Re: Note inset question
On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 05:08:41PM +0100, Georg Baum wrote:
Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 05:55:48PM +0100, Georg Baum wrote:
#! /bin/sh
SUFFIX=-1.4
INSTDIR=/path/to/lyx1.4cvs
tex2lyx${SUFFIX} $@ | ${INSTDIR}/share/lyx/lyx2lyx/lyx2lyx -t 221
Shouldn't that be $@ (in double quotes?)
I don't know. I guess the double quotes are needed if you have spaces in
file names, but are wrong if you want to pass more than one option.
No. Look up $@ in the shell manual. It's made exactly for this purpose.
Andre'
Re: Note inset question
On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 05:08:41PM +0100, Georg Baum wrote:
Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 05:55:48PM +0100, Georg Baum wrote:
#! /bin/sh
SUFFIX=-1.4
INSTDIR=/path/to/lyx1.4cvs
tex2lyx${SUFFIX} $@ | ${INSTDIR}/share/lyx/lyx2lyx/lyx2lyx -t 221
Shouldn't that be $@ (in double quotes?)
I don't know. I guess the double quotes are needed if you have spaces in
file names, but are wrong if you want to pass more than one option.
No. Look up $@ in the shell manual. It's made exactly for this purpose.
Andre'
Re: Note inset question
On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 05:08:41PM +0100, Georg Baum wrote:
> Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 05:55:48PM +0100, Georg Baum wrote:
> >> #! /bin/sh
> >> SUFFIX="-1.4"
> >> INSTDIR="/path/to/lyx1.4cvs"
> >> tex2lyx${SUFFIX} $@ | ${INSTDIR}/share/lyx/lyx2lyx/lyx2lyx -t 221
> >
> > Shouldn't that be "$@" (in double quotes?)
>
> I don't know. I guess the double quotes are needed if you have spaces in
> file names, but are wrong if you want to pass more than one option.
No. Look up $@ in the shell manual. It's made exactly for this purpose.
Andre'
Re: Note inset question
Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 05:55:48PM +0100, Georg Baum wrote:
#! /bin/sh
SUFFIX=-1.4
INSTDIR=/path/to/lyx1.4cvs
tex2lyx${SUFFIX} $@ | ${INSTDIR}/share/lyx/lyx2lyx/lyx2lyx -t 221
Shouldn't that be $@ (in double quotes?)
I don't know. I guess the double quotes are needed if you have spaces in
file names, but are wrong if you want to pass more than one option.
Georg
Re: Note inset question
On Wed, 10 Mar 2004, Georg Baum wrote:
Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 05:55:48PM +0100, Georg Baum wrote:
#! /bin/sh
SUFFIX=-1.4
INSTDIR=/path/to/lyx1.4cvs
tex2lyx${SUFFIX} $@ | ${INSTDIR}/share/lyx/lyx2lyx/lyx2lyx -t 221
Shouldn't that be $@ (in double quotes?)
I don't know. I guess the double quotes are needed if you have spaces in
file names, but are wrong if you want to pass more than one option.
$@ will quote multiple arguments separately. This is different from
$* which would take multiple arguments and create a single argument.
/Christian
--
Christian Ridderström http://www.md.kth.se/~chr
Re: Note inset question
Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 05:55:48PM +0100, Georg Baum wrote:
#! /bin/sh
SUFFIX=-1.4
INSTDIR=/path/to/lyx1.4cvs
tex2lyx${SUFFIX} $@ | ${INSTDIR}/share/lyx/lyx2lyx/lyx2lyx -t 221
Shouldn't that be $@ (in double quotes?)
I don't know. I guess the double quotes are needed if you have spaces in
file names, but are wrong if you want to pass more than one option.
Georg
Re: Note inset question
On Wed, 10 Mar 2004, Georg Baum wrote:
Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 05:55:48PM +0100, Georg Baum wrote:
#! /bin/sh
SUFFIX=-1.4
INSTDIR=/path/to/lyx1.4cvs
tex2lyx${SUFFIX} $@ | ${INSTDIR}/share/lyx/lyx2lyx/lyx2lyx -t 221
Shouldn't that be $@ (in double quotes?)
I don't know. I guess the double quotes are needed if you have spaces in
file names, but are wrong if you want to pass more than one option.
$@ will quote multiple arguments separately. This is different from
$* which would take multiple arguments and create a single argument.
/Christian
--
Christian Ridderström http://www.md.kth.se/~chr
Re: Note inset question
Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 05:55:48PM +0100, Georg Baum wrote:
>> #! /bin/sh
>> SUFFIX="-1.4"
>> INSTDIR="/path/to/lyx1.4cvs"
>> tex2lyx${SUFFIX} $@ | ${INSTDIR}/share/lyx/lyx2lyx/lyx2lyx -t 221
>
> Shouldn't that be "$@" (in double quotes?)
I don't know. I guess the double quotes are needed if you have spaces in
file names, but are wrong if you want to pass more than one option.
Georg
Re: Note inset question
On Wed, 10 Mar 2004, Georg Baum wrote:
> Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 05:55:48PM +0100, Georg Baum wrote:
> >> #! /bin/sh
> >> SUFFIX="-1.4"
> >> INSTDIR="/path/to/lyx1.4cvs"
> >> tex2lyx${SUFFIX} $@ | ${INSTDIR}/share/lyx/lyx2lyx/lyx2lyx -t 221
> >
> > Shouldn't that be "$@" (in double quotes?)
>
> I don't know. I guess the double quotes are needed if you have spaces in
> file names, but are wrong if you want to pass more than one option.
"$@" will quote multiple arguments separately. This is different from
"$*" which would take multiple arguments and create a single argument.
/Christian
--
Christian Ridderström http://www.md.kth.se/~chr
Re: Note inset question
On Sun, Mar 07, 2004 at 07:09:12PM +0100, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: Uwe Stöhr wrote: Is there a possibility to include LyX's note insets into the LaTeX output as comment? No(t yet). LyX 1.4 will have an improved Note/Comment environment where you can toggle between Note and Comment (i.e. the comment environment, not the %-comments). There is the possibility to (mis) use ERT-Boxes. Put your note there and start it with a %. Export to LaTeX is fine, but reLyX will silently eat away all %-comments. Could we have an import option to convert % soemthing\n either to a note or to an ERT-Box? Günter -- G.Milde at web.de
Re: Note inset question
Günter Milde wrote:
On Sun, Mar 07, 2004 at 07:09:12PM +0100, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
There is the possibility to (mis) use ERT-Boxes. Put your note there and
start it with a %.
Export to LaTeX is fine, but reLyX will silently eat away all
%-comments.
Could we have an import option to convert % soemthing\n either to a note
or to an ERT-Box?
Try to implement it in reLyX. Then you'll see why it is not there already...
I once tried to improve reLyX, but have given up because it was too
difficult.
As I wrote, tex2lyx is a working alternative. This is the contents of a
wrapper script to produce lyx files for lyx 1.3:
#! /bin/sh
SUFFIX=-1.4
INSTDIR=/path/to/lyx1.4cvs
tex2lyx${SUFFIX} $@ | ${INSTDIR}/share/lyx/lyx2lyx/lyx2lyx -t 221
where the real tex2lyx is named tex2lyx-1.4.
Georg
Re: Note inset question
On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 05:55:48PM +0100, Georg Baum wrote:
#! /bin/sh
SUFFIX=-1.4
INSTDIR=/path/to/lyx1.4cvs
tex2lyx${SUFFIX} $@ | ${INSTDIR}/share/lyx/lyx2lyx/lyx2lyx -t 221
Shouldn't that be $@ (in double quotes?)
Andre'
Re: Note inset question
On Sun, Mar 07, 2004 at 07:09:12PM +0100, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: Uwe Stöhr wrote: Is there a possibility to include LyX's note insets into the LaTeX output as comment? No(t yet). LyX 1.4 will have an improved Note/Comment environment where you can toggle between Note and Comment (i.e. the comment environment, not the %-comments). There is the possibility to (mis) use ERT-Boxes. Put your note there and start it with a %. Export to LaTeX is fine, but reLyX will silently eat away all %-comments. Could we have an import option to convert % soemthing\n either to a note or to an ERT-Box? Günter -- G.Milde at web.de
Re: Note inset question
Günter Milde wrote:
On Sun, Mar 07, 2004 at 07:09:12PM +0100, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
There is the possibility to (mis) use ERT-Boxes. Put your note there and
start it with a %.
Export to LaTeX is fine, but reLyX will silently eat away all
%-comments.
Could we have an import option to convert % soemthing\n either to a note
or to an ERT-Box?
Try to implement it in reLyX. Then you'll see why it is not there already...
I once tried to improve reLyX, but have given up because it was too
difficult.
As I wrote, tex2lyx is a working alternative. This is the contents of a
wrapper script to produce lyx files for lyx 1.3:
#! /bin/sh
SUFFIX=-1.4
INSTDIR=/path/to/lyx1.4cvs
tex2lyx${SUFFIX} $@ | ${INSTDIR}/share/lyx/lyx2lyx/lyx2lyx -t 221
where the real tex2lyx is named tex2lyx-1.4.
Georg
Re: Note inset question
On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 05:55:48PM +0100, Georg Baum wrote:
#! /bin/sh
SUFFIX=-1.4
INSTDIR=/path/to/lyx1.4cvs
tex2lyx${SUFFIX} $@ | ${INSTDIR}/share/lyx/lyx2lyx/lyx2lyx -t 221
Shouldn't that be $@ (in double quotes?)
Andre'
Re: Note inset question
On Sun, Mar 07, 2004 at 07:09:12PM +0100, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: > Uwe Stöhr wrote: > > Is there a possibility to include LyX's note insets into the LaTeX > > output as comment? > > No(t yet). LyX 1.4 will have an improved Note/Comment environment where you > can toggle between Note and Comment (i.e. the comment environment, not the > %-comments). There is the possibility to (mis) use ERT-Boxes. Put your note there and start it with a "%". Export to LaTeX is fine, but reLyX will silently eat away all "%"-comments. Could we have an import option to convert "% soemthing\n" either to a note or to an ERT-Box? Günter -- G.Milde at web.de
Re: Note inset question
Günter Milde wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 07, 2004 at 07:09:12PM +0100, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> There is the possibility to (mis) use ERT-Boxes. Put your note there and
> start it with a "%".
>
> Export to LaTeX is fine, but reLyX will silently eat away all
> "%"-comments.
>
> Could we have an import option to convert "% soemthing\n" either to a note
> or to an ERT-Box?
Try to implement it in reLyX. Then you'll see why it is not there already...
I once tried to improve reLyX, but have given up because it was too
difficult.
As I wrote, tex2lyx is a working alternative. This is the contents of a
wrapper script to produce lyx files for lyx 1.3:
#! /bin/sh
SUFFIX="-1.4"
INSTDIR="/path/to/lyx1.4cvs"
tex2lyx${SUFFIX} $@ | ${INSTDIR}/share/lyx/lyx2lyx/lyx2lyx -t 221
where the "real" tex2lyx is named tex2lyx-1.4.
Georg
Re: Note inset question
On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 05:55:48PM +0100, Georg Baum wrote:
> #! /bin/sh
> SUFFIX="-1.4"
> INSTDIR="/path/to/lyx1.4cvs"
> tex2lyx${SUFFIX} $@ | ${INSTDIR}/share/lyx/lyx2lyx/lyx2lyx -t 221
Shouldn't that be "$@" (in double quotes?)
Andre'
Re: Note inset question
Uwe Stöhr wrote: Is there a possibility to include LyX's note insets into the LaTeX output as comment? No(t yet). LyX 1.4 will have an improved Note/Comment environment where you can toggle between Note and Comment (i.e. the comment environment, not the %-comments). I also seem to remember that there have been posted some scripts on this list. You'll find it in the archive. Jürgen.
Re: Note inset question
Uwe Stöhr wrote: Is there a possibility to include LyX's note insets into the LaTeX output as comment? No(t yet). LyX 1.4 will have an improved Note/Comment environment where you can toggle between Note and Comment (i.e. the comment environment, not the %-comments). I also seem to remember that there have been posted some scripts on this list. You'll find it in the archive. Jürgen.
Re: Note inset question
Uwe Stöhr wrote: > Is there a possibility to include LyX's note insets into the LaTeX > output as comment? No(t yet). LyX 1.4 will have an improved Note/Comment environment where you can toggle between Note and Comment (i.e. the comment environment, not the %-comments). I also seem to remember that there have been posted some scripts on this list. You'll find it in the archive. Jürgen.
