10 GMT+01:00 Philipp Gröne: Yes. In fact, I want to be able to choose which errors are skipped. Or, even better, I want a comprehensive list of errors and a pdf-file. http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/8739

Re: Document doews not compile with rc1 and multiple bibliograpies

2014-03-28 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 12:56 PM, Murat Yildizoglu murat.yildizo...@u-bordeaux4.fr wrote: Maybe I am missing something here, but I am against softwares that decide in place of the users. This is one of the reasons why I have never adopted MS programs. If latex accepts to build the file,

Re: Document doews not compile with rc1 and multiple bibliograpies

2014-03-28 Thread Rainer M Krug
Jürgen Spitzmüller sp...@lyx.org writes: 2014-03-28 16:11 GMT+01:00 Rainer M Krug: I did - and I still get an error: , | This is BibTeX, Version 0.99d (TeX Live 2013) | Capacity: max_strings=35307, hash_size=35307, hash_prime=30011 | The top-level auxiliary file: Untitled.aux | The

Re: Document doews not compile with rc1 and multiple bibliograpies

2014-03-28 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
2014-03-28 18:06 GMT+01:00 Rainer M Krug rai...@krugs.de: That worked - after closing and re-opening the document. After which changes do I actual have to close and re-open the document? I am not sure. In any case, the problem are the aux and bbl files that need to be deleted. A complete

Re: Document doews not compile with rc1 and multiple bibliograpies

2014-03-28 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
2014-03-28 16:11 GMT+01:00 Rainer M Krug: I did - and I still get an error: , | This is BibTeX, Version 0.99d (TeX Live 2013) | Capacity: max_strings=35307, hash_size=35307, hash_prime=30011 | The top-level auxiliary file: Untitled.aux | The style file: elsarticle-harv.bst | Multiple

Re: Document doews not compile with rc1 and multiple bibliograpies

2014-03-28 Thread Rainer M Krug
Jürgen Spitzmüller sp...@lyx.org writes: 2014-03-28 15:19 GMT+01:00 Rainer M Krug rai...@krugs.de: Hi I am having a document (attached) which does not compile in the new LyX rc but on 2.0.7.1 It has something to do with multiple bibliographies - if I delete one, it is working. You

Re: Document doews not compile with rc1 and multiple bibliograpies

2014-03-28 Thread Murat Yildizoglu
However, until LyX 2.1, we did not track bibtex errors. Now we do. So were just not informed that something is wrong before. Concerning this point, could we have a preference somewhere for ignoring them? I remarked in the previous beta (having tested yet the RC1) that even if the PDF does

Re: Document doews not compile with rc1 and multiple bibliograpies

2014-03-28 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
2014-03-28 15:42 GMT+01:00 Murat Yildizoglu murat.yildizo...@u-bordeaux4.fr : However, until LyX 2.1, we did not track bibtex errors. Now we do. So were just not informed that something is wrong before. Concerning this point, could we have a preference somewhere for ignoring them? I

Re: Document doews not compile with rc1 and multiple bibliograpies

2014-03-28 Thread Rainer M Krug
Jürgen Spitzmüller sp...@lyx.org writes: 2014-03-28 15:50 GMT+01:00 Rainer M Krug rai...@krugs.de: I changed the bib style to the same, and still get the error (new lyx file attached). So where do I have to change them? The problem is not the bib file (you can of course have multiple of

Re: Document doews not compile with rc1 and multiple bibliograpies

2014-03-28 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
2014-03-28 15:19 GMT+01:00 Rainer M Krug rai...@krugs.de: Hi I am having a document (attached) which does not compile in the new LyX rc but on 2.0.7.1 It has something to do with multiple bibliographies - if I delete one, it is working. You get a bibtex error in both cases (look at

Re: Document doews not compile with rc1 and multiple bibliograpies

2014-03-28 Thread Rainer M Krug
Jürgen Spitzmüller sp...@lyx.org writes: 2014-03-28 18:06 GMT+01:00 Rainer M Krug rai...@krugs.de: That worked - after closing and re-opening the document. After which changes do I actual have to close and re-open the document? I am not sure. In any case, the problem are the aux and bbl

Re: Document doews not compile with rc1 and multiple bibliograpies

2014-03-28 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
2014-03-28 16:10 GMT+01:00 Philipp Gröne: Yes. In fact, I want to be able to choose which errors are skipped. Or, even better, I want a comprehensive list of errors and a pdf-file. http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/8739 Jürgen

Re: Document doews not compile with rc1 and multiple bibliograpies

2014-03-28 Thread Philipp Gröne
Hi there! Murat Yildizoglu wrote: Concerning this point, could we have a preference somewhere for ignoring them? I remarked in the previous beta (having tested yet the RC1) that even if the PDF does compiles with these errors, Lyx does not show it. It would be nice to preview the PDF

Re: Document doews not compile with rc1 and multiple bibliograpies

2014-03-28 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
2014-03-28 15:50 GMT+01:00 Rainer M Krug rai...@krugs.de: I changed the bib style to the same, and still get the error (new lyx file attached). So where do I have to change them? The problem is not the bib file (you can of course have multiple of these), but the bst files (styles). Jürgen

Re: Document doews not compile with rc1 and multiple bibliograpies

2014-03-28 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
2014-03-28 15:59 GMT+01:00 Rainer M Krug rai...@krugs.de: Yes - that's what I meant - I roght-clicked on the BibTeX insets - Settings - Style and changed both to elsarticle-harv. Am I missing something? Remove the style completely in the second instance, i.e. the Style field should be

Re: Document doews not compile with rc1 and multiple bibliograpies

2014-03-28 Thread Rainer M Krug
Jürgen Spitzmüller sp...@lyx.org writes: 2014-03-28 15:59 GMT+01:00 Rainer M Krug rai...@krugs.de: Yes - that's what I meant - I roght-clicked on the BibTeX insets - Settings - Style and changed both to elsarticle-harv. Am I missing something? Remove the style completely in the second

Re: Document doews not compile with rc1 and multiple bibliograpies

2014-03-28 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 3:37 PM, Jürgen Spitzmüller sp...@lyx.org wrote: 2014-03-28 15:19 GMT+01:00 Rainer M Krug rai...@krugs.de: Hi I am having a document (attached) which does not compile in the new LyX rc but on 2.0.7.1 It has something to do with multiple bibliographies - if I

Re: Document doews not compile with rc1 and multiple bibliograpies

2014-03-28 Thread Rainer M Krug
Jürgen Spitzmüller sp...@lyx.org writes: 2014-03-28 15:42 GMT+01:00 Murat Yildizoglu murat.yildizo...@u-bordeaux4.fr : However, until LyX 2.1, we did not track bibtex errors. Now we do. So were just not informed that something is wrong before. Concerning this point, could we have a

Re: Document doews not compile with rc1 and multiple bibliograpies

2014-03-28 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
2014-03-28 16:03 GMT+01:00 Philipp Gröne philipp.gro...@googlemail.com: Yes, sometimes the PDF would be the wrong one. But imagine this case: My thesis had 4 chapters, and was made up from 6 documents (Master document+Appendix where 5. and 6.). Out of some reasons, the 4th chapter wouldn't

Re: Document doews not compile with rc1 and multiple bibliograpies

2014-03-28 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 11:12 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller sp...@lyx.org wrote: 2014-03-28 16:10 GMT+01:00 Philipp Gröne: Yes. In fact, I want to be able to choose which errors are skipped. Or, even better, I want a comprehensive list of errors and a pdf-file. http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/8739

Re: Document doews not compile with rc1 and multiple bibliograpies

2014-03-28 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 12:56 PM, Murat Yildizoglu murat.yildizo...@u-bordeaux4.fr wrote: Maybe I am missing something here, but I am against softwares that decide in place of the users. This is one of the reasons why I have never adopted MS programs. If latex accepts to build the file,

Re: Document doews not compile with rc1 and multiple bibliograpies

2014-03-28 Thread Rainer M Krug
Jürgen Spitzmüller sp...@lyx.org writes: 2014-03-28 16:11 GMT+01:00 Rainer M Krug: I did - and I still get an error: , | This is BibTeX, Version 0.99d (TeX Live 2013) | Capacity: max_strings=35307, hash_size=35307, hash_prime=30011 | The top-level auxiliary file: Untitled.aux | The

Re: Document doews not compile with rc1 and multiple bibliograpies

2014-03-28 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
2014-03-28 18:06 GMT+01:00 Rainer M Krug rai...@krugs.de: That worked - after closing and re-opening the document. After which changes do I actual have to close and re-open the document? I am not sure. In any case, the problem are the aux and bbl files that need to be deleted. A complete

Re: Document doews not compile with rc1 and multiple bibliograpies

2014-03-28 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
2014-03-28 16:11 GMT+01:00 Rainer M Krug: I did - and I still get an error: , | This is BibTeX, Version 0.99d (TeX Live 2013) | Capacity: max_strings=35307, hash_size=35307, hash_prime=30011 | The top-level auxiliary file: Untitled.aux | The style file: elsarticle-harv.bst | Multiple

Re: Document doews not compile with rc1 and multiple bibliograpies

2014-03-28 Thread Rainer M Krug
Jürgen Spitzmüller sp...@lyx.org writes: 2014-03-28 15:19 GMT+01:00 Rainer M Krug rai...@krugs.de: Hi I am having a document (attached) which does not compile in the new LyX rc but on 2.0.7.1 It has something to do with multiple bibliographies - if I delete one, it is working. You

Re: Document doews not compile with rc1 and multiple bibliograpies

2014-03-28 Thread Murat Yildizoglu
However, until LyX 2.1, we did not track bibtex errors. Now we do. So were just not informed that something is wrong before. Concerning this point, could we have a preference somewhere for ignoring them? I remarked in the previous beta (having tested yet the RC1) that even if the PDF does

Re: Document doews not compile with rc1 and multiple bibliograpies

2014-03-28 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
2014-03-28 15:42 GMT+01:00 Murat Yildizoglu murat.yildizo...@u-bordeaux4.fr : However, until LyX 2.1, we did not track bibtex errors. Now we do. So were just not informed that something is wrong before. Concerning this point, could we have a preference somewhere for ignoring them? I

Re: Document doews not compile with rc1 and multiple bibliograpies

2014-03-28 Thread Rainer M Krug
Jürgen Spitzmüller sp...@lyx.org writes: 2014-03-28 15:50 GMT+01:00 Rainer M Krug rai...@krugs.de: I changed the bib style to the same, and still get the error (new lyx file attached). So where do I have to change them? The problem is not the bib file (you can of course have multiple of

Re: Document doews not compile with rc1 and multiple bibliograpies

2014-03-28 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
2014-03-28 15:19 GMT+01:00 Rainer M Krug rai...@krugs.de: Hi I am having a document (attached) which does not compile in the new LyX rc but on 2.0.7.1 It has something to do with multiple bibliographies - if I delete one, it is working. You get a bibtex error in both cases (look at

Re: Document doews not compile with rc1 and multiple bibliograpies

2014-03-28 Thread Rainer M Krug
Jürgen Spitzmüller sp...@lyx.org writes: 2014-03-28 18:06 GMT+01:00 Rainer M Krug rai...@krugs.de: That worked - after closing and re-opening the document. After which changes do I actual have to close and re-open the document? I am not sure. In any case, the problem are the aux and bbl

Re: Document doews not compile with rc1 and multiple bibliograpies

2014-03-28 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
2014-03-28 16:10 GMT+01:00 Philipp Gröne: Yes. In fact, I want to be able to choose which errors are skipped. Or, even better, I want a comprehensive list of errors and a pdf-file. http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/8739 Jürgen

Re: Document doews not compile with rc1 and multiple bibliograpies

2014-03-28 Thread Philipp Gröne
Hi there! Murat Yildizoglu wrote: Concerning this point, could we have a preference somewhere for ignoring them? I remarked in the previous beta (having tested yet the RC1) that even if the PDF does compiles with these errors, Lyx does not show it. It would be nice to preview the PDF

Re: Document doews not compile with rc1 and multiple bibliograpies

2014-03-28 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
2014-03-28 15:50 GMT+01:00 Rainer M Krug rai...@krugs.de: I changed the bib style to the same, and still get the error (new lyx file attached). So where do I have to change them? The problem is not the bib file (you can of course have multiple of these), but the bst files (styles). Jürgen

Re: Document doews not compile with rc1 and multiple bibliograpies

2014-03-28 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
2014-03-28 15:59 GMT+01:00 Rainer M Krug rai...@krugs.de: Yes - that's what I meant - I roght-clicked on the BibTeX insets - Settings - Style and changed both to elsarticle-harv. Am I missing something? Remove the style completely in the second instance, i.e. the Style field should be

Re: Document doews not compile with rc1 and multiple bibliograpies

2014-03-28 Thread Rainer M Krug
Jürgen Spitzmüller writes: > 2014-03-28 15:59 GMT+01:00 Rainer M Krug : > >> Yes - that's what I meant - I roght-clicked on the BibTeX insets - >> Settings - Style and changed both to elsarticle-harv. >> >> Am I missing something? >> > > Remove the style

Re: Document doews not compile with rc1 and multiple bibliograpies

2014-03-28 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 3:37 PM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > 2014-03-28 15:19 GMT+01:00 Rainer M Krug : > >> Hi >> >> I am having a document (attached) which does not compile in the new LyX >> rc but on 2.0.7.1 >> >> >> It has something to do with multiple

Re: Document doews not compile with rc1 and multiple bibliograpies

2014-03-28 Thread Rainer M Krug
Jürgen Spitzmüller writes: > 2014-03-28 15:42 GMT+01:00 Murat Yildizoglu >: > >> > However, until LyX 2.1, we did not track bibtex errors. Now we do. So >> were just not informed that something is wrong before. >> >> Concerning this point, could

Re: Document doews not compile with rc1 and multiple bibliograpies

2014-03-28 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
2014-03-28 16:03 GMT+01:00 "Philipp Gröne" : > Yes, sometimes the PDF would be "the wrong one". > But imagine this case: My thesis had 4 chapters, and was made up from > 6 documents (Master document+Appendix where 5. and 6.). > Out of some reasons, the 4th chapter

Re: Document doews not compile with rc1 and multiple bibliograpies

2014-03-28 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 11:12 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > 2014-03-28 16:10 GMT+01:00 "Philipp Gröne": >> >> Yes. In fact, I want to be able to choose which errors are skipped. >> Or, even better, I want a comprehensive list of errors and a pdf-file. > > >

Re: Document doews not compile with rc1 and multiple bibliograpies

2014-03-28 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 12:56 PM, Murat Yildizoglu wrote: > > Maybe I am missing something here, but I am against softwares that decide in > place of the users. This is one of the reasons why I have never adopted MS > programs. > > If latex accepts to build the

Re: Document doews not compile with rc1 and multiple bibliograpies

2014-03-28 Thread Rainer M Krug
Jürgen Spitzmüller writes: > 2014-03-28 16:11 GMT+01:00 Rainer M Krug: > >> I did - and I still get an error: >> >> , >> | This is BibTeX, Version 0.99d (TeX Live 2013) >> | Capacity: max_strings=35307, hash_size=35307, hash_prime=30011 >> | The top-level auxiliary file:

Re: Document doews not compile with rc1 and multiple bibliograpies

2014-03-28 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
2014-03-28 18:06 GMT+01:00 Rainer M Krug : > That worked - after closing and re-opening the document. > > After which changes do I actual have to close and re-open the document? > I am not sure. In any case, the problem are the aux and bbl files that need to be deleted. > > A

Re: Document doews not compile with rc1 and multiple bibliograpies

2014-03-28 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
2014-03-28 16:11 GMT+01:00 Rainer M Krug: > I did - and I still get an error: > > , > | This is BibTeX, Version 0.99d (TeX Live 2013) > | Capacity: max_strings=35307, hash_size=35307, hash_prime=30011 > | The top-level auxiliary file: Untitled.aux > | The style file: elsarticle-harv.bst > |

Re: Document doews not compile with rc1 and multiple bibliograpies

2014-03-28 Thread Rainer M Krug
Jürgen Spitzmüller writes: > 2014-03-28 15:19 GMT+01:00 Rainer M Krug : > >> Hi >> >> I am having a document (attached) which does not compile in the new LyX >> rc but on 2.0.7.1 >> >> >> It has something to do with multiple bibliographies - if I delete one, >> it

Re: Document doews not compile with rc1 and multiple bibliograpies

2014-03-28 Thread Murat Yildizoglu
> However, until LyX 2.1, we did not track bibtex errors. Now we do. So were just not informed that something is wrong before. Concerning this point, could we have a preference somewhere for ignoring them? I remarked in the previous beta (having tested yet the RC1) that even if the PDF does

Re: Document doews not compile with rc1 and multiple bibliograpies

2014-03-28 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
2014-03-28 15:42 GMT+01:00 Murat Yildizoglu : > > However, until LyX 2.1, we did not track bibtex errors. Now we do. So > were just not informed that something is wrong before. > > Concerning this point, could we have a preference somewhere for ignoring > them? I

Re: Document doews not compile with rc1 and multiple bibliograpies

2014-03-28 Thread Rainer M Krug
Jürgen Spitzmüller writes: > 2014-03-28 15:50 GMT+01:00 Rainer M Krug : > >> I changed the bib style to the same, and still get the error (new lyx >> file attached). So where do I have to change them? >> > > The problem is not the bib file (you can of course have

Re: Document doews not compile with rc1 and multiple bibliograpies

2014-03-28 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
2014-03-28 15:19 GMT+01:00 Rainer M Krug : > Hi > > I am having a document (attached) which does not compile in the new LyX > rc but on 2.0.7.1 > > > It has something to do with multiple bibliographies - if I delete one, > it is working. > You get a bibtex error in both cases

Re: Document doews not compile with rc1 and multiple bibliograpies

2014-03-28 Thread Rainer M Krug
Jürgen Spitzmüller writes: > 2014-03-28 18:06 GMT+01:00 Rainer M Krug : > >> That worked - after closing and re-opening the document. >> >> After which changes do I actual have to close and re-open the document? >> > > I am not sure. In any case, the problem are

Re: Document doews not compile with rc1 and multiple bibliograpies

2014-03-28 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
2014-03-28 16:10 GMT+01:00 "Philipp Gröne": > Yes. In fact, I want to be able to choose which errors are skipped. > Or, even better, I want a comprehensive list of errors and a pdf-file. > http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/8739 Jürgen

Re: Document doews not compile with rc1 and multiple bibliograpies

2014-03-28 Thread Philipp Gröne
Hi there! Murat Yildizoglu wrote: > Concerning this point, could we have a preference somewhere for ignoring > them? I remarked in the previous beta (having tested yet the RC1) that even > if the PDF does compiles with these errors, Lyx does not show it. It would > be nice to preview the PDF

Re: Document doews not compile with rc1 and multiple bibliograpies

2014-03-28 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
2014-03-28 15:50 GMT+01:00 Rainer M Krug : > I changed the bib style to the same, and still get the error (new lyx > file attached). So where do I have to change them? > The problem is not the bib file (you can of course have multiple of these), but the bst files ("styles").

Re: Document doews not compile with rc1 and multiple bibliograpies

2014-03-28 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
2014-03-28 15:59 GMT+01:00 Rainer M Krug : > Yes - that's what I meant - I roght-clicked on the BibTeX insets - > Settings - Style and changed both to elsarticle-harv. > > Am I missing something? > Remove the style completely in the second instance, i.e. the "Style" field should