Re: decreasing size of figure (.eps)

2009-06-16 Thread Wolfgang Engelmann
Am Tuesday 16 June 2009 16:00:05 schrieb Olivier Ripoll: Thanks, Oliver, for clarifying this Wolfgang > Wolfgang Engelmann wrote: > > Am Tuesday 16 June 2009 14:08:43 schrieben Sie: > > > > Thanks Uwe, > > > > but do you know why the 575kb sized jpg becomes after > > convertion to .png 2.8MB? >

Re: decreasing size of figure (.eps)

2009-06-16 Thread Olivier Ripoll
Wolfgang Engelmann wrote: Am Tuesday 16 June 2009 14:08:43 schrieben Sie: Thanks Uwe, but do you know why the 575kb sized jpg becomes after convertion to .png 2.8MB? (i used convert) Hi, jpeg is more aggressive than png: It compresses more, but destroys the image a little. png does not prod

Re: decreasing size of figure (.eps)

2009-06-16 Thread Wolfgang Engelmann
Am Tuesday 16 June 2009 14:08:43 schrieben Sie: Thanks Uwe, but do you know why the 575kb sized jpg becomes after convertion to .png 2.8MB? (i used convert) Wolfgang > Wolfgang Engelmann schrieb: > > slightly off topic: > > I have an eps formatted figure which is too large (45MB) which should

Re: decreasing size of figure (.eps)

2009-06-16 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Wolfgang Engelmann schrieb: slightly off topic: I have an eps formatted figure which is too large (45MB) which should go in a lyx document. Then you have a bitmap image that has only a header to be an EPS. Therefore I fear that a conversion to PDF wouldn't help. I tried to reduce the size