On 6/30/2010 3:34 AM, Julio Rojas wrote:
Are you telling me that if you put the bibliography in a note it
doesn't work? I think I remember that was the way to do it.
Fodder for the wiki?
/Paul
I think that would work pretty well. It turns out, there's actually a
couple of different approaches you can take. I'm trying to write up a
guide.
The one serious limitation to placing the information in a Note inset is
that it doesn't get passed to LaTeX. As a result, you need to manually
On 07/01/2010 11:16 AM, Rob Oakes wrote:
The one serious limitation to placing the information in a Note inset is
that it doesn't get passed to LaTeX. As a result, you need to manually
load the bibliography databases in the preamble using LaTeX. (This is
already covered in the biblatex pages
On 6/30/2010 3:34 AM, Julio Rojas wrote:
Are you telling me that if you put the bibliography in a note it
doesn't work? I think I remember that was the way to do it.
Fodder for the wiki?
/Paul
I think that would work pretty well. It turns out, there's actually a
couple of different approaches you can take. I'm trying to write up a
guide.
The one serious limitation to placing the information in a Note inset is
that it doesn't get passed to LaTeX. As a result, you need to manually
On 07/01/2010 11:16 AM, Rob Oakes wrote:
The one serious limitation to placing the information in a Note inset is
that it doesn't get passed to LaTeX. As a result, you need to manually
load the bibliography databases in the preamble using LaTeX. (This is
already covered in the biblatex pages
On 6/30/2010 3:34 AM, Julio Rojas wrote:
Are you telling me that if you put the bibliography in a note it
doesn't work? I think I remember that was the way to do it.
Fodder for the wiki?
/Paul
I think that would work pretty well. It turns out, there's actually a
couple of different approaches you can take. I'm trying to write up a
guide.
The one serious limitation to placing the information in a Note inset is
that it doesn't get passed to LaTeX. As a result, you need to manually
On 07/01/2010 11:16 AM, Rob Oakes wrote:
The one serious limitation to placing the information in a Note inset is
that it doesn't get passed to LaTeX. As a result, you need to manually
load the bibliography databases in the preamble using LaTeX. (This is
already covered in the biblatex pages
Are you telling me that if you put the bibliography in a note it
doesn't work? I think I remember that was the way to do it.
-
Julio Rojas
jcredbe...@gmail.com
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 6:12 PM, Rob Oakes lyx-de...@oak-tree.us wrote:
Right, so just
Are you telling me that if you put the bibliography in a note it
doesn't work? I think I remember that was the way to do it.
-
Julio Rojas
jcredbe...@gmail.com
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 6:12 PM, Rob Oakes lyx-de...@oak-tree.us wrote:
Right, so just
Are you telling me that if you put the bibliography in a note it
doesn't work? I think I remember that was the way to do it.
-
Julio Rojas
jcredbe...@gmail.com
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 6:12 PM, Rob Oakes wrote:
> Right, so
Hi Jim,
The appearance of the detailed list of references is usually determined
by the bibliography style that you are using. Is there a particular
style of references that you need (for example, footnotes)? Or is there
a particular style that you are aiming for? It would be especially
helpful
I just realized that there might be a second option as well. The
appearance of the bibliography in a latex document is determined by an
environment called thebibliography.
When I was working on a CV template (see
http://blog.oak-tree.us/index.php/2009/11/25/latex-cv-part1 and
Right, so just overlook everything in that last email. It doesn't work.
You might be able to accomplish something by redefining the
\thebibliography and \bibitem commands (and probably one or two more),
but I'd need to think about how to go about doing it before making
recommendations.
If this
Hi Jim,
The appearance of the detailed list of references is usually determined
by the bibliography style that you are using. Is there a particular
style of references that you need (for example, footnotes)? Or is there
a particular style that you are aiming for? It would be especially
helpful
I just realized that there might be a second option as well. The
appearance of the bibliography in a latex document is determined by an
environment called thebibliography.
When I was working on a CV template (see
http://blog.oak-tree.us/index.php/2009/11/25/latex-cv-part1 and
Right, so just overlook everything in that last email. It doesn't work.
You might be able to accomplish something by redefining the
\thebibliography and \bibitem commands (and probably one or two more),
but I'd need to think about how to go about doing it before making
recommendations.
If this
Hi Jim,
The appearance of the detailed list of references is usually determined
by the bibliography style that you are using. Is there a particular
style of references that you need (for example, footnotes)? Or is there
a particular style that you are aiming for? It would be especially
helpful
I just realized that there might be a second option as well. The
appearance of the bibliography in a latex document is determined by an
environment called thebibliography.
When I was working on a CV template (see
http://blog.oak-tree.us/index.php/2009/11/25/latex-cv-part1 and
Right, so just overlook everything in that last email. It doesn't work.
You might be able to accomplish something by redefining the
\thebibliography and \bibitem commands (and probably one or two more),
but I'd need to think about how to go about doing it before making
recommendations.
If this
21 matches
Mail list logo