On Fri, Apr 05, 2002 at 09:53:35AM +0200, Guenter Milde wrote:
For the first problem, the learnign should be constrained to the active
buffer. (Well, I have too less insight into the LyX source (i.e. None) to
know how to implement this).
I think I won't touch this for 1.2 anymore.
For the
On Fri, Apr 05, 2002 at 09:53:35AM +0200, Guenter Milde wrote:
For the first problem, the learnign should be constrained to the active
buffer. (Well, I have too less insight into the LyX source (i.e. None) to
know how to implement this).
I think I won't touch this for 1.2 anymore.
For the
On Fri, Apr 05, 2002 at 09:53:35AM +0200, Guenter Milde wrote:
> For the first problem, the "learnign" should be constrained to the active
> buffer. (Well, I have too less insight into the LyX source (i.e. None) to
> know how to implement this).
I think I won't touch this for 1.2 anymore.
> For
On Thu, 4 Apr 2002 15:03:20 +0200 wrote Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Thu, Apr 04, 2002 at 03:00:31PM +0200, Guenter Milde wrote:
When defining a math-macro in a document, LyX uses this definition for all
other open documents as well (whether the macro is defined there or not)
I
On Thu, 4 Apr 2002 15:03:20 +0200 wrote Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Thu, Apr 04, 2002 at 03:00:31PM +0200, Guenter Milde wrote:
When defining a math-macro in a document, LyX uses this definition for all
other open documents as well (whether the macro is defined there or not)
I
On Thu, 4 Apr 2002 15:03:20 +0200 wrote Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Thu, Apr 04, 2002 at 03:00:31PM +0200, Guenter Milde wrote:
> > When defining a math-macro in a document, LyX uses this definition for all
> > other open documents as well (whether the macro is defined there or not)
